
Hegseth Used Multiple Signal Chats For Official Pentagon Business
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth used Signal more extensively for official Pentagon business than previously disclosed, engaging in at least a dozen separate chats, people familiar with his management practices said.
In one case, he told aides on the encrypted app to inform foreign governments about an unfolding military operation, the people said. He also used the nongovernmental message service to discuss media appearances, foreign travel, his schedule, and other unclassified but sensitive information, two people said.
The former Fox News host set up many of the chats himself, sending texts from an unsecured line in his Pentagon office and from his personal phone, the two said.
Some of Hegseth's messages were posted by his military aide, Marine Col. Ricky Buria, who was given access to the secretary's personal phone, the people said. It was Buria who posted information in March about an imminent U.S. attack on Houthi militants in Yemen into a Signal chat group that included the secretary's wife, brother, and private lawyer, the people said.
Hegseth's frequent use of the app in his daily duties and Buria's role in posting information on his behalf haven't been previously reported.
The Pentagon and Buria didn't respond to requests for comment.
Acting Pentagon Inspector General Steven Stebbins announced last month that he was investigating Hegseth's use of Signal after the disclosure by Atlantic magazine that the secretary had posted information about the Yemen strikes in a chat involving senior administration officials. Similar information posted in the separate chat that included Hegseth's family members is also part of the inspector general inquiry.
Among the messages posted in some of the other chats by Hegseth were his thoughts on personnel matters, Pentagon programs facing cuts, and details of administration national security debates.
The texts authorizing aides to tell allies about military operations are among the most sensitive messages he sent, two people said.
Instead of using the Pentagon's vast communications network, Hegseth preferred Signal to run the Defense Department's day-to-day operations, the people said. Among those he added to chats were members of his security detail, staffers in his personal office and that of the deputy secretary, as well as public-affairs aides.
To read the messages, aides routinely had to step away from their desks to find a location in the Pentagon that received phone service, which is spotty in the building.
Previous administrations have used the nongovernmental messaging apps, but using Signal to share closely-guarded information could put sensitive information at risk of landing in the wrong hands, experts say.
'The use of personal phones and commercial apps introduces unnecessary risk. Signal is considered unclassified by the government for a reason,' said Marc Polymeropoulos, a former senior U.S. intelligence officer. 'It's clear that U.S. government systems are having a hard time keeping up with the required pace of business.'
In some cases, Hegseth's messages disappeared without being properly recorded, the people familiar said, potentially a violation of laws requiring official records to be preserved.
A 2023 Pentagon directive restricts the use of some nongovernment apps, including Signal, for official business, saying such messaging services shouldn't be used for sensitive but unclassified information.
'DOD personnel won't use non-DOD accounts or personal email accounts, messaging systems or other nonpublic DOD information systems, except approved or authorized government contractor systems, to conduct official business,' the memo from the Pentagon chief information officer said.
It isn't clear whether Signal has been approved for use by Pentagon officials since the memo was issued.
'This memo isn't definitive to determine the legality of Secretary Hegseth's use of Signal on a personal device to transmit nonpublic, unclassified DOD information,' said Aram Gavoor, the associate dean for academic affairs and a national security law professor at George Washington University Law School.
President Trump said last week that he planned to shift national security adviser Mike Waltz, who lost favor within the White House in part because of his role in the Signal controversy, out of his post. Waltz, who inadvertently added the editor of the Atlantic to a Signal group about U.S. strikes in Yemen, will be nominated to be ambassador to the United Nations and is likely to face questions during his confirmation hearing about his and Hegseth's use of the encrypted app.
Hegseth shared some of the most sensitive information on the Signal chat group that included other senior officials, including specific times that F-18s, MQ-9 Reaper drones and Tomahawk cruise missiles would be used in the March 15 attack, according to a transcript released by the Atlantic. The group was established by Waltz.
In an interview Sunday with NBC's 'Meet the Press,' Trump said Hegseth's job was 'totally safe' and that he wasn't looking for a new defense chief. 'Pete's going to be great,' Trump said. 'He's doing a great job.'
Write to Alexander Ward at alex.ward@wsj.com and Nancy A. Youssef at nancy.youssef@wsj.com
Get 360° coverage—from daily headlines to 100 year archives.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hindu
2 hours ago
- The Hindu
Israel military says intercepted two projectiles fired from Yemen
Israel's military said on Tuesday (May 27, 2025) it had intercepted a missile and another projectile fired from Yemen, which Iran-backed Houthi rebels said they had fired. "Following the sirens that sounded a short while ago in several areas in Israel, a missile that was launched from Yemen was intercepted," the military posted on Telegram. Also Read | Yemen's Houthi rebels fire missile targeting northern Israel, rare target for group It said in a separate statement that a projectile had been intercepted by the air force, without sirens being activated. The Houthis, who control large swathes of Yemen, later claimed they had launched two "ballistic missiles" towards Israel. The Houthis have repeatedly fired missiles and drones targeting Israel since the Gaza war broke out in October 2023 following Hamas's attack on Israel. The Yemeni rebels, who say they are acting in solidarity with Palestinians, paused their attacks during a two-month Gaza ceasefire that ended in March, but resumed them after Israel resumed its military campaign in the territory. While most of the projectiles have been intercepted, one missile fired by the group in early May hit the perimeter of Ben Gurion international airport near Tel Aviv for the first time. Israel has carried out several strikes in Yemen in recent months in retaliation for the attacks, including on ports and the airport in the capital Sanaa. Israel said it downed a missile fired from Yemen on Sunday and two more on Thursday. The Houthis claimed attacks on both days, saying they had targeted Ben Gurion airport.


Economic Times
2 hours ago
- Economic Times
$1 billion gone, 7 drones downed, 2 fighter jets lost — the costly Red Sea exit Trump isn't talking about
Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads FAQs U.S. President Donald Trump praised Yemen's Houthi fighters for their ability to take heavy damage and still fight back. He called them brave while announcing a sudden ceasefire with them. This ceasefire was made possible by Oman, who helped both sides agreement paused the recent fights between the U.S. military and the Houthis in the Red Sea. But it's unclear if this is a real peace or just a break in the war. The Houthis have been fighting for nearly 10 years and still control Yemen's northern areas, even after being attacked by Saudi Arabia and the UAE, who got support from the March, the U.S. started Operation Rough Rider to stop the Houthis from attacking ships and U.S. forces in the region. The operation cost the U.S. over $1 billion, but they lost 7 drones and 2 fighter jets, and didn't really achieve anything. Because of this failure, Trump decided to end the attacks. But it wasn't part of a smart new plan, it looked more like giving said the Houthis 'deserved a chance', basically admitting they held their ground and the U.S. had no better option. This ceasefire is not a full peace deal. It doesn't include Israel, which upset Israeli leaders. The Houthis are still attacking Israel with drones and missiles to show support for before the ceasefire, Houthis fired rockets near Israel's main airport. Israel hit back by bombing Yemen's airport. But the Houthis kept attacking. Israel feels upset because the U.S. made the deal without telling message to allies seems clear: if U.S. interests don't match, the U.S. might leave its allies behind. The Houthis warned Arab countries not to trust the U.S., saying America abandoned the Shah of Iran, and could abandon Israel warning matters a lot to Saudi Arabia and the UAE, who spent a lot of time and money trying to fight the Houthis. The UAE didn't fully support the U.S. attacks and now is trying to figure out its next steps. Qatar isn't sure about the ceasefire and how long it will a long-time backer of the Houthis, may have told them to agree to it. Some reports say Iran told the Houthis to negotiate instead of escalating. This could be because Iran is also dealing with nuclear talks and other unclear if Iran made a bigger deal with the U.S., or was just watching from the sidelines. Either way, Iran benefits from the Houthis putting pressure on Israel and the West. The ceasefire shows exhaustion, not peace. Trump realized that fighting in Yemen gave the U.S. nothing in of defeating the Houthis, the U.S. attacks may have made them look stronger. The Houthis feel like they beat the world's strongest military, and that has boosted their image globally. But the peace is not permanent, the Houthis said they can attack again have already increased attacks on Israel, showing that this deal doesn't stop their war with Israel. In short, nothing is really settled. The Middle East is still unstable. Trump's move may lower U.S. military risks for now, but it has weakened trust between America and its countries are now looking at China as another option for help, since they feel the U.S. might not always stand by them. Israel feels isolated, and its image as a strong power is now being tested. The Houthis come out looking like heroes in their eyes and those of their is trying to sell this as a win, but really, it looks like a retreat, not peace, just a break. Like many of Trump's decisions, this deal is about looking strong, not about long-term solutions. Whether or not the ceasefire lasts doesn't matter as much, what matters is that it has changed how countries see the U.S.Q1. Why did the U.S. agree to a ceasefire with the Houthis?Because the U.S. attacks cost a lot and didn't stop the Houthis.Q2. Why is Israel unhappy with the ceasefire?Because the U.S. didn't inform Israel and the Houthis are still attacking them.


Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
$1 billion gone, 7 drones downed, 2 fighter jets lost — the costly Red Sea exit Trump isn't talking about
U.S. President Donald Trump praised Yemen's Houthi fighters for their ability to take heavy damage and still fight back. He called them brave while announcing a sudden ceasefire with them. This ceasefire was made possible by Oman, who helped both sides talk. The agreement paused the recent fights between the U.S. military and the Houthis in the Red Sea. But it's unclear if this is a real peace or just a break in the war. The Houthis have been fighting for nearly 10 years and still control Yemen's northern areas, even after being attacked by Saudi Arabia and the UAE, who got support from the U.S. In March, the U.S. started Operation Rough Rider to stop the Houthis from attacking ships and U.S. forces in the region. The operation cost the U.S. over $1 billion, but they lost 7 drones and 2 fighter jets, and didn't really achieve anything. Because of this failure, Trump decided to end the attacks. But it wasn't part of a smart new plan, it looked more like giving up. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Indonesia: New Container Houses (Prices May Surprise You) Container House | Search ads Search Now Undo Trump said the Houthis 'deserved a chance', basically admitting they held their ground and the U.S. had no better option. This ceasefire is not a full peace deal. It doesn't include Israel, which upset Israeli leaders. The Houthis are still attacking Israel with drones and missiles to show support for Palestine. Just before the ceasefire, Houthis fired rockets near Israel's main airport. Israel hit back by bombing Yemen's airport. But the Houthis kept attacking. Israel feels upset because the U.S. made the deal without telling them. Live Events The message to allies seems clear: if U.S. interests don't match, the U.S. might leave its allies behind. The Houthis warned Arab countries not to trust the U.S., saying America abandoned the Shah of Iran, and could abandon Israel too. This warning matters a lot to Saudi Arabia and the UAE, who spent a lot of time and money trying to fight the Houthis. The UAE didn't fully support the U.S. attacks and now is trying to figure out its next steps. Qatar isn't sure about the ceasefire and how long it will last. Iran, a long-time backer of the Houthis, may have told them to agree to it. Some reports say Iran told the Houthis to negotiate instead of escalating. This could be because Iran is also dealing with nuclear talks and other issues. It's unclear if Iran made a bigger deal with the U.S., or was just watching from the sidelines. Either way, Iran benefits from the Houthis putting pressure on Israel and the West. The ceasefire shows exhaustion, not peace. Trump realized that fighting in Yemen gave the U.S. nothing in return. Instead of defeating the Houthis, the U.S. attacks may have made them look stronger. The Houthis feel like they beat the world's strongest military, and that has boosted their image globally. But the peace is not permanent, the Houthis said they can attack again anytime. They have already increased attacks on Israel, showing that this deal doesn't stop their war with Israel. In short, nothing is really settled. The Middle East is still unstable. Trump's move may lower U.S. military risks for now, but it has weakened trust between America and its allies. Arab countries are now looking at China as another option for help, since they feel the U.S. might not always stand by them. Israel feels isolated, and its image as a strong power is now being tested. The Houthis come out looking like heroes in their eyes and those of their supporters. Trump is trying to sell this as a win, but really, it looks like a retreat, not peace, just a break. Like many of Trump's decisions, this deal is about looking strong, not about long-term solutions. Whether or not the ceasefire lasts doesn't matter as much, what matters is that it has changed how countries see the U.S. FAQs Q1. Why did the U.S. agree to a ceasefire with the Houthis? Because the U.S. attacks cost a lot and didn't stop the Houthis. Q2. Why is Israel unhappy with the ceasefire? Because the U.S. didn't inform Israel and the Houthis are still attacking them.