
A Luxury Travel Bubble Is Swelling
(Bloomberg Opinion) -- When you go on vacation, do you ever treat yourself to an upgraded airline seat? Or book the (admittedly cheapest) room at a five-star hotel? Maybe splurge on a spa day or celebratory Michelin-starred meal? If any of this sounds familiar, you may be what the travel industry calls an 'aspirational' luxury traveler. And much to the industry's potential dismay, you're also inflating an economic bubble that may be about to burst.
According to McKinsey, the aspirational set, defined as those with between $100,000 and $1 million in net worth, now accounts for 35% of the global luxury travel market. In 2023, they spent $84 billion on high-end vacations, a figure expected to grow to $107 billion by 2028. That purchasing power has helped turn luxury travel from a glamorous niche into a major profit center, sparking a race among airlines, hotels, cruise lines, tour companies and the rest to cater to and capture this market segment. But what happens when economic uncertainty suddenly brings aspirations back down to earth?
Consider the reasons why so many people with money — but not true $10,000-a-night-suite money — started spending so much on fancy getaways. One is the boom that kicked off with post-Covid 'revenge travel' and was going strong until recently; even as prices climbed, Americans have increased their travel spending every year since the 2020 bust, according to the US Travel Association. There's also a demographic element: Millennials, the generation that popularized the idea of investing on experiences over things, are entering their peak spending years.
Perhaps less considered is a cultural shift that's normalized the idea that all travel should be luxurious. You see it in pop culture (who wouldn't check into the White Lotus, body count or no?) but nowhere is the luxury obsession more pronounced than on social media. The travel industry has discovered the marketing power of influencers, gifting them private jet outings and luxe villas that they then flaunt all over our timelines, sending an unmissable message that anyone bunking at a meh chain hotel or stuck in the back half of the plane is a loser. It's gotten to the point that there was even a movement on TikTok to 'normalize' flying coach.
As the luxury category has swelled to encompass both the uber-rich and aspirational splurgers, travel companies have been quick to invest. Post-pandemic, the pipeline of new luxury and upscale lodging has been expanding at a faster rate than that of more affordable hotels. At the very tip-top of that range, the number of hotels charging an average daily rate of $1,000 or more has more than tripled since 2019. Even Airbnb is looking to go upscale — in May it debuted a new service that lets users book a personal trainer, masseuse or chef for in-rental pampering.
Meanwhile, US airlines, including United and Delta, have been increasing the share of planes given over to 'premium' seating. Some have also introduced a class of service that falls between business and economy plus (i.e., extra-legroom coach seats). The cheapie airlines, too, have had their heads turned by the appeal of luxury options: Southwest has adopted extra legroom seats, while JetBlue and Frontier are planning to add first class.
But wider seats, posher rooms and even the odd hot stone massage may not be enough to woo travelers spooked by a potential downturn and America's increasing hostility to the rest of the world.
To hear the industry tell it, the falloff in the sector's latest earnings is little to worry about. In March, Delta cut its profit and revenue forecast but later reported that, 'We are not yet seeing any cracks in premium.' For its part, United said it would trim domestic routes due to weak demand — even as it noted that new premium cabin bookings were up over last year.
It's not crazy to think the ultra-rich may keep booking even if, as many are expecting, the economy slows, inflation returns and the stock market falls into a funk. (Though the recent cratering of luxury retail suggests that's not a sure thing.) Unlike the multi-millionaire crowd, though, aspirational luxury travelers aren't in a position to ignore the status of their bank and 401(k) accounts. Many of them might understandably choose to trade-down to (for shame!) economy class seats or the kind of hotel that offers a free breakfast buffet.
The industry has never been particularly good about thinking beyond the moment. When Covid hit, the airlines hacked schedules to the bone — only to be caught off guard when demand came roaring back, and then to find themselves cutting prices last year when they couldn't fill all the new flights. Meanwhile, the development process for hotels can take years; by the time a new property opens its doors, the environment that inspired its construction is long gone (the glut of supply that came online during the 2008 recession is probably the most painful such example).
This would be a smart time for travel companies to take a look back at that checkered history and reconsider just how big they want to bet on luxury carrying them through what could be a bumpy couple of years. For vacationers, a slowing economy could be a reminder that, while creature comforts are wonderful, at its heart, travel is more about people and places than perks. And the companies that find ways to deliver value and keep those experiences accessible are likely to be the ones that come out ahead. Elsewhere in Bloomberg Opinion:
This column reflects the personal views of the author and does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Kristen Bellstrom is a Bloomberg Opinion senior editor. She previously worked as a managing editor for Barron's. She has also worked as an editor and writer for Fortune, The Broadsheet, Money and SmartMoney.
More stories like this are available on bloomberg.com/opinion
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India Today
2 hours ago
- India Today
PM Modi 3.0: A resounding mandate for a stronger, bolder, rising Bharat
When Prime Minister Narendra Modi took oath on June 9, 2024, for a historic third consecutive term, he didn't just make history, he shattered every political myth built by the opposition over the last decade. In a post-COVID world where no major global leader could return to power, Modi emerged not only victorious but undefeated and unshaken. In a country where no Prime Minister in the last 50 years had achieved three consecutive terms, the people once again placed their full trust in one man, Narendra Modi 3.0, India's internal and external security has undergone a tectonic shift. The days of reacting to terror with dossiers and diplomatic notes are over. Today, terror is answered with tactical precision and overwhelming force. The world watched as Operation Sindoor redefined India's war doctrine. Nine cross-border terror hubs, linked to 25 years of attacks on India and other nations, were dismantled. Over 100 terrorists were neutralised. This was not mere retribution; it was a clear change in India's war doctrine: India now treats any act of terror as an act of war. This transformation was further strengthened by the deployment of indigenously built defence systems like Akashteer, a symbol of India's growing military self-reliance. Defence exports, which were Rs 686 crore in 2013, have surged past Rs 23,000 crore in 2025, with more than 90 countries now sourcing India's defence technology. India is no longer just a defender but a global supplier of milestones have followed in step with these security achievements. What past regimes promised for 2047, Modi 3.0 delivered in 2025. India is now a $4 trillion economy, the world's fourth-largest, proving that with vision and resolve, timelines can be compressed and milestones accelerated. Foreign exchange reserves have soared to $700 billion, reflecting deep financial resilience. The Purchasing Managers' Index (PMI) stands at a 10-month high, signaling robust industrial growth. In a move that stunned critics and delighted the masses, the Union Budget abolished income tax for incomes up to Rs 12 lakh, a historic relief to India's middle class, igniting a surge in consumption, savings, and investment. This growing economic strength translated into unprecedented political success. In state after state, the BJP-led NDA expanded its footprint, demolishing long-standing political strongholds and rewriting electoral history, all fought and won under Prime Minister Modi's leadership. In Maharashtra, the alliance secured over 79% of assembly seats, reaffirming its grip over India's industrial powerhouse. In Haryana, the BJP achieved the unprecedented feat of forming the government for a third consecutive term. Perhaps the most symbolic breakthrough came in Delhi, where the BJP returned to power after 27 years, ending decades of politics built on populism, freebies, and false promises. These victories were not isolated regional wins; they were united national endorsements for Modi's leadership, fought in his name and sealed by the people's Modi 3.0 government has also demonstrated political strength by passing some of the most contentious bills in recent history with absolute authority and without disruption in both Houses of Parliament. The Waqf Amendment Bill, long suppressed under layers of political appeasement, was decisively enacted to restore land rights and dignity to neglected Muslim sects, especially Muslim women, ending decades of the bold announcement of a nationwide Caste Census alongside the decadal census, Modi 3.0 shattered the status quo. Previous regimes merely exploited the caste census as a cynical vote-bank tool; this government seized it as a powerful instrument for data-driven governance, evidence-based policymaking, and true social empowerment, boldly moving beyond divisive politics.A major step towards long-term reform came when the Cabinet approved the long-pending One Nation, One Election proposal. This reform, long overdue, promises to eliminate policy stagnation, reduce election costs, and ensure smoother governance nationwide. Only a government with political will and a long-term vision could push this internal security story is no less remarkable. Once infamous as a Left-Wing Extremism hub, Bastar is now nearly free from Naxal terror. Through a combination of precise operations, development initiatives, and inclusive governance, the government has broken the backbone of the red corridor. The promise to make India entirely Naxal-free is no longer a slogan, it is rapidly becoming a reality. The number of LWE-affected districts reduced from 126 to 90 in April 2018, 70 in July 2021, and further to 38 in April 2024. Out of the total Naxalism-affected districts, the number of the most affected districts has been reduced from 12 to projects, too, tell a story of transformation. From the strategic Wadhwan port to the ambitious Polavaram Project, from the engineering marvel of the Chenab Bridge, the world's highest railway bridge, to the Z-Morh tunnel enhancing border connectivity, India is witnessing the largest and most integrated infrastructure revolution since Independence. These are not mere construction efforts, they are milestones in term is not just about continuity but marks a new high watermark in India's journey. Modi 3.0 is firmer in resolve, sharper in delivery, and more unstoppable in ambition. With unparalleled political capital, global credibility, and the unshakable trust of the people, this government is rewriting the rules of governance, redefining national security, and reimagining India's opposition leaders were saying that Modi 3.0 wouldn't match the momentum of his earlier terms. But PM Modi 3.0 emerges as a resounding mandate for a stronger, bolder, rising Bharat has proven otherwise, emerging as a more assertive, far-reaching, and visionary phase of leadership. With greater political consolidation, bold reforms, and a renewed national agenda, this third term is not just continuing the legacy but accelerating it, reaffirming the people's enduring trust in Modi's leadership.(Pradeep Bhandari is the national spokesperson of the Bharatiya Janata Party.) (Views expressed in this opinion piece are those of the author)Must Watch


Mint
4 hours ago
- Mint
Hedge Funds Face California Rebuke Over Role in Wildfire Claims
(Bloomberg) -- Hedge funds are facing pushback in California as their bets tied to insurance claims stemming from the Los Angeles wildfires are attacked as unethical. The transactions in focus are tied to so-called subrogation claims, which hedge funds, private equity firms and other alternative investment managers have been buying from insurers over the past few months. Subrogation kicks in if a third party such as a utility is suspected of being responsible for losses covered by insurers. Hedge funds buying these claims from insurers are now under attack from the California Earthquake Authority, which is the administrator of the California Wildfire Fund. It has described such transactions as 'opportunistic, profit-driven investment speculation,' and says it's planning to take on 'hedge funds and other speculators' that it claims 'are actively seeking to profit from California's devastating wildfire catastrophes.' In practice, that means the authority will try to block the payout of what it says could end up being 'billions of dollars' to the investors that bought the claims, according to materials prepared ahead of a meeting that took place last month with the California Catastrophe Response Council, which oversees the fund. To that end, it plans to engage California's state legislature, according to a transcript of comments made during the meeting and seen by Bloomberg. A spokesperson for the authority declined to comment. Bradley Max, a director at Cherokee Acquisition, a New York-based investment bank that trades and invests in subrogation claims, says the development has 'put a chill on bidding,' which is already visible in pricing. Subrogation rights tied to the Eaton Fire that ripped through Southern California in January were trading as high as 50 cents on the dollar at one point, but have now dropped 'at least a few points lower,' Max said. Still, even though the political development has led to lower prices on the subrogation claims, it hasn't held back transactions, he said. Cherokee said in April it had brokered deals linked to the Los Angeles fires for 'larger, more sophisticated distressed debt hedge funds.' And by April 15, investment bank Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. had executed 10 transactions tied to the Eaton and Palisades fires totaling over $1 billion worth of recovery rights, Ronald Ryder, co-head of special assets at Oppenheimer, told the California Earthquake Authority. That includes over $125 million in claims traded in just one day, Ryder wrote. A spokesperson for Oppenheimer declined to comment. Cherokee didn't name the hedge funds for which it brokered deals. In an email to the California Earthquake Authority, Ryder said that as catastrophic weather events become 'more prevalent,' insurers are increasingly resorting to 'recovery subrogation in the secondary market to fortify the balance sheet.' There's a growing consensus that insurers can't cover the rising costs of weather-related catastrophes alone, especially as climate change fuels more extreme events. For that reason, the industry is looking for ways to shift part of its financial risk over to capital markets, with alternative asset managers often the only investor class willing to step in. Efforts to prevent investors from profiting from the subrogation claims they've bought represent 'a politically motivated attempt to not pay legitimate obligations,' Max at Cherokee said. They're 'trying to beat up deep-pocketed hedge funds, despite the ethical and legal implications,' he said. Recovery of subrogation claims is costly and can take years to play out, which is why insurers have started selling them in exchange for an upfront cash payment. The hedge funds buying them are betting that the recovery sum at the end of the process will exceed the amount they paid the insurer to buy the claim. The market for investing in subrogation claims is characterized by over-the-counter deals with little to no transparency. Subrogation deals had a seminal moment more than half a decade ago, when faulty power lines and equipment failures at California utility PG&E Corp. were blamed for wildfires in the state. Back then, hedge fund Baupost Group LLC purchased claims against PG&E worth $6.8 billion. Bloomberg has previously reported that Baupost may have generated an estimated $1 billion of profits. The California Wildfire Fund, which is administered by the state's Earthquake Authority and overseen by the California Catastrophe Response Council, was set up in 2019 to help reimburse claims arising from wildfires caused by utility companies. If hedge funds prevail in their subrogation claims, some of the money could end up coming from the California Wildfire Fund. The fund, which sits on about $13 billion in liquid assets, is partly capitalized by three utilities — San Diego Gas & Electric Co., Edison International's Southern California Edison and PG&E. While the cause of the January fires remains under investigation, it's already clear that the Eaton Fire started inside the service territory of Edison and therefore leaves the fund potentially exposed, the authority said. With current estimates for insured losses as high as $45 billion, the January Southern California wildfires are expected to be the costliest in US history, according to the California Earthquake Authority. The Earthquake Authority and Catastrophe Response Council are now reviewing claims and administration procedures as they take the matter to the state legislature. More stories like this are available on


Hindustan Times
4 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Iran says no sanctions relief in US nuclear proposal
Iran's parliament speaker said on Sunday that the latest US proposal for a nuclear deal does not include the lifting of sanctions, state media reported as negotiations appear to have hit a roadblock. The two foes have held five rounds of Omani-mediated talks since April, seeking to replace a landmark agreement between Tehran and world powers that set restrictions on Iran's nuclear activities in return for sanctions relief, before US President Donald Trump abandoned the accord during his first term in 2018. In a video aired on Iranian state TV, parliament speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf said that "the US plan does not even mention the lifting of sanctions". He called it a sign of dishonesty, accusing the Americans of seeking to impose a "unilateral" agreement that Tehran would not accept. "The delusional US president should know better and change his approach if he is really looking for a deal," Ghalibaf said. On May 31, after the fifth round of talks, Iran said it had received "elements" of a US proposal, with officials later taking issue with "ambiguities" in the draft text. The US and its Western allies have long accused the Islamic republic of seeking to acquire nuclear weapons, a charge Iran has consistently denied, insisting that its atomic programme was solely for peaceful purposes. Key issues in the negotiations have been the removal of biting economic sanctions and uranium enrichment. Tehran says it has the right to enrich uranium under the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, while the Trump administration has called any Iranian enrichment a "red line". Trump, who has revived his "maximum pressure" campaign of sanction on Iran since taking office in January, has repeatedly said it will not be allowed any uranium enrichment under a potential deal. On Tuesday, Iran's top negotiator, Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, said the country "will not ask anyone for permission to continue enriching uranium". According to the UN nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency , Iran is the only non-nuclear-weapon state in the world that enriches uranium up to 60 percent still short of the 90 percent threshold needed for a nuclear warhead. Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei on Wednesday rejected the latest US proposal and said enrichment was "key" to Iran's nuclear programme. The IAEA Board of Governors is scheduled to meet in Vienna later this month and discuss Iran's nuclear activities. pdm/ami