India's Modi Directly Calls Out Trump Over His Ceasefire Brag
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi has challenged President Donald Trump over his public boast that he was behind a ceasefire brokered last month between India and Pakistan.
Modi called Trump on Tuesday night from the sidelines of the G7 summit in Canada, which the Indian PM is attending as a guest, and called him out for his claim that the U.S. was involved in mediation between the South Asian nuclear rivals who were on the brink of a full-blown war.
A White House official confirmed to the Daily Beast that the call took place.
'PM Modi clearly told President Trump that during this entire incident, at no time, at any level, were there any talks on issues like India-U.S. trade deal or mediation between India and Pakistan through America,' Indian Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri announced in a video statement.
'PM Modi stressed that India has never accepted mediation, does not accept it, and will never accept it.'
'Talks for ceasing military action happened directly between India and Pakistan through existing military channels, and on the insistence of Pakistan. Prime Minister Modi emphasised that India has not accepted mediation in the past and will never do,' Misri said.
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi called President Donald Trump on the sidelines of the G7 summit in Canada. / Kevin Lamarque / REUTERS
Trump claimed on his Truth Social platform on May 10 that 'India and Pakistan have agreed to a FULL AND IMMEDIATE CEASEFIRE' after 'a long night of talks mediated by the United States.'
The president added: 'Congratulations to both Countries on using Common Sense and Great Intelligence.'
The Daily Beast has reached out to the White House for comment.
The conflict between India and Pakistan was triggered by a deadly attack on tourists in Indian-controlled Kashmir on April 22. The brutal assault at a popular scenic meadow in the town of Pahalgam in the Himalayan mountains left at least 26 tourists dead and 17 more wounded.
In response, India launched missile strikes, ratcheting tensions up between the nations to their highest levels in more than two decades.
At the time, Trump delivered a casual response to the escalating crisis, calling it 'a shame.'
'Just heard about it,' Trump said at the Oval Office on May 7. 'I guess people knew something was going to happen based on a little bit of the past. They've been fighting for a long time.'
Trump then added: 'I just hope it ends very quickly.'
His claim that the U.S. had helped broker a ceasefire came days after that.
Donald Trump claimed that the U.S. was involved in mediation between the nuclear rivals who were on the brink of a full-blown war. / REUTERS/Nathan Howard
Indian officials also swiftly shot down Trump's claim last month that U.S. trade pressure helped bring about a ceasefire between India and Pakistan, contradicting the president's version of events.
'I said, come on, we're going to do a lot of trade with you guys. Let's stop it. Let's stop it,' Trump told reporters at the White House on May 12, referring to talks with both India and Pakistan. 'If you stop it, we're doing trade. If you don't stop it, we're not going to do any trade.'
But Indian officials told reporters trade never came up in any of the conversations with U.S. officials leading up to the ceasefire with Pakistan, Bloomberg reported, adding that the claim left senior figures furious. Trump's remarks were seen as not only upstaging Modi but also undermining India's longstanding position that the Kashmir dispute must be resolved directly between India and Pakistan, without any foreign involvement.
Trump and Modi's phone call Tuesday was their first direct contact since the India-Pakistan conflict.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Saskatchewan government plans to extend life of coal plants: Minister
REGINA — Saskatchewan's government says it's planning to extend the life of the province's coal plants before moving to nuclear power generation. Crown Investments Corporation Minister Jeremy Harrison says in a letter to SaskPower employees that the decision will maintain jobs while keeping electricity affordable and reliable. Harrison did not provide details on the costs of the plan or timelines, but says the province will explore the viability of adding carbon capture units. The province already operates the units at the Boundary Dam Power Station, which has sometimes struggled to meet carbon capture targets. SaskPower, the province's electrical utility, operates three coal-fired plants and some units were scheduled to go offline in the coming years. The province signed a deal with Ottawa in 2019 recognizing some units could run beyond the phaseout deadline of 2030, but Harrison says Saskatchewan has constitutional authority over electricity generation. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 18, 2025. Jeremy Simes, The Canadian Press Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
New York Post
26 minutes ago
- New York Post
Keep the focus on stopping Iran's nukes — ‘regime change' is too risky a game
Regime change in Iran may wind up happening as a result of the current conflict, but it's absolutely to be avoided as a goal. In particular, don't let Israel's difficulties in completely destroying Tehran's nuclear program lead to mission creep or any moving of the goalposts — even though the central problem is the ayatollahs who'd have their fingers on the buttons. No civilized human of good will would shed a tear for the Islamic Republic, but Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya have shown the perils of ousting an entire regime without clear, practical ideas for what comes next — and that our ability to steer another country's course is extremely limited. Trying to impose the shah's heir, or any group of exiles, as a new government seems guaranteed to fail, as Washington doesn't know enough (or can't make effective use of what it does know) to pull off some miraculous coup. President Donald Trump certainly won't be sending in US ground troops, nor will any Western nation so intervene; it's hard to see even any of Iran's neighbors taking that risk (though some might aim to bite off some bits of territory). Yet keeping reasonable order in Iran has to be a priority for the rest of the world: It's not only a major oil and gas exporter in its own right, it's positioned to shut off the Strait of Hormuz, through which a fifth of the planet's energy now passes. Serious disorder in Iran, such as a civil war, risks destabilizing (among others) Iraq, Turkey and nuclear-armed Pakistan — none of which is completely stable now. Meanwhile, Moscow and (especially) Beijing would be looking to guard their own interests, and spread their influence — more bad news for the West. All of this argues for Washington doing what it can to prevent the conflict from creating a total power vacuum in Tehran. Get opinions and commentary from our columnists Subscribe to our daily Post Opinion newsletter! Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters Israel has every right and military need to keep knocking out the regime's missile capabilities, its top generals and so on; eviscerating the Republican Guard is beyond legit — but leaving Iran with enough civic skeleton for some new interim government to rapidly form seems a must. Oddly enough, this is an added argument for Washington joining Israel's campaign as far as dropping those bunker-busters on the Fordow nuke site: Taking out Tehran's nuclear program is the overriding goal here; getting the job finished fast may be the best way to limit the damage to the rest of the country. Yet it's also a reason for Iran's current rulers to give in and give up on their nuclear dreams: The risk they'll be ousted grows every day the bombing continues. Trump's instincts are solid so far: Iran can't go nuclear, but America won't get bogged down in another forever war; Israel's campaign needs to end successfully and rapidly. Regime change must be left to Iran's own people; trying to impose it from outside is a fool's game.
Washington Post
29 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Eight-foot-tall ‘Dictator Approved' sculpture appears on National Mall
Remember the poop statue? The curly-swirly pile of doo that sat atop a replica of former House speaker Nancy Pelosi's (D-California) desk? The work of protest art placed on the National Mall last October in mock tribute to the Jan. 6 rioters who stormed the U.S. Capitol in an attempt to overturn the 2020 election? Well, the artists responsible for the political poo plop appear to have struck again. This time with a work called 'Dictator Approved,' an 8-foot-tall sculpture showing a gold-painted hand with a distinctive thumbs-up quashing the seafoam green crown of the Statute of Liberty. It sits at the same location on the Mall near Third Street NW as the poop statue did last fall. The artwork's creators intended 'Dictator Approved' as a rejoinder to the June 14 military parade and authoritarianism, according to a permit issued by the National Park Service. The parade, the creators wrote in the application, 'Will feature imagery similar to autocratic, oppressive regime, i.e. N. Korea, Russia, and China, marching through DC.' The purpose of the statue, they continued, is to call attention to 'the praising these types of oppressive leaders have given Donald Trump.' Plaques on the four sides of the artwork's base include quotes from world leaders including Russian President Vladimir Putin ('President Trump is a very bright and talented man.'), Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban ('The most respected, the most feared person is Donald Trump.'), former Brazilian president Jair Bolsonaro ('We do have a great deal of shared values. I admire President Trump.') and North Korea's Kim Jong Un ('Your Excellency.' A 'special' relationship. 'The extraordinary courage of President Trump.'). 'If these Democrat activists were living in a dictatorship, their eye-sore of a sculpture wouldn't be sitting on the National Mall right now,' Abigail Jackson, a White House spokeswoman, wrote in an emailed statement. 'In the United States of America you have the freedom to display your so-called 'art,' no matter how ugly it is.' Mary Harris is listed as the applicant for the permit but no contact information for her was provided. The permit allows the statue to be in place from 7 a.m. June 16 until 5 p.m. June 22. The 'Dictator Approved' statue is very similar in style and materials to the poop statue and several protest artworks placed in the District, Philadelphia and Portland, Oregon, last fall. However, no individual or group has publicly claimed responsibility for those pieces. An unidentified caller and emailer told a Washington Post reporter last year that he was part of the group that worked on the sculptures and provided information about them that only someone who had installed the projects would know, such as when the statues would appear. His identity remains a mystery. On Wednesday he replied to a Washington Post email asking if he was involved with the new statue. 'I have heard about it but not me,' he wrote. He did not respond to additional questions or a request to meet in an Arlington parking garage. Some of the tourists and locals who stopped by the statue between downpours Wednesday afternoon expressed surprise that it was allowed to be placed where it was. And they expressed reservations about weighing in on it publicly. 'I'm amazed that whoever dreamt this up could put this here,' said Kuresa, an 80-year-old from Australia who declined to give his last name because he said as an international visitor he didn't feel comfortable expressing his views. 'It reminds me of 'Animal Farm.'' District resident and retired federal employee Yvette Hatfield stopped by with her dog Max, wearing an adorable raincoat and rain hat, to get a selfie of both of them in front of the statue. Asked why she wanted a photo, Hatfield laughed. 'Because of my political views and that's all I'm going to say.' 'I actually love it,' said another District resident. He declined to give his name because he said his parents and grandparents often told him 'Fools' names, like their faces, are always seen in public places.' He wished the reporter good luck with the story. Francesca Carlo, 20, and Abigail Martin, 21, visiting from Cleveland, happened on the statue just before it started to pour. 'At first I was confused,' Martin said, 'but then I figured it out. I think it's beautiful.' Carlo agreed. She thought the quotes on the plaques could send a message. 'If all these authoritarian politicians approve of our president then maybe people will see a pattern recognition and see where democracy is headed,' she said.
