logo
Between drones and AI, Masters tries to balance past with future

Between drones and AI, Masters tries to balance past with future

Yahoo14-04-2025

Ireland's Rory McIlroy triumphs at the Masters golf tournament. Robert Perry/PA Wire/dpa
Cellphones are banned at the Masters. Food and drink prices are happily stuck in the 1970s — $1.50 for a pimento cheese sandwich — a charming holdover from yesteryear. And painted leaderboards are updated by hand.
Advertisement
Meanwhile, behind the scenes, it's Jones (Bobby) meets Jetson (George). Drones whir over tee boxes. Fans all over the world can track every shot of every player — including balls thwacked on the driving range. As soon as someone finishes his round, his highlights of the day are instantly compiled by AI.
The challenge at this legendary tournament is as tricky as a downhill putt on 15. How does Augusta National lean into emerging technologies without compromising its storied tradition?
Get creative and you can grow the game. Get too cute and you can damage the brand.
'It's a balance,' said Fred S. Ridley, chairman of Augusta National. 'And it's not always easy.'
Advertisement
That means moving in a Masters-like manner, which around here entails operating so quietly and efficiently that changes seem to magically appear.
'We certainly want to progress,' Ridley said. 'We want to try new things. We want to continue our mission to reach out and grow the game. But at the same time, we have to be cognizant of the fact that part of the magic of this place is those traditions and the mystique.'
Last week, three familiar players sought to leave their own mark on Masters tradition. Justin Rose shot a 71 to maintain his lead at eight under par. Bryson DeChambeau shot a 68 and is one back, and Rory McIlroy, who completed a career Grand Slam, had a 66 to move to six under.
'There's a bit of a sense that the course is playing a little bit differently today,' Rose said. 'A bit windier, for sure, out of a slightly different direction. So just trying to make some of those adjustments. I think it was a fairly favorable wind for the golf course in general, which is why I think you're seeing some good scores.'
Advertisement
In a larger sense, the winds of change at the Masters have been gusting for some time.
Across the street from Augusta National, through a tunnel under Washington Road, is the content center, nearly 90,000 square feet of colonial structures that house CBS and ESPN production teams, as well as the many media endeavors the club oversees, such as Masters.com, YouTube shows, podcasts, social media and the like. Inside, with its wainscoted white walls and dark oak floors, it's as luxurious and well-appointed as a Four Seasons hotel.
This home for broadcast media is not to be confused with the center for other domestic and international media such as the Los Angeles Times and many more, which is closer to the course and similarly pristine.
The content center isn't open to the public but often has visitors, guests of the club, and for one week a year thrums with activity from before daybreak to long after nightfall. Parked in back are nearly 50 production trucks that form a broadcast village that was moved from the area behind the par-three course.
Advertisement
Step into the main floor of the content center and it's like entering a tee-time time warp, a sweet-spot Smithsonian, with photos, murals, touchscreen kiosks and the faint soundtrack of Masters radio from generations gone by.
'Tradition is everything at Augusta National — everything,' said Verne Lundquist, who covered the Masters for 40 years for CBS before retiring last year.
Walk down the hallway and you'll find an acknowledgment of the first green jacket ceremony in 1949, a quote from sportswriter Herbert Warren Wind when he coined 'Amen Corner' in 1958, and a shot of Butler Cabin in 1965. Over here, more modern milestones such as the first color broadcast (1966), first Masters website (1996), first streaming (2006) and first mobile app (2009).
This wall honors famous moments on the course, from Gene Sarazen's double eagle on 15 — nicknamed 'The Shot Heard 'Round the World' — to Tiger Woods' fifth Masters victory in 2019.
Advertisement
The main Masters.com workroom looks like a modern newsroom, with about 200 new-age storytellers generating all types of content during the week of the tournament. (The place is pretty much empty the other 51 weeks of the year.) There are podcasters, video and audio production teams, photo editors, graphic designers, web publishers, a social-media team and international representatives who create material in Spanish, Japanese, Korean, Thai and Chinese, among other languages.
Ringing the room are studios for shows such as the daily 'Mornings at the Masters' on the tournament's YouTube channel, and the 'Fore Please! Now Driving' podcast.
It's club policy that no employees speak on the record, but people who work at the content center will tell you about their 'crawl, walk, run' development process in which they won't rush to put a technology in place but instead will perfect and polish it before the unveiling. For instance, the Masters briefly had a Twitter account in 2009, then paused it and refined it for several years before relaunching.
The ability to show every shot in the tournament was available well before the Masters introduced it in 2019, but was held back to make quality improvements. The driving force, the club says, is a commitment to relevance, excellence and storytelling integrity.
Advertisement
The most cutting edge of the Masters technologies is done by IBM, which has created a 'digital twin' of Augusta National using aerial surveys and analyzed nine years of tournament data, nearly a million shots, with statistical ball data and ultra-detailed modeled contours of every green.
With a few clicks on a giant video wall, someone operating the system can show you, for instance, that Woods never made a bogey or eagle on No. 13 during the nine years studied. (By comparison, Rory McIlroy eagled 13 on Friday for the sixth time in his Masters career.)
On the video game-type overview of the hole, a user can zoom in on every flight path and landing spot of every Woods shot.
Using AI technology and that huge sample size, along with wind and weather data, the program can fairly reliably forecast which holes will play tougher on a given day. The predictive models are field-based, not player-specific. IBM says that's because of Augusta National's interest in staying neutral.
Advertisement
The technology is exclusive to on-site demonstrations and not yet public, though there are ongoing discussions for broader fan access.
IBM uses AI to provide a live-shot feed in which the best and most exciting shots happening around the course are streamed online. Computers select shots in part based the on the crowd reaction and player gestures, such as a fist pump or raised putter. The same technology is used to quickly cobble together a player's daily highlight reel that encapsulates his full round in about three minutes.
'It is a balance, and if we go back to the basics,' Ridley said, 'we go back to the fact that we have to continue to get better, we have an obligation under our mission to promote the values and the virtues of the game, and we have an obligation to respect tradition.
'So when you sort of put all that together, the way I look at it is we are using technology to tell the story of who we are, to tell the story of the Masters, to explain to people maybe that — particularly younger people — what the Masters is all about and why it matters to the game of golf.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

U.S. Open cut line: Bryson DeChambeau, Phil Mickelson will miss the weekend
U.S. Open cut line: Bryson DeChambeau, Phil Mickelson will miss the weekend

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

U.S. Open cut line: Bryson DeChambeau, Phil Mickelson will miss the weekend

OAKMONT, Pa. — Rory McIlroy made it interesting, but he will see the weekend. Defending champion Bryson DeChambeau, however, will not. Neither will Phil Mickelson. The top 60 players and ties made the cut at Oakmont. That came in at +7. Advertisement That number — +7 — is one shot higher than the last time the U.S. Open was played at Oakmont (2016), when the cut line fell at +6. McIlroy, with a birdie at No. 18, got himself to +6. So he's safely made it in. DeChambeau, with a brutal 77 on Friday, finished at +10 and will not defend his title. Mickelson was comfortably inside the cut line, but a pair of double bogeys on his back nine torpedoed his round and possibly has last chance ever at a U.S. Open. If this is, indeed, his last U.S. Open, it's a brutal way to go. He was even par on his round through 14 holes, but he doubled 15 and 17, putting him on the wrong side of the cut at +8. Others who will miss the cut: Ludvig Åberg, Wyndham Clark, Tommy Fleetwood, Dustin Johnson, Gary Woodland, Patrick Cantlay, Justin Rose, Shane Lowry and Justin Thomas. To see all the players who made and missed the cut, click here for the complete live leaderboard.

Sam Burns left standing atop the US Open leaderboard as stars falter in nasty second round
Sam Burns left standing atop the US Open leaderboard as stars falter in nasty second round

New York Post

time3 hours ago

  • New York Post

Sam Burns left standing atop the US Open leaderboard as stars falter in nasty second round

OAKMONT, Pa. — Oakmont bit back Friday. It's not that the venerable venue hosting its record 10th U.S. Open this week was a pushover in Thursday's opening round. But it was a bit nastier in Friday's second round. It was particularly hard on the game's biggest stars. Scottie Scheffler, the world's No. 1 ranked player and an overwhelming favorite to win this week, fought his butt off to get himself inside the cut line and is 4-over par, seven shots behind leader Sam Burns. Burns (more on him in a moment) leads at 3-under after shooting an eye-opening 5-under 65 on Friday and is one of only three players in the 156-man field under par. 5 Sam Burns swings during the second round of the U.S. Open on June 13. Getty Images The other two are first-round leader J.J. Spaun at 2-under and Viktor Hovland at 1-under. Adam Scott and Ben Griffin, one of the hottest players in the game, are even par. Scheffler, despite his struggles, played well enough to reach the weekend, as did Rory McIlroy, who birdied No. 18 to close at 6-over before continuing his bizarre anti-media petulant pouting campaign and blowing off interview requests. For those counting at home, that's six consecutive major championship rounds since his triumphant Masters victory in April that McIlroy has refused to be interviewed. Defending champion Bryson DeChambeau did the same, bolting the grounds in a slow jog despite a USGA interview request after he stumbled off of 18 having shot 10-over in two rounds. Oakmont will do that to you. It did it to Dustin Johnson, the last player to win a U.S. Open at Oakmont, in 2016. He finished 10-over. It did it to Shane Lowry, who was runner-up to Johnson and in good form. He posted 17-over in two days. 5 Bryson DeChambeau reacts during the second round of the U.S. Open on June 13. Getty Images 5 Dustin Johnson reacts after a shot during the second round of the U.S. Open on June 13. Getty Images Burns was one of the very few who didn't seem to be bothered by Oakmont, despite entering this week having played in 19 majors and posting only one top 10, at the 2024 U.S. Open. But on Friday, in his second round, Burns looked and sounded like he's found something, posting the round of the tournament. It was a score that few saw coming this week. Asked if he saw a 65 possible in tournament play while playing practice rounds, Burns said, 'Honestly, I didn't really think of much of a score. The golf course is really too difficult to try to figure out what's a good score and what's not. 5 Sam Burns reacts during the second round of the U.S. Open on June 13. AP 'It's a 72-hole golf tournament, and if you can get a round under par out here, no matter if it's 1-under, you'll take it. I think today was really nice with the finish I had yesterday, and it felt like I played really well. I'm looking forward to the weekend.'' The 28-year-old Burns, ranked 22nd in the world and a five-time PGA Tour winner, is just days removed from a playoff loss to Ryan Fox at the Canadian Open on Sunday, so he arrived at Oakmont in good form. 'I feel like I've been playing well coming off last week and into this week and my round [Thursday],'' Burns said. 'It's really just trying to get yourself in position out here and give yourself as many looks as you can.'' When Burns gets good looks, he often cashes them in because he's one of the best putters in the game. Scheffler offered his analysis on what makes Burns such a good putter. 'He plays golf, I think, very freely, and he's got really good natural instincts when it comes to his putting,'' Scheffler said. 'And a lot of it is just very reactionary. He's got good fundamentals, good instinct, and he putts very reactionary. That's really all there is to it.'' Asked 'how badly'' Burns wants to win a major, Scheffler said, 'It's a complicated question. Sam is like me in a sense that he's a hyper-competitive person. I think you always dream of having a chance to win these tournaments, and he's put himself in position a few times at majors. He's in position again. 'I'm sure going into the weekend he's right where I would want to be on the leaderboard, so it should be a fun experience for him.'' Burns revealed what he's learned from his past struggles in majors. 5 Sam Burns lines up a putt during the second round of the U.S. Open on June 13. AP 'At times, I was trying to be a little too perfect around major championship golf courses,'' he said. 'Especially around here, it kind of forces you to take your medicine because a lot of times, that's the only option you have. 'For this golf course, you really just have to free it up. It's too hard to try to guide it around here. You're going to hit some in the rough, you're going to hit some in some bad spots, you might as well do it with authority. It's going to be a fun weekend.''

Scott Galloway bluntly predicts major change for Netflix
Scott Galloway bluntly predicts major change for Netflix

Miami Herald

time4 hours ago

  • Miami Herald

Scott Galloway bluntly predicts major change for Netflix

Scott Galloway, the podcaster and New York University professor, explained his view on June 13 that the last significant battle in the streaming industry was a showdown between Netflix and Hollywood - and Netflix emerged victorious. By expanding production globally, taking advantage of broadband technology, and capitalizing on inexpensive funding, Netflix (NFLX) was able to make large-scale investments similar to Amazon's strategy, Galloway explained, leaving competitors unable to keep pace. The outcome? A major shift in value from traditional studios and entertainment talent to Netflix's investors and subscribers. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter Netflix's newest version operates as more than just a subscription-based platform - it now combines both subscriptions and advertising in its business model. And nearly 94 million people have chosen Netflix's ad-supported plan since it was introduced fewer than three years ago, according to Galloway. Netflix has proven itself to be a master of adaptation in the media landscape. It started as a mail-order DVD business, toppling the giant Blockbuster. Then it evolved into a streaming powerhouse, upending Hollywood's dominance. Related: Jean Chatzky sends strong message to Americans on Social Security Now, after a decade without major changes, Netflix is transforming once more, Galloway wrote. The company is introducing AI-driven content recommendations, mobile-friendly vertical videos, and a refreshed visual design to take on platforms such as YouTube and TikTok. And once again, the streaming service faces a new challenge. Shutterstock Having won the last streaming war, Netflix now confronts a new threat, Galloway explained in his "No Mercy / No Malice" newsletter. In fact, this prominent challenger is in the ring with all streaming services. "The next streaming war?" Galloway wrote. "YouTube takes on the world." "This year, more people in the U.S. watched YouTube on TVs than on mobile devices - a first," he continued. "YouTube is now the No. 1 distributor of TV content, according to Nielsen. And for the past three months, YouTube registered the largest share of TV viewing (12%) among media companies; Netflix accounted for 7.5%." More on the U.S. economy: Jean Chatzky shares major statement about Social SecurityShark Tank's Kevin O'Leary has blunt words on 401(k) plansDave Ramsey strongly cautions U.S. workers on Social Security YouTube is essentially public access television scaled to the internet, but with vastly superior production quality, observed Galloway. His Markets podcast co-host Ed Elson notes that Gen Z sees YouTube - owned by Alphabet (GOOGL) - as an algorithm-driven force shifting influence away from established brands and toward individual creators. The biggest disruptor to Hollywood, Galloway argues, isn't Netflix chairman's Reed Hastings - it's MrBeast, the YouTube star who has perfected parasocial relationships. In 2023 alone, MrBeast amassed over a billion hours of watch time, surpassing the top Netflix shows. "But just as individual content creators disrupted Hollywood, AI may disrupt content creators," Galloway wrote. While Netflix is expected to invest around $18 billion in content this year, YouTube effectively operates with a content budget of zero, instead sharing ad revenue with its creators. MrBeast has revealed that producing a single video typically costs him $2.5 million. Yet in a striking shift, an AI-generated muzak channel recently surpassed him, becoming the fastest-growing channel on YouTube this month. Related: Shark Tank's Kevin O'Leary makes bold prediction on U.S. economy Galloway argues that the rise of Netflix, YouTube and the competition for streaming audiences has cost us something vital: a shared cultural experience. In 1983, the final episode of M.A.S.H. was a national event, drawing 106 million viewers - nearly half of America, he recalls. By contrast, last year's most-watched scripted TV finale, "Yellowstone," reached just 13 million people, a mere 4% of the country. The shift from scheduled programming to unlimited, on-demand content has fragmented American culture, Galloway suggests - and this fact reflects the loss of two key societal pillars: collective experiences and a shared identity. "Without shared stories, we don't laugh together, love/hate the same heroes/villains, or believe in the same facts when we argue," Galloway wrote. "We lose our empathy, our ability to see each other as human." "It's hard to demonize someone you watched 'Cheers' with every Thursday night; it's easy to hate someone whose cultural references are completely foreign to your feed." Related: Scott Galloway makes major prediction on world economy; 401(k) impact seen The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store