logo
What will education look like under the Trump administration? Probably a lot like Florida

What will education look like under the Trump administration? Probably a lot like Florida

Miami Herald19-02-2025

President Trump has demonstrated his administration's priorities for education via a series of executive orders over the past weeks. With the stroke of his pen, he has laid out a vision for the U.S. Department of Education that prioritizes funding for state school choice programs, proposes penalties for schools that 'indoctrinate' students, puts an end to transgender student athletes competing in women's sports and, most recently, eliminates Diversity, Equity and Inclusion programs in universities.
If this all sounds familiar to Floridians, it should. Gov. Ron DeSantis and the Florida Legislature have passed a series of laws aimed at reshaping public education in much the same way.
Florida laid the groundwork for Trump's education policies starting four years ago, with laws aimed at curtailing how history and sexuality could be discussed, eliminating Diversity, Equity and Inclusion programs, limiting children's access to specific books, banning transgender women from playing sports with athletes assigned female at birth and massively expanding school choice vouchers.
The Florida Department of Education said in a statement sent to the Miami Herald that they are proud to be an example for the nation on education issues, creating policies which support charter and private schools and ridding public schools of 'liberal indoctrination.'
'Florida has led the charge on these issues, enacting groundbreaking legislation such as the Parental Rights in Education Act, the STOP WOKE Act, and House Bill 1069 (2023),' read the statement, legislation aimed to prohibit schools and businesses from teaching concepts related to sexuality, race, gender, racism, and privilege, which President Trump's executive orders also oppose.
The department says it looks forward to working with the United States Department of Education and the Trump Administration to 'further this important work and protect our students from indoctrination.'
Critics say state cannot be trusted with federal funds
Critics of President Trump's executive orders say that pulling from Florida's education playbook is not wise. According to The Nation's Report Card, published by the National Center for Education Statistics, Florida's war on 'woke' hasn't seemed to improve academic outcomes over the past few years. Florida students' reading scores have fallen significantly since 2022 and eighth grade math scores are the lowest in over two decades.
Florida's Commissioner of Education, Manny Diaz Jr., blamed the Biden administration's methodology for Florida's poor results in an op-ed. He argued that the assessment should also take into account students attending private and charter schools, a growing number in the state supported by taxpayer-funded scholarships or 'vouchers.'
The Florida Education Association, the largest teachers union in the state, blames the state's education policies for the poor scores.
Andrew Spar, the president of the Florida Education Association, said that many of the proposals coming from the Oval Office have been tested in Florida, and that 'the results are not promising.'
He says this does not bode well for the future of public education in the rest of the country, particularly if the Department of Education —which uses federal grants to influence state-controlled school systems — allows the states to distribute federal funds how they see fit.
According to the Florida Department of Education, in the 2022-2023 year, 17.28 percent of school district funding came from federal sources. Florida ranks 32 in the nation for the amount of federal funding per student spent toward K-12, according to the Education Data Initiative.
But although federal funding is not the majority of Florida's education budget, much of what comes to Florida from Washington D.C. is funneled to low-performing schools and students with disabilities, as well as for financial aid for higher education.
Trump's executive order calls for federal funds to be given to the states for school choice programs, which critics worry that the limited federal funds would be stretched between traditional public, charter and private schools.
Karla Hernandez-Mats, the president of the teachers union in Miami-Dade, says that school districts are already burdened with campaigning for local referendums which harness property taxes to fund schools and she fears the federal funds will never find their way to local schools if they are distributed to the state to administer.
'What worries us is that our state has never supported education the way it should,' said Hernandez-Mats. 'We cannot feel at ease that our state, which has not done well by our community, will use these funds properly,' she said.
Throwing money into school choice
Trump's Expanding Educational Freedom And Opportunity For Families executive order underscores the president's commitment to the idea that public money should follow the child instead of automatically being sent to traditional public schools.
Last year, Florida's school voucher program expanded substantially after removing income restrictions, which makes them available to all children. In the 2024-2025 year, at least 489,585 school vouchers have been distributed by Step Up for Students, an agency that provides the vast majority of vouchers in Florida. About 70 percent of those students were already attending private school, according to Step Up for Students, which means that state tax dollars are now subsidizing private schools.
Florida is not the only state in the nation to have robust school-choice or 'voucher' programs. At least 16 states across the nation have voucher programs, according to EdChoice, a group that supports and tracks school choice vouchers.
Ralph Arza is the director of the Florida Charter School Alliance and a former legislator who was part of the early 'pro-school choice' movement in Florida. He believes that the expanded school choice voucher program is evidence there is more equity today than ever. Arza says the executive order will empower dollars to go directly to children and teachers and limit wasteful bureaucracy.
Critics warn that diverting funding to private schools and charter schools is problematic because those institutions are not governed by an elected school board and do not have the same public accountability mechanisms.
But Arza says this puts the parents in control.
'Mom and Dad are the ultimate accountability, and that is who we are empowering to make that decision,' said Arza.
Democratic Congresswoman Frederica Wilson, a former educator and Miami-Dade school board member, opposes the executive order and the trend of funneling public money into private and charter schools.
'Charters and private schools cherry-pick, and public schools have to educate everyone—even with less funding. This decision is wrong, it is unfair, and it's an insane ploy to destroy public education and leave it in shambles. I implore everyone: do not stop supporting our wonderful public schools!' she said in a statement.
Title 1 funds in danger
One of the criticisms of the U.S. Department of Education has been the amount of bureaucracy states encounter just to access federal funds.
Title I funding is meant to supplement state and local funding for low-achieving children in high-poverty areas. It has intense monitoring protocols to ensure the money is spent efficiently.
Robert Enlow, the director of EdChoice, the largest pro-school choice lobbying group in the nation, predicts the executive order will improve the flow of federal funds to where they are needed.
He suggested that federal funds for Title I — federal grants to support schools with low-income students — could be sent as block grants to the state and go directly into Educational Savings Accounts, which parents can use to send their children to private or charter schools.
He also said the money could be used to create more innovation funds to build more schools, whether that be private or charter schools. Many private schools in Florida are in high demand.
But critics are concerned that putting Title I funds in the hands of states may not be in the best interest of those students and local leaders have expressed dismay at the Trump administration's intentions.
In a statement, Randi Weingarten, the president of the American Federation of Teachers, the second largest teachers union in the nation, says the order 'hijacks federal money used to level the playing field for poor and disadvantaged kids and hands it directly to unaccountable private operators.'
Spar, the Florida Education Association president, challenges the idea that President Trump is empowering states to make their own decisions. 'They are really not giving states control, they are trying to control what states are doing,' he said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

LAPD Chief Pushes Back on Trump National Guard Claim
LAPD Chief Pushes Back on Trump National Guard Claim

Newsweek

time34 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

LAPD Chief Pushes Back on Trump National Guard Claim

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) Chief Jim McDonnell said the protests and riots in portions of downtown Los Angeles on Wednesday are "nowhere near" the level of needing the National Guard, denouncing President Donald Trump's assertion that without the troops, the city would be "burning to the ground." Newsweek reached out to the White House via email for comment on Wednesday. Why It Matters Since his January 20 inauguration, Trump has implemented sweeping change, mainly through executive orders, and has prioritized immigration control as a key pillar within his second administration. Trump last month utilized the Alien Enemies Act of 1798, a wartime law granting the commander in chief authority to detain or deport non-citizens. The implementation was originally blocked in federal court and sparked a contentious legal back-and-forth. The president also campaigned on the promise of mass deportations and appointed Tom Homan as his administration's border czar to execute his agenda. What To Know Protests broke out on Friday in reaction to numerous U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids throughout Los Angeles. Amid the ongoing tumult, city officials including Mayor Karen Bass implemented a curfew for portions of downtown, from 8 p.m. Tuesday to 6 a.m. Wednesday, and it was extended into Wednesday night as well. The LAPD warned that people who break the curfew and who are not exempt—like first responders, credentialed media and those who live in the affected area—will be subject to arrest. While speaking to CNN's Kaitlan Collins, McDonnell said that Wednesday was a "better day," adding that it is "calmer." "No, we were not in a position to request the National Guard," McDonnell said. "We have a protocol that we work up through; first we bring in all internal resources to bear on the issue, whatever it is. Then we mobilize the department or part of the department to be able to get everybody out there dealing with the issue. If we don't have the capacity at that point to be able to do that, then through the sheriff we request mutual aid and we get our law enforcement partners from police departments and sheriff's departments throughout the Southern California region to assist us in doing what it is we need to do." "We're at that level now," McDonnell added. "And we're nowhere near a level where we would be reaching out to the governor for National Guard at this stage. And my hope is that things are going in the right direction now and that we wouldn't have had to have done that, or we won't either." Trump said in part on Wednesday while speaking to reporters that if he didn't bring in the National Guard and the Marines, the city of Los Angeles would be "burning to the ground, just like it was a number of months ago." The president's reference was to the deadly wildfires that inundated Los Angeles County, torching thousands of buildings and displacing thousands of Angelenos. Democratic California Governor Gavin Newsom in a formal address to the Golden State on Tuesday ripped Trump and his administration for inflaming an already combustible situation. Newsom also denounced any violence or harm to law enforcement, vowing to prosecute any lawlessness. Protesters confront California National Guard soldiers and police outside a federal building on June 9 as protests continue in Los Angeles following three days of clashes with police after a series of immigration raids. (Photo... Protesters confront California National Guard soldiers and police outside a federal building on June 9 as protests continue in Los Angeles following three days of clashes with police after a series of immigration raids. (Photo by) More What People Are Saying Newsom posted to X, formerly Twitter, on Wednesday: "Trump is politicizing our military and pulling them off critical missions to further his own agenda." Trump said on Truth Social Wednesday: "If our troops didn't go into Los Angeles, it would be burning to the ground right now, just like so much of their housing burned to the ground. The great people of Los Angeles are very lucky that I made the decision to go in and help!!!" California Attorney General Rob Bonta posted to X on Wednesday: "18 Attorneys General from across the nation speaking out against the President's abuse of power. The Trump Administration's unlawful efforts to force federalized national guard forces and the U.S. military to patrol our streets is deeply alarming and cannot go unchecked." Bass said on X Wednesday: "Curfew remains in effect tonight 8 PM - 6 AM for Downtown Los Angeles to stop bad actors who are taking advantage of the President's chaotic escalation. If you do not live or work in Downtown L.A., avoid the area and follow guidance from law enforcement. Vandalism and violence will not be tolerated." What Happens Next There is a hearing scheduled for 1:30 p.m. Thursday to discuss the legality of the National Guard activation in Los Angeles.

NDP leader says Carney needs to keep Parliament in the loop on trade talks
NDP leader says Carney needs to keep Parliament in the loop on trade talks

Hamilton Spectator

time36 minutes ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

NDP leader says Carney needs to keep Parliament in the loop on trade talks

OTTAWA - Interim NDP Leader Don Davies is accusing Prime Minister Mark Carney of not being transparent about negotiations with the U.S. on getting President Donald Trump's tariffs lifted. Davies said Wednesday that Parliament has not been kept in the loop on what Carney and Trump are talking about behind closed doors, or whether Ottawa has involved stakeholders in negotiations with the U.S. 'Previous Liberal governments have made quite a deal out of appointing different stakeholders from society to be present in advising them. Yet we don't know anything about that in these negotiations,' Davies told reporters outside the House of Commons just ahead of question period. 'It's time that Carney government became more transparent with Canadians, let us know who's negotiating, and definitely explain to Canadians why he's pursuing deeper military and economic integration with the United States when he promised Canadians that he would do exactly the opposite.' Carney declared during the recent federal election that Canada's old relationship with the United States, based on deepening economic integration and military cooperation, had come to an end and he vowed to stand up to Trump in the face of steep U.S. tariffs. CBC/Radio-Canada reported earlier Wednesday that the U.S. and Canada are hashing out a 'working document' that outlines details of a potential trade deal and states that Canada will participate in Trump's Golden Dome missile defence project. The prime minister's office is neither confirming nor denying that report. Asked by reporters about talks on the U.S. tariffs, Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne said the government's 'endgame' is to have all of Trump's tariffs removed, but he referred journalists to Carney and Intergovernmental Affairs Minister Dominic LeBlanc for the most up-to-date information. 'It's a very dynamic situation,' Champagne said. 'We've been engaging with our friends in the United States. You know, we talk to different people in the administration.' But Carney and Foreign Affairs Minister Anita Anand breezed past reporters who shouted questions at them on Wednesday, while LeBlanc was not seen in Parliament. Ontario Premier Doug Ford publicly confirmed the secret, top-level discussions last week, saying that Carney and Trump are in 'deep discussions' on trade and working 'around the clock to get a deal.' 'They're right at the brink,' Ford said in Toronto on June 5. Pete Hoekstra, Trump's ambassador to Canada, said in an armchair talk at the Canadian Club of Ottawa on Wednesday that he thinks there's a 'possibility to have a great deal.' He said that 'all indications' are that the two countries could reach a 'very positive agreement,' but couched that 'there's also the possibility you could end up with something like no deal or whatever.' 'Until a deal is announced, you really won't know what's it in it,' Hoekstra said. Trump has insisted that Canada could join his unbuilt Golden Dome continental missile defence program at a cost of $61 billion. Carney confirmed last month that he is in talks with Trump about the project. 'It's something that we are looking at and something that has been discussed at a high level,' Carney said at a press conference in Ottawa on May 21. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 11, 2025.

How the $1,000 ‘Trump accounts' for American babies compare to 529s and custodial Roth IRAs
How the $1,000 ‘Trump accounts' for American babies compare to 529s and custodial Roth IRAs

Yahoo

time37 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

How the $1,000 ‘Trump accounts' for American babies compare to 529s and custodial Roth IRAs

President Donald Trump and American business leaders this week celebrated a provision in his tax bill that would create and fund investment accounts for babies born in the next few years. The accounts would be allowed to compound and grow tax-deferred, similar to the way some retirement accounts work. 'In addition to the substantial financial benefits of investing early in life, extensive research shows that children with savings accounts are more likely to graduate high school and college, buy a home, start a business and are less likely to be incarcerated,' Trump said. 'Trump accounts will contribute to the lifelong success of millions of newborn babies.' Here's what you should know about these 'baby 401(k)s' and how they compare to other savings plans for children. The so-called Trump accounts are part of Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' that passed through the House of Representatives last month. Republicans are aiming to get the bill through the Senate and signed by Trump by July 4th. Here's how the accounts would work: The federal government would contribute $1,000 to an investment account for every American baby born between Jan. 1, 2025, and Dec. 31, 2028. An additional $5,000 in after-tax contributions could be made annually to the accounts by parents, employers or other private entities. The money would be invested in index funds that track the overall U.S. stock market. Accounts would be controlled by a child's legal guardians until age 18. Earnings would grow tax-deferred and qualified withdrawals would be taxed at the long-term capital gains rate. 'The compounded growth of an initial $1,000 investment at the time of birth, at an average annual return of 8 percent, would amount to nearly $4,000 by age 18, more than $10,000 by age 30, and over $148,000 by age 65,' according to Bankrate Chief Financial Analyst Greg McBride. 'The key to achieving this type of growth is leaving the money untouched. As Warren Buffett espouses, 'Never interrupt compounding.'' Several business leaders praised the accounts and said they'd make contributions to their employee's kids' accounts. 'We see … the establishment of these Trump Accounts as a simple yet powerful way to transform lives,' Dell Technologies CEO Michael Dell said. 'Decades of research has shown that giving children a financial head start profoundly impacts their long-term success.' Get started: Match with an advisor who can help you achieve your financial goals Trump Accounts have some similarities with 529 savings plans, but there are some notable differences. Funding: Trump accounts would be initially funded by the federal government, while 529 plans are typically funded by parents, grandparents or other relatives. Withdrawals: Withdrawals from 529 plans are tax-free as long as they're used for qualified educational expenses. Withdrawals from Trump accounts would have fewer restrictions on their uses, but are taxed at long-term capital gains rates. Contribution limits: Annual contributions for Trump accounts would be limited to $5,000, while 529 plans allow for much higher limits, from about $235,000 to more than $600,000, depending on the state that sponsors the plan (these are lifetime limits; there's no annual limit for 529s). Many people assume that the maximum 529 plan contribution is $19,000 per child in 2025 — or $38,000 if you file jointly — but that's the maximum amount you can contribute without exceeding the annual gift tax limit. (If you give someone more than that limit in any given year, then you're required to file a gift tax return, though you likely still won't owe taxes on the gift.) Here's what else you should know about using a 529 plan to save for your kids' education. Compare advisors: Bankrate's list of the best financial advisors Custodial Roth IRAs also allow kids to set aside money and have it be invested so it grows over time. Here's how they compare to the proposed Trump accounts. Earned income requirement: Trump accounts would be funded at birth and allow for additional contributions each year, while custodial Roth IRAs require a child to have earned income during the year in order to contribute. Contribution limits: Custodial Roth IRA contributions are limited to $7,000 in 2025, or the total amount of earned income a child has during the year, whichever is less. Trump accounts would allow for annual contributions of $5,000. Taxes on withdrawals: Withdrawals from Roth IRAs during retirement are tax-free, while withdrawals from the proposed Trump accounts would be taxed at the long-term capital gains rate. Here's more on custodial Roth IRAs. The proposed Trump Accounts would create new investment accounts for every American baby born in the next few years, funded with $1,000 from the federal government. The accounts would be invested in index funds that track the U.S. stock market and could receive additional contributions each year of $5,000 from private entities. The plan is subject to change as the bill makes its way through the legislative process. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store