Israel attacks Iran's capital with explosions booming across Tehran
DUBAI, United Arab Emirates — (AP) — Israel attacked Iran's capital early Friday, with explosions booming across Tehran.
The attack comes as tensions have reached new heights over Tehran's rapidly advancing nuclear program. The Board of Governors at the International Atomic Energy Agency for the first time in 20 years on Thursday censured Iran over it not working with its inspectors. Iran immediately announced it would establish a third enrichment site in the country and swap out some centrifuges for more-advanced ones.
Israel for years has warned it will not allow Iran to build a nuclear weapon, something Tehran insists it doesn't want — though official there have repeatedly warned it could. The U.S. has been preparing for something to happen, already pulling some diplomats from Iraq's capital and offering voluntary evacuations for the families of U.S. troops in the wider Middle East.
People in Tehran awoke to the sound of the blast. State television acknowledged the blast.
It wasn't immediately clear what had been hit, though smoke could be rising from Chitgar, a neighborhood in western Tehran.
Benchmark Brent crude spiked on the attack, rising over 2%.
The White House did not have an immediate comment Thursday night.
As the explosions in Tehran started, President Donald Trump was on the lawn of the White House mingling with members of Congress. It was unclear if he had been informed but the president continued shaking hands and posing for pictures for several minutes.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Gavin Newsom's Comments About Trump's Military Parade Are Going Viral: "That's About As Small As It Gets"
Donald Trump's $45 million military parade is this weekend in DC. The tanks have arrived. The barricades are up. The soldiers have been rehearsing. Related: The Internet Is Having A Field Day Over Marjorie Taylor Greene's Tweet About Homeschooling With An Altered Map The stage has been set. The show will go on (unless there is lightning, which is a possibility). Related: This Conservative Said He Wears A Fake ICE Uniform For A Really, Really, Really Gross Reason Gavin Newsom gave his thoughts about the parade on Thursday and they're going viral: MSNBC/atrupar/Twitter: @atrupar "It's a vulgar display. It's the kind of thing you see with Kim Jong-un, you see it with Putin, you see with dictators around the world that are weak and just want to demonstrate strength. Weakness masquerading as strength. To fete the dear leader on his birthday? What an embarrassment." he said. "Honestly, that's about as small as it gets." "How weak, how weak do you have to be to commandeer the military to fete you on your birthday in a vulgar display of weakness? That's Donald Trump." As with just about everything Newsom has said this week, people are loving it: "Absolutely 100% correct," this person commented. Another person said, "You have to give the man points for hitting Trump right where it hurts most." Another person wrote, "Gavin Newsom is showing other Democrats how it's done." And this person said, "Newsom has cracked the code." Also in In the News: A NSFW Float Depicting Donald Trump's "MAGA" Penis Was Just Paraded Around Germany, And It' Also in In the News: "Honestly Speechless At How Evil This Is": 26 Brutal, Brutal, Brutal Political Tweets Of The Week Also in In the News: "I Don't Know How To Live In A Country With People Who Support Sending A 4-Year-Old To Her Death": 23 Tweets About The Dismal State Of Politics This Week
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
After US-Iran nuclear talks crumble, what happens next?
(NewsNation) — An announcement that Iran has pulled out of nuclear talks with the United States came on Friday, just days after President Donald Trump acknowledged that he was 'less confident' about reaching a deal than he had been in recent months. In an interview with NBC News on Friday, however, Trump said that even though Iran had 'missed an opportunity to me a deal,' they may still have another chance. 'We'll see,' Trump said in the interview. What did Trump know about Israel's strike on Iran before it happened? Iranian parliament member Alaeddin Boroujerdi confirmed that the sixth round of negotiations, which was set to take place in Oman on Sunday, has been canceled, according to the Times of Oman. Both the Oman News Agency and Iranian state media reported that the talks have been suspended until further notice. The diplomatic efforts were aimed at restricting Iran's nuclear program. Trump responded to Israel's strikes on Iran on Friday through a social media post, calling on Tehran to reach a deal to avoid further escalation. 'I gave Iran chance after chance to make a deal,' Trump wrote in a Truth Social post. 'I told them, in the strongest terms, 'just do it,' but no matter how hard they tried, no matter how close they were, they just couldn't get it done.' He added: 'Now everyone is dead, and it's only going to get worse, but there is still time to stop this slaughter — before the next attacks, which are expected to be even more brutal. Iran must reach a deal. Just do it, before it's too late. God bless you all!' A White House spokesperson did not immediately return a message from NewsNation seeking comment about the status of the U.S. talks with Iran in hopes of striking a deal. Israel launched an attack Thursday night, targeting Iran's nuclear infrastructure and killing senior military leaders. Israeli forces struck key sites in Natanz, targeting enrichment facilities, weapons programs, nuclear scientists and missile production infrastructure. Six nuclear scientists, including Fereydoun Abbasi-Davani and Mohammad Mehdi Tehranchi, were also reported to be dead. Rubio: US 'not involved' in Israel's strike inside Iran Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu warned Iran could soon mass-produce missiles capable of carrying nuclear warheads, calling the threat 'intolerable.' Both the Trump administration and Iran had been hopeful of reaching an agreement as a result of the negotiations that had been mostly indirect, NBC News previously reported. Previous negotiations sessions had been characterized as being 'respectful and positive.' Trump said in a podcast with the New York Post this week that he was 'less confident' that a deal could be reached than he was a couple of months ago. Trump also accused Iran of delaying, while Iran said that the U.S. was not seriously engaged in the negotiations. Iran also said that the United States did not respect its right to rich uranium, which Iran insists would be used for peaceful purposes. In the podcast, Trump said 'something happened to them,' referencing Iran. Asked what had happened to the country, Trump responded, 'Well, if they don't make a deal, they're not going to have a nuclear weapon. If they do make a deal, they're not going to have a nuclear weapon, too, you know? But they're not going a have a new nuclear weapon, so it's not going to matter from that standpoint.' The New York Post report indicated that Trump's special Middle East envoy, Steve Witkoff, had been involved in the indirect nuclear talks with Iran, but that the discussions had mostly been unproductive. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The Undo President: Trump Gets Country Off Wrong Track
Americans are usually an optimistic people - except when it comes to our countrys future. Right-track/wrong-track surveys have long found yawning gaps favoring the dark view. The RealClearPolitics poll average, stretching back to 2009, reports no point with a positive majority but several where the spread was 40 or even 50 points to the negative. When Donald Trump was sworn in last January, the wrong-track view held sway by 30 points. Followers of the news - which presents the presidents first months in office as a kleptocratic frenzy marked by destructive economic policies and naked assaults on the Constitution - would expect these numbers to have subsequently cracked the oceans bottom. But, lo and behold, the wrong-track/right-track gap has shrunk to nine points. Its still in negative territory, but that is the tightest gap since April 2021 (minus 6.5), when the COVID vaccine offered hope that we might return to normal. We did, in a way, as the gap quickly shot back up, peaking at minus 57 in July 2022. The recent positive poll numbers are just a snapshot in time. They might change tomorrow. They do not reflect an algorithms assessment of thousands of firm data points but the fluid psychological state - the vibe, to take the Democrats once favorite phrase - of the people. Still, the near-historic rise in optimism recorded by established polls is significant. It can also be a little confounding given Trumps ridiculously harsh press coverage and the fact that material conditions have not dramatically improved during the last five months. Indeed, a key story of Trumps second term is the difficulty he and the GOP Congress are having passing his agenda. Whats driving the vibe shift? Americas drive for innovation and the progressive domination of the intelligentsia have led us to judge presidencies by their forward-looking plans to get America on the right track. We remember what our leaders built. Trumps secret sauce so far has been his focus on the other side of the equation - dismantling past actions that sent us down the wrong track. Trump may not be a classic conservative, but, like Ronald Reagan, much of his success at home has been rooted in subtraction rather than addition. Trump is a reactionary in the best sense of the word. He has been more "undo" than "can do." The Biden administration gave his wrecking ball plenty of targets. His efforts to reverse the Biden administrations embrace of open borders and its insistence that males be allowed to compete against women seek a return to the way things used to be. His deployment of troops to quell the LA riots is not a strong mans push to silence dissent but a commitment - lost in both the BLM riots of 2020 and the Jan. 6 assault on the Capitol - to the principle that we should not express our political discontent through violence. The same spirit informs his efforts to reform higher education. He is not trying to destroy Harvard, Columbia, and other elite schools. He is seeking to restore their pivotal role as safe spaces for the free exchange of ideas. His efforts to limit the number of foreign students - 25% of whom come from our main adversary, China - aim to reassert the basic point that even our private institutions should, on the whole, serve our countrys interests. Yes, many Americans have concerns about how Trump is pursuing these aims. The devil is always in the details. But the shrunken right-track/wrong-track gap suggests the broad sense across the country that he is moving the country in the right direction by moving us off the wrong track. Anecdotal evidence suggests that even some of his opponents are quietly pleased by some of his more controversial actions. I recently asked a very liberal friend who "fears and despises" Trump whether she supports his opposition to birthright citizenship. "I support the Constitution," she replied. After telling her I wanted to wait for the Supreme Court to definitively answer that question, I asked her: "If we were writing the Constitution from scratch today, should we enshrine the idea that anybody born on our soil is automatically a citizen?" "Of course not," she said, without missing a beat. Taking a step back, it seems fair to say she is not unhappy that he is asking the question. Likewise, she does not support his efforts to cut the federal government, but she is happy that hes refocused attention on the deficit and debt. The right-track/wrong-track numbers show that Americans have recognized that things were amiss in our nations capital. The vibe has shifted because of Trumps willingness to challenge many assumptions of governance and sacred cows. Will it last? Who knows. Getting us off the wrong track is a key first step; moving us on to the right track may be harder still. J. Peder Zane is an editor for RealClearInvestigations and a columnist for RealClearPolitics. Follow him on X @jpederzane.
