Public divided on Bill 5 but say Indigenous rights are more important than speed: poll
Public sentiment is divided on the Ford government's controversial new mining law, according to fresh polling, which indicates people are in favour of speeding up projects but not at the expense of First Nation rights or labour laws.
New polling from Liason Strategies for the National Ethnic Press and Media Council of Canada gauged the mood of Ontarians as the government passed Bill 5 into law.
The legislation makes a number of changes, among them is the power for the government to create so-called special economic zones, where municipal, environmental or labour laws could be bypassed.
The government has indicated the Ring of Fire will be one such area, potentially along with Highway 401 and Ontario's fleet of nuclear power stations.
The law's passage at Queen's Park last week sparked a storm of protests and backlash from First Nations leaders, who fear it will infringe on their rights and labour unions, who worry about workers' rights.
Story continues below advertisement
First Nations groups, in particular, have promised a summer of disruption in response to the legislation — potentially blocking railways, highways and mines in the north.
Get breaking National news
For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy
Liaison's polling shows public opinion on the legislation itself is evenly split. About half of those polled (49 per cent) said they were following the legislation somewhat or very closely as it passed through the legislature.
Opinion of its value was also split. Forty-four per cent of those polled said they were in favour of it, while 41 per cent said they were opposed. Fifteen per cent of people said they were unsure.
'Given the poll's margin of error, this is a pretty close result,' David Valentin, principal at Liason Strategies, said in an interview on Focus Ontario.
'It's not probably where the premier wants to see it, which is somewhere closer to 60 or 65 per cent, but it's also not where the opposition would like to see it, with overwhelming opposition. So, we've got a sort of mixed result.'
The poll also asked people to rank various issues against the importance of fast-tracking key construction projects.
Sixty-three per cent of respondents said fast-tracking was more important than municipal bylaws, and 58 per cent favoured speeding up projects over following environmental regulations.
Story continues below advertisement
On the other hand, 64 per cent of people said respecting Indigenous rights was more important than speeding up projects, and 56 per cent of those polled said it was more important to follow labour laws than to speed up projects.
The polling points to public opinion sitting behind two groups who have been most vocal in their opposition to Bill 5.
'It shows you that when it comes to Indigenous leaders and labour leaders, they've gotten their message out, their message has resonated, and Ontarians agree with them: Yeah, you can speed up the process, but you're not going to suspend labour laws,' Valentin said.
Last week, Bill 5 received Royal Assent and became law, with Ontario Premier Doug Ford saying he wants to designate the Ring of Fire as a special economic zone 'as quickly as possible.' At the same time, the government is promising to consult with First Nations leaders before any major changes are made using the new powers.
Valentin said the lack of examples for what a special economic zone will be was potentially making it harder for people to form a strong opinion in favour or against the legislation.
'What does it actually mean? Which regulations, which laws are going to be suspended? Which groups are ultimately going to be impacted?' he said.
'They've written the law so they can do a lot of things — OK, what are the specifics of that going to be? I think that might be why people perhaps have a hard time understanding what the ultimate effects of the bill are.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Global News
an hour ago
- Global News
Edmonton faces $1.5B capital funding budget shortfall — which is set to grow
The City of Edmonton doesn't have enough money to maintain its existing infrastructure, let alone build anything new. In a fiscal update on Tuesday at City Hall, administration said there is $1.5 billion capital funding shortfall. The money goes towards grants, neighbourhood renewals, fleet replacements and also for debt finance infrastructure. Edmonton isn't unique in this struggle — the city said this is an issue many cities are struggling with in the years following the COVID-19 pandemic. Five years ago, Edmonton paused increasing taxes — something thought to be necessary at the time when many households were dealing with financial struggles such as layoffs or business closures due to the global health emergency. Story continues below advertisement But now, Mayor Amarjeet Sohi says decisions like that, made by previous councils, are coming back to bite the city now. 'They froze taxes, they reduced taxes, they left this council with a huge deficit in our day-to-day operations — underfunding of city services like snow removal, not caring much about social equity issues that we are trying to tackle here, or grant funding that we have increased to community organizations.' 'Neglect will catch up on you and that's exactly what we see.' Tweet This Click to share quote on Twitter: "Neglect will catch up on you and that's exactly what we see." 2:01 Edmonton city council approves 8.9% property tax increase in 2024 City leaders say the solution isn't as simple as just spending less, because that can end up costing more down the road. Get weekly money news Get expert insights, Q&A on markets, housing, inflation, and personal finance information delivered to you every Saturday. Sign up for weekly money newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy 'Fiscal responsibility isn't just about keeping taxes low or repressing things because this is what you end up getting,' said Ward Anirniq councillor Erin Rutherford. Story continues below advertisement 'You end up with deferred maintenance, deferred renewal, and then we have the deficit that we're seeing today. 'That hole was dug over years and years — probably decades — and we can't get out of it in one fell swoop.' Tweet This Click to share quote on Twitter: "That hole was dug over years and years — probably decades — and we can't get out of it in one fell swoop." Rutherford said one of the long-term solutions the city has come up with is a Universal Renewal Fund. She explained it's dedicated to things like neighbourhood renewal and road maintenance – which can't be funded through loans or money from other levels of government. 'Renewal isn't sexy. It's a lot of behind-the-scenes stuff. So you need what we call pay-as-you-go funding, which means we need cash in hand to fix the things. That's really hard to find unless you build up a piggy bank, so to say, of tax funding that is going straight to that purpose,' Rutherford said. 'It's saying to the residents, 'You know, I know we're taxing you on this, this is what it's going for. You know those potholes that you're complaining about all the time? It's because we're actually not renewing at our ideal state.' So to get there, we need to actually have this fund that, on an ongoing basis, will give us more cash in hand to do the work of maintaining our city.' 1:44 City of Edmonton explores avenues to address funding shortfall Sohi said the city has reduced the operating budget by nearly $200 million but more still needs to be done. Story continues below advertisement The mayor said the city's finances took a hit due to changes the province made to Municipal Sustainability Initiative (MSI) funding. The program allocated more than $15.2 billion to Alberta communities when it was in place between 2007 and 2023. The provincial government replaced MSI with the Local Government Fiscal Framework (LGFF) in 2024-25. 'We are getting one-third of what we were getting before, and we had to make it up by raising taxes or deferring the repairs. So I think municipalities in Alberta do not get the kind of support that is necessary to continue to provide good quality public services,' Sohi said. On top of the current shortfall, the city expects to be another $1.8 billion short in the next budget cycle, making the gap $3.2 billion. But that doesn't mean the city can just stop maintaining its assets — if nothing is done, Rutherford said it could mean closing down facilities and selling off assets. 'If we do nothing, in 20 years we'll have a huge proportion of our city assets in D and F condition, which means they're basically at failure level, and we will have to shut down some of the most valuable assets that Edmontonians have come to love, right? Our recreation centres, our libraries, our transit service will get worse. 'We will start to see those failures in service across the system.' Tweet This Click to share quote on Twitter: "We will start to see those failures in service across the system." Story continues below advertisement 1:54 City of Edmonton environmental policies driving up capital budget costs Rutherford said that means the City of Edmonton will be quite limited in what new builds it commits to in the next four-year budget cycle. 'Any growth projects need to very strategic on things like safety — so fire halls, police stations — things that create tax uplift and economic wellness, and things that have funding from other orders of government.' Ultimately to tackle a billion-and-a-half-dollar gap, Edmonton taxpayers will be on the hook.
CTV News
an hour ago
- CTV News
Hydro One to hold information sessions on a new power line
Hydro One is preparing for the construction of a 260-km transmission line between Wawa and Timmins, with service expected by the end of 2030. Hydro One is preparing for the construction of a 260-km transmission line between Wawa and Timmins, with service expected by the end of 2030. With demand for electricity expected to increase in Ontario by 75 per cent by 2050, Hydro One is preparing for the construction of a 260-kilometre transmission line between Wawa and Timmins, with service expected by the end of 2030. Sonny Karunakaran, vice-president of Strategic Projects and Partnership for Hydro One, said the new transmission line will be better for the environment. Timmins Hydro One Hydro One will hold public information sessions in July regarding the new Wawa to Timmins transmission line. (CTV News file photo) 'Industries that are presently reliant on certain fossil fuels can have the opportunity to look at decarbonization and conversion of energy, into cleaner sources accordingly,' Karunakaran said. Open houses Before work begins, Hydro One will host open houses in Timmins on July 7; in Chapleau on July 8; and, in Wawa on July 9. All sessions will be open to the public and held at Royal Canadian Legion branches. Hydro One is also working with nearby First Nations, who can invest in a 50 per cent equity stake in the transmission line component. 'Our communities have been long in the back seat when it comes to industrial development, so we're so happy to be included 50-50 with our partners at Hydro One,' said Jason Batise, executive director of Wabun Tribal Council. 'Adding our expertise and experience to … advise on things like route selection and ensuring that our communities are comfortable with where the line is going to be and how it's going to operate.' Batise said public input is mostly needed on environmental issues to ensure sensitive areas are avoided.
Vancouver Sun
2 hours ago
- Vancouver Sun
Opinion: It's time to fast-track actions to defend B.C.'s lands, waters, fish and wildlife
B.C. Premier David Eby and Prime Minister Mark Carney have outlined visions for rapid development of B.C. and Canada's natural resources to 'aggressively develop projects that are in the national interest in order to protect Canada's energy security.' As a drastic action to fast-track key projects, the provincial government recently narrowly passed Bills 14 and 15, laws that risk trampling Indigenous rights and circumventing environmental protections. As a scientist who studies the health of western Canada's oceans, rivers, and salmon, my alarm bells are going off. B.C. and Canada have an unfortunate track record of failing to protect ecosystems and people from industrial activities. From Eagle Creek to Mount Polley, mining disasters are releasing toxins into drinking water and killing fish — 70 per cent of B.C.'s salmon populations are declining . In the 2021 B.C. vs. Yahey decision, the B.C. Supreme Court found that the province enabled oil and gas and other industries to cumulatively degrade northeast B.C.'s ecosystems to such an extent that moose and caribou populations collapsed, violating Blueberry River First Nations' treaty rights. A daily roundup of Opinion pieces from the Sun and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Informed Opinion will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. Risk of such harms to lands, waters, fish, wildlife, and Indigenous rights could be decreased through effective implementation of environmental policies. Eby also states he wants to advance 'conservation of precious water and land, and partnership with First Nations.' Here are five actions that the province could advance to fast-track safeguards for the lands and waters that sustain fish, wildlife, and people: First, set interim limits of cumulative industry disturbance to minimize risks of pushing lands and waters over thresholds of unacceptable harm. Currently, neither B.C. nor Canada has a policy that provides certainty for local peoples and industry by saying, 'This is too much.' There is an opportunity to leverage the existing B.C. Cumulative Effects Framework and the 2021 Yahey legal precedence to set interim baseline thresholds for cumulative disturbance with statutory power across all sectors. Second, support and empower regional planning processes. There are various new and ongoing planning processes that work with local rights-holders and other groups to incorporate local values and priorities to identify opportunities and limits for industry. Local peoples may want more, or less, stringent regulations than provincial thresholds. There is an opportunity to increase investment in and authority of land-use planning processes that supersede provincial guidelines. Third, protect 30 per cent of B.C. by 2030, guided by local rights-holders and scientific information. Indigenous protected and conserved areas and other Indigenous-led conservation initiatives can protect key ecosystems for current and future generations. Collectively, these locally and science-driven conservation areas could prioritize the protection of critical areas for cultural keystone species such as moose, caribou, and salmon and set no-go zones for industry. Continued action is needed if commitments of 30 per cent protection by 2030 are to be met. Fourth, prevent empty promises of economic benefits of industries. A 2023 study found that mines underdelivered promised jobs by 40 per cent, and delivered only one-third of forecasted tax revenue. A 2024 report found that many mine claims are doing environmentally harmful explorations aimed to garner investments that make mining executives even richer, but without intent to actually extract minerals. B.C.'s lands, waters, and local peoples would have some defence against get-rich-quick schemes if mining companies were required to submit a robust economic feasibility plan as part of their project description in the early stages of environmental assessment. Fifth, reconsider Bills 14 and 15 and clarify their application. Bills 14 and 15 give authority to fast-track projects and thus are a bellwether for the true colours of the province. Amendments to the bills could clarify how selected projects will consider environmental risks and incorporate free, prior, and informed consent to avoid violation of B.C.'s 2019 Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act. If the bills are used to fast-track a gold or coal mine, then it will be clear that B.C. is extracting its resources for short-term dollars at the expense of environmental well-being and future generations. In these times of crisis, B.C. and Canada have the very real opportunity to be global leaders in the triple bottom line of social, economic, and environmental thriving. As Canada takes action to fast-track sustainable development, there is a parallel need to fast-track actions to not sell off the health of our lands, waters, and futures to extractive industries. Healthy watersheds mean healthy people and healthy economies. Jonathan Moore is a professor of aquatic ecology and conservation at Simon Fraser University and Liber Ero Chair of coastal science and management.
