&w=3840&q=100)
How Pakistan SC empowered Asim Munir, man who triggered tensions with India
Against the backdrop of tensions between India and Pakistan rising, the Pakistan Supreme Court just backed Army chief General Asim Munir. Pakistan's apex court, in a 5-2 ruling, has allowed civilians to be tried by military courts. But why has the court strengthened Munir's hand? And why does it matter? read more
India and Pakistan are at each other's throats.
After the Pahalgam attack, India launched Operation Sindoor – carrying out strikes on terror bases in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir.
Ever since the two countries have accused each other of sending drones and missiles across the Line of Control.
Now, the Pakistan Supreme Court may have just made things worse.
The apex court of the neighbouring country just backed Army chief General Asim Munir, according to several media reports.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
A speech of Munir's comments backing the two-nation theory recently went viral on social media.
But what happened? How did Pakistan's Supreme Court rule? And what did Munir say?
What happened?
As per Hindustan Times, the Supreme Court of Pakistan has ruled that civilians can be tried by military courts.
The apex court in doing so overturned an October 2023 judgment that called civilians being tried by the military 'unconstitutional."
The seven-judge constitution bench of the court led by Justice Aminuddin Khan on May 7 cleared the way for those involved in anti-Pakistan Army protests in May 2023 to be tried by the military.
As per News18, lakhs of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) members in May 2023 had taken to the streets to protest the arrest of ex-prime minister Imran Khan.
Imran, who has been in jail for two years, had accused Munir of ordering his arrest in a corruption case.
The demonstrators, blaming Munir for the arrest of their party leader, had swamped military institutions.
As per News18, nearly PTI 1,000 workers had been arrested – many without evidence, they claimed.
In October 2023, Pakistan's apex court had ruled that the civilians could not be tried by the military.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
However, several petitioners including law enforcement agencies appealed the Supreme Court's decision.
Imran, who has been in jail for two years, had accused Asim Munir of ordering his arrest in a corruption case.
Pakistan's court in a 5-2 decision overturned the previous ruling.
The court also restored three parts of the Pakistan Army Act, 1952, which had been struck down in 2023.
As per Hindustan Times, Justice Aminuddin Khan ordered the government to amend the Army Act in less than two months to allow those convicted by the military courts the chance to appeal in a high court.
Justices Jamal Khan Mandokhail and Naeem Akhtar Afghan disagreed with the majority.
The court had reserved its judgement on Monday.
Why this matters
The decision deals yet another blow to democracy in Pakistan – which since Independence has seen long periods of military rule.
It also concentrates even more power in the hands of the Pakistan Army chief – which has historically been the most powerful position in Pakistan – who many believe is responsible for the standoff between India and Pakistan
'With this shield in his hand, the increasingly unpopular general can now worry a little less about internal dissent,' a piece in India Today noted.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Munir was formerly head of the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) during the Pulwama attack.
Experts say India needs to be careful when dealing with Munir.
An analyst told India Today, 'This is not an asymmetric war like Israel vs Hamas or Azerbaijan vs Armenia. This is between two of the most professional armies who are equally matched and have nuclear capabilities. Anything we do, we should expect him to retaliate. Controlling the escalation ladder of conflict will not be easy. Judging by Munir's recent actions, we should be prepared for unpredictability and surprises, including him initiating something and blaming us for it.'
'Munir would have gamed all options beforehand and is moving with greater caution than normal. We need to carefully gauge him, as he has extensive intelligence and operational exposure. It's like a game of chess in which we need to think 10 steps ahead of him along with our own contingency plans and punches. So, we have to keep second-guessing his moves till we have some tentative answers at least. Specialists also need to do a detailed psychological profiling based on his behaviour and statements,' another strategist added.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
PTI slams ruling
As per India Today, the PTI slammed the ruling as a 'weaponised decision'.
'The decision has been given on a day when the purportedly installed regime and the establishment want to build National Cohesion,' Omar Ayub Khan, a member of the National Assembly (Parliament) from the PTI, was quoted as saying by Dawn.
Haleem Adil Sheikh, PTI's chief of Sindh province, added 'Dropping the military courts verdict amid a war-like situation is a deliberate move to mask injustice'.
Reena Omer, South Asian legal advisor to the International Commission of Jurists, Reena Omer, called the decision 'terrible, though perhaps expected'.
'A pity the highest court of the land is on board with such militarisation of justice in the country,' Omer wrote on X.
What Munir said
Munir in April made an extremely inflammatory speech at the Overseas Pakistanis Convention in Islamabad.
'You have to narrate Pakistan's story to your children so that they don't forget it when our forefathers thought we were different from Hindus in every possible aspect of life. Our religion is different, our customs are different, our traditions are different, our thoughts are different, our ambitions are different, that's where the foundation of the two-nation theory was laid. We are two nations, we are not one nation," Munir, endorsing the two-nation theory championed by Muhammad Ali Jinnah, said.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Pakistani Army Chief General Asim Munir. Photo: YouTube/ISPR
Munir made the speech in the presence of Pakistan's Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif.
'Because of that, our forefathers mounted that incessant struggle to create this country. Our forefathers, they have sacrificed immensely, and we have sacrificed a lot for the creation of this country, and we know how to defend it,' Munir said.
'My dear brothers and sisters and sons and daughters, please don't forget the story of Pakistan, and don't forget to narrate this story of Pakistan to your next generation, so that their bond with Pakistan never weakens, whether it is the third generation, or the fourth generation, or the fifth generation, they know what Pakistan is for them,' he added.
Munir in the same speech referred to Kashmir as Pakistan's 'jugular vein.'
Indian intel agencies said they were looking into whether the Pakistan Army chief's speech played any part in causing the Pahalgam attack.
'Our stance is absolutely clear, it was our jugular vein, it will be our jugular vein, we will not forget it. We will not leave our Kashmiri brothers in their heroic struggle,' Munir said,
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Intelligence officials say Munir's words and his focus on the 'differential treatment' of Muslims and Hindus may have encouraged militant groups to act.
Munir had also warned of a 'swift and notched-up response' to any Indian action following the Pahalgam attack.
MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal responded to Munir's remarks by saying, 'How can anything foreign be in a jugular vein? This is a Union Territory of India. Its only relationship with Pakistan is the vacation of illegally occupied territories by that country.'
With inputs from agencies
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


United News of India
32 minutes ago
- United News of India
PM Modi announces additional aid for families hit by cross-border shelling
Katra (J&K), June 6 (UNI) Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Friday announced additional financial assistance of Rs 2 lakh each for families whose houses were severely damaged due to cross-border shelling from Pakistan. Addressing a public gathering here, the Prime Minister stated that households suffering severe damage due to cross-border firing will now receive Rs 2 lakh, while those with partially damaged homes will be granted Rs 1 lakh. This assistance is in addition to the support already provided earlier by the government, an official statement said. He emphasised the government's commitment to the well-being of those affected, noting that families who lost loved ones in the shelling have already received appointment letters for government aid. Recognising the hardship faced by over 2,000 families impacted by the shelling, PM Modi reaffirmed the government's solidarity with the victims, saying, 'Their pain is the nation's pain.' Stating that the government recognises border residents as the nation's frontline protectors, Modi said, 'Over the past decade, unprecedented efforts have been made to strengthen development and security in border districts'. Highlighting key initiatives, Modi said that approximately 10,000 new bunkers have been constructed, which played a critical role in safeguarding lives during the aftermath of Operation Sindoor. He also announced the formation of two new border battalions for the Jammu and Kashmir division, further enhancing security operations in the region. Additionally, he said two dedicated women battalions have also been successfully established, reinforcing defence capabilities and empowering women in the armed forces. Emphasising the significant infrastructure development taking place in India's international border regions, particularly in challenging terrains, the Prime Minister announced that hundreds of crores are being invested to improve connectivity and security. 'The Kathua-Jammu Highway is being upgraded into a six-lane expressway, while the Akhnoor-Poonch Highway is undergoing widening to facilitate smoother travel. Under the Vibrant Village Programme, development initiatives in border villages have been accelerated, ensuring better living conditions and opportunities for residents,' the Prime Minister said. He mentioned that 400 villages in Jammu and Kashmir, previously lacking all-weather connectivity, are now being linked with 1,800 km of newly constructed roads. He announced allocation of over Rs 4,200 crore for these infrastructure projects, reinforcing economic growth and regional development in border areas. Earlier, the Prime Minister laid the foundation stone, inaugurated and dedicated to the nation multiple development projects worth over Rs 46,000 crore at Katra. UNI VBH RBE PRS


United News of India
32 minutes ago
- United News of India
Modi did not contradict Trump on his claim of making him surrender: Rahul
Rajgir, June 06 (UNI) Congress leader Rahul Gandhi on Friday said US President Donald Trump had claimed eleven times that he forced Prime Minister Narendra Modi to surrender during operation Sindoor, but he did not contradict it and remained silent. Gandhi, while addressing a conference organised by his party here, said that PM Modi had the habit of surrender. Trump had claimed eleven times that he forced Modi to surrender during the operation Sindoor carried out recently, but the latter did not contradict and remained silent on the issue, he remarked. Congress leader also took potshots at Modi on his decision to conduct a caste census, saying he was also reluctant on the issue. When he exerted slight pressure on Modi on the caste census, he surrendered and announced the decision of his government to conduct a national-level caste census, he added. PM Modi had rejected the demand of Bihar Chief Minister Nitish Kumar for a national-level caste census in 2021, when he had called on him, leading an all-party delegation from the state. After his refusal, Nitish Kumar's government had conducted a caste census in Bihar from its resources and named it as caste survey, as carrying out any sort of census is the right of the Central government. Even in parliament on several occasions and during its replies in the Supreme Court in several cases, the Narendra Modi government had expressed its opinion against the caste census in the country. UNI KKS BD
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
38 minutes ago
- First Post
India at BRICS is a balancing force, not anti-US
India may have its own share of grudges with the West or even the US, including its recent experience during Operation Sindoor, but it will prefer bilateral mechanism to register them on a one-on-one basis read more US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick made an explosive statement this week when he said that the United States views India's membership of BRICS in a very negative way because of the grouping's obsession with de-dollarisation, something that does not go down well in making friends or influencing people in America. While Lutnick is right about BRICS's fixation with challenging the dollar hegemony, he is absolutely off the mark when it comes to judging India's role at the grouping. As a matter of fact, if there is one country that effectively tempers the anti-US or the larger anti-West rhetoric and agenda at BRICS then it has to be India. It is a different matter that Trump administration officials such as Lutnick may not want to engage with nuanced arguments while putting charges but even a cursory assessment of reality will prove how India is a genuinely balancing force at BRICS. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD After the end of the Cold War, in the emerging geopolitical scenario of the 1990s, all the three prominent BRICS member countries—India, China and Russia—were duly following a policy of mending their respective bridges with the West. Unlike India and Russia, China had a greater advantage here because its rapprochement with the West had begun a little earlier with the famous 1972 visit by US President Richard Nixon to Beijing. For India, the world had changed drastically in 1991 with the disintegration of the erstwhile Soviet Union and a debilitating balance of payment crisis. India as a much-reformed economy was naturally gravitating towards the capitalist powerhouse of the world, the United States, as best captured in the visit by the then- Prime Minister, PV Narasimha Rao, who declared to corporate America loudly that India is now open for Business. The firm steps of conviction that each of these countries including India, China and Russia were taking towards the west left little doubt towards their intentions. However, an interesting twist came in the late 1990s when Russian foreign minister Yevgeny Primakov gave his famous 'Primakov Doctrine' that advocated for a multipolar world order to counterbalance the US particularly through a strategic triangle between Russia, India and China. Although the RIC strategic triangle has since remained a pipe dream, this coordination took a concrete shape with the establishment of BRICS in the year 2009. Ironically, BRICS was a term that was originally coined by an American economist Jim O'Neill in 2001 to refer to the potential of emerging economies of Brazil, Russia, India and China that according to him would even dominate the global economy by 2050. But soon this term took on a life of its own when a rising and increasingly assertive China and a revisionist Russia started using the BRICS forum to push their own alternative to a West-led world order. One of the leading examples of their efforts is the thrust on expanding the grouping to include countries such as Iran and Cuba which are one of the biggest opponents of the West-led international order. While both China and Russia have their own agenda in using BRICS to create a geopolitical counterweight to the West, India is in a different league altogether. First, India does share the dreams of a multipolar world order with them, one where the US is not the only power to call the shots. But in order to realise this dream, it is counting only on its individual potential to rise as a formidable great power and not membership of any forum such as BRICS. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Nothing sums this up more clearly than Prime Minister Narendra Modi's statement in 2024 when he categorically called for the grouping to avoid becoming an anti-West forum as it expands further. Despite having articulated several times that India is a great power in its own right, PM Modi cautioned against the grouping taking an anti-West character. This proves that multipolarity may be a cherished goal for a rising India but to achieve that it is not willing to lock horns with the West. India's stand on BRICS taking an anti-US stance becomes even more apparent when one takes the issue of de-dollarisation into account. Unlike Russia and China that have taken a lead in promoting de-dollarisation of the world economy, India, a rising economy, has many a times affirmed that it has no intent to undermine the US dollar or back a BRICS currency that seeks to do the same. In a speech given on the floor of Parliament early this year, External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar clearly outlined that undermining the American currency was not a part of the country's strategic or economic policy. This stand stems from the stability that India widely enjoys due to its heavy dependence on dollars for international trade, foreign exchange reserves and even remittances. India is also very aware that de-dollarisation would come with an additional risk of Chinese Yuan gaining prominence as an international currency and this is a scenario that India would never find acceptable at all. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD India may have its own share of grudges with the West or even the US, including its recent experience during Operation Sindoor, but it will prefer a bilateral mechanism to register them on a one-on-one basis. For India, the scariest geopolitical scenario will be a world where China replaces the US as the hegemon. It is precisely to balance China that India has willingly signed up for the Quad initiative in the Indo-Pacific. Until India and China are locked in this geopolitical tussle, BRICS would never become the kind of forum that US Commerce Secretary Lutnick has accused it to be. In fact, India's presence at BRICS should be seen as a relief by the Americans because it is just the kind of balancing force that they badly need. One of the biggest achievements of India at the forum is to amplify the voice of the Global South and make it a genuinely inclusive grouping. It is time the West, especially the United States, started appreciating the role that India is playing rather than trade charges or undermine the core interests of a so-called ally. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The author is a New Delhi-based commentator on geopolitics and foreign policy. She holds a PhD from the Department of International Relations, South Asian University. She tweets @TrulyMonica. The views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost's views.