logo
ROSS CLARK: As Labour creates 27 new quangos in eight months... How quangocracy rakes in the cash

ROSS CLARK: As Labour creates 27 new quangos in eight months... How quangocracy rakes in the cash

Daily Mail​27-04-2025

Is there anything more dishonest than repeated government promises to pare back the quangos?
Two months ago, this doomed process began yet again when Keir Starmer announced he, too, would cut out pointless bureaucracy.
'For too long, the previous government hid behind regulators, deferring decisions and allowing regulations to bloat and block meaningful growth in this country,' he said.
Yet the Labour Government has already created 27 new quangos in eight months, including the Fair Work Agency and the Independent Football Regulator – without which the sport had long managed to operate quite happily.
Not that the Conservatives can talk. Remember David Cameron 's great 'bonfire of the quangos'?
While it's true his coalition government culled 285 public bodies, it also created 184 new quangos, many disguised as companies in which the government was the sole shareholder.
Between 2018 and 2023 the May, Johnson, Truss and Sunak governments went on to create 17 more quangos, from the Regulatory Horizons Council to Active Travel England.
Coined in a 1982 book by Anthony Barker called the Quangos In Britain, the acronym stands for a 'quasi-autonomous non-governmental organisation' – an arm's length organisation to which governments have increasingly delegated power.
At the time, there were officially 2,171 of these, many of which Margaret Thatcher promised to cut.
Yet by 1994, a group called Democratic Audit claimed there were 5,521 bodies that could fairly be called 'quangos'. Which is great news for the quangocrats.
According to an analysis by the Taxpayers' Alliance of the annual reports for 398 quangos for the year 2022/23, some 285 quangocrats sat on the boards of more than one body.
Five sat on four different boards, one on six and one sat on an astonishing nine boards, earning a total of £145,000 for his troubles.
So, who are the men and women on Britain's quango gravy train and how much are they raking in for what, in many cases, seems a remarkably light workload?
On the gravy train
Since last year, unelected Peter Hendy, 72, has been rail minister in Sir Keir's government, a position he is able to fill thanks to a life peerage.
He doesn't report to MPs in the House of Commons but he is at least a bit more accountable than he was in his previous job as Chairman of Network Rail. There he had the distinction – if it can be called that – of being the highest-paid non-executive member of any quango, receiving £316,000 a year.
Not only did he have no responsibility to report to the Commons, he had no shareholders to report to, either, because Network Rail is a wholly government-owned company.
Maybe if the trains ran on time and services were not constantly disrupted by strikes, over-running engineering works and staff shortages, it wouldn't matter so much. But anguished passengers have every right to feel short-changed.
The City fat cat
In a scathing report last autumn, Richard Lloyd, of the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Investment Fraud and Fairer Financial Services, branded Britain's financial regulator 'incompetent' for its failure to protect people against scams.
According to UK Finance, the trade body for banks, consumers lost £1.17billion to fraud in 2023.
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has also been accused of having terrible staff relations. One worker spoke of being 'criticised, bullied and sidelined' after challenging the regulator's performance.
None of this, however, has prevented the FCA's top brass from doing very nicely.
Now Senior Independent Director and Deputy Chairman of the FCA, Mr Lloyd has also acted as interim chairman in which capacity he earned £136,000.
At the same time he held the position of Chairman of Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority – being paid as much as £60,000 last year.
Woman who sat on FOUR boards
Catharine Seddon's background is as a BBC documentary-maker. But that hasn't stopped her sitting on multiple quangos covering subjects for which she does not have any obvious qualification.
In 2022/23, she was on four boards. She was a non-executive director of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority for which she was paid £22,500, a senior independent director of the Gambling Commission (£12,500), a lay member of the Legal Service Bill (another £12,500) and a board member of the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (£7,500).
Retaining roles with two of these organisations, her expertise seems to have widened further – she now sits on the disciplinary committee of the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons.
Chairman of the jet set
Air Chief Marshal Sir Stephen Hillier enjoyed a distinguished career in the Royal Air Force, which he ended up leading between 2016 and 2019.
He won't be lacking a good pension, but he is doing pretty well in retirement by building a portfolio of quango positions.
He is paid £130,000 as chairman of the Civil Aviation Authority and £17,500 as non-executive director at the UK Atomic Energy Authority. He is also chairman of the RAF Museum, for which his remuneration is unknown.
Missed many meetings
A polite way to describe Martin Spencer would be to call him a prolific figure in the quango world.
Others might prefer to see him as feasting on public money, spreading himself too thinly in the process.
In 2022/23 Spencer set what must surely be a record by sitting on no fewer than nine quangos.
He served as a commissioner for the Civil Service Commission, for which he received £70,000 a year.
On top of that were posts as a non-government, non-executive director of the Submarine Delivery Authority (£17,500); a non-executive board member for Companies House (£12,500); the interim Chair of the Education and Skills Funding Agency (£12,500); a member of the Legal Ombudsman (£12,500); and a non-executive director of the NHS Counter-Fraud Authority.
Spencer also had roles with Ofsted, the Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority and the Criminal Cases Review Commission. This all adds up to a handsome annual income from the taxpayer of £145,000.
Given his testing schedule, he missed many meetings of the various bodies on which he served. In the year 2022/23 he made it to only one out of four meetings of the Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority, three out of eight of the NHS Counter-Fraud Authority and just three out of six meetings of Ofsted.
String of directorships
Not far behind Spencer on the quango gravy train is Emir Feisal, a chartered accountant who in 2022/23 managed to hold down a very impressive six positions, the second-most of any individual.
As a member of the British Transport Police Authority he pocketed £17,500 a year, alongside lucrative yet not obviously onerous roles as a non-executive director of the Driver and Vehicle Standards Authority (which earned him £17,500) and as a commissioner for the Judicial Appointments Commission (for which he was paid £13,000).
He also found time to serve as a non-executive board member of Companies House (£12,500), a non-executive director of the Pensions Ombudsman (£7,500) and a non-executive director of the Serious Fraud Office (£2,500).
He was eligible to attend 32 meetings at four of the organisations, and made it to 23.
He has since given up half of the six positions, and supplemented his income with new board roles with the Disclosure and Barring Service and Planning Inspectorate.
Paid advisor
Another quangocrat with four jobs, Deep Sagar has served as a non-executive director of the Animal and Plant Health Agency (£7,500), a non-executive board member (commercial) for the Legal Aid Agency (£8,000), an independent advisory member of the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman (£6,000), and a board member for the Gangmasters and Labour Abuse Authority (£7,500). He no longer performs the last role.
Multiple roles
Mother-of-three Caroline Corby has a background working in the City in private equity, after which she devoted her time to penning historical and children's books.
But she has since reinvented herself as a quangocrat, with multiple fingers in the public sector pie.
In 2022/23 she combined being chair of the Parole Board (£37,500) with chair of the Professional Standards Authority for Health and Social Care (£35,000) as well as being a non-executive director of the Security Industry Authority (£2,500), roles she continues to hold.
Rich rail rewards
Cementing the rail industry's role as the biggest gravy train of all, Mark Bayley receives £66,000 as a non-executive director of Network Rail, which is responsible for the upkeep and development of railway infrastructure.
In 2022/23 as he was also a non-executive director of the much criticised Water Services Regulation Authority (or Ofwat, annual salary £17,500) and of the UK Atomic Energy Authority (£17,500), which he has since given up.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Zia Yusuf hits back over ‘burka ban'
Zia Yusuf hits back over ‘burka ban'

Spectator

timean hour ago

  • Spectator

Zia Yusuf hits back over ‘burka ban'

There's trouble in paradise, it seems. Perhaps the most eye-catching moment at yesterday's PMQs came when Sarah Pochin, Reform's newest MP, stood up to grill Keir Starmer for the first time. The moment was heavily trailed by deputy leader Richard Tice, who promised it would be 'interesting' in a video on X. Pochin duly rose and asked Keir Starmer the following: Given the Prime Minister's desire to strengthen strategic alignment with our European neighbours, will he – in the interests of public safety – follow the lead of France, Denmark, Belgium and others, and ban the burqa? Lee Anderson, sat beside her, was heard muttering: 'Here, here!' He later posted on X: 'Ban the burqa? Yes we should. No one should be allowed to hide their identity in public.' Given Anderson's role as the party's chief whip, you'd think that the Reform disciplinarian would be speaking the party line.

Five MILLION pensioners could get winter fuel allowance in chaotic Labour U-turn - but millions more face higher tax bills to 'claw back' the benefit
Five MILLION pensioners could get winter fuel allowance in chaotic Labour U-turn - but millions more face higher tax bills to 'claw back' the benefit

Daily Mail​

time2 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Five MILLION pensioners could get winter fuel allowance in chaotic Labour U-turn - but millions more face higher tax bills to 'claw back' the benefit

Five million pensioners could get winter fuel allowance reinstated this year under Labour's humiliating climbdown, it was claimed today. However, millions more face higher tax bills to 'claw back' the benefit - worth up to £300. And there are concerns that bereaved families could be hit with unexpected demands for cash. The complicated solution has been mooted after months of scrambling to defuse fury at the policy. It was one of the first announcements Rachel Reeves made after entering No11, and has been blamed for triggering the dramatic slump in Labour's popularity. Keir Starmer dramatically announced a U-turn on the plans last month, without saying what exactly was being proposed or when it would take effect. Yesterday the Chancellor confirmed confirmed the changes would be in place 'this winter' – but was still unable to say who will qualify. She also said the Government will not set out how the reinstated payments will be funded until the Autumn Budget. Designing a cost-effective means test for the benefit - which ministers are adamant should not be paid to 'millionaires' - has been causing major headaches for officials. According to the Times, the Treasury has drawn up an option that would hand winter fuel payments to all 10million pensioners this season. But there would then be an equivalent tax charge for those with incomes above a threshold. That could be set at the average household disposable income of £37,000. In that case around half of pensioners would end up paying back the allowance to the Treasury later. But there are concerns that the government would end up chasing repayments from the families of pensioners who die after receiving the handouts, but before the tax settlement. Pensions minister Torset Bell is facing an angry backlash after he claimed that scrapping the winter fuel allowance had 'no effect' on the health of older people. Mr Bell told MPs that among those who had been hit by the cuts 'we see no differential effects on their health'. Dennis Reed, of over-60s campaign group Silver Voices, said: 'It is a ridiculous thing to say. 'We know from our own members that a lot of people have been shivering in their homes with their overcoats on last winter because they were too afraid to put the heating on. 'Many conditions, such as arthritis and respiratory conditions, are made worse by the cold – how can he possibly claim it's had no effect?'

Experts back DfE's claim free school meals plan will lift 100,000 English children out of poverty but say only over time
Experts back DfE's claim free school meals plan will lift 100,000 English children out of poverty but say only over time

The Guardian

time2 hours ago

  • The Guardian

Experts back DfE's claim free school meals plan will lift 100,000 English children out of poverty but say only over time

Update: Date: 2025-06-05T08:27:12.000Z Title: Experts back DfE's claim free school meals plan will lift 100,000 English children out of poverty – but stress only over time Content: Good morning. Normally child poverty is not at the centre of the national political debate (although it probably should be). But yesterday, at PMQs, Kemi Badenoch did make it a lead talking point by asking Keir Starmer if he would commit to keeping the two-child benefit cap, the Osborne-era benefit cut that is seen as a key driver of child poverty. She was doing this not because she wanted to promote the Tories as supporters of child poverty (although arguably that is one interpretation of her stance), but because she knows the policy is popular with voters who accept George Osborne's argument that it is unfair for the state to pay very poor people to have more than two children when many other parents restrict the number of children they have depending on what they can afford. (Welfare experts say this is a grossly misleading caricature of why people with three or more children end up needing benefits, and that even if it was true it would be unfair to punish children, but in the court of public opinion, the Osborne argument still seems to be winning.) Badenoch was using as a classic 'wedge issue', and her question was designed to force Starmer to choose between siding with Labour MPs (who want the cap to go) and mainstream voters (who want to to stay, by almost two to one, according to some polling). Badenoch did not get very far because Starmer just dodged the question. (That does not mean she was wrong to identify this as a dilemma for Labour; it just means Starmer avoided it becoming a problem yesterday.) It is still not clear what Starmer will do about the two-child benefit cap. But he told MPs at lunchtime yesterday: 'I believe profoundly in driving down poverty and child poverty.' And, overnight, the government has announced a policy that has been widely welcomed and that will reduce child poverty in England. It is going to extend access to free school meals for poorer children. In a news release the Department for Education says: Over half a million more children will benefit from a free nutritious meal every school day, as the government puts £500 back into parents' pockets every year by expanding eligibility for free school meals. From the start of the 2026 school year, every pupil whose household is on Universal Credit will have a new entitlement to free school meals. This will make life easier and more affordable for parents who struggle the most, delivering on the government's Plan for Change to break down barriers to opportunity and give children the best start in life. The unprecedented expansion will lift 100,000 children across England completely out of poverty. But not immediately. In an analysis, which is generally positive about the announcement, the Institute for Fiscal Studies says that, although eventually 100,000 children in England will lifted out of poverty by this measure, in the short term the figure will be much lower. Christine Farquharson, associate director at IFS, explains: Offering free school meals to all children whose families receive universal credit will, in the long term, mean free lunches for about 1.7 million additional children. But transitional protections introduced in 2018 have substantially increased the number of children receiving free school meals today - so in the short run, today's announcement will both cost considerably less (around £250m a year) and benefit considerably fewer pupils (the government's estimate is 500,000 children). This also means that today's announcement will not see anything like 100,000 children lifted out of poverty next year. It is the big announcement this week, linked to next week's spending review, with positive news for Labour MPs and supporters. (Yesterday's was about a £15bn transport infrastructure programme.) Westminster sceptics think the Treasury is trying to buy some goodwill ahead of an actual announcement that will generate grim headlines about spending cuts. It is also not clear whether today's child poverty story is evidence that the governnment is moving towards the abolition of the two-child benefit cap, which would have a much bigger impact on child poverty reduction, or whether it is just a substitute for it. The free school meals announcement just covers England. England often lags behind the devolved governments in welfare policy, and it is worth pointing out that they have more generous provision on free school meals anyway. In Scotland all children get them for their first five years in primary schools, in Wales all primary school children get them, and in Northern Ireland a means test applies, but it is more generous than the English one. In Labour-run London all primary school pupils also get free school meals. Here is the agenda for the day. 9.30am: Pat McFadden, Cabinet Office minister, takes questions in the Commons. Morning: Keir Starmer is visiting a school in the south-east of England, where he is due to speak to broadcasters. After 10.30am: Lucy Powell, leader of the Commons, takes questions from MPs on next week's Commons business. 11am: Mel Stride, shadow chancellor, gives a speech at the RSA thinktank where he will say the Tories will 'never again' risk the economy with unfunded tax cuts like those in Liz Truss's mini-budget. 11.30am: Downing Street holds a lobby briefing. And in Scotland people are voting in Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse byelection, where the death of an SNP MSP has triggered a byelection. If you want to contact me, please post a message below the line when comments are open (normally between 10am and 3pm at the moment), or message me on social media. I can't read all the messages BTL, but if you put 'Andrew' in a message aimed at me, I am more likely to see it because I search for posts containing that word. If you want to flag something up urgently, it is best to use social media. You can reach me on Bluesky at @ The Guardian has given up posting from its official accounts on X, but individual Guardian journalists are there, I still have my account, and if you message me there at @AndrewSparrow, I will see it and respond if necessary. I find it very helpful when readers point out mistakes, even minor typos. No error is too small to correct. And I find your questions very interesting too. I can't promise to reply to them all, but I will try to reply to as many as I can, either BTL or sometimes in the blog.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store