Kennedy and Milei double down on WHO exit after meeting in Buenos Aires: 'Free from totalitarian control'
U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. met with Argentine President Javier Milei on Tuesday at the Casa Rosada, where both leaders reaffirmed plans to withdraw their nations from the World Health Organization (WHO) and build a new international health framework.
The meeting brought together two strong-willed political outsiders. Milei, a libertarian economist known for cutting government spending, and Kennedy, a Trump-appointed health chief skeptical of pandemic-era mandates. Both promised to challenge what they call global overreach and politicized health policy.
Argentina officially confirmed its exit from the WHO during Kennedy's visit, following Milei's initial announcement in February. The move aligns with President Trump's revived pledge to pull the U.S. out of the WHO as part of his "Make America Healthy Again" (MAHA) agenda.FIERY RFK JR. FLOGS WHO FOR CAVING TO CHINA ON COVID, CELEBRATING PANDEMIC 'FAILURES' IN STUNNING VIDEO TO ORG
Milei's government blasted the WHO for what it called a failed COVID response. "The WHO's prescriptions do not work because they are not based on science but on political interests and bureaucratic structures that refuse to review their own mistakes," the government said, referring to the group's lockdown strategy as a "caveman quarantine."
Kennedy offered support, encouraging other countries to also exit the WHO in a recent address to the World Health Assembly. He has argued the organization is compromised by foreign governments and corporate interests, and that a fresh approach is needed.
After the meeting, Kennedy posted on X: "I had a wonderful meeting with President Milei about the mutual withdrawal of our nations from the WHO and the creation of an alternative international health system... free from totalitarian impulses, corruption, and political control."
Both governments say the new alliance will prioritize real science, individual freedom, and national sovereignty, pushing back against what Milei's team calls "interference" from global agencies.ARGENTINA'S MILEI SHUTS UP CRITICS WITH MIRACLE TURNAROUND OF ECONOMY, STRONG SECURITY POLICIES
The meeting also highlighted shared philosophies between the two leaders. Milei took office vowing to slash Argentina's massive public spending. He famously carried a chainsaw during his campaign to symbolize budget cuts—and has since followed through, cutting public salaries, halting state projects, and ending energy subsidies.
His tough measures have produced results: Argentina posted its first budget surplus in nearly 15 years and sharply reduced monthly inflation.
Kennedy's MAHA campaign echoes Milei's anti-establishment style, but in the health sector. The Trump administration's health agenda has focused on rolling back federal overreach, enforcing science-based policy, and promoting transparency in public health.
Tuesday's meeting marks a deeper alignment between Argentina and the current U.S. administration. Milei has welcomed top American officials in recent months and shown clear interest in building strong ties with Washington. Now, by joining the U.S. in rejecting the WHO, Milei becomes the first foreign leader to openly back Trump's health sovereignty push.
The decision is a major departure from Argentina's previous international partnerships and could signal a shift for other countries weighing similar moves. Both Milei and Kennedy have framed the initiative as the start of a more accountable and independent global health network.
Critics, including some in Argentina's opposition, warn that leaving the WHO could limit access to funding and vaccines. Global health experts largely defend the WHO's role, despite acknowledging its COVID missteps.
But Milei and Kennedy appear unfazed. Argentina's health minister praised the shared "vision" between the two governments, emphasizing a joint commitment to transparency and reform.CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital's request for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The ‘revenge tax' buried deep in the budget bill could turn a trade war into a ‘capital war,' analyst says
Section 899 of the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' moving through Congress has raised growing alarms on Wall Street, after the once-obscure provision was initially overshadowed by the budget proposal's estimated impact on the deficit. Deutsche Bank warned that what's been dubbed the 'revenge tax' could further harm the attractiveness of U.S. assets. As Wall Street continued digesting the myriad line items in the 1,000-page budget bill that passed recently, one part has triggered an especially acute case of heartburn. Section 899 of the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' moving through Congress has raised growing alarms, after the once-obscure provision was initially overshadowed by the budget's estimated impact on the deficit. It has been dubbed the 'revenge tax' because it would increase rates for individuals and companies from countries with tax policies branded as 'discriminatory.' That means foreign investors, who own trillions of dollars in U.S. assets, could face higher levies on passive income like dividends and interest payments. Investors have already shifted toward Europe and China as President Donald Trump's aggressive tariff agenda has eroded the idea 'American exceptionalism.' Meanwhile, foreign investors are showing signs of a buyer's strike, shunning U.S. assets. For George Saravelos, head of FX research at Deutsche Bank, the idea of a revenge tax could make them even less attractive. It's also notable in the wake of a U.S. trade court's ruling Tuesday that invalidated Trump's reciprocal tariffs, as Section 899 could represent an alternative tool. 'We see this legislation as creating the scope for the US administration to transform a trade war into a capital war if it so wishes, a development that is highly relevant in the context of today's court decision constraining President Trump on trade policy,' Saravelos wrote in a note. He pointed out that Section 899 uses taxation on foreign investors as leverage to advance U.S. economic priorities and only has to meet a low bar before it can be enforced. It would also make covering deficits more difficult by lowering the de facto yield foreign government earn from U.S. Treasury bonds by nearly 100 basis points, Saravelos estimated. While the ultimate impact could be less than that, the mere introduction of more uncertainty and complexity around investing in U.S. assets 'undermines the attractiveness of dollar inflows at a time when this is already put in to question,' he warned. 'It is not unreasonable for the market to conclude that if the President is constrained on using trade policy, taxing foreign capital could be a new means of leverage,' he added. Even House Ways and Means Committee Chair Jason Smith, who supports the revenge tax, said during a panel discussion on Friday that he hopes it's never used and instead acts like more of a deterrent that stops other countries from cracking down on U.S. companies unfairly. Meanwhile, the Joint Committee on Taxation, the nonpartisan tax scorekeeper for Congress, echoed some of Wall Street's fears. Thomas Barthold, the committee's chief of staff, said in a statement to Bloomberg Tax that Section 899 would lead to a 'decline in foreign demand for US direct and portfolio investment.' This story was originally featured on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Miami Herald
20 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Stock market whipsaws on latest tariff tirade, triggers TACO trade
Investors may not be fans of stock market volatility, but that doesn't bother President Trump. His back-and-forth trade and tariff war updates have sent stocks on a roller coaster ride since he announced tariffs on Canada, Mexico, and China in February. The stock market's nerve-racking swings include a 19% tumble from mid-February through early April, and a 20% rally since April 9, when Trump paused many reciprocal tariffs that rocked stocks after they were announced on April 2. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter Investors have oscillated between pessimism that tariffs would send the U.S. into economic stagnation or recession, and optimism that negotiations would tame the worst of tariffs' bite. The seesaw pattern continued this week. Stocks tumbled on Friday, May 23, when Trump threatened 50% tariffs on the European Union, only to rally on Tuesday after Trump said he'd delay implementing them on the EU until July. The volatility continued on Friday, May 30. The S&P 500 lost over 1% at session lows after Trump made a bold accusation on China trade, only to recover most of the day's losses on hopes that cooler heads would again prevail over the weekend. Image source:The on-and-off again nature of Trump's trade war and the stock market's reaction to it has led to investors buying dips to profit from potential easing of rhetoric amid negotiations. Profitable dip buying has led to the coining of the "TACO" trade, where TACO stands for "Trump Always Chickens Out." The phrase is credited to Financial Times writer Robert Armstrong, who noticed the phenomenon. Related: Jamie Dimon sends terse message on stocks, economy The sell-off and rally from last Friday and Tuesday are perfect examples of the TACO trade in action. Trump made a huge, eye-popping threat, only to back away from it, claiming positive trade talk developments. Those who bought low on the S&P 500 last Friday and sold high on Tuesday pocketed a quick 2.7%. The returns were even better for those risk-tolerant enough to try their hands at technology stocks. Buying the dip in the Nasdaq 100 or high-flying artificial intelligence stock Palantir delivered 3.2% and 6%, respectively. Stocks' action on May 30 suggests many think that Trump's latest tough talk toward China may be similarly walked back, resulting in gains. The S&P 500 and Nasdaq finished May 30th up 1.3% and 1.5% from their intraday low. Palantir gained 6.1% from its low. President Trump kicked off a major trade war with China in April when he set reciprocal tariffs at 34%, bringing total tariffs to 54%, including the 'fentanyl' tariff. China responded in kind, and the tit-for-tat eventually left China's tariffs at 145% and China's US tariffs at 125%. Those rates were high enough to effectively shutter trade between the two economic giants, which caused ripples in supply chains, sending retailers heavily reliant on low-cost apparel and electronics scrambling. Related: Secretary Bessent sends message on Walmart price increases due to tariffs Absent relief, most began to assume a recession driven by tariff-driven inflation was inevitable. Those fears were mitigated when Trump surprised everyone, announcing he would roll back China tariffs to 30% on May 14 for 90 days in a sign of good faith after what appeared to be positive initial trade talks. Unfortunately, that optimism faded quickly after Trump delivered a stark rebuke of China on May 30. "Two weeks ago, China was in grave economic danger! The very high Tariffs I set made it virtually impossible for China to TRADE into the United States marketplace," wrote Trump on Truth Social. "I was what was happening and didn't like it, for them, not for us. I made a FAST DEAL with China... Everybody was happy!... The bad news is that China, perhaps not surprisingly to some, HAS TOTALLY VIOLATED ITS AGREEMENT WITH US. So much for being Mr. NICE GUY!" More Economic Analysis: Hedge-fund manager sees U.S. becoming GreeceA critical industry is slamming the economyReports may show whether the economy is toughing out the tariffs Trump's frustration with China is evident, and the implications for markets aren't great. China may be negotiating tough, like Trump, so it may take longer to seal a deal, or the final agreement may not include much more in tariff relief. If so, recession worry will escalate. Stock market participants, however, don't seem concerned, embracing the TACO trade fully on Friday. Will that bet pay off? We'll have to wait and see if Trump's rhetoric eases over the coming days. Related: Veteran fund manager unveils eye-popping S&P 500 forecast The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Findi Full Year 2025 Earnings: Revenues Beat Expectations, EPS Lags
Revenue: AU$75.5m (up 14% from FY 2024). Net loss: AU$12.5m (down by 409% from AU$4.04m profit in FY 2024). AU$0.26 loss per share (down from AU$0.10 profit in FY 2024). Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. All figures shown in the chart above are for the trailing 12 month (TTM) period Revenue exceeded analyst estimates by 7.9%. Earnings per share (EPS) missed analyst estimates by 8.3%. Looking ahead, revenue is forecast to grow 56% p.a. on average during the next 2 years, compared to a 7.2% decline forecast for the Diversified Financial industry in Australia. Performance of the Australian Diversified Financial industry. The company's shares are up 9.8% from a week ago. Before we wrap up, we've discovered 1 warning sign for Findi that you should be aware of. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
