logo
Trump's first 100 days will require a second Reconstruction

Trump's first 100 days will require a second Reconstruction

Yahoo01-05-2025

Donald Trump has been president for 100 days. He promised to 'Make America Great Again!' Instead, Trump and his administration and the MAGA Republicans have made the United States less democratic, less free, less safe, less prosperous, less respected around the world, and much more unhappy.
Trump has been remarkably direct and transparent in his plans to become the country's first elected autocrat, a 'dictator' on 'day one.' He and his enablers are following through on this plan with reckless abandon.
An avalanche of recent public opinion polls shows that Donald Trump is now the least popular president in 80 years at this point in office. Specifically, Trump's handling of the economy and disregard for the rule of law and the Constitution and general abuse(s) of power have caused the American people to turn against him en masse. Trump's MAGA voters, especially the Christian right-wing and other Christian authoritarians and theocrats, remain dedicated to him and the cause. They view Donald Trump as a type of prophet and god; they are fighting a type of crusade; Trumpism and MAGA are their religious politics.
Legal scholars, political scientists, and other leading voices are sounding the alarm at a deafening level that the United States is quickly collapsing (or already has) into a state of authoritarian rule under Trump. In a new article in the prestigious journal Foreign Affairs, political scientists Stephen Levitsky and Lucan A. Way describe this collapse, as 'U.S. democracy will likely break down during the Second Trump administration in the sense that it will cease to meet standard criteria for a liberal democracy — full adult suffrage, free and fair elections, and broad protection of civil liberties….'
Donald Trump's authoritarian push and his MAGA movement have encountered little substantive resistance from the Democratic Party, the news media and the Fourth Estate, civil society, big business, and other counterbalancing forces in American society. In the worst examples, these elite institutions are engaging in 'anticipatory compliance,' aka surrender and collaboration with Trump and the larger MAGA authoritarian populist movement.
With few exceptions, such as the 'Hands off' protests several weeks ago, the American people have also been cowed by Donald Trump and his forces' shock and awe campaign. The American people appear to be vacillating between learned helplessness and mass disinhibition.
Whatever may happen after Trump's first 100 days as the long Trumpocene further digs in, one thing is almost certain: it will not end well for the American people and their democracy and society. The question is now not if the disaster can be avoided but instead what level of catastrophe and horribleness awaits and how the American people can rebuild if that is even possible.
Ultimately, the first 100 days of Trump's return and the long years of the Trumpocene were preventable. The American people — or at least enough of them in certain parts of the country — inflicted this disaster on themselves. Donald Trump is just doing what he promised and threatened.
In an attempt to gain a better perspective and insights on Donald Trump's first 100 days back in power, what may happen next, and what has already been lost, I reached out to a range of leading experts. I also asked them the following question: If these first 100 days of Trump's administration are indeed the good times as compared to what will come next, what do they want to prepare the American people for?
Barbara McQuade is a professor at the University of Michigan Law School. She is the author of the book '.' McQuade is also a legal analyst for NBC News and MSNBC, and a co-host of the podcast #SistersInLaw.
At 100 days, my strongest emotion is sadness. I think we will get through these dark days, but not without some significant steps backward in our march toward a more perfect union. Trump's chaos and low approval ratings show that his authoritarian moves are not what voters chose in November, which gives me hope for candidates more interested in unity in the 2026 and 2028 elections, but it will take us a long time to recover from the harms of this administration. Damage to scientific research, public health, universities, diversity, and the rule of law will not recover overnight.
I am most surprised by Trump's use of executive orders to target American institutions, such as universities and law firms. These orders are completely lawless, and yet, we have seen some of his targets capitulate rather than defend themselves in court. As I learned in my work as a federal prosecutor, appeasing the extortionist only invites more extortion.
If these are the good times, then I don't want to see the bad times! I actually think that for all his bluster, Trump is unable to execute most of his plans because he surrounds himself with incompetence. I think that Trump wanted to create the illusion of action right at the start of his administration, but his choice of cabinet members and other leaders has stymied his success. It appears to me that many leaders were selected for their loyalty rather than for their expertise, and we are seeing the consequences of those choices in their blunders, such as the use of Signal to discuss military attack plans. Running the government like a business never works. I think most Americans see the foolishness of cutting government services without rhyme or reason.
Trump's willingness to violate the rule of law and to traffic in disinformation makes him a very dangerous person to serve as president. He seems to be attacking any institution that can serve as a check on his power — the media, universities, judges, lawyers, and state officials. But so far, our courts have largely held him in check. The real question is whether he will obey court orders. I remain optimistic that the public will not tolerate a president who violates court orders. Trump may not care about many things, but he cares about his ratings, as we have seen from his repeated examples of backing down from unpopular moves, such as tariffs, cancellation of student visas, firing of federal employees, and the like. Public sentiment is everything, and the people still hold the power to shape our democracy. The 'Hands Off' protests seemed like a turning point when the public realized that Trump's tactics did not make his success inevitable.
is a professor of religious studies and Africana studies at the University of Pennsylvania. Her most recent book is "."
We are in authoritarianism, and things will only get worse unless everyone understands where we really are. I'm a black woman. 92% of us voted for Kamala. We did the work. Now it's time to take care of our own.
is emeritus scholar at the American Enterprise Institute and co-author of the bestseller "."
I am not feeling good. The pace of movement toward full-blown autocracy, greater than we saw with Orban and Erdogan among others, is distressing. More distressing is the collapse or shrinkage of the guardrails to prevent it, from the press to Congress to the business community to some judges.
I am somewhat surprised by the level of incompetence combined with the lack of concern over missteps, blunders, destruction of critical health and safety safeguards and direct threats to national security. And the level of cruelty. Not that any of these things are completely unexpected, but it is all worse.
We are seeing a backlash, and I expect it will grow as more Americans, including many who voted for Trump, feel the awful effects of policies and blunders. But Americans should not expect that all this can be ameliorated, much less erased. These are far from normal times for our country and voting and elections and politics as usual. For example, prepare for the possibility that Trump responds by invoking the Insurrection Act, provoking violence against dissent, and declaring martial law. Perhaps it will fall short of that. If it does, and we see a turnaround in the reins of power in 2026 and again in 2028, prepare for some very rough times. The destruction of much of the government and its infrastructure will take a very long time to overcome
Eric Schnurer is a widely recognized expert on public policy and government effectiveness, efficiency and reinvention. His newsletter can be read at .
I'm not really surprised by anything that's taking place now. I thought Trump would win from early in 2016. I also thought that Trump would win in 2024 back in January 7, 2020 onward. I have also believed that Trump would and still will seek and likely attain a third term. Trump will likely get his third term because of America's political and legal dysfunction.
More crucially, I always believed he would encourage a violent insurrection to stay in power, would not leave office as long as he's alive, and that his time in office will culminate in something like the Troubles in Great Britain and Northern Ireland. This has little to do with Trump — although he foments the worst in people instead of the best — and more to do with deeper factors like emerging technologies and a changing economy leaving most people out: Trump is the fever, not the underlying illness.
But you don't have to have shared my views to be unsurprised by anything happening today: Trump promised every bit of this. The people running this administration published an entire book announcing what they planned to do and how they were going to do it. If you're surprised by anything at this point, you haven't been paying attention.As for how I'm feeling, anticipating the end of everything I've valued my entire life about this great country — the Constitution, mostly-civil discourse, a public ethos of decency to other human beings no matter how short we fall of our ideals in practice, political processes built on something other than violence, real-if-grudging progress on racial and other forms of discrimination and injustice, America as both a concept and a reality – doesn't make its actual disappearance any better. It all bothers me, every minute of every day. But the intentional inhumanity and cruelty being visited on individual human beings on a daily basis — not just the dissolution at a general level of everything that made this country great — is the truly depressing part, no matter how much it is to be expected of these people.
The only things that have surprised me in the least are how quickly and comprehensively Trump and his forces have pressed ahead, while, at the same time, how grossly incompetent they have proven to be. Some of the incompetence is intentional — you don't intentionally destroy all trust in government without acting incompetently in it, and putting incompetent people in charge, to some degree — but you'd expect people who spent five years planning this in minute detail to be somewhat better on the execution. So, I'm actually more optimistic about it all than I expected to be. Relatively speaking.
I don't entirely agree with the premise that these are the good times compared to what is going to happen next. Yes, things are going to get worse than they currently are. But I also believe, and have believed for a long time, that this is a fire that will burn itself out eventually, and what comes after will probably be better. However, I think the United States is now only about halfway through a roughly 30-year transition of tremendous magnitude, so we've reached roughly the bottom of the trough but there are still many more years before the dawn starts to break, and more than a decade before a real, and better, alternative emerges. I believe it will require a generational change in leadership at all levels to lead us out of this situation. This will be from people who did not grow up in the 'before times,' who can and will think completely differently about the brave new world we have entered.
But I think alternatives will eventually emerge, as they always do, that look completely different from what this country has looked like for more or less the last 100 years, or before. Some will be good and some will be bad. I agree with Dylan Thomas that we must rage against the dying of the light, but the crucial work now is formulating what the eventual new dawn can bring, and how to build that. It is not to dash all our energy against a wave that's not yet spent, trying vainly to roll it back to yesterday.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

George Floyd unrest informs Trump's response to Los Angeles protests
George Floyd unrest informs Trump's response to Los Angeles protests

Politico

time9 minutes ago

  • Politico

George Floyd unrest informs Trump's response to Los Angeles protests

President Donald Trump's response to the Los Angeles protests isn't just an opportunity to battle with a Democratic governor over his signature issue. The president sees it as a chance to redo his first-term response to a wave of civil unrest. As protests broke out after the killing of George Floyd in 2020, Trump's instincts were to deploy thousands of active-duty troops across U.S. cities. But some administration officials resisted the idea and reportedly urged the president against invoking the Insurrection Act to do so. Five years later, Trump sees something familiar as protests rage across Los Angeles in response to the administration's immigration raids. He moved quickly to deploy 4,000 National Guard members and 700 Marines to support law enforcement, a decision he credited on Tuesday with preventing a 'great City' from 'burning to the ground.' And he repeatedly signaled his willingness to invoke the Insurrection Act if protests continue to escalate. There's a chief motivating factor driving Trump's aggressive response: The president is eager to avoid a repeat of the summer of protest that followed a Minneapolis police officer's killing of Floyd. The civil unrest added another layer to the turmoil facing Trump, as the country reeled from the Covid pandemic and voters prepared to return to the ballot box. And this time, he has stacked his Cabinet with loyalists and is less restrained by officials such as those in his first administration who feared deploying active-duty military troops would further inflame tensions and be viewed as a step toward martial law. 'The president is trusting his gut here,' said a person close to the White House, granted anonymity to discuss the president's response, reflecting back to former Chair of the Joint Chiefs Mark Milley and former Defense Secretary Mark Esper breaking with Trump's desire to send troops. 'He thinks the Milleys and the Espers of the world, five years ago, they gave him bad advice on that stuff.' Administration officials and allies say the president's hardline approach also sends a warning to other city and state leaders as anti-ICE protests spread beyond Los Angeles. 'In 2020, I was a governor of a neighboring state to Tim Walz and watched him let his city burn,' Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said in the Oval Office on Tuesday. 'The president and I have talked about this in the past: He was not going to let that happen to another city and to another community, where a bad governor made a bad decision.' It's yet another example of the president acting on his belief that he has a governing mandate from his 2024 comeback, which aides and allies attribute in large part to immigration and, specifically, the president's vow to deport undocumented immigrants. 'Is the left going to be able to take this over and turn rules-based immigration into yet another fight about how America is racist?' said Matt Schlapp, a Trump confidant and chair of the American Conservative Union. 'The No. 1 reason Donald Trump got reelected was the border. He's implementing exactly what he said he would do, and out of nowhere, there's violence in the streets, there's fire bombs, there's attacks on cops.' A White House official, granted anonymity to discuss the administration's thinking, said immigration enforcement has continued across the country despite the protests: 'Individuals in other cities should realize that rioting will not prevent immigration enforcement operations in their cities as well.' Trump has repeatedly referred to the protesters as 'insurrectionists' and 'violent insurrectionist mobs,' and his rhetoric intensified on Tuesday as he said the protests amount to an 'invasion' that threatens U.S. 'sovereignty' and that he will now allow 'an American city to be invaded and conquered by a foreign enemy.' He condemned what he called 'lawlessness' and the burning of the American flag, suggesting it should be punished with a year in prison — echoing his rhetoric from June 2020. But he also said the Los Angeles protests are not yet an insurrection — and that he will only invoke the Insurrection Act, which would allow troops to directly participate in civilian law enforcement, if it escalates to that point. The president on Sunday directed Noem, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Attorney General Pam Bondi to take 'all such action necessary to liberate Los Angeles' and 'put an end to these Migrant riots.' 'Mark Esper fought like the dickens to avoid the Insurrection Act. He wasn't the only one. So did Attorney General [Bill] Barr, and so forth,' said Ken Cuccinelli, who served as Trump's deputy of Homeland Security during the first term. 'Whereas, Pam Bondi and Pete Hegseth are more along the lines of just giving advice, and 'if it's the route you want to go, Mr. President, we'll salute and we'll move right down that path.' And that speaks to a unity in government that didn't exist in the first term.' The Trump administration's response has alarmed California Democrats, who warn that what's happening in their state paves the way for the president to deploy the military nationwide to enact his immigration agenda. The president has already militarized the border to an unprecedented degree, with military, immigration and legal experts questioning the legality of the approach and warning of potential violations to the Posse Comitatus Act, a federal law that generally prohibits active-duty troops from being used in domestic law enforcement. Trump's decision to deploy troops has also set off a legal firestorm: California sued the administration for deploying the National Guard without consultation, arguing that using the military to quell the immigration protests is illegal and unconstitutional. Gov. Gavin Newsom filed another suit on Tuesday, asking a federal judge for a restraining order to block Hegseth from ordering troops to support immigration raids in the city 'immediately.' 'There is no invasion or rebellion in Los Angeles; there is civil unrest that is no different from episodes that regularly occur in communities throughout the country, and that is capable of being contained by state and local authorities working together,' California Attorney General Rob Bonta and other lawyers wrote in the new motion. Rallies protesting the administration's ICE raids and immigration agenda spread across U.S. cities this week. And so-called 'No Kings' rallies, coinciding with the president's military parade in Washington on Saturday, are planned in more than 1,800 cities across the country, including the nation's capital. Trump warned on Tuesday that any protests during this weekend's parade will be met with 'very heavy force.' 'If there's any protester who wants to come out, they will be met with very big force,' the president said in the Oval Office. 'I haven't even heard about a protest, but [there are] people that hate our country.' Dasha Burns contributed to this report.

ABC News cuts ties with Terry Moran after Trump ‘hater' post
ABC News cuts ties with Terry Moran after Trump ‘hater' post

The Hill

time14 minutes ago

  • The Hill

ABC News cuts ties with Terry Moran after Trump ‘hater' post

ABC News says it will not renew the contract of veteran journalist Terry Moran after he authored a social media post sharply criticizing President Trump and top White House aide Stephen Miller. 'We are at the end of our agreement with Terry Moran and based on his recent post – which was a clear violation of ABC News policies – we have made the decision to not renew,' a spokesperson for the network told The Hill on Tuesday. 'At ABC News, we hold all of our reporters to the highest standards of objectivity, fairness and professionalism, and we remain committed to delivering straightforward, trusted journalism,' the spokesperson added. Moran was suspended by the network over the weekend for his post on the social platform X in which he called Miller a 'world-class hater' and said 'you can see this just by looking at him because you can see that his hatreds are his spiritual nourishment. He eats his hate.' In the since-deleted post, Moran also criticized the president, saying he too is 'a world-class hater' and adding that 'his hatred only a means to an end, and that end [is] his own glorification. That's his spiritual nourishment.' Moran's post enraged the West Wing, which called on the Disney-owned network to punish the journalist. Almost immediately once Moran's ouster was made public, White House director of communications Steven Cheung celebrated the news, writing in an X post: 'Talk s—. Get hit.' Moran's ouster comes as Trump and his allies in government are ratcheting up pressure on broadcast news networks over their coverage of him and threatening to use executive power to crack down on coverage they say is unfair to his administration. Trump has called out ABC News specifically several times in recent weeks, suggesting the Federal Communications Commission scrutinize its broadcast license. The network late last year agreed to pay Trump $15 million to settle a defamation lawsuit out of court stemming from an incorrect statement made by anchor George Stephanopoulos during a broadcast claiming Trump had been convicted of sexual assault. Moran has worked for ABC News for more than two decades and is based in Washington, D.C., having served in a variety of roles for the network.

More Than 1,500 ‘No Kings' Protests Planned Amid Trump Crackdown on L.A. Demonstrations
More Than 1,500 ‘No Kings' Protests Planned Amid Trump Crackdown on L.A. Demonstrations

Time​ Magazine

time15 minutes ago

  • Time​ Magazine

More Than 1,500 ‘No Kings' Protests Planned Amid Trump Crackdown on L.A. Demonstrations

More than 1,500 ' No Kings Day ' demonstrations are set to take place across the U.S. this weekend to protest the Trump Administration as President Donald Trump holds a military parade in Washington, D.C. The demonstrations will take place all over the country on Saturday, coinciding with the parade Trump has planned to mark the U.S. Army's 250th birthday. Ezra Levin, the co-founder and co-executive director of the progressive organization Indivisible that's behind 'No Kings Day,' told MSNBC on Monday that the protests—originally announced last month—have generated 'overwhelming interest' in the aftermath of the Administration's response to the immigration-related protests in Los Angeles. 'In America, we don't do kings,' reads a website for the events. 'They've defied our courts, deported Americans, disappeared people off the streets, attacked our civil rights, and slashed our services. The corruption has gone too. Far.' The protests will follow days of demonstrations in L.A. over Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raids targeting undocumented immigrants. In a rare and controversial exercise of presidential power, Trump over the weekend mobilized the National Guard—against the wishes of California Gov. Gavin Newsom—to quell the protests in the L.A. area, which had been largely peaceful. The move sparked immediate outcry from Democratic politicians, advocacy organizations, and legal experts. Trump has since escalated federal involvement by deploying hundreds of Marines and thousands of additional National Guard troops to the city. 'No Kings is a nationwide day of defiance. From city blocks to small towns, from courthouse steps to community parks, we're taking action to reject authoritarianism—and show the world what democracy really looks like,' the 'No Kings Day' description said. 'On June 14th, we're showing up everywhere [Trump] isn't—to say no thrones, no crowns, no kings.' The event's organizers aren't holding a protest in D.C. itself, saying they want to make the demonstrations elsewhere the story of the day rather than allowing Saturday's military parade to be 'the center of gravity.' On Tuesday, Trump warned people planning to protest at the parade that they would face 'very big force.' 'For those people that want to protest, they're going to be met with very big force,' Trump said. 'And I haven't even heard about a protest, but you know, this is people that hate our country, but they will be met with very heavy force.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store