I fought hard to expand Arizona's Medicaid program. We all pay if it's scaled back
Restoring health care coverage for Arizonans who lost it during the Great Recession stands out as one of my proudest moments as governor.
It wasn't easy, but it was the right thing to do for the people of Arizona — and we got it done, despite a lot of people telling me I shouldn't, or couldn't.
Now, more than a decade later, that same coverage is once again in jeopardy. And Arizona's members of Congress will play a critical role in determining whether folks can still count on that care.
The House Energy and Commerce Committee, which oversees Medicaid, has been tasked with finding $880 billion in savings to help fund an extension of the 2017 tax cuts.
That's a big number. And there's no question — Medicaid is on the table.
Some of the proposals being floated would mean deep cuts to state Medicaid programs, including the Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System (AHCCCS). If these ideas move forward, our state could lose close to $2 billion in federal funding.
That kind of shift would dump massive costs onto the state without a roadmap for how to cover them. And as every governor knows — Democrat or Republican — we can't just print more money.
If the federal dollars disappear, the state is left with a handful of bad choices: cut eligibility, cut services, cut payments to providers or raise taxes.
I've sat in that chair. I've faced those choices. I had to make all of them as governor during one of Arizona's hardest times. We were in the middle of a deep recession, and I inherited a budget crisis unlike our state had ever seen.
Some in Washington say they don't want to hurt those who depend on Medicaid. They say they want to stop waste and fraud and make sure that people who can work, do.
But here in Arizona, we've already done that. We already have work requirements — there has been a law on the books since 2015.
And most AHCCCS recipients are working. In fact, more than 200,000 people left the program in 2023 — most because they got jobs. That's something to celebrate.
Arizona voters made it clear nearly 25 years ago who should qualify for Medicaid in this state with the passage of Proposition 204. That wasn't a decision made by politicians — it was made by the people. So, regardless of what Congress does, Arizona is still required by law to cover this population.
If Congress forces states to find savings, Arizona won't be trimming fat — it'll be cutting muscle. Tens of thousands of Arizonans will lose coverage. I've seen what happens when that lifeline disappears. It's not theoretical. It's real.
In 2024, AHCCCS helped 64,000 Arizonans battling cancer. It treated 67,500 people fighting opioid addiction. It supported 180,000 residents managing diabetes.
But sick people just don't disappear if they don't have coverage. They show up in emergency rooms, the most expensive place to get care. Under federal law, hospitals are required to treat them.
Opinion: You'll pay more for health care if Republicans ax AHCCCS expansion
Hospitals and the health care industry can't provide services for free, so they end up passing the costs on to health care insurance companies who end up raising all our premiums to cover the cost of service, something called the 'hidden health care tax,' which creates a drag on the whole economy.
That's not just bad health policy. It's bad economics. Hospitals will struggle. Some may close.
Health care workers like doctors and nurses will lose their jobs. Insurers will raise premiums to make up for the losses. Employers and families will pay more — and Arizona's economy will feel the strain.
These cuts don't just hurt AHCCCS members. They ripple through every part of our state.
I know what it's like to be a lawmaker faced with a tough vote. I know what it's like to stand up to your own party when it matters. And I know how hard it is to do the right thing — especially when it's not the popular thing.
But I hope our delegation remembers what's at stake. This isn't about politics. It's about people. And it's about protecting something that works — for patients, providers and taxpayers.
Because at the end of the day, leadership is about more than just holding the line — it's about doing what's right for Arizona.
Jan Brewer, a Republican, is a former Arizona lawmaker and secretary of state who served as governor from 2009 to 2015. Reach her on X @GovBrewer.
This article originally appeared on Arizona Republic: Jan Brewer: Scaling back AHCCCS hurts all of Arizona | Opinion
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Moody's Downgrades America's Credit Rating Over D.C. Dysfunction
In a sure sign that President Donald Trump is ushering the U.S. into a new Golden Age, Moody's became the third and final credit ratings agency to downgrade America's rating on Friday, citing rising debt and interest payments, as well as dysfunction in Washington D.C. Downgrading America's financial outlook from 'stable' to 'negative,' Moody's pointed the finger at lawmakers, saying, 'Successive U.S. administrations and Congress have failed to agree on measures to reverse the trend of large annual fiscal deficits and growing interest costs.' In doing so, the agency joined its fellow ratings agencies in removing the United States' former top triple-A status; Fitch downgraded the U.S. in 2023, and S&P did so back in 2011, where it has remained at AA+ ever since. The news comes as Trump's attempts to implement his radical fiscal policies in the form of his 'Big Beautiful' bill were thwarted by his fellow Republicans, who blocked the legislation. Trump's proposed plan focused on taxes, including extending 2017 tax cuts he previously implemented, and allocated $46.5 billion to resume construction of his long-talked-about border wall. Analysts have warned that the bill, including a proposed $5 trillion in tax cuts, could exacerbate the country's already massive debt. In a statement on Friday, Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) said of the news, 'Moody's downgrade of the United States' credit rating should be a wake-up call to Trump and Congressional Republicans to end their reckless pursuit of their deficit-busting tax giveaway,' adding, 'Sadly, I am not holding my breath.' Chairman of the U.S. House Committee on Financial Services, Rep. French Hill (R-AR) also released a statement, pointing the finger at Democrats as well as his fellow Republicans and stating that the news served as a 'strong reminder that our nation's fiscal house is not in order,' a growing threat that agencies had been 'sounding the alarm' about for years but that 'neither party in power' had managed to fix. Since taking office, Trump has promised to balance the national budget, primarily through drastically lowering government expenditure by laying off huge swaths of the workforce via DOGE and implementing a convoluted series of tariffs that set off a trade war with China. The U.S. national debt now sits north of $36 trillion. In achieving a unanimous AA+ credit rating, the U.S. now sits alongside nations like New Zealand and Finland, but below Canada, Australia, and Germany.
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
JD Vance Tells Theo Von Musk Made A 'Huge Mistake' Going After Trump
Vice President JD Vance said Elon Musk made a critical error attacking President Donald Trump and his so-called Big Beautiful Bill. 'I think it's a huge mistake for him to go after the president like that,' Vance told podcaster and comedian Theo Von in an interview released Friday. 'I think that if he and the president are in some blood feud, most importantly it's going to be bad for the country, but I don't think it's going to be good for Elon, either.' The two were taping an episode of Von's podcast, 'This Past Weekend w/ Theo Von,' as Trump and Musk publicly traded barbs on Thursday. As Vance and Von spoke, Musk shared a post to X, formerly Twitter, accusing Trump of holding off on the release of files about late financier and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein due to Trump being mentioned in them. 'The fucking shit-missile is in the cannon,' Von said, before reading the post aloud to Vance. Vance acknowledged his loyalties would always be with Trump and defended the president against Musk's accusations, saying Trump never did 'anything wrong' with Epstein. Vance praised Musk's work with the Department of Government Efficiency and suggested Musk could just be lashing out due to frustration with the political process. 'I hope that eventually Elon kind of comes back into the fold,' Vance said. 'Maybe that's not possible now, because he's gone so nuclear.' Vance said it's unfair for Musk to go after Trump for the Big Beautiful Bill — arguing it's good but not perfect — and that Congress made the bill, not Trump. 'I just think it's a huge mistake for the world's wealthiest man, I think one of the most transformational entrepreneurs ever, to be at this war with the world's most powerful man, who I think is doing more to save the country than anybody— and I'm 40 years old — anybody in my lifetime,' Vance added. Vance also addressed a post in which Musk suggested Trump should be impeached and replaced with Vance, calling it 'totally insane.' Vance wasn't the only Trump administration official to learn of Musk's feud with the president while taping a podcast. FBI Director Kash Patel was taping a podcast with Joe Rogan when Musk sent the Epstein post, prompting the podcast host to exclaim, 'Jesus Christ, that's a crazy thing to say.' 'I'm just staying out of the Trump-Elon thing, that's way outside my lane,' Patel said. 'I know my lane, and that ain't it.'
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Civics in the time of MAGA: Junior high kids get right what we adults have gotten wrong
So, I'm sitting here on a Thursday afternoon, watching a bunch of junior-high-school kids answering questions about American government and constitutional rights. And the sad irony is they know more about it than at least 90% of the politicians and elected officials I cover on a daily basis. It's called the National Civics Bee. It's like a spelling bee, but with civics. And Thursday was the state finals, held at the downtown Wichita headquarters of the Kansas Leadership Center. What made this a lot more fun than the usual 'bee' format was it was set up to allow for audience participation. Attendees (in a separate group) could play along with the competitors and test their own knowledge. I talked with Chris Green of the Leadership Center and we both agreed it would be fun to invite some of our elected officials next year to see see how they stack up against the sixth-, seventh- and eighth graders in the contest. I wonder how many would accept the challenge. The questions ranged from fairly easy, like . . . Q: A new education reform bill was introduced in Congress and successfully passed through both the House of Representatives and the Senate. What is the next step before the bill can become law? A: The president must sign the bill into law or take no action for 10 days, after which it will automatically become law. . . . to the detailed and difficult, for example. . . Q: In Federalist number 39, how does Madison distinguish between a federal and national government, and what does this distinction suggest about the nature of the Constitution as a product of the convention? A: Madison claims that the Constitution is both federal and national, with the House of Representatives representing the national and the Senate representing the federal, suggesting that the constitution will balance power between the state and national. (I got that one wrong. I picked the answer with the House representing the federal and Senate national). In addition to the multiple choice, the five finalists had to read from and answer judges' questions on an essay they wrote on a current issue, ranging from saving rural hospitals to reforming state policy on driver's license revocation. When all was said and done, Tanya Ramesh of Wichita won the competition, a $1,000 giant check, and a ticket to Washington for the national finals. Madeline Stewart of Overland Park took second and $500, while Zane Hoff of Salina got third and $250. I thought the Civics Bee was one of the coolest events I've been to in a while, so I hesitate to even bring this up, but some of the questions probably need updating in this era of MAGA. For instance: Q: How did Afroyim versus Rusk in 1967 affect the government's power regarding citizenship revocation? A: It limited the government's ability to to revoke citizenship. Afroyim v. Rusk was a landmark case that ruled: 'Congress has no power under the Constitution to divest a person of his United States citizenship absent his voluntary renunciation thereof. ' The court's revised that stance since, to allow citizenship to be revoked (called denaturalization) if it was granted on false pretenses that would have prevented it in the first place, for example, terrorists or Nazi war criminals living under false identities. Now, denaturalization has become a key part of President Donald Trump's ongoing efforts to deport as many non-white immigrants as possible, whom he accuses (echoing a former world leader named Adolf) of 'poisoning the blood of our country.' During his first term, Trump created 'Operation Second Look,' a program to comb immigrant citizens' paperwork for misstatements or errors that would allow them to be denaturalized. This term, his top immigration advisor, Stephen Miller, has vowed to 'turbocharge' Operation Second Look, which could also lead to denaturalization and deportation of American-born children of immigrants, under Trump's executive order that purports to end birthright citizenship. Another Civics Bee question that caught my attention was this one: Q: Which statement best reflects the application of federalism in the Clean Air Act, considering the following quotation, 'the Clean Air Act represents a partnership between federal and state governments to improve air quality and to protect public health.' A: The federal government sets national standards, while states can implement stricter regulations based on local needs. That's the way it's supposed to work. But it brought to mind a recent press release I got from Kansas 1st District Rep. Tracey Mann, taking a victory lap over Congress rolling back California anti-pollution regulations. At the time, I remember thinking, 'What business is this of Tracey Mann's?' given that he represents a district that sprawls from Colorado to one county away from Missouri, where there are about four times as many cows as people and the largest city, Lawrence, would be a minor suburb of Los Angeles. What he knows of the pollution challenges facing California I'm guessing would fit on a microscope slide, but he couldn't care less as long as he can own some libs and send out a press release titled: 'Rep. Mann Reverses Biden Green New Deal Policies.' When I was growing up, we didn't have civics bees. We barely had any civics education. Truth be told, most of what we ever knew about the workings of government came from 'Schoolhouse Rock,' three-minute educational cartoons sandwiched between Jonny Quest and Scooby-Doo on Saturday mornings. Cue the music: 'I'm just a bill, yes I'm only a bill, and I'm sitting here on Capitol Hill.' I can't help thinking if we'd had civics bees back then, we wouldn't be in this mess we're in today. So it lifts my heart to see these earnest young kids competing over who knows the most about the people and ideals that built America. It gives me great hope that their future will be better than the present that my generation has handed them.