School smartphone bans - are they effective?
Banning smart phones in schools has become an increasingly popular move for teachers looking to improve children's education, concentration and wellbeing.While some health and education professionals and campaigners argue the bans help improve young people's mental health, there are arguments that sanctions can make little difference, do not go far enough, or could have a negative impact.The head teacher of one of the first schools to ban mobiles - Rebecca Mahony from Birkenhead High School Academy in Merseyside - said many parents had accepted the move.But she told the BBC she had been told by some parents that their children were becoming anxious because they felt they were missing out.
Ms Mahony said the prohibition was "now very much part of the DNA" after its introduction in 2017 due to concerns over disruption, lower attention spans and cyber-bullying.But she added: "There have been some really sad tales from parents actually saying my child needs their phone because they are anxious. "But it's the complete reverse of that - they don't need their phone because that is causing their anxiety."
A recent study found that banning phones in schools was not linked to pupils getting higher grades or having better mental health. Sleep, classroom behaviour, exercise, and how long was spent on phones overall were also found to be no different for pupils at schools with phone bans and those without, the academics found.However, University of Birmingham academics did find that spending longer on smartphones and social media in general was linked with worse results across all those areas.Ms Mahony said her school's ban involved phones being locked away, which meant students were now "chatting, playing UNO, communicating".But after a 35-year career in the education sector, she said her main concern for wider society was mobile phones' "impact on mental health"."The anxiety levels are through the roof, we're seeing an addiction to phones," she said."I'm seeing children that can't communicate with one another. They can't look each other in the eye when they communicate. They're not learning the social norms. They're not learning about body language."
About 145,000 children and 14,000 schools in the UK have signed a pact to increase the age at which smartphones should be used, according to the organisers Smartphone Free Childhood.Campaign spokeswoman Victoria Kazi, a GP, said the campaign recommended no smartphones for under-14s, and no social media for under-16s, after which age "they're more mature and able to cope with the complicatedness".A recent conference in Wirral, held by the Smartphone Free Childhood parents network, heard from other teachers who had taken tough measures over smartphones. Adrian Whiteley, head teacher of The Mosslands School in Wallasey, decided to start locking phones away in last year after finding children were "making excuses to go out of lessons, go to the toilet… and they'd get their phones out".He said students now "talkED to each other at break" and the stricter policy meant the school was "helping parents" avoid succumbing to their children's requests for a smartphone."The child doesn't need their phone during the school day," he said."I think sometimes parents having conversations with their children about use of phones leads to conflict in the house."But by being universal and absolute in our rule about no phones, we've stopped that being a problem, because the parents know that we won't move."So they can say, 'Well that's what the schools say - we can't do anything about it'."Ms Kazi said some parents were now able to say to their children "don't tell me everyone else has got a smartphone because I know about another 20 children in your year who don't"."So it just gives you more support," Ms Kazi added.
Dr Victoria Goodyear, the lead author of the University of Birmingham study, previously told the BBC its findings were not "against" smartphone bans in schools."What we're suggesting is that those bans in isolation are not enough to tackle the negative impacts," she added. She said the focus needed to be on reducing how much time students spent on their phones, adding: "We need to do more than just ban phones in schools."A bill suggesting banning smartphones in schools and addictive algorithms aimed at young teenagers will be debated in parliament this July following widespread concerns. Campaigners including Esther Ghey, whose 16-year-old daughter Brianna was murdered by two teenagers - one of whom had been watching violent content online – have called for social media access to be banned for under-16s. Writer Jack Thorne, who created the recent ground-breaking drama Adolescence about a fictional killing spurred by a boy's use of social media, has also called for the government to take "radical action" similar to Australia's recent ban on under-16s from using social media. Technology Secretary Peter Kyle has previously said he would be watching the situation in Australia "very closely".
Listen to the best of BBC Radio Merseyside on Sounds and follow BBC Merseyside on Facebook, X, and Instagram. You can also send story ideas via Whatsapp to 0808 100 2230.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
2 hours ago
- BBC News
Completion of £16m Trowbridge medical centre 'firmly in sight'
The completion of a £16m integrated care centre is "firmly in sight" following the installation of a new roof. The Trowbridge Integrated Care Centre in Wiltshire has been described as a "state-of-the-art health and care facility" and is due to open to patients early next site will become the location for the minor injury unit and X-ray department that are currently based within the nearby Trowbridge Community executive lead for cancer, planned care and community, Caroline Holmes, said: "The building work is well under way, the finish line is firmly in sight, and local people can now see their new integrated care centre really begin to take shape. Using the latest green technology, such as solar panels and heat pumps, the centre is designed to be fully self-sufficient and net zero carbon. Representatives from Bath and North East Somerset, Swindon and Wiltshire Integrated Care Board (ICB) marked the "milestone" occasion on the recently installed were joined by the Mayor of Trowbridge, along with a number of NHS colleagues who will soon call the new centre Holmes thanked those who had helped bring the new centre to added: "When the very first spades went in the ground, it was difficult to picture how a brand new health and care facility could emerge from what was essentially a very muddy field. Yet, here we are."The new centre is set to be a "flagship location" for local health and care, with teams from many different organisations, including HCRG Care Group, Avon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership and the Royal United Hospital, working together under one roof.
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Mum thought four-year-old was faking sick to get off school - then doctors gave a heartbreaking diagnosis
When four-year-old Farihah complained of a painful sensation in her leg, her mother thought it was an excuse to skip school. But the truth turned out to be much worse as the youngster, from East London, was later diagnosed with a rare illness that would no doubt be any parent's worst nightmare. Now 18, Farihah explained her symptoms started as unexplained wounds on her body, as well as alarmingly heavy nosebleeds that would come out of nowhere. Then, during her second week of reception, she complained to her mother of a pain in her right leg, after feeling like she couldn't walk. 'My mum thought it was an excuse not to go to school, but I generally couldn't walk. That's when my mum thought there was something wrong,' she told the Mirror. Farihah visited her local GP before undergoing further tests, but nothing could have prepared the family for the tragedy that followed. In October 2011, the little girl was diagnosed with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, a rare type of cancer. Did something similar happen to YOU? Email 'They told my family, while I was sitting outside with my uncle, and they were really heartbroken,' Farihah said. 'At the time, I was confused, but I also felt relieved in a sense, because I knew that I was being treated. I had been feeling ill for so long.' Farihah started an intense two-year course of chemotherapy treatment, which made her hair fall out three times and caused trouble walking. In 2013, the little girl and her family were told her intense course of treatment had ended - greeted with the news by a large banner with her name on it at the hospital. While it was around 14 years ago, Farihah said she is still grateful for the care she received at Great Ormond Street Hospital (GOSH). Today, the 18-year-old said she has remained cancer free and is sitting her A-Levels, with dreams of going to university to study film.
The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
I ditched the gym and you can too – here are six ways to get fit without it
After almost two decades of regular gym-going, I've finally cancelled my membership. The reasons for this are many and varied – I'm trying to save money, gym music is terrible these days, everyone seems to have forgotten how to share the equipment – but the main one is, I think it may actually make me fitter. Working for Men's Fitness magazine for almost 10 years, I got to try out every trend, workout style and fitness event I wanted, and I noticed something interesting: quite frequently, the people with the fewest resources were in the best shape. I'm not including Hollywood actors in this, but otherwise, it's often true: powerlifters working out in unheated concrete sheds get the strongest, runners who stay off treadmills get the fastest, and people exercising in basements have a focus rarely seen in palatial upmarket gyms. Browsing through photos from when my own gym membership was (briefly) paused during Covid lockdowns, I look … if not quite like Jason Statham, then at least his off-brand office-party equivalent. I might not have had the best cardio of my life – even social distancing couldn't convince me to run more than three miles (5km) at a time – but I was certainly lean. Some of the correlation and causation here might be muddled, obviously – Covid also prevented me from getting to my favourite cake shop – but let's not worry about that right now. So what's the plan? Well, as a 46-year-old father with a lot to do, I'm focusing on fitting workouts into my life wherever is feasible, combining cardio, strength and mobility as much as possible, and buying as little kit as I can. Here's what I'm up to. Over recent years, it's become increasingly clear that VO2 max, a measure of your body's ability to use oxygen during intense exercise, is a key indicator of health and lifespan: to the extent that it's probably one of the main things worth focusing on for longevity. Unfortunately, building up a good VO2 max takes a little bit longer than getting strong – but there are things you can do to speed the whole process along. One is the so-called 'Norwegian protocol': working out at a high intensity for four minutes, then at a lower intensity for three minutes, then repeating – four times altogether. With a warmup on top, you're done in little more than 30 minutes – and if you do that once a week, any other running workouts can be more ponderous or plodding. Recently, I've been a regular at my local Parkrun, which is always delightful – there are plenty of people far faster than me to keep me motivated, but nobody bats an eye if you put an audiobook on and turn in a 40-minute three miles. The final thing I'm doing run-wise is hill 'sprints' – a bit of a misnomer, as my nearest hummock is angled so steeply that I can barely get up it faster than a jog. This is actually a good thing; with a couple of hamstring pings in my past, my actual sprinting days are probably over, but the hilly variety still force you to work hard, generate power with each stride, and recruit dozens of muscle fibres with every step. Being strong is good for you: apart from the obvious benefits (carrying furniture, shopping and weary children), it can improve bone density, balance and mobility, heart health, and might even have protective effects against dementia. Some sort of strength training should be a non-negotiable part of your workout week, but the good news is that it really doesn't have to take long – recent research suggests that two 'sets' of exercise per body part, per week can be enough to build strength, with the diminishing returns kicking in quickly afterwards. These workouts can also be very simple: unless you want to look like a Marvel character, there's no need for dozens of movements. All you really need to focus on is what many trainers call the fundamental human movements: push, pull, squat, 'hinge', and carry – all of which can be done with a kettlebell, set of dumbells, or a bag of books if you're on a budget. My twice-weekly strength plan is as simple as it gets: two sets each of overhead presses (push), one-armed rows (pull) and goblet squats (hopefully obvious), and one set of kettlebell swings (this is the 'hinge', but so is any movement where the power comes from your hips, from picking a weight off the ground to doing the long jump). I get my carrying by doing the shopping – I usually do a big bagload or two once or twice a week. This style of working out – popularised by former Soviet strength coach Pavel Tsatsouline – has been around for decades, but it's never been more relevant than in an era where lots of people work from home. The idea is that you're getting into the groove of the movements you do a lot, so not just working out your muscles but also your neuromuscular efficiency, or how well your brain and nervous system can activate your muscles. Basically, you do one or two exercises at a relatively manageable intensity multiple times throughout the day, rather than in one workout session. Each set ought to feel fairly easy (you never go to 'failure', or even get sweaty), allowing you to focus on perfect form and make your body more efficient at recruiting muscle fibers. It won't make you huge, if that's the goal – but it will make you stronger. I'm currently doing it with pullups. There's a bar in my kitchen, so whenever I let our new pup out in the garden – for a wee, for a little dash around, for the sheer joy of trying to eat a plastic plant-pot – I do seven or eight pullups, or roughly half the number I could manage if I really tried. I don't do another set for at least half an hour; I might do anywhere between three and about 10 sets a day: and in a couple of weeks, I'll probably add a rep or two. It's a great system for pullups, but it also works for more beginner-friendly movements – you could try it with wall pressups, squats, or lunges. Sandbags, now making a comeback in functional fitness classes and Hyrox events, are great for lots of reasons. They challenge your body in a way that's difficult to do with barbells alone, working your stabiliser muscles and challenging your balance even at lower weights. You can also drop them on most sorts of flooring without too much fuss. And here's the secret: you can make your own sandbag, which is better and more versatile than most pre-made sandbags, for a fraction of the cost of the ones you see in the gym. My preferred method is to fill a bunch of little sandwich bags with builders' sand (20kg in total is enough to start with), then duct-tape them closed: this helps to minimise leakage, and lets you adjust the weight. After that, just fling as many as you'd like in an old duffel bag or rucksack, and play around with it: lift it off the ground, squat with it on your shoulders, press it overhead or do glute-bridges with it balanced across your lap (much more comfortable than a barbell). You'll build the sort of strength that lets you throw a bag effortlessly into an overhead locker, and also be ready for the next idea … 'Rucking', or putting on a big backpack and going for a hike, might be better for most people than running: there's less impact on your joints, it builds a bit more strength in your legs and core, and it still elevates your heart rate and challenges your cardio. It's currently catching on as a trend, with dedicated clubs and ergonomically designed 'plate carrier' bags that can cost upwards of a hundred pounds – but let's be realistic, there's nothing to stop you throwing a few books in a rucksack and carrying it along on your everyday activities. For me, the school run is perfect: it's about a mile each way, there are a couple of big hills, and if I get too out of breath to talk, my seven-year-old's perfectly happy to pick up the conversational slack. I've been loading myself up with 10kg for the trip for a couple of weeks now, and I'll probably add to that soon – if anything, it makes the treats I pick up at the en route bakery a lot easier to justify. It's the simplest thing of all, but one of the most worth doing. One 2022 study found that taking up to 10,000 steps a day has protective effects against cardiovascular disease and cancer, but the benefits go far beyond that – walking in nature seems to improve mental health, while daily walks also seem to correlate with improved sleep. I'm lucky that I live in a very walkable city, and semi-lucky that I work from home – even though I don't have a commute to worry about, I quite often go for a little wander around (with my dog), to solve work problems that seem impossible when I'm sitting at my desk. Try skipping the headphones for a couple of weeks – you'll probably notice a big difference in how much creative thinking and problem-solving you get done. You can get enough equipment to give you dozens of home-workout options for just more than 30 quid – less than a month's membership at most gyms. Once you've got the workout bug, upgrade as you save. Here's the order to invest in. Resistance bands (£5+)These are excellent for back health and shoulder mobility. Doing a few band pull-aparts (hold the band in front of your chest and stretch it until your arms form a T with your body) whenever you have a spare moment will work wonders for your posture and dislocates (where you hold the band with straight arms, then slowly raise it over your head and behind your back). Adjustable dumbbells (£20-£60)These can be as basic as you like: the main thing to bear in mind is that, after a while, they might not be heavy enough to actually challenge you much. Aim for a pair that you can load up to at least 10kg each – you can use them for everything from squats to overhead presses, and they'll let you directly target muscle groups that are tough to hit with bodyweight alone. An ab wheel (£7+)These are underrated – they're cheap, light enough to throw in a bag, and might be the only bit of kit you ever need to train your midsection. Ab wheel 'rollouts' (the main movement you'll do with them) are a move to build up to – even one can be tricky, so start off by rolling towards a wall that'll stop you short of the full move, or even practising your roll on a shallow incline (if you can find one). These aren't absolutely essential, but if you can hold a plank for two minutes, it might be time to step it up. A pullup bar (£20+)You might never plan to do a pullup, but these can be handy simply for doing dead hangs – and if they're securely anchored enough, you can also use them with a suspension trainer (see below). The version that clips over a doorframe will be fine for pullups, but if you're planning on anything fancier, consider the style that screws into the wall. A kettlebell (£20-£40)The key thing about kettlebells is picking one with a nice shape to it – the official 'sport' versions come in a standard size (with a chunky 'bell' section) that should rest nicely against your forearm when you're doing more complex movements. The other consideration is weight – if you're only getting one (because they're pricey), you'll want the option that allows you to do the most movements, with a weight that's easy enough to lift at first but still stays reasonably challenging as you get stronger. A 12kg or 16kg kettlebell will work if you've never exercised before, but consider a 20kg version if you're a bit stronger. A suspension trainer (£40+)These are the priciest thing on the list, and not strictly necessary – but if you've got somewhere to put one up (or a nearby tree), they'll vastly increase the movements you can do, including the excellent-for-your-shoulders inverted row. TRX is the brand everyone knows, but there are lots of others that are equally good – read the reviews.
