Inside the NATO charm offensive that shocked as much as it delivered
It must have been the last thing NATO's chief needed.
Late Tuesday, on the eve of a crucial summit that would lock in a generational investment in NATO's defense, Donald Trump's Truth Social account pinged with a single photo: a gushing message signed 'Mark Rutte,' written in a carbon-copy Trump style and overflowing with sycophantic praise for the US president.
'You are flying into another big success in the Hague this evening,' Rutte's message read.
'Europe is going to pay in a BIG way, as they should, and it will be your win,' he continued.
'You will achieve something NO American president in decades could get done.'
While the diplomatic world has bent toward many norms of the Trump White House, this was extreme.
Doubling down on the comments the following day, saying Trump deserved credit for his actions on Iran and NATO, Rutte waded through many observers' incredulity at his kowtowing tone. But as the summit crescendoed, there was a growing sense he may have pulled off a diplomatic masterstroke.
Rutte, the former Dutch prime minister, is no stranger to dealings with Trump, having deployed his easy charm in several visits to Washington, DC, during Trump's first term.
Exuding an easygoing, relaxed image – his signature boyish grin never far from his face – Rutte's charm offensive echoes that of other NATO leaders.
French President Emmanuel Macron has charted up a boisterous bromance with Trump; Finnish President Alex Stubb bonded with him over rounds of golf, and Italian far-right Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni has won a reputation as something of Trump whisperer: She's a 'fantastic woman,' in Trump's words.
Rutte's message – signed with his surname – perhaps spoke of a less pally relationship. So did one of Trump's reactions Wednesday: 'I think he likes me. If he doesn't, I'll let you know. I'll come back and I'll hit him hard,' Trump announced in his Wednesday news conference.
But in The Hague, Rutte seemed ready to do anything to burnish the US president's ego and save him face.
Trump's decision to attack Iran's nuclear program was 'extremely impressive,' the NATO chief told Trump. 'The signal it sends to the rest of the world that this president, when it comes to it, yes, he is a man of peace, but if necessary, he is willing to use strength.'
Time and again around the summit, Rutte's interjections soothed Trump's passage – softening his landing after a fiery 'f**k' at Iran and Israel's latest exchange of missiles lit up international headlines.
Rutte's response: a jokey aside in front of the world's cameras.
'Daddy has to sometimes use strong language,' he said beside Trump, after the US president used the analogy of two children fighting to describe the conflict between Iran and Israel.
Rutte later said he wasn't referring to Trump as 'daddy' but was merely using a metaphor.
The Dutchman didn't spare praise for Trump's strikes on Iran – a conflict technically outside the NATO wheelhouse – as the president railed against suggestions in a leaked government assessment that undercut his claim the strikes 'obliterated' parts of Iran's nuclear program.
'The secretary general knows that personal relationships go a long way with this administration,' Torrey Taussig, a senior fellow at the Atlantic Council and a former NATO policy adviser at the Pentagon, told CNN.
'I do think this is a kind of hold-your-nose moment. Ensure there are no fireworks in The Hague. Get a good photo op and go home,' she added.
Beyond Rutte, the whole summit was sculpted around Trump.
Slimmed down, the schedule featured a single session for leaders; experts have suggested this was for Trump, who earlier this month skipped the ending of the G7 summit, missing a meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.
Of course, the summit result is largely pre-ordained, after rounds of pre-negotiations to ensure the leaders had to only rubber-stamp declarations.
Ukraine's war with Russia – by far the most pressing issue on NATO's agenda – was also excised from the summit's final declaration, the first time it has been missing since Russian President Vladimir Putin's full invasion of Ukraine in 2022.
Even the crown jewel of the gathering, the promise to spend 5% of gross domestic product on defense (split into core defense requirements and 1.5% on defense-related spending by 2035), was a Trump-branded product.
Back in January, Trump lofted the idea of a 5% spending target for NATO members, a figure that hadn't been given serious consideration before, as members limped towards 2%.
'They can all afford it. They're at 2% but they should be at 5%,' he told journalists.
But Rutte may have had the last laugh.
The summit was, by all accounts, a win for NATO: Members unanimously agreed to boost spendings to post-Cold War highs – and thanked Trump for it.
'In diplomacy, you try to get a goal and an aim, and what did we achieve here? We achieved an historic result, where NATO went back to its roots of collective defense,' Finland's Stubb told CNN on the sidelines of the summit.
Spain was a notable exception, pushing for softened language that may have left a loophole for the Iberian nation to meet its responsibilities for NATO military capabilities without having to spend 5% of GDP. (The final summit declaration signed by NATO members referred only to 'allies' in its clauses on spending, while others spoke of commitments 'we' will make.)
Leaders – led, of course, by Rutte – singled out Trump as the sole pressure responsible for finally corralling NATO allies to previously unthinkable spending targets.
Boosted defense spending 'is the success of President Donald Trump,' Polish President Andrzej Duda told journalists at the summit.
'Without the leadership of Donald Trump, it would be impossible,' he added.
His Lithuanian counterpart suggested a new motto for the alliance, 'Make NATO great again,' as he welcomed the pressure Trump had levied on stingy allies.
'I'm up for all the pressure we can get,' Lithuanian Defense Minister Dovile Sakaliene told CNN. Smaller nations on the front lines with Russia were buoyed by an alliance-wide commitment to meeting spending levels they had largely led the charge on.
One Western European official ahead of the summit shared fears with CNN the summit would be marred by another diplomatic spat around Trump.
But in public, comment on Rutte's messaging to Trump was largely off limits, with leaders waving off or swerving around questions.
Finland's president wouldn't be drawn on the NATO secretary general's messages, but he said, however, 'Diplomacy has so many different forms.'
Casualties – particularly from diplomatic skirmishes with Trump – were fewer than expected. Only Spain caught flak from the US president over its foot-dragging over the 5% GDP spend.
'It's terrible what they've done,' Trump said, threatening to use trade talks to force Madrid into line. 'We're going to make them pay twice as much,' he said.
Even Zelensky – who has had a turbulent relationship with Trump – came away with wins.
While he stopped short of committing further US aid to Ukraine, Trump suggested Kyiv may see future Patriot missile system deliveries from the United States – and he slammed Putin as 'misguided,' conceding the Russian leader may have territorial designs that extend further than Ukraine.
Finally, Trump's own views on NATO – often a prickly subject for the famously transactional president – saw a reversal.
'These people really love their countries,' Trump said of the NATO leaders at his news conference concluding the NATO summit. 'It's not a rip-off, and we're here to help them protect their country.'
'I came here because it was something I'm supposed to be doing,' he added, 'but I left here a little bit different.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
33 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Supreme Court Issues Ruling Impacting Medicaid—What to Know
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. A divided U.S. Supreme Court ruled Thursday that states can block Medicaid funding to Planned Parenthood, delivering a victory to Republicans seeking to defund the nation's largest abortion provider. The 6–3 decision, with the court's three liberal justices dissenting, centers on a South Carolina case involving non-abortion services such as contraception, cancer screenings, and pregnancy testing—but could have sweeping implications for Medicaid patients nationwide. Although federal law prohibits public health funds from being used for abortions, many low-income patients rely on Planned Parenthood for other essential health services, particularly in areas where it's difficult to find providers who accept Medicaid. South Carolina Governor Henry McMaster, a Republican, moved to cut off the organization's funding in 2018, arguing that no taxpayer dollars should go to Planned Parenthood. That action was initially blocked by a lawsuit from Julie Edwards, a patient who relies on the clinic for birth control due to a high-risk medical condition. The case also tested whether Medicaid patients have the legal right to sue over the choice of providers. While public health groups such as the American Cancer Society argued in court that lawsuits are often the only tool Medicaid recipients have to enforce their rights, South Carolina contended that patients should not be allowed to file such suits. The court's decision siding with the state could restrict patients' ability to challenge funding decisions, particularly in rural areas with limited access to care. Though Planned Parenthood receives only $90,000 annually in Medicaid funds from South Carolina—a small fraction of the state's total Medicaid budget—the ruling arrives as Congress considers a Trump-backed federal budget that would eliminate Medicaid funding to the group entirely. According to the organization, such cuts could force the closure of roughly 200 clinics, many in states where abortion remains legal. South Carolina currently bans abortion at around six weeks of pregnancy, following the Supreme Court's 2022 decision overturning Roe v. Wade. This is a breaking news story. Updates to follow.
New York Times
34 minutes ago
- New York Times
Zohran Mamdani's Well-Dressed Balancing Act
In all the post-mortems that have appeared since Zohran Mamdani upset the political apple cart to potentially, if unofficially, clinch the Democratic nomination for New York mayor, one particular aspect of his appeal has been largely overlooked: not how Mr. Mamdani conducted his campaign but how he looked while conducting it. Put another way: Mr. Mamdani didn't just record himself for his various social media platforms running into the freezing Atlantic on New Year's Day to publicize his pledge to freeze rents; he recorded himself running into the freezing ocean not in a wet suit or a bathing suit, but in a suit and tie. Sure, it was funnier that way. But it was also tactical. For a 33-year-old progressive and democratic socialist trying to be the city's first Muslim mayor, whose opponents are painting him as a '100 percent Communist lunatic' and a 'radical leftie' (that from President Trump on Truth Social), not to mention trying to other him because of his racial and religious identity, dressing like an establishment guy offers a counterargument of its own. As Mr. Mamdani walks the tightrope between embodying change, generational and otherwise, and reassuring those who may be leery of such change, his clothes have played a not insignificant role. His mouth may be saying one thing, but very often his outfit is saying another. This is a man, after all, who appeared in Vogue India as long ago as 2020, when he won his seat in the State Assembly, and whose mother is the film director Mira Nair. He has long understood that costume is one way to convey character. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
San Francisco Chronicle
37 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Key Medicaid provision in Trump's big tax cut and spending bill is found to violate Senate rules
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Senate parliamentarian has advised that a key Medicaid provider tax overhaul that is central to President Donald Trump's big tax cut and spending bill does not adhere to procedural rules, delivering a crucial blow to Republicans rushing to finish the massive package this week. The guidance Thursday from the parliamentarian is rarely ignored, and it forces GOP leaders to consider options. Senate leaders could try to revise it or strip it from the package. Otherwise, the provision could be challenged during floor votes, requiring a 60-vote threshold to keep it, a tall order in the narrowly split Senate. Democrats are unified against the Republican president's bill. Republican leaders are relying on the provider tax change to save billions of dollars from the Medicaid health care program for the massive tax cuts package. But they had been struggling to rally support because several GOP senators warn it would harm rural hospitals who depend on the funds. The outcome is a setback as Senate Republicans hoped to launch votes on the package by the end of the week, to meet Trump's Fourth of July deadline for passage. The parliamentarian of the Senate is a nonpartisan appointed position, a chief arbiter of the chamber's historic and often complicated rules.
