12 killed as Russia pummels Ukraine in fresh night of strikes
Kyiv's military said it had shot down 45 Russian missiles and 266 drones overnight. (Ukrainian emergency service/AP pic)
KYIV : Russian strikes killed at least 12 people in Ukraine overnight into today, officials said, as Kyiv and Moscow traded fire amid an ongoing major prisoner swap.
Ukraine's emergency services described a night of 'terror' as Russia launched a second straight night of major air strikes on Ukraine, including on the capital Kyiv, after pummelling the country with ballistic missiles and drones overnight Friday to yesterday.
The latest fire comes as the two sides pursue their biggest prisoner swap since Moscow launched its full-scale invasion in February 2022, and as the US tries to broker a ceasefire to halt the three-year-old war.
The death toll from the latest Russian strikes included three children ages eight, 12 and 17, killed in the northwestern region of Zhytomyr, officials said.
Ukraine's military said early today it had shot down 45 Russian missiles and 266 attack drones overnight.
Four people were also reported dead in the western Khmelnytskyi region, four in the Kyiv region and one in Mykolaiv in the south.
Emergency services said four people were killed and 16 injured in the Kyiv region, including three children, in the 'massive night attack'.
AFP journalists heard explosions in Kyiv, with Tymur Tkachenko, the head of the city's military administration, warning 'the night will not be easy'.
The capital was 'under attack' but 'air defences are operating', said Kyiv mayor Vitali Klitschko.
Russian authorities meanwhile reported that a dozen drones flying towards Moscow had been downed.
In Moscow, restrictions were imposed on at least four airports, including the main hub Sheremetyevo, the Russian civilian aviation authority said.
The renewed attacks came after Russia launched 14 ballistic missiles and 250 drones overnight Friday to yesterday, which left 15 wounded, according to Ukrainian officials.
The Russian military said yesterday Ukraine had targeted it with 788 drones and missiles since Tuesday.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said Russia's attacks indicated Moscow was 'prolonging the war' and repeated his call for ramped-up sanctions.
But he also said he expected officials to press on with a prisoner swap agreed during talks in Istanbul on May 16.
Yesterday, 307 Russian prisoners of war were exchanged for the same number of Ukrainian soldiers, according to announcements in Kyiv and Moscow.
Both sides received 390 people in the first stage on Friday.
They are expected to exchange 1,000 each in total.
Russia has signalled it will send Ukraine its terms for a peace settlement after the exchange, without saying what those terms would be.
The two enemies have held regular prisoner swaps, but this would be the largest so far, if completed.
An AFP reporter saw some of the formerly captive Ukrainian soldiers arrive at a hospital in the northern Chernigiv region, emaciated but smiling and waving to crowds waiting outside.
'It's simply crazy. Crazy feelings,' 31-year-old Konstantin Steblev, a soldier, told AFP Friday as he stepped back onto Ukrainian soil after three years in captivity.
US President Donald Trump on Friday congratulated the two countries for the swap.
'This could lead to something big?' he wrote on his Truth Social platform.
Trump's efforts to broker a ceasefire in Europe's biggest conflict since World War II have so far been unsuccessful, despite his pledge to rapidly end the fighting.
One of the soldiers formerly held captive, 58-year-old Viktor Syvak, told AFP it was hard to express his emotional homecoming.
Captured in the Ukrainian port city of Mariupol, he had been held for 37 months and 12 days.
'It's impossible to describe. I can't put it into words. It's very joyful,' he said.
After more than three years of fighting, both countries are holding thousands of POWs.
Russia is believed to have the larger share, with the number of Ukrainian captives estimated to be between 8,000 and 10,000.
Diplomatic efforts to end the conflict have stepped up in recent weeks, but the Kremlin has shown no sign of walking back maximalist demands for a negotiated peace.
President Vladimir Putin has defied European pressure for a full and unconditional truce in Ukraine, pressing on with the Russian military offensive, which has left tens of thousands dead.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Free Malaysia Today
29 minutes ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Israel kills Revolutionary Guards chief Hossein Salami
Hossein Salami was appointed head of the Revolutionary Guards in 2019. (EPA Images pic) DUBAI : Iran said several top commanders and six nuclear scientists were killed in Israeli strikes today targeting Iran's nuclear facilities, ballistic missile factories and military commanders to prevent Tehran from developing an atomic weapon. At least 20 senior Iranian commanders, including the head of the Revolutionary Guards' aerospace force commander Amir Ali Hajizadeh, were killed in Israel's strikes on Iran today, two regional sources told Reuters. Below is a list of the commanders and scientists killed: Hossein Salami Salami was commander-in-chief of Iran's elite Revolutionary Guards Corps, or IRGC. Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei appointed Salami, who was born in 1960, as head of the IRGC in 2019. Mohammad Bagheri A former IRGC commander, major-general Bagheri was chief of staff of Iran's armed forces from 2016. Born in 1960, Bagheri joined the Guards during the Iran-Iraq war of the 1980s. Amir Ali Hajizadeh Hajizadeh was the head of the Revolutionary Guards' aerospace force. Israel has identified him as the central figure responsible for directing aerial attacks against its territory. In 2020, Hajizadeh took responsibility for the downing of a Ukrainian passenger plane, which occurred shortly after Iran launched missile strikes on US targets in Iraq in retaliation for the US drone strike that killed Qassem Soleimani. Gholamali Rashid Major-general Rashid was head of the IRGC's Khatam al Anbia headquarters. He previously served as deputy chief of staff of the Iranian armed forces, and fought for Iran during the 1980s war with Iraq. Fereydoun Abbasi-Davani Abbasi, a nuclear scientist, served as head of Iran's Atomic Energy Organization from 2011 to 2013. A hardliner, Abbasi was a member of parliament from 2020 to 2024. Mohammad Mehdi Tehranchi Tehranchi, a nuclear scientist, was head of Iran's Islamic Azad University in Tehran. Four other scientists killed in today's strikes are Abdolhamid Manouchehr, Ahmad Reza Zolfaghari, Amirhossein Feghi and Motalibizadeh.
Free Malaysia Today
4 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
UK not currently providing support to Israel as Iran retaliates
Keir Starmer said Britain was not involved in Israel's strikes against Iran overnight. (EPA pic) LONDON : Britain is not currently providing military support to Israel to defend against Iran's retaliation to overnight Israeli strikes, two UK media outlets reported on Friday. The Times newspaper cited defence sources as saying that Britain was not providing support to Israel on Friday morning. Sky News separately reported that British warplanes were not currently involved in helping to defend Israel's skies, but that this could change as the situation develops. In October 2024, when Iran fired a salvo of ballistic missiles at Israel, Britain said two of its fighter jets and an air-to-air refuelling tanker played a part in attempts to prevent further escalation, but that the jets did not engage any targets. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer has urged both sides to use restraint and return to diplomacy, and said Britain was not involved in Israel's strikes against Iran overnight. Britain's foreign office and ministry of defence did not immediately respond to a request for comment on any potential British involvement in protecting Israel.
Malay Mail
7 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Netanyahu, not Zelensky, is bringing the world to the brink of World War III — Phar Kim Beng
JUNE 13 — As dawn broke across Tehran on a Friday — normally a sacred day of prayer and family respite in the Islamic world — the calm was shattered by the sound of explosions. Iran's state media, often opaque and delayed in its disclosures, confirmed that several locations, including civilian nuclear facilities, had been struck. The key revelation: the targeted assassination of senior Iranian military personnel, including top commanders from the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC). The prime suspect and perpetrator? Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin 'Bibi' Netanyahu. This latest Israeli military operation — if not outright aggression — was not coordinated with the United States, nor was it welcomed. In fact, President Donald Trump, who returned to the White House in 2025 amidst widespread controversy, had explicitly warned just weeks earlier that it was Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky, through his intransigence in refusing to negotiate with Russia's President Vladimir Putin, who was 'bringing the world to the edge of World War III.' Flanked by Vice President JD Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Trump made this assertion in April 2025, casting blame on Ukraine for prolonging a war that has devastated Europe's eastern flank. But the detonation in Tehran today has made one thing abundantly clear: the global fuse was not lit in Kyiv. It is being held — and lit — by the hands of Benjamin Netanyahu and his ultra ilks. According to the author, Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's decision to strike Iran, on a day so symbolically loaded with religious significance, not only risks igniting another front in an already combustible Middle East, it also imperils the precarious diplomacy that US President Donald Trump has painstakingly tried to preserve, especially among Sunni Arab monarchies. — Reuters file pic Netanyahu's decision to strike Iran, on a day so symbolically loaded with religious significance, not only risks igniting another front in an already combustible Middle East, it also imperils the precarious diplomacy that Trump has painstakingly tried to preserve, especially among Sunni Arab monarchies. By choosing Friday, a day of unity for both Sunni and Shia Muslims, Netanyahu has poured gasoline onto the already-scorched earth of sectarian tensions. More dangerously, Netanyahu's provocation has come without a formal rebuke from the United States. Although Trump was quick to claim that Washington does not support the strikes, he stopped short of condemning Israel. There has been no denouncement of Netanyahu's recklessness, nor of the systemic corruption and cronyism surrounding his inner circle — including his wife, Sara Netanyahu, whose own scandals have contributed to one of the most contentious premierships in Israeli history. That silence is deafening. Despite his second-term rhetoric on 'America First,' Trump now finds himself caught in a bind. If he backs Netanyahu, he risks losing the hard-won strategic trust of Gulf leaders such as Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman of Saudi Arabia, Emir Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani of Qatar, and Crown Prince Mohammed bin Zayed of the UAE. All three leaders have repeatedly signaLled that de-escalation and economic cooperation — not more conflict — are the pillars of their future. Israel's actions have just upended those delicate calculations. Indeed, Netanyahu's manoeuvre is less about national security and more about political survival. Long before Hamas' attacks on October 7, 2023, Netanyahu was deeply unpopular, marred by corruption charges and domestic protests that spanned across Israeli society — from tech sector workers to army reservists. His attempts to overhaul the judiciary and weaken the rule of law were met with mass demonstrations, including some of the largest in Israeli history. His coalition, propped up by ultra-right religious nationalists, has made him beholden to fringe ideologies that thrive on perpetual conflict. By provoking Iran, Netanyahu accomplishes several short-term objectives: he diverts domestic attention from his crumbling legitimacy, consolidates his grip on a fragmented Israeli government, and forces Trump's hand in a Middle East he would rather sidestep. It is a classic bait-and-switch, designed not for long-term strategy but for momentary political reprieve. But the global costs of this gambit could be staggering. If Iran retaliates — and history suggests it likely will — the Middle East could spiral into a conflagration unseen since the US invasion of Iraq in 2003. Already, Iranian proxies in Iraq, Lebanon, Syria, and Yemen are poised to respond. The Houthis, emboldened by their own recent confrontations in the Red Sea, may escalate maritime strikes. Hezbollah could intensify operations along the Lebanese border. And in Iraq, Shia militias may again target US or Gulf installations, just as Tehran signals that it will no longer 'exercise restraint.' Such a regional escalation will not remain confined to the Middle East. Oil markets, already jittery due to Trump's tariff policies and ongoing disruptions of on again and off again tariff deals with friends and foes alike of the US, especially friends, could react violently. Brent crude prices are likely to spike — indeed as of 12pm Malaysian time it has gone up by a dramatic 10 per cent according reports from Risk Rating Agencies in Wall Street. Thus inflation could reignite, and economic recovery from the pandemic-era shocks might stall. For South-east Asia — especially oil-importing nations like Malaysia, Indonesia, and the Philippines — the consequences will be immediate and severe. Netanyahu's reckless strategy also threatens to undermine the fragile civilisational diplomacy that has been gathering momentum between the Islamic world and the broader Global South. Initiatives like the Asean-GCC-China Summit, meant to restore harmony and cooperation across civilisations, now risk being drowned in the echoes of fighter jets and missile strikes. Of course, on the flip side Islam and Confucianism Dialogue must now be easily deterred to encourage peace and more peace while the Middle East and Persia are redolent with the stench of gunpowder. And then there is Israel itself. While Netanyahu may wish to project strength, the reality is that his standing within Israel has never been weaker. Public trust in his leadership has eroded. His allies are fewer, his policies more extreme. Poll after poll in Israel shows growing disillusionment with the direction of his government. The Israeli public — many of whom are still traumatised by the failures that led to October 7, 2023 — may soon reach a tipping point. If this military gamble fails, or worse, triggers a sustained Iranian response, Netanyahu could be remembered not as Israel's wartime prime minister, but as the one who dragged his country into a war it cannot afford, and may not survive. To the degree the US needs to rally to Israel's side, Trump is now an entrapped President and just as embattled. Ironically, Trump — once described by Netanyahu as the 'greatest friend Israel ever had' — now finds himself manipulated, even cornered, by that very friendship. He knows that his re-election was not won to start new wars. American voters, weary of foreign entanglements, will not look kindly on another Middle East quagmire. Should Netanyahu continue down this path, it could fracture the Trump-Netanyahu alliance permanently. It is no longer possible to blame Zelensky for the world's drift toward a major global war. The Ukrainian president, however obstinate, was reacting to a direct invasion. Netanyahu, in contrast, has launched a premeditated strike on a sovereign state without provocation, choosing the most sacred of Islamic days to do so, with zero regard for regional or global stability. As the world watches Tehran smolder, one thing is clear: Netanyahu, not Zelensky, has lit the match closest to the powder keg. If the world is now inching toward World War III, we must be honest about who is dragging us there. And the answer lies not in Kyiv — but in the House of Netanyahu albeit a collapsing one. Bibi Netanyahu must go into General Election by this year, and he knows he needs to whip up the sentiments of the Israelites to be as hyper ultra nationalistic as him. * Phar Kim Beng is Professor of Asean Studies at the International Islamic University of Asean Studies, International Islamic University Malaysia ** This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of Malay Mail.
