Prison Population Projected To Boom Over Next Decade
New Zealand's prison population is expected to increase by 36 percent over the next decade.
The Ministry of Justice projects there will be 14,230 prisoners in June 2035, up from 10,488 in February 2025.
The projections take into account government policies like the reinstatement of 'Three Strikes', and reforms to cap sentencing discounts and introduce more aggravating factors.
Last year's report, which projected a prison population of 11,317 by June 2034, did not take into account those policies, as they had not yet been passed into law.
"The new policy settings are expected to see more offenders receive prison sentences and for those sentences to be longer," said ministry sector insights general manager Rebecca Parish.
The projected increase takes into account both the remand and sentenced populations.
The number of those on remand is projected to increase steadily over the time period. The sentenced population is expected to increase rapidly until June 2028 and then gradually by June 2035.
Those on remand have spent longer on remand, due to their cases taking longer to go through the courts, but Parish said initiatives were underway to reduce the time taken to resolve cases and the time spent in custodial remand.
The ministry said it released these reports to evaluate long-term trends, and help inform investment, planning and policy decisions.
Corrections Minister Mark Mitchell said he had every confidence that Corrections had the capacity and capability to safely manage short-term and long-term projections.
"The government has invested significantly into our Corrections system to safely manage the increasing prison population. This includes funding for the expansion of Waikeria and Christchurch Men's prisons, and investment to enable Corrections to recruit, train, and deploy more frontline corrections officers," he said.
Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith said last year's projections had made it clear that once the government's law and order policies had taken effect the numbers would increase.
"This simply reflects our work to restore law and order to New Zealand, which we know is working. We've given police and the courts more tools to go after gangs, we've put a stop to public funding of background reports, we've toughened up our sentencing laws, and reinstated the Three Strikes legislation," he said.
"We want to see fewer people in prison, but only after we see fewer victims of violent crime. Victims are our priority."
The report was done in collaboration with Corrections, Police, Crown Law and the Serious Fraud Office.
Labour corrections spokesperson Tracey McLellan said building expensive mega-prisons would not fix the problem in the long-term.
"If the government were serious about reducing crime and keeping communities safe, they'd be focusing on the drivers of crime and providing rehabilitation," she said.
"We need a government focused on truly breaking the cycle of crime to keep our communities safe."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
43 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Christchurch real estate agent Yanfei Bao's killer Tingjun Cao sentenced to at least 17 years in jail
Tingjun Cao is removed from the court room during his sentencing for the murder of real estate agent Yanfei Bao. Photo: CHRIS SKELTON Chinese national Tingjun Cao will spend at least 17 years behind bars for murdering Christchurch real estate agent Yanfei Bao. Her family told the High Court at Christchurch of the unbearable absence of Bao from their lives since the 44-year-old disappeared from Hornby in July 2023. Bao's 11-year-old daughter told the court: "My family is sad and our house feels different. It is quieter and emptier." Cao killed Bao in July 2023 after luring her to a Hornby home she was selling. On Friday, Justice Lisa Preston sentenced Cao to life imprisonment with a non-parole period of 17 and a half years. Cao was earlier removed from the court by Corrections officers after he regularly interjected and interrupted the hearing with outbursts. Immigration New Zealand said it would now consider enforcement action against Cao. In victim impact statements read to the court on their behalf, Bao's family called for the judge to impose the harshest possible sentence and outlined the immeasurable trauma and loss they had suffered. Bao's daughter, who had name suppression, told the killer: "You took my mummy away from me and my life has not been the same since". "I laugh less now because nothing feels as fun or as happy as it used to. "I miss my mummy every single day. I miss the way she used to do my hair, cook for me and make me feel safe. I miss her voice, her smell and the way she always knew how to make things better. "Since mummy has been gone, I feel lonely a lot. Even when I am with other people, it is not the same without her." Bao's husband, Paul Gooch, said he was still haunted by her final moments. "We find ourselves in a profound state of grief, grappling with the heart-wrenching questions that linger," he said. "When did she first sense the peril to her life? For how long did she endure the unimaginable suffering before her death? The deep sorrow of her pain continues to resonate within us all." Gooch paid tribute to his partner. "Nineteen months ago we were heartlessly deprived of Yanfei. She was a devoted wife and mother and now we are left with the unbearable absence of her presence," he said. "We can no longer share in the joy of her laughter, the fullness of our lives with her, or the comfort of her warmth and love. Her radiant light has been forever extinguished." Gooch's father, David Gooch, called Cao a "despicable monster". "You took Yanfei - a wife, a mother and daughter - for your own gratification and created a huge hole in all our hearts, which will never be filled. We are all heartbroken and are lost without Yanfei," he said. Bao's 74-year-old father, who had name suppression and spoke to the court via audio-visual link from China, said he wished he was present for the hearing. "What right did the defendant have to take my daughter's precious life. What right did they have to destroy our happiness and cause such a heinous impact on society?" prosecutor Cameron Stuart translated on the man's behalf. "In this case, the facts of the defendant's deliberate murder are clear and the evidence is irrefutable. I believe the perpetrator acted with deep malice, used particularly cruel means, caused especially severe consequences, and had a highly adverse social impact. "After being apprehended, the defendant demonstrated a poor attitude, evading responsibility and refusing to plead guilty, which greatly hindered the police and courts investigation. Furthermore, neither the defendant nor their family have ever apologised to the victim's family, showing no remorse whatsoever. Therefore, I solemnly request that the court, in order to uphold the dignity of the law, ensure judicial fairness and maintain social stability, convict and sentence the defendant to the highest penalty according to the law." He also described the immense suffering the family had suffered with the loss of a loved daughter and sister. "My heart at this moment is filled with immense sorrow which words cannot adequately convey," Bao's father said. "My daughter was an intelligent, kind, brave and resilient, modern Chinese woman, full of positivity. She was the light of my wife's and my life, the most brilliant colour in our ordinary days and the greatest spiritual support and source of motivation during our families tough times. "Every stage of her growth was the most precious memory in our hearts, and her laughter was the most melodious tune in our home. Filling it with love and hope throughout the seasons." Detective Inspector Nicola Reeves paid tribute to Bao and her family following the sentencing. "A dedicated investigation team, supported by our forensic specialist partners, has worked tirelessly since July 2023 to tell Yanfei's story and seek a resolution for her and her loved ones. I speak on behalf of all the staff involved when I say this case will stay with us forever," Reeve said. "Once again, I would like to acknowledge Yanfei's family, both here in New Zealand and in China, who have showed nothing but strength, grace and courage over the last two years. "Yanfei was, like so many of us, a much loved and admired woman who was working hard to provide a better life for herself and her family. She had a fundamental right to be safe in her place of work and return home at the end of the day. "Violent men who harm women will not be tolerated in our community and New Zealand Police will hold offenders to account. Violent men should feel under threat, not women and girls going about their lives. "While there is no outcome that can bring Yanfei back to her family, we hope that today's sentencing can bring them some closure, as they continue to adjust to life without her. This is just one part of the healing process and I hope her family can take some comfort knowing the person responsible has been held to account for his actions." As court began on Friday morning, Cao made protestations about evidence he claimed would demonstrate his innocence, leading to Justice Preston closing the court to the public to address the outbursts. However, when court resumed, Cao again leapt to his feet and began interrupting. As Corrections officers escorted him from the court, he continued speaking loudly and gesticulating. His final protest came as he ripped up his papers, bundled them into a ball and threw them to the ground. Cao was forced to watch the remainder of the hearing from another courtroom. His seven-week jury trial last year was also marked by Cao's odd displays. He sacked his defence lawyers during the trial and represented himself with the help of a trio of interpreters. Justice Preston repeatedly warned Cao about asking irrelevant questions, making meandering and repetitive statements, and accusing witnesses of lying. The prosecution described the case against Cao as an "absolute slam dunk" with compelling and overwhelming evidence demonstrating his guilt. However, Cao claimed he was at the centre of a conspiracy and police officers had lied, fabricated, planted and doctored evidence to frame him. In delivering his closing argument he regularly turned and spoke to the glass panes of an empty dock and at other times rambled through measurements and minutiae which were difficult to link to his claims of innocence or the case. Cao lured the 44-year-old Yanfei Bao to the Hornby home on 19 July 2023 under the pretence of wanting to view the property. There he attacked her, bundled her into the boot of his car and drove her to a remote rural road near Lincoln where he killed her. He buried her in a shallow grave along the treeline of a farm in Greenpark where police found her remains almost a year later. Bao's husband reported her missing the day she vanished after discovering his wife had not collected her daughter from an after-school programme, had not come home for lunch and calls to her phone went unanswered. Police found Bao's phone in grass beside the southern motorway two days later. Cao was arrested on his way to Christchurch Airport in the days after her disappearance with a one-way ticket to Shanghai. He was initially charged with Bao's kidnapping but the charged was later dropped. Cao was charged with murder in September 2023. RNZ asked Immigration New Zealand if a deportation order had been sought for Cao, national manager compliance Damon Tredaway said: "we will consider any appropriate enforcement actions once the court proceedings have concluded". Cao would not be eligible for parole until 2041. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
12 hours ago
- RNZ News
Tingjun Cao to be sentenced for murder of Christchurch real estate agent Yanfei Bao
Tingjun Cao in the Christchurch High Court wearing a bandage on his neck. Photo: NZME/George Heard Chinese national Tingjun Cao will today be sentenced for the murder of Christchurch real estate agent Yanfei Bao. Cao lured the 44-year-old to a Hornby home under the pretence of wanting to view the property before attacking her, putting her in the boot of his car and killing her on a remote rural road near Lincoln on 19 July, 2023. He buried her in a shallow grave along the treeline of a farm in Greenpark where police found her remains almost a year later. Missing Christchurch real estate agent Yanfei Bao Photo: RNZ / NZ Police Bao's husband Paul Gooch reported her missing the day she vanished after discovering his wife had not collected her daughter from an after-school programme, had not come home for lunch and calls to her phone went unanswered. Police found Bao's phone in grass beside the Christchurch Southern Motorway two days later. Cao was arrested at Christchurch Airport in the days after her disappearance with a one-way ticket to Shanghai. He was initially charged with Bao's kidnapping but the charged was later dropped. Cao was charged with murder in September 2023. A jury found the 54-year-old guilty following a seven-week High Court trial, during which he sacked his defence lawyers and represented himself with the help of a trio of interpreters. Justice Lisa Preston repeatedly warned Cao about asking irrelevant questions, making meandering and repetitive statements, and accusing witnesses of lying. The prosecution described the case against Cao as an "absolute slam dunk" with compelling and overwhelming evidence demonstrating his guilt. An abundance of digital data placed Cao and Bao together at the time of her disappearance and death and, ultimately, where her body was found. DNA also linked the pair to the Hornby property from which Bao disappeared. Cao's palm print was found on her broken cellphone, including on the internal battery, and there was a photo of a naked woman's body taken by Cao's phone and later deleted. His defence centred around a conspiracy and alternative perpetrator named Mr Tang, who Cao was unable to prove existed. Cao claimed police officers had lied, fabricated, planted evidence and doctored images and videos to frame him. In delivering his closing argument, he regularly turned and spoke to the glass panes of an empty dock and at other times rambled through measurements and minutiae which were difficult to link to his innocence or the case. Following the guilty verdict Gooch yelled at Bao: "You might want to get a refund on that plane ticket you scum bag." Tingjun Cao in the dock of the Christchurch High Court facing the jury on a charge of murder relating to real estate agent Yanfei Bao. Photo: The Press / Peter Meecham Outside court, Gooch detailed the enormity of his family's loss. "Coming to terms with this devastating loss has been an incredibly challenging journey, especially considering the complete lack of remorse displayed by the individual responsible," he said. "His actions throughout this trial have highlighted a profound absence of humanity." Detective Inspector Nicola Reeves paid tribute to Bao's family. "This was no ordinary case and it will leave a lasting impact on all staff involved including myself," she said. "We would like to acknowledge the strength of Yanfei Bao's family who have endured a terribly distressing experience. "Our thoughts are with Yanfei's family and while the verdict has been reached, this is just one part of the healing process. I acknowledge the strength they have shown and, while the outcome does not bring Yanfei back, I hope they take some comfort knowing that the person responsible will be held accountable." Justice Preston will sentence Cao at the High Court in Christchurch. The Sentencing Act contains a presumption convicted murderers will be sentenced to life imprisonment unless such a sentence is manifestly unjust. If sentenced to life, Cao would spend no less than a decade behind bars, but Justice Preston could also engage section 104 of Sentencing Act allowing judges to impose a non-parole period of at least 17 years for particularly egregious murders. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Otago Daily Times
13 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
The Regulatory Standards Bill is an attack on all of us
It is that time again. We have another big parliamentary Bill to submit on, the Regulatory Standards Bill. It is a complicated beast. I know this because I submitted on the discussion document back in December. I was one of the 20,108 not-bot submitters who argued against its complex and contradictory proposals. You might be one of the 76 people who supported the proposals. Good on you for having your say. You and I both get to do it again. I do not know anyone other than Act New Zealand who is providing advice if you are one of the 76 but there is a lot of support if you want to join the 20,000. A major concern is the explicit exclusion of Te Tiriti o Waitangi from the Bill's narrow law-making principles. The Bill excludes Māori perspectives in the law-making process, erodes Māori rights to self-determination and threatens te reo Māori. It perpetuates systemic racism and colonial structures of power. Lawyer Tania Waikato argues the Bill will lead to even greater legal confusion and uncertainty, and undoubtedly more litigation because it discards decades of law on the application of te Tiriti in New Zealand policy and legislation. Even the Ministry of Justice has said the Bill fails to reflect the constitutional importance of Te Tiriti o Waitangi. The government wants to use the Bill to help it avoid having te Tiriti conversations, but it will only encourage and amplify them. There are other reasons too. The Bill will constrain the regulation and law-making of future governments. All laws and regulations will have to meet a set of principles that idolise individual freedoms and private property rights over everything else. That means, for example, over public services like a good, fit-for-purpose, future-proofed hospital for the South. You do not have to be a hardcore socialist to think public hospitals are a good idea. Or that it is good for governments, even ones we did not vote for, to be able to legislate for the public good over private interests. Academic Jane Kelsey describes this as "metaregulation", where the Bill will regulate the way governments can regulate. Because of this, the Bill has the potential to constrain parliamentary sovereignty, in practice if not in law. What about our environment? The environment has taken some big hits under this government and the Bill will make more of them more likely. Greenpeace is saying it will be harder for the government to address climate change and biodiversity loss. The Bill might require the government to compensate corporations for the impact of protective laws that affect their property. You do not get compensated when the law impacts your property: why should corporations? The Bill encourages deregulation which will compromise the health of the environment. It will encourage exploitation of natural areas and accelerate the loss of endangered species. It is very contradictory. On one hand the government is encouraging more tourists into New Zealand and on the other promoting legislation that puts our most valuable tourism asset, our natural environment, at even greater risk. Some are also arguing the Bill will disproportionately benefit wealthy people, widening the gap between them and everybody else. The Bill will prioritise individual's property rights over workers' rights to secure and safe employment or the rights of vulnerable communities. These are collective services, like social services and infrastructure. Collective services help to keep us working, support the elderly through superannuation, and provide the social safety net. As eroded as these services might be right now, it can still get much worse, for everyone. The Bill proposes having an unelected regulatory standards board appointed by the minister to oversee the regime. This is not a body representing the public. This is an elite group hand-picked by the minister to help put pressure on the government to follow the Bill's prescription. The board will be unelected lobbyists for the Bill's ideology and will not be accountable to voters. The submissions on the Bill close on June 23, so you have 10 more days. There is a good portal on the parliamentary website to make your submission through, so it is easy to do. You do not have to say much and you do not have to know all about the Bill's trickier details. ODT columnist Chris Trotter is right that no Parliament can bind a future one. A future government could, of course, repeal the Bill if it becomes law — but that is not a reason not to fight it. Putting your faith in the good judgement of a future government is, well, not good judgement. We have to keep up our side of our democracy and have our say, even more so as democracy comes under intense attack. Because that is what this Bill represents. It is not just an attack on Māori and te Tiriti. Or just on conservationists. Or just on the social safety net. It is an attack on everyone. ■Metiria Stanton Turei is a senior law lecturer at the University of Otago and a former Green Party MP and co-leader.
