Tennessee bill looks to lower minimum school bus driving age to 21
UNICOI Co., Tenn. (WJHL) – Those hoping to drive school buses in Tennessee can begin the process at age 25. However, some Tennessee lawmakers want to lower the age requirement by four years.
House Bill 0084 and Senate Bill 1042 would bring the minimum age for school bus drivers down to 21. In Unicoi County, the school system continues to look for staff to drive buses.
Downtown Johnson City last call bill sails through first committee vote
'There's just such a demand for it,' Transportation Supervisor Drew Rice said. 'And the demand for it succeeds the supply for it, and I don't think that's a problem that's unique to us.'
Rice said a lower age requirement would help grow the list of potential drivers, something current drivers have commented on.
'We've had a couple of our younger drivers go out there and get their [commercial driver's license] at 25,' Rice said. 'And they would have gotten it two or three years earlier if they could. So it just widens the pool of applicants and maybe people potentially interested in it.'
James Tilson drives a bus for the school system and has been a driver for 43 years, having been certified when he was only 22 years old.
'I had to go through my certifications, testing,' Tilson said. 'I rode with a certified driver, then he rode with me on it.'
Tilson said he supports the bill as long as the new drivers receive the proper training.
'You get them trained and turn them loose,' Tilson said. 'Ride with them, see how they're going to do before we turn them loose.'
Rice said that's exactly what the school system plans to do.
'We would probably let them go with some training wheels, per se,' Rice said. 'To kind of get them used to it and ease them into it and maybe start with driving a ball team somewhere.'
If the bill is passed, the law would go into effect on July 1.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Tensions rising in GOP over Trump border plan as Rand Paul squares off with Stephen Miller
A bitter feud is escalating between Republican Sen. Rand Paul and Donald Trump's top border official, injecting uncertainty into Congress's attempt to pass the administration's signature policy bill this month. Key Trump adviser Stephen Miller came to Capitol Hill to meet with Senate Republicans on Thursday to resolve a major issue over the bill's border security provisions – which Paul opposes. Paul and Miller have been locked in a dispute for days over the border funding. The White House is seeking $150 billion in funds for border security and deportation. But Paul – who has repeatedly lashed out against the price tag of Trump's bill – wants to dramatically cut down that funding. Now, that tension between the two key GOP figures is spilling into the open. Paul is taking swipes at Miller to reporters on Capitol Hill, attacking Miller for his recent comments about the administration looking at suspending habeas corpus and then suggesting on Wednesday that Miller himself was the reason he was uninvited from a White House picnic. Trump has since personally asked him and his family to attend the Thursday event, the senator said. Miller, meanwhile, has been firing off social media posts at the Kentucky senator, accusing him of, for instance, trying to cut funding for border security amid the Los Angeles riots. 'They want to quiet me down, and it hasn't worked, and so they're going to try to attack me. They're going to try to destroy me in other ways, and then do petty little things like social occasions or whatever. But you know, it probably will not work. It probably will not make me cow down or bend over,' Paul told CNN on Wednesday, after saying he was disinvited from the White House picnic. Asked if he was talking about Miller, Paul nodded. Paul's strong push to limit Trump's border security cash puts him mostly on an island among Hill Republicans, according to one person familiar with the talks, though other GOP senators pressed Miller about specific funding accounts in a meeting earlier Thursday. And the back-and-forth has frustrated some of their fellow GOP senators. Oklahoma Sen. Markwayne Mullin said Miller 'did a good job' answering GOP senators' questions on Thursday about border wall money, but he added some Republicans 'were upset' or 'just didn't want to hear it.' 'I mean, Rand Paul's solution is cut everything in half and call it good. Yeah, that's not real budgeting,' Mullin added. Paul, however, has defended his stance, insisting that the White House needs to justify its funding request, especially since it was made before Trump came into office. And he specifically called out a certain GOP senator whom he accused of being a fiscal hawk only when 'convenient.' 'Senator Graham wants to make sure the president gets exactly what he wants. He's a rubber stamp, and I am a believer that we are acting fiscally responsible at every level of government, across government, and that you can't just sort of be fiscally conservative when it's convenient, when it comes to the border,' Paul told reporters Thursday. Paul did not attend Miller's visit to Senate Republicans on Thursday, citing a conflicting committee meeting. Even so, the meeting at times grew contentious over the president's plans to spend billions on the border. Florida Sen. Rick Scott, offering a defense of his GOP colleagues, said those Republicans were interested in more specifics about how the border money would be spent. 'I think what everybody was pushing back is we want more detail. I know exactly how the money is going to be spent. It's not, has nothing to do with whether we support him,' Scott said. One of those probing Miller on the border funding was GOP Sen. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, another fiscal hawk who has been working to make sure Trump's pricey tax breaks don't add to the deficit. 'The numbers didn't quite add up,' Johnson later told reporters of his questions to Miller. 'He did a really good job of explaining why it is going to be more expensive, but then just how difficult it is going to be to create the beds and the expense of that.' 'There was just some basic numbers that we weren't aware of. We didn't have the math. We didn't have their calculation. I think he was a little blindsided from that standpoint.'
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump signs measure to block California car standards, says it will 'rescue' automakers
President Donald Trump has signed a congressional resolution reversing a waiver previously granted to California and other states that would have let them ban the sale of gasoline-powered cars, trucks and sport-utility vehicles. At a ceremony at the White House on June 12, Trump said the resolution has the force of law and suggested it can't be challenged in court. But California officials and a coalition of officials from other states on the same day did just that, arguing it was passed in the U.S. House and Senate under a process they say violated existing law. By signing the resolution, Trump continued to deliver on his promise to tear down rules and regulations promoting the adoption of electric vehicles (EVs) nationwide which he and other Republicans argue amounted to a mandate on American consumers regarding which cars and trucks they may buy. The signing also happened as Trump and California Gov. Gavin Newsom continue to spar over Trump's decision to send thousands of National Guard members and some 700 Marines to that state in support of efforts to respond to protests against immigration enforcement by the Trump administration. No such military intervention has been ordered into a state by the federal government without the state's request since the 1960s. Trump said the California waiver, which is provided for under the Clean Air Act, "has been a disaster for this country." He added that by signing the resolution, he was moving to "rescue the American auto industry." But Trump repeatedly seemed to suggest that the resolution somehow ends the federal government's requirement to consider and approve California's waivers on fuel emissions standards on cars and trucks except for under narrow legal circumstances. The resolution passed by the U.S. House and Senate only dealt with a waiver granted to California — and more than a dozen other states which are allowed to follow California's lead on car and truck emissions standards — about a month before former President Joe Biden left office in January. The Trump administration, under Environmental Protection Agency head Lee Zeldin, asked Congress to overturn the Biden waiver for California's so-called Advanced Clean Cars II program under the Congressional Review Act, which lets Congress reverse certain agency rules within a short time of their implementation. Most importantly, the Congressional Review Act allows the U.S. Senate to adopt those reversals with a simple 52-vote majority, rather than a 60-vote margin needed to shut down debate. But the review act has never been applied to California's waivers under the Clean Air Act and the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO), which provides nonpartisan recommendations to Congress and federal public agencies, has formally said that those waivers can't be considered under that law. California Attorney General Rob Bonta called Trump's actions "reckless, politically motivated and illegal." More: Trump has kind words for Slotkin, UAW's Fain, though without mentioning them by name More: U-M raises tuition and fees 3.4% amid state and federal funding questions California's ability to get waivers to set fuel emissions standards has been in place for decades as a way to fight pollution in a state where smog has been a huge problem. The most recent waiver allowed the state to effectively end the sale of gas-powered cars and trucks in the state by 2035. Trump signed other resolutions reversing a few other California Clean Air Act waivers, as well, on June 12, including a measure sponsored by U.S. Rep. John James, R-Shelby Township, which overturns California's program to require heavy trucks also emit no greenhouse gases. James attended the signing ceremony and was acknowledged by Trump. The resolution overturning the California program affecting a ban on gas-powered cars and light-duty trucks and SUVs was sponsored by U.S. Rep. John Joyce, R-Pennsylvania. Trump said his move will save consumers thousands on new cars and trucks, though that may not take into account fuel costs that EVs can save their owners over the lives of their vehicles. The White House put out a statement June 12 from General Motors with the automaker saying, "We appreciate the actions taken by President Trump to sign (the resolution) into law and help align emissions standards with today's market realities. We have long advocated for one national standard that will allow us to stay competitive, continue to invest in U.S. innovation, and offer customer choice across the broadest lineup of gas-powered and electric vehicles.' GM and other automakers have long argued that California and the states that follow it shouldn't be allowed to effectively decide what kind of cars and trucks they have to make for the whole country. But in more recent years — certainly since the Obama administration stepped in to financially rescue GM and what is now Stellantis in 2009 — automakers have been more willing to work to avoid legal fights over fuel standards with California. As to the most recent California standards, John Bozzella, president and CEO of the Alliance for Automotive Innovation, an industry trade group in Washington, said, 'Everyone agreed these EV sales mandates were never achievable and wildly unrealistic" and, if they remained in place would be, "harmful to auto affordability, to consumer choice, to industry competitiveness and to economic activity." [ Take our short survey. ] He credited Trump for "identifying this problem and doing something about it." Meanwhile, American Petroleum Institute President and CEO Mike Sommers and American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers President and CEO Chet Thompson issued a statement calling the resolution, along with others reversing some other vehicle mandates earlier provided to California, "a major win for the American people." Environmental groups criticized the resolution, as they had on its passage last month. 'California's vehicle standards reduce costs for drivers, increase customer choice, boost domestic manufacturing, improve air quality and help address the climate crisis," said Simon Mui, managing director for transportation at the Natural Resources Defense Council. "The only losers from cleaner vehicles are oil industry billionaires." Several officials from the oil industry were on hand as the president signed the resolution. 'Ripping away California's clean air protections is Trump's latest betrayal of democracy,' added Dan Becker, director of the Center for Biological Diversity's Safe Climate Transport Campaign. 'Signing this bill is a flagrant abuse of the law to reward big oil and big auto corporations at the expense of everyday people's health and their wallets." Contact Todd Spangler: tspangler@ Follow him on X @tsspangler. This article originally appeared on Detroit Free Press: Trump moves to block Calif. car rules, says it will rescue automakers
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US senator dragged out of LA immigration news conference
Democratic US Senator Alex Padilla has been forcibly removed from a news conference held by Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem in Los Angeles. Noem was offering the latest figures on immigration enforcement in the area, which has led to nearly a week of protests in the city, to members of the news media when Sen Padilla interrupted and started shouting a question. Once removed from the room, the California senator was handcuffed. Padilla's removal caused condemnation on both sides of the aisle, with fellow senators calling the arrest shocking and a "sickening disgrace" and the Trump administration dubbing it "disrespectful political theatre". "I'm Senator Alex Padilla," he said as he was confronted by authorities. "I have questions for the secretary!" Noem, who was speaking about immigration and the protests in LA, continued addressing reporters and law enforcement officers while the senator was ejected from the room. Padilla's office said he was "forced to the ground and handcuffed" by federal agents when trying to ask the secretary a question, and added that he was not currently being detained. The Department of Homeland Security said Padilla had engaged in "disrespectful political theatre" and that Noem met with the senator after the news briefing. LA Mayor Karen Bass called the incident "absolutely abhorrent and outrageous", adding that the Trump administration's "violent attacks on our city must end". Padilla told reporters that he was already in the federal building for a previously scheduled meeting. He said he stopped by Noem's news briefing because he and his colleagues have received "little to no information in response" to several immigration-related queries. Padilla, the son of Mexican immigrants, is the most senior Democrat on the Senate's Border Security and Immigration subcommittee. "I came to the press conference to hear what she had to say, to see if I could learn any new additional information," he said. "If this is how the Department of Homeland Security responds to a senator with a question, you can only imagine what they're doing to farm workers, to cooks, to day labourers out in the Los Angeles community and throughout California and throughout the country." He urged Americans across the country to "continue peacefully protesting" the Trump administration and its policies. The DHS in a statement said Padilla didn't identify himself and was not wearing the Senator's pin on his clothing so officers thought he was an attacker. Video footage of the incident shows Padilla saying he was he was a senator as he was being pushed outside the room. California's Governor Gavin Newsom called on Republican congressional leadership to condemn the detaining of Padilla. "If they can handcuff a U.S. Senator for asking a question, imagine what they will do to you," Newsom wrote on social media. But the White House accused the California senator of storming the press conference, and said he "yelled and lunged toward Secretary Noem". "Padilla didn't want answers; he wanted attention," Abigail Jackson, White House spokesperson said. "Padilla embarrassed himself and his constituents with this immature, theater-kid stunt – but it's telling that Democrats are more riled up about Padilla than they are about the violent riots and assaults on law enforcement in LA." Former vice-president and Trump opponent, Kamala Harris also criticised the move and said the California senator was trying to get answers for his constituents about the ongoing immigration raids in the state. "United States Senator Alex Padilla was representing the millions of Californians who are demanding answers to this Administration's actions in Southern California," she said on Twitter. "This is a shameful and stunning abuse of power."
