Judge denies Ontario contractor's bid to return to work on 3 bridges
Social Sharing
Julmac Contracting, the Ontario company kicked off three major bridge projects in New Brunswick, will not be allowed to return to work while its lawsuit against the province over contract breaches drags on.
In a decision issued March 28, Justice Richard Petrie said he would not grant Julmac the injunction it had sought.
Julmac had asked for an interlocutory injunction, a provisional measure that would have allowed company employees to return to work on the Anderson and Centennial bridges in Miramichi, as well as the Mactaquac Dam bridge near Fredericton.
The injunction application had also asked the province not to hire third-party contractors to complete the work.
In his decision, Petrie wrote that the court did not have jurisdiction to grant the injunction under the 1973 Proceedings Against the Crown Act.
WATCH | Judge denies injunction request while lawsuit continues:
Judge says no to Julmac Contracting injunction
13 minutes ago
Duration 1:01
He said the court has jurisdiction to maintain the status quo while the lawsuit continues. Petrie disagreed with Julmac's argument that restoring the contractor to working on the contracts would be the status quo.
The company's definition of the status quo "would not simply preserve the status quo but in fact redefine the parties' contractual rights and likely represent a final remedy," Petrie wrote said.
David Outerbridge, one of the lawyers representing Julmac, declined to comment when reached Tuesday, noting that Julmac is appealing the decision.
The province's lawyer, Mark Heighton, did not respond to a request for comment.
In the facts of the case, Petrie cited an affidavit from Renee Morency-Cormier, the construction director with the Transportation and Infrastructure Department, who said Julmac had made little progress on the bridge projects, "and contractual completing dates were not achieved."
As well, the company "took an adversarial approach" to working with the department, Morency-Cormier said.
Petrie also cited an affidavit from Julmac owner Derek Martin, who said the province's concerns "were not valid."
Contractor sees 'irreparable financial harm'
Martin claimed that removing Julmac from the contracts brought the company "irreparable financial harm."
Work on the largest of the stalled Julmac contracts, the Centennial bridge, was pushed back from this summer, the province announced in February.
The provincial government's public tenders website currently says that new contracts for the Anderson and Mactaquac bridges are "pending." None are listed for the Centennial bridge.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Global News
5 days ago
- Global News
Court turfs Metro Vancouver attempt to delay sewage plant legal battle
A B.C. Supreme Court judge has denied Metro Vancouver's attempt to delay an ongoing legal battle with Acciona, the former contractor of the North Shore Wastewater Treatment Plant. The North Shore Wastewater Treatment Plant is an estimated $3 billion over budget. Metro Vancouver blames the disaster on contractor Acciona, which it fired. Acciona maintains that Metro Vancouver's failure to deliver on its obligations prompted their $250 million damage claim. 1:59 Fired wastewater plant contractor fires back at Metro Vancouver In a July 2024 interview, Metro Vancouver's CAO said Acciona had failed to deliver. Story continues below advertisement Jerry Dobrovolny said, 'One of the difficulties we have is we're locked in litigation with our previous contractor, who we let go for not delivering on what was contracted'. Get breaking National news For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy In his ruling, Justice Bruce Elwood stated, 'I am persuaded that there is a real risk to Acciona of a loss of evidence if the adjournment is granted' and 'if the trial is adjourned, there will be a further three-and-a-half-year delay … For these reasons, the application to adjourn the trial is dismissed.' Elwood also ruled that Metro Vancouver 'is a sophisticated litigant represented by one of the leading law firms in the country. The resources required to litigate this case on the current schedule are not disproportionate to the amount of money involved.' 2:43 Wastewater treatment plant debacle Metro Vancouver told Global News, 'Acciona has produced nearly four million documents, an extraordinarily large document production that disrupts the usual flow of the litigation process.' Story continues below advertisement The regional district added that it 'respects Justice Elwood's decision and will continue to work diligently to prepare for the March 2027 trial date.' Acciona responded, 'We welcome the court decision and will continue to work towards a timely resolution. Acciona remains committed to full transparency and a full review of this project by the court.'
CBC
28-05-2025
- CBC
'No MAGA left behind': Trump turning pardons into partisan exercise, critics say
As U.S. President Donald Trump makes a dizzying series of tariff proclamations, puts Ivy League schools in his sights over their policies, and tries to broker ceasefire agreements in global conflicts, his administration is periodically issuing pardons and commutations that attract less media attention. These recent decisions — which included a pardon Tuesday for a reality-show couple convicting of defrauding banks out of more than $30 million US — haven't led the widespread condemnation that met Trump's sweeping pardon of some 1,500 people, many convicted of violent assault, in the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot. Based on the evidence so far, many of the subsequent pardons seem to be less about the legal nuances of specific cases than affiliation and partisanship. Trump on Monday said he would pardon Scott Jenkins, alleging in a social media post that the Virginia sheriff was the victim of an "overzealous" Justice Department in president Joe Biden's term and by a judge appointed by Biden. In fact, the Culpeper County sheriff was seen on video during his 2024 trial accepting cash, part of what prosecutors said was a pattern of taking money in exchange for auxiliary sheriff badges, as well as for personal gain. Jenkins, who's run as both a Republican and an independent, said last month he had hoped to plead for clemency directly with the Trump administration. Democrat Abigail Spanberger, running for governor in Virginia, panned the pardon in a social media post that pointed out that a jury of U.S. citizens, not a politicized individual or body, voted to convict Jenkins on 12 separate counts. Spanberger said the pardon was an "affront" to many officials, including "the law enforcement officers who investigated this case and hold themselves to the highest ethical standard every day." Former Ronald Reagan administration official and longtime conservative commentator William Kristol excoriated the pardon of Jenkins, arguing it sends a signal to Trump-supporting sheriffs "that they can act with immunity." "MAGA vigilantism over the next four years will be supercharged," Kristol wrote for the Bulwark. MAGA loyalists, Biden antagonists Nevada politician Michele Fiore, a staunch MAGA loyalist for a decade, was pardoned in April. Fiore was convicted after raising more than $70,000 for a statue for a slain Las Vegas police officer but instead spent some of the donations on cosmetic surgery, rent and her daughter's wedding. Brian Kalt, a Michigan State University constitutional law expert who's written about presidential pardons, told the Las Vegas Review-Journal after the Fiore pardon that "the main criterion seems to be someone is a supporter and if [Trump] can sort of identify with them as the victim of a politically motivated prosecution." In the case of Nikola electric vehicle founder Trevor Milton's pardon, issued in March, Trump said, "They say the thing that he did wrong was he was one of the first people that supported a gentleman named Donald Trump for president." In response to the president's comments, the nonprofit watchdog organization Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington Inc. (CREW) posted: "Well, one thing's for sure: Trevor Milton and his wife donated more than $1.8 million to the Trump 47 Committee in the weeks before the election." It also didn't escape notice from Democrats that Milton, convicted of wire and securities fraud, was represented during his legal travails by lawyers including Brad Bondi — brother of current Republican attorney general Pam Bondi — and Marc Mukasey, who has represented the Trump Organization. There have also been pardons and sentence commutations for individuals who have, coincidentally or not, painted Biden's children in an unfavourable light. Jason Galanis and Devon Archer, who gave critical testimony about one-time business associate Hunter Biden, the president's son, on Capitol Hill, had their sentences for defrauding an Indigenous tribe in a separate transaction commuted by Trump. Paul Walczak, the son of a major Trump donor who was convicted of income tax fraud and ordered to pay over $4 million in restitution, received another pardon slammed by CREW and Democrats. In describing the presidential action, the New York Times headline read: Trump Pardons Executive Whose Family Sought to Publicize Ashley Biden's Diary. Democratic Sen. Chris Murphy on the Walczak pardon: Trump's Justice Department weaponized: legal analyst Presidents have broad power to pardon federal crimes or commute sentences, as an act of mercy or justice, and Democratic presidents have faced criticism in certain cases: Jimmy Carter for executive actions involving folk singer Peter Yarrow and kidnapped heiress Patricia Hearst, and Bill Clinton for pardoning Marc Rich, an international fugitive whose former spouse was a Democratic donor. But according to Liz Oyer, the cost of these 2025 pardons is significant. Oyer, the former chief pardon attorney who is suing the government after being fired in March, has argued in a series of TikTok videos that it's not just the optics that are suboptimal. It costs taxpayers, Oyer says, as those pardoned no longer are mandated by the courts to pay back ill-gotten proceeds. She estimates that the total of debts wiped off the books is over $1.2 billion so far. Biden was only the second president in over a century whose pardons overall did not number in the hundreds or even the thousands, according to Pew Research. But among the 80 he granted, he received considerable criticism for pre-emptive pardons for figures who are hated by many of Trump's MAGA supporters, including Dr. Anthony Fauci and military leader Gen. Mark Milley. Legal analyst Dan Abrams, founder of Mediaite and host of a Sirius radio program, was in that camp, but said last week he'd changed his mind. "President Biden was right to preemptively pardon these folks even though it sets a terrible precedent; what we have seen [so far] is much worse," he said. Abrams said he changed his mind because "it is clear now that this administration is going to use the [Department of Justice] as a weapon," pointing to a series of threats from the White House and its cabinet members to investigate former or current Trump critics, from former FBI director James Comey for a seashell display on the beach, to former Trump administration cybersecurity expert Chris Krebs. In addition, Democratic Congress member LaMonica McIver has been charged over a fracas at an immigrant detention centre. Can Trump really revoke Biden's pardons? | About That 2 months ago Duration 11:10 'We can't leave those guys behind' Trump, indicted in four separate criminal matters until three of those cases fell away in the wake of his November election win, spent considerable time railing on the campaign trail about a justice system he said was weaponized against Republicans. Democrats have pointed out that despite those claims, mimicked by some Republican Congress members, the Justice Department in Biden's term appeared to pursue cases without favour. Prosecutions were pursued against Hunter Biden, Democratic legislators Bob Menendez and Henry Cuellar, and Democratic Mayor Eric Adams in New York City. It's not clear if federal prosecutors in this administration will aggressively probe suspected criminal activity by Republicans. But in Trump's first term, Justice Department officials under the auspices of then-attorney general William Barr sought to intervene in sentencing on behalf of Roger Stone and Michael Flynn, Trump loyalists charged with federal crimes. Both Stone and Flynn were subsequently pardoned. Trump has tapped loyalist Ed Martin to replace Oyer as chief pardon attorney. Martin was originally chosen to be lead attorney in D.C., but the required Senate confirmation appeared doomed given his staunch support of 2021 Capitol rioters, including of an avowed white supremacist Martin referred to as a friend. Martin, not needing Senate confirmation in his new role, recently told a radio host he's taking a "hard look" at the convictions of two men convicted in federal court over a plot to kidnap Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, adding, "We can't leave those guys behind."
Winnipeg Free Press
28-05-2025
- Winnipeg Free Press
Bodog's bet on province a losing one: court
A judge has barred Bodog, an offshore online casino, from operating in Manitoba, after the Crown corporation responsible for gambling argued the illicit site had siphoned off a significant amount of its revenue. Bodog and its operators, which are registered in Antigua and Barbuda, break the law by offering unauthorized online gambling in the province, Manitoba Liquor and Lotteries argued in a notice of application filed in the Manitoba Court of King's Bench earlier this year. Justice Jeffrey Harris agreed with the Crown corporation in an order issued Monday that prevents Il Nido Ltd. and Sanctum IP Holdings Ltd. from allowing anyone in Manitoba to access their gambling services. 'This court orders and declares that the respondents have no lawful authority to offer online gambling products and services… or to advertise such online products and serves to persons located in Manitoba,' said Harris. He said the operator's activities constitute criminal offences related to gambling. The permanent injunction orders the companies and any affiliates or successors to cease operations in Manitoba and to implement geo-blocking technology on their website to prevent users from accessing it in Manitoba. The Crown corporation said advertising by the companies — which claimed websites and were lawful, 'safe' and 'trusted' in Manitoba — was false and misleading. Harris ordered the companies to cease advertising that is targeted or accessible to Manitobans on any form of physical, digital or online media. Harris, who is expected to write further reasons for his decision in the coming weeks, awarded court costs to the Crown corporation. Il Nido Ltd. and Sanctum IP Holdings failed to respond to the application in court, despite being served notice, the judge's order said. Earlier this year, Manitoba Liquor and Lotteries said it filed the application on behalf of the Canadian Lottery Coalition, which represents Crown gaming authorities in Manitoba, British Columbia, Saskatchewan, Quebec and Atlantic Canada. The coalition formed in 2022 to combat illegal online gambling in Canada. Federal law allows gambling only when managed and licensed by provincial governments. Liquor and Lotteries has sole authority over legal gaming in Manitoba, including on its regulated online platform, The Crown corporation has said in court filings it believes 'significant revenue' was diverted to Bodog. Coalition executive director William Hill said earlier this year that research conducted by gaming consultant H2 Gambling Capital estimated illegal online gaming costs Canadian public gaming corporations about $2 billion in revenue annually. Hill said Tuesday he could not comment further on the court order until the judge's full reasons for his decision are made public. Liquor and Lotteries said in its filing that online gambling has grown, in part because amendments to the Criminal Code in 2021 permitted single-event sports betting — gambling on a single game rather than multiple games — and the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in the closing of casinos and boosted gambling on the web. That led the corporation to develop new rules and regulations on online gaming, including measures to prevent money laundering, the filing said. As a regulated site, protects gamblers from harms — unlike illicit sites — and puts money toward provincially funded programs such as health and education, MLL argued. It had sent cease-and-desist letters to Bodog, but the operator would not obey them. Erik PinderaReporter Erik Pindera is a reporter for the Free Press, mostly focusing on crime and justice. The born-and-bred Winnipegger attended Red River College Polytechnic, wrote for the community newspaper in Kenora, Ont. and reported on television and radio in Winnipeg before joining the Free Press in 2020. Read more about Erik. Every piece of reporting Erik produces is reviewed by an editing team before it is posted online or published in print — part of the Free Press's tradition, since 1872, of producing reliable independent journalism. Read more about Free Press's history and mandate, and learn how our newsroom operates. Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber. Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.
