
Who was David Souter? Former US Supreme Court Justice dead at 85
Former US Supreme Court Justice
David Souter
has died "peacefully" at his home in New Hampshire at the age of 85. In 1990, Justice Souter came into the spotlight after President George HW Bush appointed him to the court. He eventually stepped down in 2009 after completing more than 19 years in the service.
#Operation Sindoor
India-Pakistan Clash Live Updates| Missiles, shelling, and attacks — here's all that's happening
Pakistani Air Force jet shot down in Pathankot by Indian Air Defence: Sources
India on high alert: What's shut, who's on leave, and state-wise emergency measures
The retired Associate Justice breathed his last on Thursday (May 8), according to a statement by the US Supreme Court, issued on Friday morning. However, the cause of death was not mentioned in the official release.
Who was Justice David H. Souter?
Born on September 17, 1939, he belonged to the Melrose town in Massachusetts. Souter was a Harvard Law School graduate, besides studying at the prestigious Oxford University as well. The Rhodes scholar completed his graduation in 1966 and then shifted back to New Hampshire's Concord. Thereafter, he did his law practice at the Orr and Reno firm until 1968.
Continue to video
5
5
Next
Stay
Playback speed
1x Normal
Back
0.25x
0.5x
1x Normal
1.5x
2x
5
5
/
Skip
Ads by
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Modern and Economic Container Houses in the Philippines: 2025 Prices and Models
LocalPlan
Learn More
Undo
He was named the region's Deputy Attorney General in 1971. Few years later, he was appointed as New Hampshire's Attorney General, in 1976. With time, Souter's rank continued to rise. Some of the other positions he held were Associate Justice of the Superior Court as well as the Associate Justice of the state's Supreme Court (1983).
David Souter appointed to Supreme Court by the then-President
In 1990, then US President George H.W. Bush chose Justice Souter when William Brennan announced his retirement from the top judicial body, according to Reuters.
Live Events
Back then, not much was known about his personal views on several key issues, especially abortion rights. While "the litmus test approach" was not applied, Bush had praised him as a "remarkable judge of keen intellect".
Dubbed a "stealth nominee" at his Senate confirmation hearings, Souter later became a favourite for the American liberals. He is said to have left several conservatives disappointed when he backed the abortion rights in a major ruling in 1992.
The right to abortion got reaffirmed through the decision under the 1973 Roe vs Wade. The conservatives were unhappy as they hoped the panel would overturn the earlier order. But, they instead ended up setting new standard barring regulations. This imposed "undue burden" on the ability of a woman to obtain the procedure, according to Reuters.
During his time in the court, he also joined the liberal justices in dissent over the high-profile Bush vs Gore matter. The 5-4 verdict ended the dispute over recount of Florida ballots. Post this, Republican George W. Bush was announced the winner for US presidential polls in 2000.
Souter never got married during his entire life. He announced his retirement at the age of 69. His exit was during the US Supreme Court's 2008-2009 term. This led to a vacancy at the court during President Barack Obama's early days in the White House.
FAQs:
1. Who was appointed after David Souter's retirement from the US Supreme Court?
President Barack Obama had nominated Judge Sonia Sotomayor to the seat.
2. When did David Souter get appointed to the US Supreme Court?
He was named as the Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit in May 1990.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Mint
26 minutes ago
- Mint
Indian Embassy clarifies Navy officer's remark on IAF ‘losses' during Operation Sindoor: ‘Misrepresented'
The Indian Embassy in Indonesia issued a clarification on Sunday, addressing reports concerning comments made by its Defence Attaché, Navy Captain Shiv Kumar, regarding Indian Air Force losses during Operation Sindoor. The embassy stated that the captain's remarks had been taken out of context and misrepresented by the media. In a statement posted on X, the embassy emphasised that the presentation delivered by Captain Kumar at a recent seminar was misunderstood. 'We have seen media reports regarding a presentation made by the Defence Attaché at a seminar. His remarks have been quoted out of context and the media reports are a misrepresentation of the intention and thrust of the presentation made by the speaker,' the embassy said. The statement further clarified that the presentation highlighted the principle that the Indian Armed Forces operate under civilian political leadership, unlike some other countries in the region. It also explained that the objective of Operation Sindoor was to target terrorist infrastructure, and that India's response was deliberately non-escalatory. During a presentation on 10 June, India's Defence Attaché to Indonesia, Captain Shiv Kumar of the Indian Navy, disclosed that the Indian Air Force (IAF) lost 'some aircraft' during Operation Sindoor, the May 7 strikes targeting terror sites in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK). He claimed that these losses occurred because the political leadership had instructed the armed forces not to target Pakistani military infrastructure or air defences in the initial strike. 'Only because of the constraint given by the political leadership to not attack the military establishment or their air defences,' Captain Kumar said, clarifying why the IAF suffered fighter jet losses. He further stated that following these losses, the Indian armed forces adjusted their tactics. 'We went for the military installations... we first achieved suppression of enemy air defences and then... all our attacks could easily go through using BrahMos missiles,' he added. The Defence Attaché's candid remarks sparked criticism from the opposition Congress party, which accused the BJP-led government of misleading the nation. Congress leader Jairam Ramesh questioned, 'Why is the PM refusing to preside over an all-party meeting and take the Opposition into confidence? Why has the demand for a special session of Parliament been rejected?' Senior Congress leader Pawan Khera also took to X, calling the defence attaché's comments a 'direct indictment.' He asserted, 'They know they've compromised national security, and they're terrified of what the Congress Party will expose before the people of India.' Captain Kumar's statements came during a seminar titled 'Analysis of the Pakistan-India Air Battle and Indonesia's Anticipatory Strategies from the Perspective of Air Power'.
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
34 minutes ago
- First Post
US resumes trade talks with Canada after PM Carney revokes 'digital tax' on American tech firms
Trade talks between Canada and the United States are back on after Canada decided to drop its planned tax on American tech companies, Prime Minister Mark Carney said on Sunday. read more US President Donald Trump and Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney. The Canadian PM earlier in May said his government is talking to the US about joining the Golden Dome missile defence program. AFP Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney said on Sunday that trade talks with the United States have resumed after Canada dropped its plan to tax American tech companies. US President Donald Trump had paused trade discussions on Friday because of Canada's proposed Digital Services Tax, which he called 'a direct and blatant attack on our country.' The Canadian government announced it would cancel the tax 'in anticipation' of a trade deal. The tax was supposed to take effect on Monday. Carney's office confirmed that he and Trump agreed to restart negotiations. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'Today's announcement will help resume talks aiming for the July 21, 2025, deadline we set at the G7 Leaders' Summit in Kananaskis,' Carney said in a statement. Carney visited Trump at the White House in May for discussions. Later, during the G7 summit in Alberta, Carney said Canada and the US had agreed on a 30-day timeline to reach a trade agreement. This is a developing story.


Time of India
36 minutes ago
- Time of India
Iran-Israel conflict: Iran's top clerics issue 'fatwa' against Donald Trump, Benjamin Netanyahu; calls them 'warlords'
US President Donald Trump and Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu - File Image Iran's leading Shiite religious authority issued a "fatwa" against US President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Sunday. Grand Ayatollah Naser Makarem Shirazi's fatwa, a religious decree, like one issued against prize-winning author Salman Rushdie, calls on Muslims to bring down the American and Israeli leaders for threatening the Islamic Republic leadership, as reported by the New York Sun. The decree states that any person or administration threatening the unity and leadership of the global Islamic community (the Ummah) should be classified as a "warlord" or "mohareb" - one who wages war against God. Iranian legislation permits execution, crucifixion, amputation of limbs, or banishment for those deemed mohareb. "Those who threaten the leadership and integrity of the Islamic Ummah are to be considered warlords," Makarem declared in the ruling. He concluded with a prayer seeking protection from these "enemies" and requesting the prompt arrival of the Mahdi, a prophesied figure in Shiite Islam. This religious decree followed the "12-Day War," during which American and Israeli operations reportedly caused substantial damage to Iran's nuclear infrastructure. On June 13, Israeli air attacks struck Iranian nuclear and military installations, reportedly causing casualties among senior scientists and commanders. Iran responded by firing ballistic missiles at Israeli urban centres. The United States entered the conflict a week afterwards, targeting three Iranian nuclear facilities. Trump had previously cautioned that further Iranian uranium enrichment to weapons-grade would trigger additional American responses. This statement followed a brief cessation of hostilities that ended 12 days of intense fighting. Iranian clerics have previously issued fatwas encouraging violence. The most notable instance was the 1989 edict against author Salman Rushdie following the publication of "The Satanic Verses," which numerous Muslims found offensive. This fatwa forced Rushdie into hiding, resulted in the killing of a Japanese translator, and sparked various attacks on the book's publishers. Rushdie has endured several assassination attempts since, including a 2023 stabbing in upstate New York that cost him an eye.