Hopeful messages about humanity abound in ‘Utopian Hotline' at the planetarium
Though there are a couple of turntables on the work station at the center of the planetarium's circular theater, the show does not focus on the contents of the 'Golden Record.' Instead, the four performers, dressed in matching olive-drab jumpsuits, take turns addressing the audience in hushed tones, through headphones.
Advertisement
The performance is structured as a thought experiment: What is time, and what is space? What does it mean to be lonely? And how could we make the world a better place?
Audience members, who are encouraged to put on their headphones in the lobby before the show begins, are introduced to a series of unidentified voices. They're ordinary people who have left messages through the 'Utopian Hotline' (646-694-8050). The question: How do you imagine a more perfect future?
Advertisement
On the show's opening night at the museum, responses ranged from thoughts on reforming consumer culture and ending our addiction to guns to a longing for the day 'when phones are abolished and waffles are mandatory.'
Once the audience is seated and the lights go down, the performers begin to move around the work station, which is equipped with playback devices and push-button telephones. When an actor picks up a handset and begins to speak, their voice is transmitted to the audience headphones. The effect is dreamy, like an inner voice speaking to your subconscious.
Overhead, projected on the dome of the planetarium, we see kinetic images of space travel and an astronaut's view of our 'little blue dot.' Circles abound, from spinning records to rotary dials. During an actor's quiet monologue about sitting on her grandmother's porch, listening to old-time music, the audience is immersed in a bubble-like field of tall grass at sunset.
At one point, an actor tees up the computer voice of the late physicist Stephen Hawking, who explains his theory of black holes. The projected images that accompany this are simple geometry – pairs of circles that represent the dance of charged particles, or human attraction.
The anecdotes the actors relate seem to come from their own actual lives. One recalls leaving rocks in secret places for childhood friends 'in hopes of making meaning.' Another performer explains how her mother cherished nothing more than family dinner time, during which her children were forbidden to answer the phone.
Advertisement
'Don't pick it up,' her mother would warn. 'It could be the future!'
If time is linear, the performers suggest, then why are clocks round? It's a never-ending circle, one says. Everything is connected.
Experimental electronic music – the kind the mind typically associates with the early days of computer development and space exploration – drifts behind the voices. In stretches, the actors speak their parts as if singing in the round. The women sometimes sing a cappella: haunting versions of 'Are You Lonesome Tonight?' and Hank Williams's 'I'm So Lonesome I Could Cry.'
But even if we are truly alone in the universe, 'Utopian Hotline' will leave those who experience it with a welcome sense of tranquility and wonder. We're reminded that humans, like all things, are made of stardust: 'It takes a cosmos to make a human,' one of the performers says.
Is anybody out there? The curious-minded may want to attend this otherworldly show to give it some thought.
UTOPIAN HOTLINE
By Theater Mitu. Presented by ArtsEmerson[cq] and the Museum of Science. Through May 18 at Museum of Science, 1 Science Park. Tickets $25 general, $17.50 museum members.
James Sullivan can be reached at
.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
What if the Big Bang wasn't the beginning? New research suggests it may have taken place inside a black hole
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. The Big Bang is often described as the explosive birth of the universe — a singular moment when space, time and matter sprang into existence. But what if this was not the beginning at all? What if our universe emerged from something else — something more familiar and radical at the same time? In a new paper, published in Physical Review D, my colleagues and I propose a striking alternative. Our calculations suggest the Big Bang was not the start of everything, but rather the outcome of a gravitational crunch or collapse that formed a very massive black hole — followed by a bounce inside it. This idea, which we call the black hole universe, offers a radically different view of cosmic origins, yet it is grounded entirely in known physics and observations. Today's standard cosmological model, based on the Big Bang and cosmic inflation (the idea that the early universe rapidly blew up in size), has been remarkably successful in explaining the structure and evolution of the universe. But it comes at a price: it leaves some of the most fundamental questions unanswered. For one, the Big Bang model begins with a singularity — a point of infinite density where the laws of physics break down. This is not just a technical glitch; it's a deep theoretical problem that suggests we don't really understand the beginning at all. To explain the universe's large-scale structure, physicists introduced a brief phase of rapid expansion into the early universe called cosmic inflation, powered by an unknown field with strange properties. Later, to explain the accelerating expansion observed today, they added another "mysterious" component: dark energy. Related: 5 fascinating facts about the Big Bang, the theory that defines the history of the universe In short, the standard model of cosmology works well — but only by introducing new ingredients we have never observed directly. Meanwhile, the most basic questions remain open: where did everything come from? Why did it begin this way? And why is the universe so flat, smooth, and large? Our new model tackles these questions from a different angle — by looking inward instead of outward. Instead of starting with an expanding universe and trying to trace back how it began, we consider what happens when an overly dense collection of matter collapses under gravity. This is a familiar process: stars collapse into black holes, which are among the most well-understood objects in physics. But what happens inside a black hole, beyond the event horizon from which nothing can escape, remains a mystery. In 1965, the British physicist Roger Penrose proved that under very general conditions, gravitational collapse must lead to a singularity. This result, extended by the late British physicist Stephen Hawking and others, underpins the idea that singularities — like the one at the Big Bang — are unavoidable. The idea helped win Penrose a share of the 2020 Nobel prize in physics and inspired Hawking's global bestseller A Brief History of Time: From the Big Bang to Black Holes. But there's a caveat. These "singularity theorems" rely on "classical physics" which describes ordinary macroscopic objects. If we include the effects of quantum mechanics, which rules the tiny microcosmos of atoms and particles, as we must at extreme densities, the story may change. In our new paper, we show that gravitational collapse does not have to end in a singularity. We find an exact analytical solution — a mathematical result with no approximations. Our maths show that as we approach the potential singularity, the size of the universe changes as a (hyperbolic) function of cosmic time. This simple mathematical solution describes how a collapsing cloud of matter can reach a high-density state and then bounce, rebounding outward into a new expanding phase. But how come Penrose's theorems forbid out such outcomes? It's all down to a rule called the quantum exclusion principle, which states that no two identical particles known as fermions can occupy the same quantum state (such as angular momentum, or "spin"). And we show that this rule prevents the particles in the collapsing matter from being squeezed indefinitely. As a result, the collapse halts and reverses. The bounce is not only possible — it's inevitable under the right conditions. Crucially, this bounce occurs entirely within the framework of general relativity, which applies on large scales such as stars and galaxies, combined with the basic principles of quantum mechanics — no exotic fields, extra dimensions or speculative physics required. What emerges on the other side of the bounce is a universe remarkably like our own. Even more surprisingly, the rebound naturally produces the two separate phases of accelerated expansion — inflation and dark energy — driven not by a hypothetical fields but by the physics of the bounce itself. One of the strengths of this model is that it makes testable predictions. It predicts a small but non-zero amount of positive spatial curvature — meaning the universe is not exactly flat, but slightly curved, like the surface of the Earth. This is simply a relic of the initial small over-density that triggered the collapse. If future observations, such as the ongoing Euclid mission, confirm a small positive curvature, it would be a strong hint that our universe did indeed emerge from such a bounce. It also makes predictions about the current universe's rate of expansion, something that has already been verified. This model does more than fix technical problems with standard cosmology. It could also shed new light on other deep mysteries in our understanding of the early universe — such as the origin of supermassive black holes, the nature of dark matter, or the hierarchical formation and evolution of galaxies. These questions will be explored by future space missions such as Arrakihs, which will study diffuse features such as stellar halos (a spherical structure of stars and globular clusters surrounding galaxies) and satellite galaxies (smaller galaxies that orbit larger ones) that are difficult to detect with traditional telescopes from Earth and will help us understand dark matter and galaxy evolution. These phenomena might also be linked to relic compact objects — such as black holes — that formed during the collapsing phase and survived the bounce. RELATED STORIES —When will the universe die? —Universe may revolve once every 500 billion years — and that could solve a problem that threatened to break cosmology —Scientists may have finally found where the 'missing half' of the universe's matter is hiding The black hole universe also offers a new perspective on our place in the cosmos. In this framework, our entire observable universe lies inside the interior of a black hole formed in some larger "parent" universe. We are not special, no more than Earth was in the geocentric worldview that led Galileo (the astronomer who suggested the Earth revolves around the Sun in the 16th and 17th centuries) to be placed under house arrest. We are not witnessing the birth of everything from nothing, but rather the continuation of a cosmic cycle — one shaped by gravity, quantum mechanics, and the deep interconnections between them. This edited article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
New research challenges everything we know about the Big Bang
The Big Bang is often described as the explosive birth of the universe – a singular moment when space, time and matter sprang into existence. But what if this was not the beginning at all? What if our universe emerged from something else – something more familiar and radical at the same time? In a new paper, published in Physical Review D, my colleagues and I propose a striking alternative. Our calculations suggest the Big Bang was not the start of everything, but rather the outcome of a gravitational crunch or collapse that formed a very massive black hole – followed by a bounce inside it. This idea, which we call the black hole universe, offers a radically different view of cosmic origins, yet it is grounded entirely in known physics and observations. Today's standard cosmological model, based on the Big Bang and cosmic inflation (the idea that the early universe rapidly blew up in size), has been remarkably successful in explaining the structure and evolution of the universe. But it comes at a price: it leaves some of the most fundamental questions unanswered. For one, the Big Bang model begins with a singularity – a point of infinite density where the laws of physics break down. This is not just a technical glitch; it's a deep theoretical problem that suggests we don't really understand the beginning at all. To explain the universe's large-scale structure, physicists introduced a brief phase of rapid expansion into the early universe called cosmic inflation, powered by an unknown field with strange properties. Later, to explain the accelerating expansion observed today, they added another 'mysterious' component: dark energy. In short, the standard model of cosmology works well – but only by introducing new ingredients we have never observed directly. Meanwhile, the most basic questions remain open: where did everything come from? Why did it begin this way? And why is the universe so flat, smooth, and large? Our new model tackles these questions from a different angle – by looking inward instead of outward. Instead of starting with an expanding universe and trying to trace back how it began, we consider what happens when an overly dense collection of matter collapses under gravity. This is a familiar process: stars collapse into black holes, which are among the most well-understood objects in physics. But what happens inside a black hole, beyond the event horizon from which nothing can escape, remains a mystery. In 1965, the British physicist Roger Penrose proved that under very general conditions, gravitational collapse must lead to a singularity. This result, extended by the late British physicist Stephen Hawking and others, underpins the idea that singularities – like the one at the Big Bang – are unavoidable. The idea helped win Penrose a share of the 2020 Nobel prize in physics and inspired Hawking's global bestseller A Brief History of Time: From the Big Bang to Black Holes. But there's a caveat. These 'singularity theorems' rely on 'classical physics' which describes ordinary macroscopic objects. If we include the effects of quantum mechanics, which rules the tiny microcosmos of atoms and particles, as we must at extreme densities, the story may change. In our new paper, we show that gravitational collapse does not have to end in a singularity. We find an exact analytical solution – a mathematical result with no approximations. Our maths show that as we approach the potential singularity, the size of the universe changes as a (hyperbolic) function of cosmic time. This simple mathematical solution describes how a collapsing cloud of matter can reach a high-density state and then bounce, rebounding outward into a new expanding phase. But how come Penrose's theorems forbid out such outcomes? It's all down to a rule called the quantum exclusion principle, which states that no two identical particles known as fermions can occupy the same quantum state (such as angular momentum, or 'spin'). And we show that this rule prevents the particles in the collapsing matter from being squeezed indefinitely. As a result, the collapse halts and reverses. The bounce is not only possible – it's inevitable under the right conditions. Crucially, this bounce occurs entirely within the framework of general relativity, which applies on large scales such as stars and galaxies, combined with the basic principles of quantum mechanics – no exotic fields, extra dimensions or speculative physics required. What emerges on the other side of the bounce is a universe remarkably like our own. Even more surprisingly, the rebound naturally produces the two separate phases of accelerated expansion – inflation and dark energy – driven not by a hypothetical fields but by the physics of the bounce itself. One of the strengths of this model is that it makes testable predictions. It predicts a small but non-zero amount of positive spatial curvature – meaning the universe is not exactly flat, but slightly curved, like the surface of the Earth. This is simply a relic of the initial small over-density that triggered the collapse. If future observations, such as the ongoing Euclid mission, confirm a small positive curvature, it would be a strong hint that our universe did indeed emerge from such a bounce. It also makes predictions about the current universe's rate of expansion, something that has already been verified. This model does more than fix technical problems with standard cosmology. It could also shed new light on other deep mysteries in our understanding of the early universe – such as the origin of supermassive black holes, the nature of dark matter, or the hierarchical formation and evolution of galaxies. These questions will be explored by future space missions such as Arrakhis, which will study diffuse features such as stellar halos (a spherical structure of stars and globular clusters surrounding galaxies) and satellite galaxies (smaller galaxies that orbit larger ones) that are difficult to detect with traditional telescopes from Earth and will help us understand dark matter and galaxy evolution. These phenomena might also be linked to relic compact objects – such as black holes – that formed during the collapsing phase and survived the bounce. The black hole universe also offers a new perspective on our place in the cosmos. In this framework, our entire observable universe lies inside the interior of a black hole formed in some larger 'parent' universe. We are not special, no more than Earth was in the geocentric worldview that led Galileo (the astronomer who suggested the Earth revolves around the Sun in the 16th and 17th centuries) to be placed under house arrest. We are not witnessing the birth of everything from nothing, but rather the continuation of a cosmic cycle – one shaped by gravity, quantum mechanics, and the deep interconnections between them. Enrique Gaztanaga is a Professor in the Institute of Cosmology and Gravitation (University of Portsmouth) at the University of Portsmouth. This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
Entrepreneur
2 days ago
- Entrepreneur
AI or Illusion? Hawking's Warning Rings True in 2025
Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own. You're reading Entrepreneur India, an international franchise of Entrepreneur Media. "Success in creating AI could be the biggest event in the history of our civilization. But it could also be the last unless we learn how to avoid the risks," said renowned physicist Stephen Hawking. Today, Hawking's warning feels more relevant than ever. AI-generated content is rapidly flooding the internet, leaving audiences both amazed and confused. A recent example occurred when actor Paresh Rawal announced his exit from Hera Pheri 3 Movie. AI-generated images depicting Pankaj Tripathi as Baburao quickly circulated, leaving many viewers convinced of their authenticity. Addressing this concern, Tripathi himself emphasised the dual nature of technology. He noted that technology can be used positively or negatively, but consumers must stay vigilant about distinguishing real from fake. But are we truly prepared to identify what's genuine? The recent Mary Meeker's Artificial Intelligence Trends report 2025 highlights this leap. AI now surpasses human-level performance and realism in multiple areas, including realistic conversations, voice generation, and image creation. For instance, Stanford's AI Index 2025 Annual Report revealed that AI models in 2024 achieved an accuracy of 92.3 per cent on the Massive Multitask Language Understanding (MMLU) benchmark, overtaking the human average of 89.8 per cent. This test evaluates general knowledge and reasoning across diverse subjects, demonstrating AI's dramatic improvement from just 34 per cent accuracy in 2019. AI's conversation beyond face, and voice The realism of AI interactions has also reached new heights. In a recent test by researchers Cameron Jones and Benjamin Bergen, 73 per cent of human testers mistook AI-generated responses from GPT-4.5 (with persona) as human-created. Even more striking, an example Turing Test conducted in March 2025 showed participants were 87 per cent certain that an AI-generated conversation was human, noting, "Witness A had human vibes." AI's image-generating capabilities have similarly advanced, with AI-created visuals now nearly indistinguishable from real photographs, leaving viewers in awe and raising crucial ethical questions. Audio generation has also seen remarkable progress. Companies like ElevenLabs have enabled realistic AI voice translations, reaching millions of global users. In two years, ElevenLabs users generated an astonishing 1,000 years of audio content. Spotify has integrated this technology, translating audiobooks into 29 languages and making global content accessible to hundreds of millions of listeners worldwide. With these innovations, Kunal Varma, CEO and Co-founder of Freo, believes, "The greatest challenges lie in the magnitude and pace of AI-driven fake news, deepfakes, and manipulated graphics or videos, which can lead to confusion, mistrust in television, film, and written content, and serious financial consequences. Misinformation has the potential to go viral on social media and messaging platforms, making it problematic for the typical user to determine what's real and what's not." Ankit Sharma, Senior Director and Head of Solutions Engineering at Cyble, feels the risk is especially high in Tier-2 and Tier-3 cities. "Communities are becoming more connected, but digital literacy initiatives have not kept pace with smartphone and internet uptake. When AI-created disinformation—particularly voice recordings or videos in local languages—is distributed in these communities, the information is often consumed without fact-checking. This makes it a powerful tool for instability, hysteria, or manipulation. In addition, such regions are usually dependent on closed messaging systems such as WhatsApp or Telegram, where identifying the source and tracking the virality of debunked information is even more challenging. One effectively crafted, AI-fabricated piece of misinformation can trigger real-world consequences, ranging from social tension to election manipulation or cyberattacks on critical infrastructure," Sharma emphasised. To combat fake AI content, Varma suggested, "Private firms, digital platforms, and industrial bodies must work collaboratively on solutions—whether that be developing superior AI to detect and flag manipulated content, or connecting threat intelligence across organisations. Tech firms can also invest in rapid-response systems, and platforms have the opportunity to empower end users with simple tools to flag misleading content." Ankush Sabharwal, Founder and CEO of CoRover, added, "We're seeing rapid adoption of AI-powered media forensics and content validation platforms. Tools leveraging Natural Language Processing (NLP), image forensics, and blockchain-backed content provenance are increasingly being integrated into the workflows of both government agencies and responsible media houses. These tools enable real-time detection of manipulated narratives, sentiment skew, and coordinated propaganda efforts."
