logo
'Future At Stake': Why Indian Students In US Aren't Going Home This Summer

'Future At Stake': Why Indian Students In US Aren't Going Home This Summer

NDTV14 hours ago

A number of Indian students are not going home to their families in India or travelling outside the US this summer - just like many Indian nationals there on work visas - thanks to the risk of being denied reentry into the country. Referring to the administration's stance on foreign students as 'threatening', an Indian student at the University of Southern California has taken up an internship at a local company instead of travelling home for college vacations. 'The current visa situation is unpredictable. I can't risk it after putting in three years here,' says the undergraduate, who holds a valid student visa, referring to the heightened scrutiny at American airports and reports of foreign nationals being barred.
The tussle between universities and the government was first triggered by on-campus protests against Israel's actions in Gaza. The demonstrations led the Trump administration to blame elite colleges for allegedly tolerating 'antisemitism'. Soon, foreign students started facing arrests, detention and visa cancellations, and prominent colleges were slapped with funding threats.
The Attack On Columbia And Harvard
Critics say the ongoing attacks on wealthy universities, including Brown, Columbia, Cornell, Harvard, Pennsylvania, Princeton, etc., is an infringement of academic freedom, a hallmark of these institutions. In fact, even after the University of Columbia initially agreed to a few of the demands, the US government threatened it again on June 4, saying it could strip the institute's accreditation for allegedly not doing enough to protect Jewish students.
Similarly, Harvard University, older than the US itself, has about $9 billion at stake in federal cuts. On its part, Harvard is fighting back by suing the government for withdrawal of funding, threats to its tax-exempt status, and for barring the enrollment of foreign students. On May 23, a federal judge blocked the administration's efforts, allowing the university to continue international admissions. But on June 4, the government invoked the Immigration and Nationality Act to prohibit noncitizens from entering the US to study at Harvard for at least six months, arguing that the institution is "no longer a trustworthy steward" of international students. Calling the step 'retaliatory', the university reassured its student body that "Harvard will continue to protect its international students".
The White House, on its part, in a fact sheet cited the Federal Bureau of Investigation's (FBI) 'warnings' about how 'foreign adversaries take advantage of easy access to American higher education to steal information, exploit research and development, and spread false information'.
The Mass Lawsuit
Amidst the 'America for Americans' campaign of the current US administration, foreign students, researchers and their colleges have been putting up strong legal battles to save their academic futures. Earlier this year, when foreign students found their visas revoked in the middle of their semesters, a flurry of lawsuits were filed by hundreds of international students across multiple states in the country, a majority of them being from India. The lawsuits compelled the Department of Homeland Security to reinstate their visas and student records (SEVIS) in their database. Ironically, many of these students - some of them just had petty traffic offences to their name, already settled, while others had no prior run-ins with law enforcement - had been given no explanation for the cancellation of their visas.
A New Jersey-based Indian student was relieved to be able to continue her job as part of her course-related practical training, but recounted how other Indian students whose visas had been revoked were forced to leave the US before the lawsuits came about. 'Our careers are at stake here. My friend had a student loan of many lakhs, but they self-deported as per DHS [US Department of Homeland Security] instructions,' she says.
With academic and professional dreams in limbo, federal courts have become an important battleground in this tussle between universities and the US administration. Critics say the high-profile institutions being targeted by the Republican administration are campuses that lean largely towards Democratic politics. Foreign students constitute a large share at these institutions. They currently make up 27% of Harvard's student body, bringing in hundreds of thousands of dollars in tuition fees. Over 11 lakh foreign students in the US - approximately 3.3 lakh of them Indians - contributed $44 million to the US economy in the 2023-24 academic year.
America Stands To Lose, Too
If unwelcome in the US, bright students are bound to start looking for other options in the years to come. That will not only blunt the US's academic supremacy but also cost it economically. An Indian research scholar at a US university whose cancelled visa was reinstated because of his lawsuit against the government is now looking towards Europe. 'After studying in the US for eight years, I am facing uncertainty. I have applied and interviewed for two research positions at European universities. They are more inviting,' he says.
Along with the risk of brain drain, the ongoing tensions might spur other countries to strengthen their own academic institutions. On May 29, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio suggested that the US must 'aggressively revoke' the visas of Chinese students, especially those 'in critical fields' - namely, computer science, mathematics and science. Tech industry leaders in America believe that this can lead to China improving the quality of its colleges further, impacting the pool of talent available to the US in the long run. China produces 50% of the world's AI graduates and double the number of STEM doctorates as the US. That's not encouraging given the intense tech war the US and China have been engaged in already.
For decades, US colleges had been beacons of the American dream - a good degree, followed by a job and life in the US. These colleges have played a huge part in the country's economic success. With their excellent labs and resources, they have been a gateway for attracting and training international talent, filling the vast number of jobs America's high tech and medical sectors require, making the country a world leader in these industries.
The US administration's action against foreign students will likely impact the choices of a rising number of high school and undergraduate students in India. They might take their time and money elsewhere. Dr Rajika Bhandari, an international higher education expert and author of America Calling: A Foreign Student in a Country of Possibility, sums it up well. 'There are basically four countries - Canada, the UK, Australia and the US - all anglophone destinations where the largest mass of Indian students keeps circulating. Every few years we see these ebbs and flows for a particular country depending on what happens with immigration policies and world events. We've seen that with the UK, we've seen it with Canada, now maybe it's the turn of the US that some of that flow is going to get redirected elsewhere.'
(Savita Patel is a San Francisco Bay Area-based journalist and producer. She reports on the Indian diaspora, India-US ties, geopolitics, technology, public health, and the environment. She tweets at @SsavitaPatel.)

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US Court Rules Trump Can Exclude Journalists From Oval Office
US Court Rules Trump Can Exclude Journalists From Oval Office

Mint

time20 minutes ago

  • Mint

US Court Rules Trump Can Exclude Journalists From Oval Office

A federal appeals court has ruled that President Donald Trump can exclude journalists from the Oval Office, Air Force One and other 'restricted' spaces based on their editorial decisions, handing the administration a win in its fight with the Associated Press over access. In a 2-1 order on Friday, the US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit halted a lower-court judge's order that had restored the wire service's ability to participate in a rotating pool of reporters who cover the president's daily movements. The news agency sued the Trump administration in February when the White House press office started limiting the access of reporters and photographers after the wire service refused to update its style guide to rename the 'Gulf of Mexico' the 'Gulf of America' following a Trump executive order. A Washington federal judge's order forcing the White House to reinstate the 's access took effect April 14 after the appeals court didn't immediately intervene. The next could ask the full bench of active judges of the DC Circuit to reconsider the panel's order or ask the US Supreme Court to immediately intervene. A lawyer for the and a White House spokesperson did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Judge Neomi Rao wrote in the majority opinion that the lower court's decision 'impinges on the president's independence and control over his private workspaces.' The panel did leave in place part of the original order that required the to still have access to the East Room in the White House, which was usually open to a broader group of reporters. 'Throughout our nation's history, presidents have held crucial meetings and made historic decisions in the Oval Office and on Air Force One,' wrote Rao, joined by Judge Greg Katsas. 'On occasion, they have welcomed the press to observe. But these restricted presidential spaces are not First Amendment fora, and the President retains discretion over who has access.' Rao and Katsas were nominated by Trump in his first term. Judge Nina Pillard, appointed under former president Barack Obama, dissented. Historically, the has been part of a small, rotating pool of media outlets that cover the president's day-to-day activities as well as events open to larger groups of credentialed media outlets. In an April 8 order, US District Judge Trevor McFadden ruled that the was likely to succeed in arguing that the Trump administration violated the First Amendment of the US Constitution by singling out one media outlet based on its editorial choices. He said that officials remained free to exclude journalists from one-on-one access to Trump, but that they couldn't kick out the if it allowed in its peers. The case is Associated Press v. Budowich, 25-5109, DC Circuit Court of Appeals This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.

Amid White House Peace Push, Trump Calls Musk Mentally Gone; But Is Elon Even Listening?
Amid White House Peace Push, Trump Calls Musk Mentally Gone; But Is Elon Even Listening?

India.com

time21 minutes ago

  • India.com

Amid White House Peace Push, Trump Calls Musk Mentally Gone; But Is Elon Even Listening?

New Delhi: Just a day after X (formerly Twitter) lit up with signs of a possible ceasefire between the two alpha billionaires of American influence, US President Donald Trump has poured cold water over any reconciliation talk. Asked by ABC News if he would speak to Musk after their very public clash, he scoffed, 'You mean the man who has lost his mind? I am not particularly interested in talking to him.' Classic Trump, doubling down even when the temperature seems to be cooling. There is an odd symmetry here. Musk, who had just hinted at making peace – replying 'You are not wrong' to billionaire investor Bill Ackman's call for the two to settle their feud for the sake of the nation – now finds himself ghosted by the very man he might have tried to reach out to. 'I am not even thinking about Elon. He has got a problem, the poor guy has got a problem,' Trump told CNN with dismissive finality during a June 6 interview. And while the White House reportedly flirted with the idea of brokering a peace call, as per Politico, other sources quickly knocked that down – saying no such call had been scheduled. So now, America's two most powerful disruptors remain locked in a bizarre standoff that is half-reality TV and half-national policy debate. This feud is not only personal, it is political and economic. It started when Trump lashed out during a White House appearance, accusing Musk of betrayal over criticism of his tax and spending bill. Musk hit back hard. He accused Trump's trade policies of potentially triggering a recession and even dragged the former president's links to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein into the public arena. Then came the bizarre twist – Trump, clearly furious, threatened to cancel U.S. government contracts with Tesla CEO Elon Musk's companies. In retaliation, Musk posted that he would 'retire' the Dragon spacecraft – a vehicle crucial to NASA. The internet melted down. But a few hours and likely a few backchannel calls later, Musk reversed course: 'Good advice. Ok, we won't decommission Dragon.' In this verbal space race, it is hard to tell who is steering the ship and who is punching holes in the hull. Whether this ends in detente or total decoupling remains unclear, but what is certain is this – the Trump-Musk saga has become a defining narrative of America's political tech complex where egos, economics and electoral stakes collide like celestial bodies on a crash course.

‘No idea what he was thinking': Errol Musk on son Elon's Epstein-Trump association claims; urges to let feud 'fizzle out'
‘No idea what he was thinking': Errol Musk on son Elon's Epstein-Trump association claims; urges to let feud 'fizzle out'

Time of India

time22 minutes ago

  • Time of India

‘No idea what he was thinking': Errol Musk on son Elon's Epstein-Trump association claims; urges to let feud 'fizzle out'

Errol Musk weighs in on Elon-Trump feud Elon Musk 's father, Errol Musk, weighed on his son's feud with Donald Trump which included reference to Jeffrey Epstein in an attack on US President, calling it 'just a silly mistake' and "not knowing what he (Elon) was thinking". He also urged his son to let the feud 'fizzle out.' In an interview with Al Arabiya English from a lounge in Delhi Airport, Errol Musk downplayed the widely publicised social media clash between the two high-profile figures, characterising it as a momentary flare-up between strong personalities under pressure. 'I have no idea what he was thinking… I can only imagine that's just a silly mistake,' Errol said of Elon's now-viral post alleging Trump's name was in the Epstein files. Musk had, in a post on X, said, 'Time to drop the really big bomb: @realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!'. Errol, attributed his son's actions to stress rather than intent. Referencing scripture, he added, 'Let the innocent person cast the first stone,' suggesting no one is without fault. The elder Musk said he had personally messaged his son to help ease tensions. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Here's The Price for a 1-Day Walk-in Shower In 2025 Homebuddy Learn More Undo 'I did send him a message… telling him, make sure this fizzles out,' he said, confidently predicting that the spat would be short-lived. 'Yes, of course,' he added when asked whether Trump and Elon would reconcile. 'When people have been through a great deal of stress… eventually people reach a point where they lash out,' Errol said. 'Even at the highest levels, people struggle to find common ground.' He suggested Elon's criticisms stemmed from concerns over Democrats' use of financial incentives to push legislation—a dispute that eventually escalated into a social media confrontation. Describing the online standoff as 'elephant bulls or alphas having a go at each other,' Errol Musk brushed off the seriousness of the episode. Reflecting on his recent visit to the US, Errol also claimed overwhelming public support for the former president. 'I would like to say 80 percent, but actually 100 percent [are] behind Trump,' he said. What is the Musk-Trump feud ? The public spat between US President Donald Trump and former adviser Elon Musk has intensified, following Musk's opposition to a significant domestic policy initiative by Trump. Following his 129-day tenure at the Department of Government Efficiency (Doge), Musk utilised his platform X to denounce the bill as a "disgusting abomination", adding: "Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong." He expressed concerns about the legislation's impact on national debt levels and urged his followers to contact their representatives in opposition to the spending proposal. The conflict between the two wealthy individuals heightened on Thursday as they traded harsh words on their respective social media platforms, indicating the end of their previous collaboration. Trump initiated the exchange by expressing disappointment over Musk's criticism of his administration's primary tax and spending legislation, suggesting this could terminate their formerly positive association. In response, Musk claimed credit for Trump's electoral success, stating: "Without me, Trump would have lost the election". The deterioration in their relationship occurred after Musk's sustained opposition to Trump's spending legislation, which received approval from the US House and awaits Senate consideration.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store