Harvard students slam latest Trump visa ban
NEW YORK: Donald Trump's late night proclamation blocking Harvard's new international students has sparked fear and anger among existing students left in limbo amid the escalating showdown between the president and their university.
Alfred Williamson, a Welsh-Danish physics and government student in his second year at Harvard, said he was 'clinging onto the hope that Harvard will win this fight and that I will get to return next semester.'
Harvard had won a reprieve from a judge who paused an earlier bid by Trump to revoke the university's ability to sponsor the school's large international student population -- 27 percent of the total.
'Then the Trump administration does whatever it can to crush those dreams,' Williamson, 20, told AFP of Trump's proclamation Wednesday alleging that 'Harvard's conduct has rendered it an unsuitable destination for foreign students and researchers' and also threatened existing international students with visa cancellations.
'This represents another authoritarian instance of executive overreach, which punishes international students for attending a university that refuses to bow down to the administration,' said Williamson who is vacationing outside the United States.
He said 'Trump is targeting Harvard because it has the integrity to stand up to his unlawful and un-American demands.'
Harvard has been at the forefront of Trump's campaign against top universities after it defied his calls to submit to oversight of its curriculum, staffing, student recruitment and 'viewpoint diversity.'
The government already cut around $3.2 billion of federal grants and contracts benefiting Harvard and pledged to exclude the Cambridge, Massachusetts, institution from any future federal funding while threatening its tax-exempt status.
Harvard did not respond to calls for comment Thursday, but said Wednesday that Trump's proclamation was 'retaliatory.'
A graduate student at the Harvard Kennedy School of Government from India who declined to be named said: 'I just read this latest news. We have not received anything from Harvard yet, but this isn't surprising -- albeit concerning.'
'I knew it was going to be a long summer.'
- 'Grab for power' -
One international student who declined to be named for fear of retribution raised the plight of international students who had moved their lives to Harvard, leaving for the summer break, and now faced uncertainty following Trump's order.
'What about students who went home for the summer? There's a risk they won't be able to come back,' said the student who is currently seeking to renew their own visa.
Legal experts say a legal challenge from Harvard is all but inevitable.
'In response to the proclamation, we foresee Harvard University pursuing similar legal action by filing a lawsuit in federal court and seeking a preliminary injunction to temporarily block enforcement,' said Laura Devine Immigration attorney Khensani Mathebula.
'In parallel, the university will need to act quickly on an administrative level to explore options for its international student population.'
A US Harvard student of government going into her fourth year who is friends with many international students, Olivia Data, said 'this news is heartbreaking and scary.'
'Our friends and classmates are being used as collateral in a dictator's grab for power, and none of us know where it will end or whether our university can protect its students in our current political system,' she said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
44 minutes ago
- The Star
Trump tariffs may remain in effect while appeals proceed, US Appeals court decides
U.S. President Donald Trump holds a chart as he delivers remarks on tariffs in the Rose Garden at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., April 2, 2025. REUTERS/Carlos Barria/File Photo A federal appeals court allowed President Donald Trump's most sweeping tariffs to remain in effect on Tuesday while it reviews a lower court decision blocking them on grounds that Trump had exceeded his authority by imposing them. The decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington, D.C. means Trump may continue to enforce, for now, his "Liberation Day" tariffs on imports from most U.S. trading partners, as well as a separate set of tariffs levied on Canada, China and Mexico. The appeals court has yet to rule on whether the tariffs are permissible under an emergency economic powers act that Trump cited to justify them, but it allowed the tariffs to remain in place while the appeals play out. The tariffs, used by Trump as negotiating leverage with U.S. trading partners, and their on-again, off-again nature have shocked markets and whipsawed companies of all sizes as they seek to manage supply chains, production, staffing and prices. The ruling has no impact on other tariffs levied under more traditional legal authority, such as tariffs on steel and aluminum imports. A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of International Trade ruled on May 28 that the U.S. Constitution gave Congress, not the president, the power to levy taxes and tariffs, and that the president had exceeded his authority by invoking the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, a law intended to address "unusual and extraordinary" threats during national emergencies. The Trump administration quickly appealed the ruling, and the Federal Circuit in Washington put the lower court decision on hold the next day while it considered whether to impose a longer-term pause. The ruling came in a pair of lawsuits, one filed by the nonpartisan Liberty Justice Center on behalf of five small U.S. businesses that import goods from countries targeted by the duties and the other by 12 U.S. states. Trump has claimed broad authority to set tariffs under IEEPA. The 1977 law has historically been used to impose sanctions on enemies of the U.S. or freeze their assets. Trump is the first U.S. president to use it to impose tariffs. Trump has said that the tariffs imposed in February on Canada, China and Mexico were to fight illegal fentanyl trafficking at U.S. borders, denied by the three countries, and that the across-the-board tariffs on all U.S. trading partners imposed in April were a response to the U.S. trade deficit. The states and small businesses had argued the tariffs were not a legal or appropriate way to address those matters, and the small businesses argued that the decades-long U.S. practice of buying more goods than it exports does not qualify as an emergency that would trigger IEEPA. At least five other court cases have challenged the tariffs justified under the emergency economic powers act, including other small businesses and the state of California. One of those cases, in federal court in Washington, D.C., also resulted in an initial ruling against the tariffs, and no court has yet backed the unlimited emergency tariff authority Trump has claimed. - Reuters
The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
Govt revokes mining permits in Raja Ampat after outcry
Natural beauty: An aerial shot of the islands around Raja Ampat. — AFP THE government revoked permits yesterday for four of the five mining companies operating in the eastern archipelago of Raja Ampat after activists shared videos of islands damaged by nickel extraction. The cluster of islands and shoals in South West Papua Province sits in the Coral Triangle and is thought to be one of the world's most pristine reefs, with its clear blue waters making it a popular diving spot. Last week, Greenpeace Indonesia published videos highlighting nickel mining projects on three islands, including one which racked up more than 15 million Instagram views. President Prabowo Subianto 'decided that the government will revoke the mining business license of four companies in Raja Ampat', state secretariat minister Prasetyo Hadi said. Energy and mineral resources minister Bahlil Lahadalia said 'they have violated' regulations. 'We believe this region must be protected,' he said. Greenpeace said nickel exploitation on the islands of Gag, Kawe and Manuran had led to the destruction of more than 500 hectares of forest and vegetation. It led to growing calls for the licences to be withdrawn from politicians and celebrities. Indonesia has the world's largest nickel reserves and is the biggest producer of the metal, which is used in electric vehicle batteries and stainless steel. Greenpeace Indonesia said the decision was a good start but further action was needed. — AFP
New Straits Times
an hour ago
- New Straits Times
ICE's tactics draw criticism as it triples daily arrest targets
MIGRANT workers picked up at a well-known Italian restaurant in San Diego. A high school volleyball player detained and held for deportation after a traffic stop in Massachusetts. Courthouse arrests of people who entered the US legally and were not hiding. US Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers (ICE) have been intensifying efforts in recent weeks to deliver on Republican President Donald Trump's promise of record-level deportations. The White House has demanded the agency sharply increase arrests of migrants in the US illegally, sources have told Reuters. That has meant changing tactics to achieve higher quotas of 3,000 arrests per day, far above the earlier target of 1,000 per day. Community members and Democrats have pushed back, arguing that ICE is targeting people indiscriminately and stoking fear. Tensions boiled over in Los Angeles over the weekend when protesters took to the streets after ICE arrested migrants at Home Depot stores, a garment factory and a warehouse, according to migrant advocates. "It seems like they're just arresting people they think might be in the country without status and amenable to deportation," said Julia Gelatt, associate director of the US immigration policy programme at the nonpartisan Migration Policy Institute. The apparent shift further undercuts the Trump administration message that they are focused on the "worst of the worst" criminal offenders, and suggests they are pursuing more people solely on the basis of immigration violations. Trump's border czar, Tom Homan, told Reuters in late May that the administration had deported around 200,000 people over four months. The total lags deportations during a similar period under former President Joe Biden, who faced higher levels of illegal immigration and quickly deported many recent crossers. ICE's operations appeared to intensify after Stephen Miller, a top White House official and the architect of Trump's immigration agenda, excoriated senior ICE officials in a late May meeting over what he said were insufficient arrests. During the meeting, Miller said ICE should pick up any immigration offenders and not worry about targeted operations that focus on criminals or other priorities for deportation, three people familiar with the matter said, requesting anonymity to share the details. Miller said ICE should target stores where migrant workers often congregate, such as the home improvement retailer Home Depot and 7-Eleven convenience stores, two of the people said. The message was "all about the numbers, not the level of criminality," one of the people said. Miller did not seem to be taking into account the complexities of immigration enforcement, one former ICE official said. In Los Angeles, for example, a 2024 court decision limits ICE's ability to knock on doors to make immigration arrests and local law enforcement does not cooperate fully with federal immigration authorities. "The numbers they want are just not possible in a place like L.A. unless you go to day labourer sites and arrest every illegal alien," the former ICE official said. A DHS spokesperson said ICE officers executed criminal search warrants at the restaurant in San Diego; that the high school volleyball player in Massachusetts was subject to deportation; and that courthouse arrests were aimed at speeding up removals of migrants who entered under Biden. On Sunday, more than a hundred people gathered outside the jail in Butler County, Ohio, to protest the detention of Emerson Colindres, 19, a standout soccer player from Honduras who graduated from high school in May. Colindres, who has been in the US since he was 8 years old, was being monitored via an ICE "alternatives to detention" programme that uses cell phone calls, ankle bracelets and other devices to track people. He received a text message to come in for an appointment last week and was taken into custody on arrival. Colindres was ordered deported after his family's asylum claim was denied, but he had been appearing for regular check-ins and had a pending visa application, his mother, Ada Baquedano, said in an interview. "They want to deport him, but he knows nothing about our country," she said. "He's been here since he was very little." The DHS spokesperson said Colindres had a final deportation order and that too many people with such orders had previously been placed on alternatives to detention. "If you are in the country illegally and a judge has ordered you to be removed, that is precisely what will happen," the spokesperson said. The Migration Policy Institute's Gelatt said detaining people at ICE check-ins will help the agency boost arrest numbers. But these are often people who are already cooperating with ICE and could cost more to detain.
