
US to impose sanctions on Sudan after finding government used chemical weapons
By Simon Lewis and Daphne Psaledakis
Measures against Sudan will include limits on U.S. exports and U.S. government lines of credit and will take effect around June 6, after Congress was notified on Thursday, State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce said in a statement.
'The United States calls on the Government of Sudan to cease all chemical weapons use and uphold its obligations under the CWC,' Bruce said, referring to the Chemical Weapons Convention treaty banning the use of such weapons.
In a statement, Sudan rejected the move, and described the allegations as false.
'This interference, which lacks any moral or legal basis, deprives Washington of what is left of its credibility and closes the door to any influence in Sudan,' government spokesperson Khalid al-Eisir said on Friday.
The war in Sudan erupted in April 2023 from a power struggle between the army and the RSF, unleashing waves of ethnic violence, creating the world's worst humanitarian crisis and plunging several areas into famine. Tens of thousands of people have been killed and about 13 million displaced.
Washington in January imposed sanctions on army chief Abdel Fattah al-Burhan, accusing him of choosing war over negotiations to bring an end to the conflict.
The U.S. has also determined members of the RSF and allied militias committed genocide and imposed sanctions on some of the group's leadership, including RSF leader General Mohamed Hamdan Dagalo, known as Hemedti.
The New York Times reported in January, citing four senior U.S. officials, that the Sudanese army had used chemical weapons at least twice during the conflict, deploying the weapons in remote areas of the country.
Two officials briefed on the matter said the chemical weapons appeared to use chlorine gas, which can cause lasting damage to human tissue, the New York Times reported at the time.
Bruce's statement said the U.S. had formally determined on April 24 under the Chemical and Biological Weapons Control and Warfare Elimination Act of 1991 that the government of Sudan used chemical weapons last year, but did not specify what weapons were used, precisely when or where.
'The United States remains fully committed to hold to account those responsible for contributing to chemical weapons proliferation,' Bruce said.
'The intention here is to distract from the recent campaign in Congress against the UAE,' a Sudanese diplomatic source said.
The source said the U.S. could have gone to the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons to investigate the claims and neglected to do so.
Sudan's government is aligned with the army.
It cut diplomatic relations with the UAE this month, saying the Gulf power was aiding the RSF with supplies of advanced weaponry in the devastating conflict that broke out following disagreements over the integration of the two forces.
The UAE has denied the allegations and says it supports humanitarian and peace efforts.
U.S. congressional Democrats sought last Thursday to block arms sales to the United Arab Emirates over its alleged involvement in the war.
Sudan said this week that the United Arab Emirates was responsible for an attack on Port Sudan this month, accusing the Gulf state for the first time of direct military intervention in the war.
The UAE denied the allegations in a statement and said it condemned the attack.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Citizen
3 hours ago
- The Citizen
More than four million displaced by Sudan war, says UN
Tens of thousands of people have been killed in the civil war since it began in April 2023. Sudanese army soldiers sit atop a parked tank after their capture of a base used by the rival Rapid Support Forces (RSF) paramilitaries on May 26, 2025. Picture: Ebrahim Hamid / AFP More than four million people have fled Sudan since the start of the conflict in 2023, the United Nations said Tuesday, calling the figure a 'devastating milestone'. UNHCR, the UN refugee agency, said that if the war continues, the outflow of people would threaten regional and global stability. Sudan's regular army and the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF) have been locked in a battle for power since April 2023. 'Devastating milestone' The war has killed tens of thousands of people and created the world's largest hunger and displacement crises. 'Four million people now have fled Sudan into neighbouring countries since the start of the war, now in it's third year,' UNHCR spokeswoman Eujin Byun said at a press briefing in Geneva. 'It's a devastating milestone in what is the world's most damaging displacement crisis,' he added. ALSO READ: Sudan marks two years of war with no end in sight 'If the conflict continues, thousands more people will continue to flee, putting regional and global stability at stake.' UNHCR figures showed that 4 003 385 people had fled Sudan as refugees, asylum seekers, and returnees as of Monday. Of those, 1.5 million have fled to Egypt; more than 1.1 million to South Sudan, including nearly 800 000 returnees who had been refugees themselves in Sudan; and more than 850 000 to Chad. Strain on neighbouring Chad The UNHCR described a deepening humanitarian emergency in eastern Chad, where the number of Sudanese refugees has more than tripled since the war broke out. The country was already hosting more than 400 000 Sudanese refugees before the conflict began, and the figure has now surpassed 1.2 million. This is placing 'unsustainable pressure on Chad's ability to respond', said Dossou Patrice Ahouansou, UNHCR's principal situation coordinator in Chad, speaking from Amdjarass in the country's east. He said there had been an influx across the border since late April following violent attacks in Sudan's North Darfur region, including assaults on displacement camps. ALSO READ: Sudan denies using chemical weapons after US imposes sanctions In just over a month, 68 556 refugees have arrived in Chad's Wadi Fira and Ennedi Est provinces, with an average of 1 400 people crossing the border daily in recent days, he said. 'These civilians are fleeing in terror, many under fire, navigating armed checkpoints, extortion, and tight restrictions imposed by armed groups,' Ahouansou said. He said the emergency response was 'dangerously underfunded', with people living in 'dire' shelter conditions, and tens of thousands exposed to extreme weather, insecurity and water shortages. Urgent action needed UNHCR said there was an 'urgent need' for the international community 'to acknowledge, and act to eradicate, the grave human rights abuses being endured in Sudan'. 'Without a significant increase in funding, life-saving assistance cannot be delivered at the scale and speed required,' Ahouansou said. The war has effectively split Sudan in two, with the army holding the centre, east and north, while the paramilitaries and their allies control nearly all of Darfur and parts of the south. NOW READ: Sudan cholera outbreak kills 172 in one week


The South African
7 hours ago
- The South African
Are second batch of refugees ONLY white South Africans?
A second batch of South African 'refugees' has arrived in the US under President Donald Trump's resettlement programme. The offer is open to all 'racial minorities' in South Africa, including Afrikaners, who believe they have been persecuted. But do the numbers reflect that? According to reports, a second batch of 'refugees' arrived in the US last week. The group consists of nine white South Africans and their families. Jaco Kleynhans, of the Afrikaner rights group Solidarity Movement, claimed that the group travelled on a commercial flight. While it's not clear if other races will be included in the group, there has been speculation that many Afrikaners will be part of the programme. Kleynhans told the media: 'Several more groups will fly to the USA over the next few weeks. The US Embassy in Pretoria, in collaboration with the State Department in Washington DC, is currently processing 8,000 applications. And we expect many more Afrikaner refugees to travel to the USA over the next few months. 'They are settling in states across the USA, but particularly southern states such as Texas, North and South Carolina, Kansas, Oklahoma, and Nebraska.' He continued: 'Our primary focus is not refugee status for Afrikaners. But rather to find ways to ensure a free, safe, and prosperous future for Afrikaners in South Africa. We remain 100% convinced that South Africa can and must create a home for all its people.' While many Afrikaners and white South Africans have seemingly been prioritised in the group, other smaller communities are also welcome to apply for refugee status in the US. Last month, the US Embassy issued a statement detailing the resettlement programme, which was extended to 'racial minorities' in South Africa. Despite initially being targeted at Afrikaner farmers and white people, US authorities have since included coloured, Indian, and 'mixed-race' South Africans. Applicants must prove that they are 'persecuted' South Africans who are victims of 'racial discrimination'. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 . Subscribe to The South African web

TimesLIVE
10 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
Emergency services staff confused after head said he was unaware of US hurricane season, sources say
Staff at the federal emergency management agency (Fema) were left baffled on Monday after the head of the US disaster agency said he had not been aware the country has a hurricane season, according to four sources familiar with the situation. The remark was made during a briefing by David Richardson, who has led (Fema) since early May. It was not clear to staff whether he meant it literally, as a joke, or in another context. The US hurricane season officially began on Sunday and lasts until November. The national oceanic and atmospheric administration forecast last week that this year's season is expected to bring as many as 10 hurricanes. A spokesperson for the department of homeland security, Fema's parent agency, said the comment was a joke and Fema is prepared for hurricane season. The spokesperson said under homeland security secretary Kristi Noem and Richardson 'Fema is shifting from bloated, DC-centric deadweight to a lean, deployable disaster force that empowers state actors to provide relief for their citizens'. Richardson said during the briefing there would be no changes to the agency's disaster response plans despite having told staff to expect a new plan in May, the sources told Reuters. Richardson's comments come amid widespread concern that the departures of a raft of top Fema officials, staff cuts and reductions in hurricane preparations will leave the agency ill-prepared for a storm season forecast to be above normal. Democrats criticised Richardson after the Reuters report. Top Senate Democrat Chuck Schumer posted the Reuters headline about Richardson on X and said he was 'unaware why he hasn't been fired yet'. Representative Bennie Thompson, the senior Democrat on the House homeland security committee with oversight of Fema, issued a statement to Reuters that read: 'Suffice to say, disaster response is no joke. If you don't know what or when hurricane season is, you're not qualified to run Fema. Get someone knowledgeable in there.' Hurricanes kill dozens of people and cost hundreds of millions annually across a swath of US states every year. The storms have become increasingly more destructive and costly due to the effects of climate change. Richardson's comment purporting ignorance about hurricane season spread among agency staff, spurring confusion and reigniting concern about his lack of familiarity with Fema's operations, said three sources. Richardson, who has no disaster response experience, said during Monday's briefing, a daily all-hands meeting held by phone and video conference, he will not issue a new disaster plan because he does not want to make changes that might counter the Fema Review Council, the sources said. President Donald Trump created the council to evaluate Fema. Its members include Noem, governors and other officials. In a May 15 staff town hall, Richardson said a disaster plan, including tabletop exercises, would be ready for review by May 23. The back-and-forth on updating the disaster plan and a lack of clear strategic guidance have created confusion for Fema staff, said one source. Richardson has evoked his military experience as a former marine artillery officer in conversations with staff. Before joining Fema, he was assistant secretary at the department of homeland security office for countering weapons of mass destruction, which he has told staff he will continue to lead. Richardson was appointed as the new chief of Fema last month after his predecessor, Cameron Hamilton, was abruptly fired. Hamilton had publicly broken with Trump over the future of the agency, but sources told Reuters Trump allies had been manoeuvring to oust him because they were unhappy with what they saw as Hamilton's slow-moving effort to restructure Fema. Trump has said Fema should be shrunk or even eliminated, arguing states can take on many of its functions, as part of a wider downsizing of the federal government. About 2,000 full-time Fema staff, one-third of its total, have been terminated or voluntarily left the agency since the start of the Trump administration. Despite Noem's prior comments that she plans to eliminate Fema, in May she approved Richardson's request to retain more than 2,600 short-term disaster response and recovery employees whose terms were set to expire this year, one source said, confirming an earlier report by NBC News. The short-term staff make up the highest proportion of Fema employees, about 40%, and are a pillar of the agency's on-the-ground response efforts. Fema recently sharply reduced hurricane training and workshops for state and local emergency managers due to travel and speaking restrictions imposed on staff, according to prior Reuters reporting.