Judge denies stay request, lets ruling stand blocking DOGE efforts to shut down peace institute
WASHINGTON: A federal judge on Friday denied the Trump administration's request that she stay her May 19 ruling that returned control of the US Institute of Peace back to its acting president and board.
In a seven-page ruling, US District Court Judge Beryl A. Howell said the government did not meet any of the four requirements for a stay, including a 'strong showing' of whether its request could succeed on the merits.
Howell reiterated her finding that the Institute is not part of the executive branch and is therefore beyond President Donald Trump's authority to fire its board. She added that the firings also did not follow the law for how a board member of the Institute might be removed by the president.
Most of the board was fired in March during a takeover of the Institute by the Department of Government Efficiency. That action touched off the firing of its acting president, former ambassador George Moose, and subsequently most of the staff. The organization's headquarters, funded in part by donors, was turned over to the General Services Administration.
In her ruling May 19, Howell concluded that the board was fired illegally and all actions that followed that were therefore 'null and void.'
In Friday's ruling Howell also rejected the government's argument that the organization had to fall into one of the three branches of government and since it does not legislate, nor is it part of the judicial branch, it must be part of the executive branch. 'As the Court has previously pointed out, other entities also fall outside of this tripartite structure,' she wrote.
Howell also said that the government did not 'describe any cognizable harm they will experience without a stay, let alone an irreparable one.' However, 'as plaintiffs explain, every day that goes by without the relief this Court ordered, the job of putting (USIP) back together by rehiring employees and stemming the dissipation of USIP's goodwill and reputation for independence will become that much harder.'
Moose reentered the headquarters Wednesday without incident along with the organization's outside counsel, George Foote.
The White House was not immediately available for comment. In requesting the stay the government also requested a two-business-day stay to allow for an appeal to the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Howell denied that request.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Arabiya
an hour ago
- Al Arabiya
Multiple burn injuries after attack on Gaza war protest in US
Several people suffered burns and other injuries Sunday in the US state of Colorado in what the FBI called a 'targeted terror attack' against demonstrators seeking the release of Israeli hostages held in Gaza. Police in the city of Boulder said a man was taken into custody. They were more cautious in presuming a possible motive for the attack, which multiple sources said was committed against members of the Jewish community during a peaceful gathering. Local media cited eyewitnesses describing a man throwing something resembling a homemade Molotov cocktail at the group. In one video apparently of the attack, a shirtless man holding clear bottles in his hands is seen pacing as the grass in front of him burns. He can be heard screaming 'End Zionists!' 'Palestine is Free!' and 'They are killers!' towards several people in red t-shirts as they tend to a person lying on the ground. Other images showed billowing black smoke above a park. 'We are aware of and fully investigating a targeted terror attack in Boulder, Colorado,' FBI chief Kash Patel said on X. The White House said President Donald Trump has been briefed on the incident. Asked if it was a terror attack against the protesters, Boulder Police Chief Steve Redfearn insisted it was 'way too early to speculate motive' behind the violence, which took place shortly before 1:30 pm (1930 GMT). He told reporters that 'initial callers indicated that there was a man with a weapon and that people were being set on fire.' 'When we arrived, we encountered multiple victims that were injured, with injuries consistent with burns and other injuries,' Redfearn said. Police on the scene 'immediately encountered that suspect, who was taken into custody without incident,' he added. 'Antisemitic attack' The Anti-Defamation League, a Jewish activist group, said on X that the attack occurred at Sunday's 'Boulder Run for Their Lives' event, a weekly gathering of the Jewish community in support of the hostages seized during Hamas's attack on Israel on October 7, 2023. Israel's ambassador to the United Nations, Danny Danon, voiced outrage at the incident. 'Terrorism against Jews does not stop at the Gaza border -- it is already burning the streets of America,' he said in a statement, describing how people marching for the return of hostages were attacked by someone 'throwing... Molotov cocktails.' 'Make no mistake -- this is not a political protest, this is terrorism.' US Secretary of State Marco Rubio weighed in, like Patel describing the incident as a 'targeted terror attack.' 'Terror has no place in our great country,' Rubio said. Several organizations decried the apparent hate-fueled violence. 'Today, during a peaceful walk on Pearl Street in Boulder to raise awareness for the hostages still in Gaza, our community was targeted in a violent, antisemitic attack,' the Israeli-American Council said in a statement. 'This is an attack on all of us -- and we will not stay silent,' it added. The Boulder violence comes almost two weeks after the fatal shooting of two Israeli embassy staffers outside a Jewish museum in Washington, where a 31-year-old suspect who shouted 'Free Palestine' was taken into custody by police.
Arab News
4 hours ago
- Arab News
6 injured in Colorado attack the FBI is investigating as terrorism
BOULDER, Colorado: The suspect in an attack in Boulder, Colorado, that injured six yelled 'Free Palestine' and used a makeshift flamethrower, the FBI said. Mark Michalek, the special agent in charge of the Denver field office, said federal law enforcement is investigating the attack as an act of terrorism. The suspect, identified by the FBI as 45-year-old Mohamed Sabry Soliman, was taken into custody. No charges were immediately announced but officials said they expect to hold him 'fully accountable.' The attack took place at a popular pedestrian mall in Boulder where demonstrators with a volunteer group called Run For Their Lives had gathered to raise visibility for the hostages who remain in Gaza as a war between Israel and Hamas continues to inflame global tensions and has contributed to a spike in antisemitic violence in the United States. Video from the scene showed a witness shouting, 'He's right there. He's throwing Molotov cocktails,' as a police officer with his gun drawn advanced on a bare-chested suspect with containers in each hand. Injuries ranged from serious to minor. Soliman was also injured and was taken to the hospital to be treated, but authorities didn't elaborate on the nature of his injuries. The attack occurred more than a week after the fatal shooting of two Israeli embassy staffers in Washington by a Chicago man who yelled 'I did it for Palestine, I did it for Gaza' as he was being led away by police. FBI leaders in Washington said they were treating the Boulder attack as an act of terrorism, and the Justice Department — which leads investigations into acts of violence driven by religious, racial or ethnic motivations — decried the attack as a 'needless act of violence, which follows recent attacks against Jewish Americans.' 'This act of terror is being investigated as an act of ideologically motivated violence based on the early information, the evidence, and witness accounts. We will speak clearly on these incidents when the facts warrant it,' FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino said in a post on X. Israel's war in Gaza began when Hamas-led militants stormed into southern Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, killing some 1,200 people, mostly civilians, and abducting about 250 others. They are still holding 58 hostages, around a third believed to be alive, after most of the rest were released in ceasefire agreements or other deals. Israel's military campaign has killed over 54,000 people in Hamas-run Gaza, mostly women and children, according to Gaza's Health Ministry, which does not say how many of the dead were civilians or combatants. The offensive has destroyed vast areas, displaced around 90 percent of the population and left people almost completely reliant on international aid. Police in Boulder were more circumspect about a motive. Police Chief Steve Redfearn said it 'would be irresponsible for me to speculate' while witnesses were still being interviewed but noted that the group that had gathered in support of the hostages had assembled peacefully and that injuries of the victims — ranging from serious to minor — were consistent with them having been set on fire. The violence comes four years after a shooting rampage at a grocery store in Boulder, about 25 miles (40 kilometers) northwest of Denver, that killed four people. The gunman was sentenced to life in prison for murder after a jury rejected his attempt to avoid prison time by pleading not guilty by reason of insanity. Multiple blocks of the pedestrian mall area were evacuated by police. The scene shortly after the attack was tense, as law enforcement agents with a police dog walked through the streets looking for threats and instructed the public to stay clear of the pedestrian mall. Colorado Gov. Jared Polis said in a statement that he was 'closely monitoring' the situation, adding that 'hate-filled acts of any kind are unacceptable.'
Arab News
9 hours ago
- Arab News
The US-China trade war's consequences for agriculture
The trade war initiated by the Trump administration, particularly focused on China, has sparked widespread debate about its implications for various sectors, especially agriculture. As tariffs have been imposed on numerous goods, the US agricultural sector faces significant challenges, particularly concerning essential exports like soybeans and corn. This article examines the consequences of the trade conflict, especially regarding food security and weaponry, while also assessing the position of developing countries, with a specific focus on Saudi Arabia. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for formulating strategies that mitigate negative impacts and foster collaboration in an increasingly interdependent global economy. The US-China trade war was started with the intent to rectify perceived trade imbalances and protect American industries. The administration's tariffs aimed to shield domestic producers from foreign competition and address issues related to intellectual property theft. However, the immediate fallout of these tariffs has been a disruption in agricultural exports, particularly to China, which has historically been one of the largest markets for US agricultural products. American farmers, particularly those in Republican strongholds, have reported significant declines in sales, leading to financial distress. The repercussions extend beyond individual farms, threatening the broader agricultural sector's viability and influencing global food security. This conflict has highlighted the fragility of agricultural markets, which are intricately linked to international trade dynamics. The imposition of tariffs has led to a significant decrease in US agricultural exports to China, particularly in commodities like soybeans, which have seen a dramatic fall in demand. As Brazil and Argentina have ramped up their production and captured market shares, US farmers are finding it increasingly difficult to regain access to these crucial markets. The historical example of the 1980s grain embargo against the Soviet Union serves as a cautionary tale, illustrating how protectionist measures can backfire, hurting domestic producers while leaving foreign competitors relatively unscathed. Additionally, the psychological burden on American farmers cannot be overlooked. The uncertainty surrounding trade relations has led to fears of economic instability, with farmers expressing concerns over unsold crops and the long-term viability of their operations. Kenneth Hartman of the National Corn Growers Association encapsulated this anxiety by emphasizing the dire consequences of prolonged disconnection from the Chinese market. Food security has historically been a pivotal aspect of international relations. The US has often leveraged its agricultural prowess to exert influence over other nations, particularly in developing countries. Following its sanctions on Russia, the US sought to intertwine agricultural economies with its own, thereby fostering dependency through strategic practices. This raises questions about the ethical implications of using food security as a tool of power. In contrast, Saudi Arabia's approach to agricultural self-sufficiency offers a compelling counternarrative. By investing significantly in domestic agriculture, the Kingdom aims to reduce reliance on external sources, thereby enhancing national food security. This strategic pivot underscores the importance of sovereignty in food production and highlights the potential of developing nations to chart their own paths in the face of global trade pressures. Historically, John R. Block, who was secretary of agriculture in the Reagan administration, advocated for self-sufficiency in developing nations, promoting the idea that countries should cultivate their agricultural capabilities to reduce reliance on imports. However, this notion becomes paradoxical when considering that many developing countries could achieve food security more efficiently through American agricultural products. This dynamic illustrates a broader strategy of domination: controlling food equates to wielding power. By fostering dependency on US agricultural exports, America not only secures its own economic interests but also reinforces its geopolitical influence. A compelling counterexample to this paradigm is Saudi Arabia, where King Fahd's administration made a strategic pivot toward agricultural self-sufficiency, directly challenging US recommendations that favored external dependence. Recognizing the vulnerabilities associated with food imports, the Saudi government invested heavily in domestic agriculture, focusing on initiatives that would enhance local production capabilities. These investments led to significant advancements in technology, irrigation systems and agricultural practices, resulting in increased yields and a reduced reliance on imported food. This pursuit of self-sufficiency not only enhanced food security for Saudi Arabia but also economically empowered its citizens by creating jobs, fostering local industries and integrating them into the agricultural mainstream. Farmers received training and resources that allowed them to contribute to a more robust domestic agricultural sector, ultimately leading to greater national pride and resilience against global market fluctuations. Saudi Arabia's approach underscores the importance of national sovereignty in food security, highlighting that self-sufficiency can be achieved through strategic planning and investment rather than reliance on external sources. This successful policy serves as a valuable lesson for other nations, particularly those in similar geopolitical situations, emphasizing that prioritizing local agricultural development can lead to sustainable food security and economic empowerment. Saudi Arabia's pursuit of agricultural self-sufficiency serves as a valuable lesson for other nations. Dr. Turki Faisal Al-Rasheed Furthermore, as global food systems continue to evolve, the Saudi model demonstrates that countries can effectively balance self-sufficiency with international trade. By developing a robust domestic agricultural sector while maintaining trade relationships, Saudi Arabia has positioned itself to navigate the complexities of global food markets more effectively. This dual approach not only secures its food supply but also enables the country to play a more influential role in regional and global food security discussions. In conclusion, while the US promotes self-sufficiency in developing nations as a means of encouraging independence, the Saudi experience illustrates that achieving food security can also involve strategic investments in local agriculture. By recognizing the interplay between self-sufficiency and international cooperation, countries can develop more resilient food systems that protect their interests while contributing to global food security efforts. Developing countries, often caught in the crossfire of US-China trade tensions, face unique challenges. Many of these nations rely on agricultural exports to sustain their economies, making them particularly vulnerable to market fluctuations triggered by trade wars. The trade conflict can exacerbate existing inequalities, as wealthier nations with greater resources can better absorb the shocks of tariffs and retaliatory measures. In the context of Saudi Arabia, while the nation has made strides toward agricultural self-sufficiency, it remains heavily dependent on imports for various food products. The trade war complicates these dynamics, as rising food prices and market instability can threaten food security for vulnerable populations. The interplay of global trade and domestic agricultural policies thus becomes crucial in ensuring that developing nations can navigate these challenges effectively. Given the complexities of the trade war and its implications for agriculture and food security, several strategies can help mitigate negative impacts on both the US and developing nations. Firstly, pursuing diplomatic resolutions to enhance trade access with key markets, particularly China, can create a more stable environment for agricultural exports. Constructive dialogue focused on fair trade practices can cultivate cooperation and trust. Secondly, innovating through sustainable farming practices can enhance productivity and food security. Investing in technology such as precision farming can position US farmers to compete effectively in both domestic and international markets. Thirdly, forming strategic partnerships with countries facing similar agricultural challenges can establish a united front in advocating fair trade practices. Collaborating with nations with aligned agricultural interests can bolster global food security. Fourthly, encouraging farmers to diversify their export markets can reduce dependence on any single nation. By exploring opportunities in emerging markets, US agriculture can build resilience against trade disruptions. Finally, providing support to developing nations through investment, technology transfer and capacity building can help them achieve greater self-sufficiency in food production. This, in turn, can enhance global food security by reducing reliance on a few dominant suppliers. In summary, the trade war's impacts reach far beyond the immediate economic consequences for US farmers. They challenge the very foundations of global food security and the strategies employed to navigate this conflict will determine the resilience of agricultural sectors worldwide. As nations strive to adapt to these changes, the lessons learned from both the US and Saudi Arabia will prove integral to developing sustainable pathways for food security and economic cooperation in the future. The ongoing trade war between the US and China has significant implications for agriculture and global food security. As American farmers grapple with the challenges posed by tariffs and market disruptions, it is essential to consider the broader consequences of these actions on developing nations. By adopting a balanced approach that emphasizes collaboration, innovation and strategic engagement, the US can navigate the complexities of the global trade landscape. The decisions made today will shape the future of agriculture and international relations for generations to come. Through resilience and strategic foresight, American agriculture can not only weather the storms of trade conflict but also reaffirm its role as a leader in global food production. In an interconnected world, fostering cooperation and embracing the realities of global trade will be crucial for ensuring a sustainable and secure future for all nations.
