
Gang rape near Marrakech : Light sentences spark plans for appeal
The Criminal Chamber of First Instance at the Marrakech Court of Appeal sentenced three men to prison terms ranging from six to ten years on Wednesday evening after they were found guilty of abducting a minor with a mental disability and raping her.
Following the childbirth of the 13-year-old victim, a DNA test identified one of the accused, a 74-year-old man, as the biological father. Based on Articles 471, 475-2, and 485 of the Penal Code, he was sentenced to eight years in prison for these offenses, in addition to an attempted bribery charge involving a gendarme.
The second accused received a ten-year sentence under Articles 471, 475-2, 485, and 488 for rape resulting in the victim's loss of virginity. The third defendant was sentenced to six years based on Articles 471, 475-2, and 485.
The court also ordered the three men to pay the victim 100,000 dirhams in damages. Additionally, a symbolic one-dirham compensation was awarded to the Marrakech-Menara branch of the Moroccan Association for Human Rights (AMDH), which joined the case as a civil party, supporting the victim's father with legal representation from 18 lawyers.
Following the verdict, the NGO confirmed to Yabiladi that the civil party intends to appeal, arguing that the sentences handed down are too lenient compared to the minimum penalties prescribed by the applicable Penal Code articles. Another legal procedure will be initiated to establish the paternity of the child, given that DNA test results confirmed a 99.9999% match with the accused.
Lenient sentences for crimes punishable by up to 20 years
Omar Arbib, president of AMDH's local branch, criticized the verdict, calling it both «lenient » toward the perpetrators—despite the repeated nature of the assault—and «unjust » toward the victim.
«This ruling fails to meet the standards of justice and fairness, which are essential for true reparation. The sentences are far from exemplary and fail to serve as a deterrent, despite the severity of the crimes. They do not even align with the penal code, which prescribes sentences of 20 years or more in cases involving aggravating circumstances».
Omar Arbib
After exposing the case and the victim's childbirth, the AMDH branch in El Attaouia raised concerns over the growing normalization of «rape, sexual exploitation of children, pedophilia, and child abuse » in Morocco.
While commending the legal team representing the civil party, Saïd Fadili, president of the AMDH branch, condemned the verdict as «disproportionately light, lacking any real deterrent effect, and failing to reflect the severity of the crime ». He emphasized that the association had pushed for the maximum penalties, which could have reached 30 years in prison under the penal code.
The association reiterated its call for «zero tolerance » for crimes involving rape, pedophilia, and the sexual exploitation of children, stressing the need for tougher sentences—especially given the similarities between this case and the Tiflet gang rape trial, where sentences were increased on appeal.
Calls for harsher sentences and stronger child protection laws
For the NGOs supporting the civil party, this trial is an opportunity to advocate for stronger enforcement of the principle of the best interests of the child—both for the 13-year-old victim and her newborn. This aligns with Articles 6, 7, and 8 of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, which Morocco has ratified. These provisions guarantee a child's right to protection, identity, and the ability to know their parents.
« We will also advocate for these provisions to be included in the ongoing reform of the Family Code, ensuring that paternity recognition is explicitly mandated in law, despite opposition from groups resisting universal human rights », stated Omar Arbib.
The NGO Don't Touch My Child « Matkich Weldi » described the first-instance ruling as « a step forward» but still «insufficient given the gravity of the case». Najat Anwar, the organization's president and legal representative in the case, reiterated calls for harsher penalties for sexual crimes against children. She also praised the role of human rights organizations, particularly AMDH, in ensuring the case received public attention.
Additionally, the NGO renewed its appeal for «enhanced child protection mechanisms, particularly for those in vulnerable situations», alongside a «strong and exemplary judicial response against perpetrators to eliminate all forms of impunity».

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Ya Biladi
4 days ago
- Ya Biladi
Two Sahrawis from Tindouf arrested in Spain on terrorism charges
In Spain, Basque police arrested two young Sahrawis from the Tindouf camps on Wednesday in the province of Álava. They are accused of «collaboration with jihadist organizations» and «glorifying terrorism». On Friday, the two suspects appeared before an investigating judge specializing in terrorism cases at the National Court in Madrid. Following the hearing, the magistrate ordered that one of the suspects remain in custody, while the other was released under judicial supervision. Notably, most Spanish media outlets covering the arrests, particularly those in the Basque region, did not disclose the origins of the individuals detained. «One of the suspects is reportedly a close associate of the new Polisario representative in Algiers, Khatri Addouh. Since Wednesday, Polisario representatives in Spain have been actively pressuring Basque media not to disclose the alleged terrorists' links to the Tindouf camps», a Moroccan source told Yabiladi. It is worth recalling that for several months, American think tanks and political figures have been lobbying the Trump administration to designate the Polisario Front as a terrorist organization.


Ya Biladi
03-06-2025
- Ya Biladi
Moroccan families demand justice as teacher sentenced for sexual assault remains free
Five families from the town of Bni Tadjite, in Morocco's Figuig Province, have addressed an open letter to the Public Prosecutor and the Attorney General at the Oujda Court of Appeal, urging them to enforce a final court ruling against a teacher convicted of sexually assaulting five underage female students. In 2021, the accused—a French language teacher—was sentenced to three years in prison. The verdict was upheld by both the Oujda Court of Appeal and the Court of Cassation in Rabat, rendering it final and binding as of June 2024. Despite this, the families note in their petition, of which Yabiladi has obtained a copy, that the convicted teacher remains free. They describe this situation as «incomprehensible for the victims and their families», especially in light of the «psychological and social suffering» the children have endured. The signatories, parents of the victims, stress that they have made repeated journeys from Bni Tadjite to Oujda in defense of their daughters' dignity. They warn that the continued failure to enforce the sentence undermines both the authority of the justice system and the victims' right to accountability. Families call for immediate action In their appeal, the families call on the Public Prosecutor and Attorney General to urgently intervene and order the enforcement of the sentence against the convicted teacher, described as a married man and a father. They write that this step is essential «to uphold the dignity of the victims and restore their families' honor». The case first surfaced in October 2019, when parents and guardians of a group of schoolgirls—then aged eight and nine—filed a complaint accusing the teacher of sexual assault and harassment. Initially, seven families filed complaints; two later withdrew, while five continued legal proceedings. According to the 2021 investigative judge's report, the teacher—then employed at Dakhla School in Tadjite, under the administrative jurisdiction of Bouarfa—allegedly summoned students to the board, positioned them between his thighs, and touched their buttocks and genitals. The court ultimately referred the case to the criminal court for a ruling. Ongoing Trauma and a Father's Devotion In a statement to Yabiladi, Houcine Boukhdou, father of one of the victims, called the assault «cowardly» and said, «From the moment the perpetrator dared to harm our daughters, we chose to act with reason and place our trust in state institutions, believing justice would prevail». His daughter, now 13, still suffers from severe psychological trauma. «We faced many difficulties in finding psychiatric care for her, especially since we live in a small town», he said. «We tried taking her to a specialist in Oujda, but we couldn't get the help she needed». Boukhdou, who worked in mineral and fossil collection, gave up his job to stay close to his daughter. «I couldn't bear to be away when she had a therapy session. I chose to stay until the Court of Cassation's ruling is enforced». Despite the ordeal, Boukhdou emphasized that the family never acted impulsively or outside the law. «Even though we had every reason to lose control, we believed in the institutions of the state and the justice system».


Ya Biladi
31-05-2025
- Ya Biladi
Moroccan women's rights group calls for justice reform after assault case
The Democratic Association of Moroccan Women (ADFM) has expressed its «deep regret» and «serious concern» over the two-month sentence handed down by the Mechra Bel Ksiri court of first instance in a case of physical assault against a woman. The victim, attacked with a sharp object, was left permanently disfigured and incapacitated for 35 days. In a statement received by Yabiladi, the ADFM emphasized that this case is not isolated, but part of a broader pattern in which women—particularly those in socially and economically vulnerable situations—are subjected to various forms of violence without meaningful access to justice. «While victims struggle to navigate the justice system, prove harm through material evidence, and cope with complex, costly, and psychologically taxing procedures, the courts frequently hand down lenient, non-deterrent sentences that undermine women's trust in a legal system that perpetuates impunity», the NGO warned. The association stressed that the lack of clear and specific criminal provisions addressing gender-based violence in the current Penal Code—along with the limitations and shortcomings of Law 103.13—pose significant barriers to effectively protecting women. The ADFM is calling for a comprehensive reform of criminal policy to ensure the principle of non-impunity, provide swift responses to cases of violence, and eliminate discriminatory provisions that weaken victims' legal standing. The association further recommends that the Penal Code revision include explicit and strict provisions criminalizing all forms of violence against women, including physical violence resulting in disability, psychological and moral abuse, sexual violence (including marital rape), and economic violence. Moreover, the ADFM asserts that there can be no true reform of the Penal Code without establishing a fair criminal justice system that recognizes victims, holds offenders accountable, and guarantees women's right to physical and psychological safety. Finally, the association reaffirmed its solidarity with all women victims of violence and reiterated its commitment to legislative action in favor of stronger legal protections for women, restoring public trust in the justice system, and making the fight against violence a societal and institutional priority.