
Disabled woman ‘killed herself after benefits were incorrectly stopped'
Extracts from notes Jodey Whiting, 42, left for family members were read at the second inquest into her death, in which she said she could not pay her bills and had no food.
An initial inquest into her death in Stockton-on-Tees in 2017 did not consider the actions of the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) in stopping her benefits.
Her mother Joy Dove fought a long legal battle for a second inquest, going all the way to the Court of Appeal.
She told the hearing at Teesside Magistrates' Court how her daughter, who was a mother of nine, including two sets of twins, suffered from a curvature of the spine and was later diagnosed with a brain cyst.
She dealt with chronic pain for years, developed drug dependency and had poor mental health, Teesside Coroner's Court was told on Monday.
Coroner Clare Bailey recorded a conclusion that Ms Whiting's death was suicide 'in the context of a deteriorating mental state, precipitated by the withdrawal of state benefits'.
An Independent Case Examiner (ICE) report into the decision to remove Ms Whiting's benefits found that a number of mistakes had been made, that her payments should not have been withdrawn and it recommended that the DWP pay £10,000 to her family.
Extracts from notes found alongside prescription drugs in her flat were read in court.
Bridget Dolan KC, coroner's counsel, said: 'She wrote about not being able to pay her bills and having no food.
'In some she wrote about feeling breathless and having back pain and trying to pay her bills and being in debt.'
Another note stated: 'I have had enough.'
In a pen portrait, Ms Dove said: 'Her death really impacted on me, and to learn from the ICE reports of the number of failures by the DWP was to play was a further deep shock that I have not recovered from.'
Her father Eric Whiting said in his tribute in court, how she was like the 'Pied Piper' as she always had children around her who adored her.
He added: 'She always saw the fun side of life until her health issues started.'
Her mother agreed that Ms Whiting, who had six grandchildren, became increasingly housebound in the last years of her life.
She had a hospital stay in December 2016 after contracting pneumonia and that meant she missed a letter about her benefits, saying she needed to be medically assessed.
Ms Dove said she reassured her daughter that she would help, telling the inquest: 'I said, don't you worry, we will write in and we will explain how you have been in hospital and you are still convalescing.'
But in January 2017, Ms Whiting was told she had missed the medical assessment and she was therefore judged to be fit to work.
As well as losing her Employment and Support Allowance, she would also lose housing and council tax benefits.
Ms Dove said when she saw her daughter, two days before her death, she was 'shaking and crying' and had threatened to kill herself.
Ms Dove said she was sure that the stress of losing her benefits was the trigger for her to decide to kill herself.
'I know my daughter and I know it was (that),' she told the inquest.
'It was the fact she couldn't find a job, the worry of paying bills and being pushed out after being so vulnerable all those years and years.'
Helga Swidenbank, a DWP director for disability services, said the organisation should have recognised that Ms Whiting had 'good cause' not to attend a health assessment, given her illnesses and mental health concerns.
The witness told the hearing: 'I was not in post at the time but those who I have spoken to are deeply regretful and sorry about what happened.
'There were a number of opportunities to have picked up concerns about Jodey and we are very sorry about that.'
Ms Swidenbank said the organisation was now more focused on people's vulnerabilities, although this remained a 'work in progress'.
She added: 'I understand that there is a culture shift from being process-driven to being much more compassionate.
'We are not there yet, we still have more work to do.'
The coroner cited evidence from psychiatrist Dr Trevor Turner who looked into the background of the case and who said losing her benefits was the 'straw that broke the camel's back'.
Ms Bailey said: 'Dr Turner says, and I accept, that withdrawal of her benefits would have had an acute and pervasive effect on Jodey's mental state given her vulnerability and her emotional instability.'
The coroner added: 'Her actions were in the context of her benefits having been wrongly withdrawn by the DWP in circumstances where there had been five missed opportunities to avoid the significant errors.
'This had the effect of negatively impacting upon her mental health, and was the trigger to her taking a fatal overdose.'
The coroner praised the family's determined campaign to bring about justice, describing their 'perseverance, resilience and dignity.'
After the hearing, Ms Dove said: 'I have always believed that Jodey took her life due to failings by the DWP and today the coroner has confirmed that mistakes made by the DWP in the way they handled Jodey's case caused her death.
'It should not have taken an eight-year fight for justice to get where we are today.
'It has been an uphill battle trying to get answers and accountability, but I would never give up.
'I was determined to keep fighting for justice for Jodey.'
The family's solicitor Merry Varney, from Leigh Day, said: 'Today's conclusion shows the importance of thorough inquests that properly investigate how a death occurred.
'Without them, the dangerous and sometimes deadly way that those unable to work due to ill health or disability are treated by the DWP will remain covered up and unchecked.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


North Wales Live
3 hours ago
- North Wales Live
DWP plans could see thousands of Universal Credit claimants lose almost £100 a week
The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has proposed new plans that could result in thousands of Universal Credit claimants losing nearly £100 each week. Disability Rights UK is battling against government proposals to eliminate access to the health component of Universal Credit, now referred to as the Limited Capability for Work and Work-Related Activity (LCWRA) element, for most adults aged 16-21. This would apply to those within this age bracket who claim the benefit independently. Campaigners argue that if the proposal is approved, almost 110,000 disabled young adults could lose nearly £100 each week, reports Nottinghamshire Live. Contact, a charity that assists families with disabled children, says that this could have a "devastating financial impact not only on disabled young adults who are not in Education, Employment or Training (NEET), but also on many who are in education or low-paid employment". It further states that DWP plans push "disabled young adults and their families further away from employment prospects and further into poverty". The Green Paper recognises that the government needs to "consider what special provisions need to be put in place for those young people where engagement with work or training is not a realistic prospect". The Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, Liz Kendall, stated in a speech on May 21: "Those with the most severe, life-long conditions that will never improve and who can never work will have their Universal Credit protected, including young people aged under 22." However, campaigners argue that the criteria for severe conditions have an "extremely high threshold". The proposed changes are set to take effect in the 2027/28 financial year. The Green Paper is also seeking views on extending Disability Living Allowance (DLA) to 18 year olds, rather than stopping it at 16, a move that has Contact's backing.


Wales Online
3 hours ago
- Wales Online
DWP plans could see thousands of Universal Credit claimants lose almost £100 a week
Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. More info The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has proposed new plans that could result in thousands of Universal Credit claimants losing nearly £100 each week. Disability Rights UK is battling against government proposals to eliminate access to the health component of Universal Credit, now referred to as the Limited Capability for Work and Work-Related Activity (LCWRA) element, for most adults aged 16-21. This would apply to those within this age bracket who claim the benefit independently. Campaigners argue that if the proposal is approved, almost 110,000 disabled young adults could lose nearly £100 each week, reports Nottinghamshire Live. Contact, a charity that assists families with disabled children, says that this could have a "devastating financial impact not only on disabled young adults who are not in Education, Employment or Training (NEET), but also on many who are in education or low-paid employment". It further states that DWP plans push "disabled young adults and their families further away from employment prospects and further into poverty". The Green Paper recognises that the government needs to "consider what special provisions need to be put in place for those young people where engagement with work or training is not a realistic prospect". The Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, Liz Kendall, stated in a speech on May 21: "Those with the most severe, life-long conditions that will never improve and who can never work will have their Universal Credit protected, including young people aged under 22." However, campaigners argue that the criteria for severe conditions have an "extremely high threshold". The proposed changes are set to take effect in the 2027/28 financial year. The Green Paper is also seeking views on extending Disability Living Allowance (DLA) to 18 year olds, rather than stopping it at 16, a move that has Contact's backing. Sign up for the North Wales Live newsletter sent twice daily to your inbox Find out what's happening near you


The Guardian
16 hours ago
- The Guardian
Group stranded with Ice in Djibouti shipping container after removal from US
A group of men removed from the US to Djibouti, in east Africa, are stranded in a converted shipping container together with the US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Ice) officers sent to supervise them after a deportation flight to South Sudan was stopped by an American court. The eight deportees and 13 Ice staff have begun to 'feel ill', the US government said. Eight men, from Latin America, Asia and South Sudan, and the Ice staff have been stuck at a US naval base since late May. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) said that the Ice officers began to fall ill 'within 72 hours of landing' in Djibouti, and continue to suffer from suspected bacterial upper respiratory infections. The Trump administration had attempted to send the eight detainees, who it said had been convicted of criminal offenses, to South Sudan, but a judge intervened to stop their flight in May, arguing that they were entitled to challenge the deportation in the courts. Mellissa Harper, a top official at the DHS and Ice, said in a court declaration that the detainees are being held in a shipping container that was previously converted into a conference room. The Ice officers are 'sharing very limited sleeping quarters', Harper said, with only six beds between 13 people. In the declaration, Harper said burn pits in Djibouti have led to Ice officials experiencing 'throat irritation'. She said the outside temperature frequently exceeds 100F (38C) in the daytime, and said Ice officials were at risk of malaria because they did not take anti-malaria medication before arriving in Djibouti. 'Within 72 hours of landing in Djibouti, the officers and detainees began to feel ill,' Harper said, but they are unable to obtain proper testing for a diagnosis. Harper added: 'Upon arrival in Djibouti, officers were warned by US Department of Defense officials of imminent danger of rocket attacks from terrorist groups in Yemen. The Ice officers lack body armor or other gear that would be appropriate in the case of an attack.' The declaration detailed the conditions that the detainees face, including only being allowed to shower once a day, and being subjected to 'pat-downs and searches' during trips to the restroom, which is 40 yards from the shipping container where they are being held. Harper said there is limited lighting in the area, 'which makes visibility difficult and creates a significant security risk for both the officers and aliens'. The Trump administration had attempted to send the eight men to their home countries of Myanmar, Cuba, Vietnam, Laos, Mexico and South Sudan. Those countries declined to accept them, however, and US authorities then arranged to fly them to South Sudan in late May. Brian Murphy, a US district judge in Boston, intervened, ruling that the administration had 'unquestionably' violated his earlier order, issued in April, which ruled that anyone being deported to third-party countries had the right to challenge it legally.