Peruvian president avoids impeachment over 'Rolexgate' scandal
A congressional committee in Peru has dismissed an investigation into President Dina Boluarte over allegations she accepted Rolex watches as bribes.
The decision by the subcommittee means Boluarte - whose approval ratings are in single digits - is shielded from impeachment proceedings while in power.
However, she could potentially still face charges when she leaves office next year and loses her presidential immunity.
The corruption inquiry, dubbed "Rolexgate", saw her home raided by police in March 2024, with authorities searching for more than a dozen luxury watches Boluarte had allegedly not declared.
The investigation began after a news report drew attention to luxury watches she wore at public events.
The raid took place after prosecutors refused her request for more time to respond to a subpoena requesting her to provide proof of purchase for her watches. The government palace was also raided.
Peru's government last year described the raid as "disproportionate and unconstitutional".
Boluarte had insisted she entered government "with clean hands" and that she would "leave it with clean hands", claiming her Rolex was an old item that she bought with the proceeds of working since she was 18.
The president also faces a separate probe over an unannounced two-week absence in 2023 for a nose surgery during which she did not delegate powers.
Boluarte became president after her predecessor, Pedro Castillo, was impeached when he tried to dissolve Congress and rule by decree.
Dozens of people were killed in clashes following Castillo's ousting during violent protests demanding Boluarte step down.
The next presidential and legislative elections will be held in April 2026.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
14 minutes ago
- Fox News
Rep. Alford to introduce congressional stock trading ban mirroring Senate's 'PELOSI Act'
FIRST ON FOX: Rep. Mark Alford, R-Mo., on Wednesday will introduce legislation that would ban congressional stock trading, serving as the House companion bill to Sen. Josh Hawley's, R-Mo., "PELOSI Act" in the Senate. Alford's proposed bill would ban lawmakers and their spouses from holding, purchasing or selling individual stocks while in office, but it allows investments in diversified mutual funds, exchange-traded funds or U.S. Treasury bonds. If passed, current lawmakers would have 180 days to comply with the legislation. Likewise, newly elected lawmakers must achieve compliance within 180 days of entering office. "As public servants, we should hold ourselves to a higher standard and avoid the mere appearance of corruption," Alford said in a statement. "Unfortunately, too many members of Congress are engaging in suspicious stock trades based on non-public information to enrich themselves." "These gross violations of the public trust make clear: we must finally take action to ban members and their spouses from owning or selling individual stocks," he added. Under the proposed legislation, lawmakers who continue to make wrongful transactions would be required to hand over any profits they made to the U.S. Treasury Department. The House or Senate ethics committees could also impose a fine on such lawmakers amounting to 10% of each wrongful transaction. House Speaker Mike Johnson endorsed a stock trading ban on Wednesday, saying "a few bad actors" have ruined Americans' trust in lawmakers on the issue. "You want me to tell you my honest opinion on that? I'm in favor of that, because I don't think we should have any appearance of impropriety here," he told reporters during a press conference. President Donald Trump himself endorsed the same ban for members of Congress in an interview with Time magazine last month. "I watched Nancy Pelosi get rich through insider information, and I would be okay with it. If they send that to me, I would do it," he said of a trading ban. "You'll sign it?" the reporter pressed. "Absolutely," Trump responded. Democrats in the House of Representatives have also expressed support for a ban, with House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., throwing his weight behind the proposal last week.
USA Today
25 minutes ago
- USA Today
Trump agrees with longtime rival Elizabeth Warren on need to abolish the cap on US debt
Trump agrees with longtime rival Elizabeth Warren on need to abolish the cap on US debt Eliminating the federal limit on government borrowing would remove one hurdle to congressional approval of the Trump's package of major policy priorities for tax cuts and border security. Show Caption Hide Caption Moody's pushes US out of top triple-A rating club, citing debt Moody's downgraded the U.S. sovereign credit rating on May 16 due to concerns about the nation's growing $36-trillion debt pile, in a move that could complicate President Donald Trump's efforts to cut taxes and send ripples through global markets. Trump agreed with Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., that the country should abolish the federal limit on borrowing. After credit-rating agencies downgraded the U.S. government, Trump said the debt limit should be scrapped to avoid economic catastrophe. WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump announced he agrees with a longtime antagonist, Democratic Sen. Elizabeth Warren, on the need to abolish the cap on the country's borrowing. The announcement marked a thaw in years-long criticism that Trump and Warren of Massachusetts have hurled at each other over government finances and other issues. The rare consensus came as Congress faces the need to raise the country's debt limit again, a hurdle to approving an 1,100-page package of Trump's priorities for tax cuts and border security. The United States is nearly $37 trillion in debt and every time it approaches the limit on borrowing set by Congress, lawmakers must take a painful vote to raise it or risk being unable to pay bills. More: When is the debt ceiling deadline? What happens when the US reaches debt limit Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has warned the country will reach the cap in August. A provision to increase the limit was included in the House-passed package of Trump's priorities. The two-term Republican president lashed out this week at Sen. Rand Paul, R-Kentucky, who opposes the House bill and called for a separate vote on the debt limit. The debt limit is largely procedural because Congress has always voted to increase it. But the vote every few years becomes a cudgel against members of the governing party because approval contributes to the appearance of unbridled spending. Congress imposed a debt limit in 1939 to modernize federal financing, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service. But political disputes about the accumulation of debt and difficulties raising the limit led credit-rating agencies to lower their grades for the federal government. The debate is another example of strange bedfellows in U.S. politics. Trump has derisively called Warren 'Pocahontas' for previously claiming Native American heritage. But Warren posted on social media May 30 that she agreed with Trump that 'the debt limit should be scrapped to prevent an economic catastrophe.' Trump endorsed the proposal in a social media post June 4 and said he was 'very pleased to announce' that he agreed with her. 'The Debt Limit should be entirely scrapped to prevent an Economic catastrophe,' Trump said. 'It is too devastating to be put in the hands of political people that may want to use it despite the horrendous effect it could have on our Country and, indirectly, even the World.'
Fox News
27 minutes ago
- Fox News
Sen. Tim Scott expresses confidence about codifying DOGE cuts
All times eastern Making Money with Charles Payne The Evening Edit with Elizabeth Macdonald FOX News Radio Live Channel Coverage WATCH LIVE: House DOGE subcommittee holds hearing to expose NGOs' use of funds
