logo
Letters to The Editor — June 27, 2025

Letters to The Editor — June 27, 2025

The Hindu5 hours ago

Conflict and aftermath
The Iran-Israel conflict has virtually left the nuclear non-proliferation treaty in tatters. Meanwhile, a well-scripted agenda of genocide continues in Gaza. It is another matter that the Ukraine war — which U.S. Preisident Trump had famously promised to end in '24 hours' upon taking office — has been relegated to the background.
C.G. Kuriakose,
Kothamangalam, Kerala
The direct involvement of the U.S. in the conflict is an indication that the U.S. is trying to reassert its supremacy through intimidation. Iran cannot be underestimated, as it too has friends. U.S. President Donald Trump should concentrate more on the state of America's economy.
Govardhana Myneedu,
Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh
Software testing
I wish to highlight a critical shift in software testing in the IT industry. As demand for efficient, scalable solutions grows, automation testing is becoming essential. The future of software quality assurance lies in automation, which offers faster, error-free testing, especially for tasks such as validating chatbots with numerous queries. Firms must invest in upskilling staff in automation tools and coding to drive productivity and innovation. By embracing this shift, businesses can improve testing efficiency and empower staff to meet the challenges of the tech industry.
Vivek M. Jain,
Chennai

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump vows 3.1% economic growth through ‘Big Beautiful Bill'; promises 7 mn jobs, tax cuts
Trump vows 3.1% economic growth through ‘Big Beautiful Bill'; promises 7 mn jobs, tax cuts

Time of India

time21 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Trump vows 3.1% economic growth through ‘Big Beautiful Bill'; promises 7 mn jobs, tax cuts

US President Donald Trump made his final pitch at a White House event Thursday for his massive tax relief and spending cuts package as the Senate eyes a vote in the coming days. Trump was joined in the White House by "everyday Americans" who would benefit from the bill, according to the White House, including waiters, food delivery drivers and border patrol agents. Show more Show less

U.S. requires visa applicants to share social media used in 5 years: U.S. Embassy in India
U.S. requires visa applicants to share social media used in 5 years: U.S. Embassy in India

The Hindu

timean hour ago

  • The Hindu

U.S. requires visa applicants to share social media used in 5 years: U.S. Embassy in India

Describing each visa adjudication as a 'national security decision', the U.S. has asked applicants to share their social media usernames or handles for each platform they have used in the last five years. The U.S. Embassy in India shared the information in a brief statement issued on Thursday (June 26, 2025), which also cautioned against 'omitting' social media information, as it could lead to 'visa denial and ineligibility for future visas.' The statement that was posted on X read, 'Visa applicants are required to list all social media usernames or handles of every platform they have used from the last 5 years on the DS-160 visa application form. Applicants certify that the information in their visa application is true and correct before they sign and submit it.' The communication continued, 'Omitting social media information could lead to visa denial and ineligibility for future visas.' On June 23, the U.S. Embassy asked those applying for an F, M, or J non-immigrant visa to switch the privacy settings of their social media accounts to 'public' to facilitate vetting, which it said was necessary to establish their identity and admissibility to the US under law. The embassy had also said since 2019, the U.S. has required visa applicants to provide 'social media identifiers' on immigrant and non-immigrant visa application forms. The F or M category is for student visas, and the J category is for exchange visitor visas. In Thursday's (June 26, 2025) communication, the embassy also attached two related digital posters. National security decision 'Every U.S. visa adjudication is a national security decision,' read the caption on the top of a poster, followed by a note. The note read, 'The United States requires visa applicants to provide social media identifiers on visa application forms. We use all available information in our visa screening and vetting.' It comes against the backdrop of an immigration crackdown by the Trump administration in Los Angeles recently. On June 24, the embassy's statement said that the U.S. had increased enforcement of immigration laws, and violators would face detention, deportation, and permanent consequences for future visa eligibility. The U.S. further warned that those entering the country illegally would face jail time and deportation. The U.S. Embassy in India has issued a series of statements on the subject of visas and immigration this month. On June 19, the embassy said a U.S. visa was 'a privilege, not a right,' and its screening did not stop after a visa was issued, as authorities might revoke it if one broke the law. The embassy had also said that using illegal drugs or breaking any of the U.S. laws while on a student or visitor visa could make one ineligible for future U.S. visas. Earlier this month, the U.S. Embassy in India also issued statements, underlining that while people travelling legally to America were welcome, illegal entry or abuse of visas won't be tolerated by the country. The United States 'will not tolerate' those who facilitate illegal and mass immigration to the U.S., its embassy said on June 16, 2025. The U.S. Embassy had said the U.S. had 'established new visa restrictions' targeting foreign government officials and violators.

No evidence Iran moved enriched uranium before strikes: US defence chief
No evidence Iran moved enriched uranium before strikes: US defence chief

India Today

time2 hours ago

  • India Today

No evidence Iran moved enriched uranium before strikes: US defence chief

US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth on Thursday said he was unaware of any intelligence suggesting Iran had moved any of its highly enriched uranium to shield it from U.S. strikes on Iran's nuclear program during the weekend.U.S. military bombers carried out strikes against three Iranian nuclear facilities early Sunday local time using more than a dozen 30,000-pound bunker-buster results of the strikes are being closely watched to see how far they may have set back Iran's nuclear "I'm not aware of any intelligence that I've reviewed that says things were not where they were supposed to be, moved or otherwise," Hegseth told an often fiery news President Donald Trump, who watched the exchange with reporters, echoed his defense secretary, saying it would have taken too long to remove anything."The cars and small trucks at the site were those of concrete workers trying to cover up the top of the was taken out of (the) facility," Trump wrote on his social media platform, without providing experts have cautioned that Iran likely moved a stockpile of near-weapons-grade highly enriched uranium out of the deeply buried Fordow site before the strikes, and could be hiding it in locations unknown to Israel, the U.S. and U.N. nuclear noted satellite imagery from Maxar Technologies showing "unusual activity" at Fordow on Thursday and Friday, with a long line of vehicles waiting outside an entrance to the facility. A senior Iranian source told Reuters on Sunday most of the 60% highly enriched uranium had been moved to an undisclosed location before the OF URANIUMThe Financial Times, citing European intelligence assessments, reported that Iran's highly enriched uranium stockpile remains largely intact since it was not concentrated at comments denying such claims came at the news briefing where he also accused journalists of downplaying the success of the U.S. strikes following a leaked preliminary assessment from the Defence Intelligence Agency suggesting they may have only set back Iran by said the assessment was low confidence, and, citing comments from CIA Director John Ratcliffe, said it had been overtaken by intelligence showing Iran's nuclear program was severely damaged and would take years to Hegseth, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and General Dan Caine, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, held a classified briefing on the strikes on Thursday for all 100 members of the U.S. Gabbard, who would normally conduct such briefings as director of national intelligence, was not scheduled to participate. Trump said last week that she was wrong in suggesting there was no evidence Iran was building a nuclear Senate briefing had been scheduled for Tuesday, but was postponed. Senators are expected to vote this week on a resolution that would require congressional approval for strikes against Iran, although the measure is not expected to be the Pentagon news conference, Hegseth described the strikes as "historically successful." His comments came after Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said on Thursday Iran would respond to any future U.S. attack by striking American military bases in the Middle claimed victory after 12 days of war, and promised Iran would not surrender despite Trump's 'HATRED'During the news conference, Hegseth criticised the media, without evidence, for having an anti-Trump bias."It's in your DNA and in your blood to cheer against Trump because you want him not to be successful so bad," Hegseth said."There are so many aspects of what our brave men and women did that ... because of the hatred of this press corps, are undermined," he praised Hegseth's news conference as: "One of the greatest, most professional, and most 'confirming' news conferences I have ever seen!"advertisementOn X, Hegseth thanked Trump for his the press conference, Caine, the top U.S. general, largely stuck to technical details, outlining the history of the bunker-busting bombs used. Caine showed a video testing the bombs on a bunker like the ones struck on declined to provide his own assessment of the strike and deferred to the intelligence community. He denied being under any pressure to change his assessment to present a more optimistic view of the U.S. also said he would not change his assessment due to politics. Uniformed military officials are supposed to remain apolitical and provide their best military advice."I've never been pressured by the president or the secretary to do anything other than tell them exactly what I'm thinking, and that's exactly what I've done," he said.- EndsMust Watch

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store