Man bids to overturn conviction for rape of girl, 7, over lack of corroboration warning
WARNING: Some readers may find the following report upsetting
A man who raped and sexually assaulted a seven-year-old girl who lived in his shared rented house has launched a bid to overturn his conviction on the grounds that the trial judge declined to warn the jury about the dangers of convicting on uncorroborated evidence.
The trial heard that the now 55-year-old man, who cannot be named to protect the identity of his victim, offered the little girl treats such as Kinder Eggs and proceeded to sexually assault her, and on one occasion he bent her over the bed and raped her.
Following a Central Criminal Court trial in May 2023, a jury convicted him on one count of rape and 12 counts of sexual assault between September 21, 2012 and September 6, 2013. The complainant would have been around seven or eight years old at the time of offending.
The man had pleaded not guilty to all charges. He was convicted on May 9, 2023, and was sentenced to 10 years and six months for the count of rape and a period of seven years and six months on the 12 counts of sexual assault, to run concurrently.
At the Court of Appeal on Thursday, Maurice Coffey SC, defence counsel for the man, brought a single ground of appeal before the three-judge court. He argued that the trial judge erred in law by declining to give a corroboration warning to the jury and that the judge had predetermined this decision prior to hearing the application by the defence.
Such a warning can be given by a judge to a jury to highlight the dangers of convicting a defendant on the basis of uncorroborated evidence.
The original trial heard that the complainant's parents had separated and she would stay with her father from Friday to Sunday. The appellant was known to the complainant's father and arranged to move into the shared rental property with him, along with the appellant's ex-wife and her son.
In a specialist interview with gardaí on December 5, 2020, when the complainant was 15 years old, she said that the offending started when she was around seven years old. She stated that the appellant would 'whenever he got the chance' stroke the back of her head and touch her.
She said this progressed to him offering her treats like Kinder Eggs saying words to the effect of 'if I give you this, would you let me do that'. She said that she always said no but he did it anyway. She said that she had no clue what was going on as she was only six or seven years old.
The complainant described that the appellant would 'feel me, lick me, finger me, everything, on my neck, face, hands, boobs, fanny, bum, everywhere - and this was more than one time'.
She alleged that the incidents would occur when she was left alone in the house with him or when people were downstairs. She said that he would touch her in a sexual way and on one occasion he licked her genitals.
The complainant also alleged occasions where the appellant stripped her naked and got her to lie on the bed, where on one occasion he bent her over the bed and he raped her. She said the abuse happened 'whenever he got the chance - nearly every weekend'.
Corroboration warning
An application for a corroboration warning was made during the trial, when the accused man's counsel argued there was an absence of any witness to the offending. They also asserted the generality of the complainant's evidence and that there were conflicting accounts of other witnesses as regards when the complainant would be in the house.
Prosecuting counsel had counter-argued at the time that none of these factors are unusual in the case of sexual offending generally, and certainly not in the case of offending perpetrated against a child.
Mr Coffey said on Thursday that the judge erred in law and in fact by declining to give a corroboration warning. He said that considering the specific evidence in this case and how it was presented, together with 'the absence of any corroborative evidence whatsoever', on balance such a warning was warranted.
Counsel for the Director of Public Prosecutions, Anne-Marie Lawlor SC, said it was "manifestly clear" there was nothing 'special and peculiar' in the case that mandated the issuing of a corroboration warning. She argued there is no basis to assert that the trial judge exercised her discretion in error.
Mr Justice John Edwards said the three-judge court would reserve judgement in the case.
- If you are affected by any of the issues raised in this article, please click here for a list of support services.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sunday World
a day ago
- Sunday World
Convicted drug dealer and former soccer club boss moved to Midlands jail
Andrew Noonan was jailed for 13-and-a-half years in relation to his 'high' level role in a €2.7 million heroin importation enterprise last month CONVICTED drug dealer and the former soccer club boss, Andrew Noonan has been transferred from Mountjoy to the Midlands Prison. Sources said the former manager of Bluebell United in Dublin, who was jailed for 13-and-a-half years in relation to his 'high' level role in a €2.769 million heroin importation enterprise last month – was moved for 'operational reasons.' These are understood to relate to the chronic overcrowding currently being experience by inmates in Mountjoy. Noonan role in the heroin importation scheme was discovered after gardaí posed as delivery men in a controlled delivery of the drugs to a co-accused, Keith Quinn (36) Dublin Circuit Criminal Court heard last month that gardaí believe 45-year-old Noonan had a supervisory role in relation to his co-accused Quinn and say Noonan's level in the overall context of the enterprise was 'high.' Andrew Noonan News in 90 Seconds - 7th June Quinn pleaded guilty in relation to his own role and received a seven-and-a-half year sentence with the final three-and-a-half years suspended in 2021. This was later increased by the Court of Appeal to eight years imprisonment with 18 months suspended. He has since been released. Noonan, of Redhills Park, Ellistown, Co Kildare, was convicted following a trial of three drugs offences in relation to the possession, sale and supply of the drugs at Rosemount Business Park, Dublin 11, on August 5th, 2020. He was also convicted of possession of a phone with an encrypted application, Enigma, giving rise to a reasonable inference that it was to be used in connection with a drug trafficking offence. He was acquitted of possession of a signal blocker. The court heard Noonan does not accept the verdict of the jury and denied any role in relation to the drugs. Garda Redmond O'Leary of the Garda Drugs and Organised Crime Bureau told John Berry SC, prosecuting, that in August 2020, British police authorities became suspicious of a package travelling through the UK. It was analysed and tested positive for heroin. A garda operation involving a controlled delivery was put in place, and the package was delivered to Quinn's workplace in the Dublin industrial estate by a garda posing as a UPS driver. Internal CCTV of the workplace showed Quinn taking out his phone and interacting with the package in what was later found to be a picture and text messages sent to Noonan. No suspicion attaches to Quinn's former workplace. Quinn placed the package in his car and was observed driving in convoy with another car, driven by Noonan, to another office in the estate. Quinn got out, placed the package in the office and then drove in convoy with Noonan to a coffee shop where gardaí intercepted them. Noonan was, at this stage, found in possession of the keys to the office where Quinn had placed the package. Three phones were also retrieved from Noonan's person and his car. Passing sentence, Judge Elma Sheahan said foremost in the court's mind in sentencing was the devastating harm caused by the drugs trade, which the court deals with on a daily basis. She said the value and quantity of the seizure were also critical factors. Judge Sheahan said at the time of this offending, Noonan was the manager of a soccer team and employed in a family business. She said he was in a position of trust and influence over young men. She said this did not sit easy and offends all society expects from an individual in such a role.
The Journal
3 days ago
- The Journal
Two boys who raped teenage girl at Limerick Racecourse sentenced to six years in detention
TWO BOYS WHO raped a teenage girl in a car at Limerick Racecourse when they were aged 13 and 15 years old have each been sentenced to six years in detention. A third defendant (now 18) who was found guilty of aiding and abetting the rapes by moving the car in which it occurred was jailed for three-and-a-half years. The daytime attack against the girl involved humiliation and degradation and was committed by offenders of a very young age, the Central Criminal Court heard. The teenage rapists and their families did not accept the verdicts of the jury and there was a heavy garda presence in court for sentencing today. Justice Paul McDermott said that if the boys – who are all cousins – had been adults at the time of the offending, the headline sentence for the rape offences would have been in the range of 15 years to life imprisonment. 'This was a 16-year-old intoxicated girl in a vulnerable situation subjected to rape and sexual assault,' he said. 'She was raped one after the other by [the two boys] and in the course of these rapes, she was sexually assaulted.' The girl was repeatedly saying no during the assaults. Further indignity was heaped upon her by video footage being taken of the incident, the judge said. Handing down sentence, Justice McDermott noted there was very little to be said in mitigation for the boys, as they have not expressed remorse or any understanding of the harm caused to the complainant. They must be sentenced as juveniles under the Children Act, in which detention is a last resort, the court heard. The judge accepted the third defendant, who aided and abetted the rapes, has taken some responsibility for his involvement but struggles to understand it. He noted they have no previous convictions and have been subject to some childhood trauma, with mental health difficulties in their families. They had a lack of understanding in the areas of sexual relations and consent, the court heard. Justice McDermott sentenced the two rapists to a sentence of seven-and-a-half years of detention, with the final 18 months suspended on a number of conditions, including that they engage in sexual offending programmes and have no contact whatsoever with the complainant. The judge noted this means that part of their sentence will be served in prison. He sentenced the third defendant to five years in jail as he is now over the age of 18 years. He suspended the final 18 months of this sentence on the same conditions. The three boys stood trial at the Central Criminal Court sitting in Cork earlier this year, with two of the boys (now aged 16 and 17) found guilty of sexually assaulting and raping the then 16-year-old girl in a car at the racecourse on 26 December 2022. They were 13 and 15 years old at the time. The third boy (now 18) was found guilty by the jury of four counts of aiding and abetting the rapes and sexual assaults following the six-week trial. The court heard he moved the car during the course of the attack. He was aged 15 at the time. He was acquitted of one count of false imprisonment. Video clips were taken of the incident by one of the boys, including one clip of the girl walking away from the car after she had been raped. When she found her friends, she was extremely upset and immediately told them what had happened to her, the court heard. Advertisement The boys denied raping the girl, telling gardaí differing versions of events including one who said he was in Dublin on the day in question. They all eventually claimed it was a consensual encounter. Detective Garda Lisa O'Regan told Dean Kelly SC, prosecuting, that the girl was socialising with her friends at the racecourse on the day in question. She was, in her own words, 'really drunk' when she got chatting to the three boys, Kelly said. The court heard she agreed to go for a walk with one of the boys because she wanted to kiss him. Instead, she found herself in a car belonging to the father of one of the boys, where she was sexually assaulted and raped by two of them. The third boy moved the car at one point during the attack. The girl said she told the boys 'No' repeatedly and that she was on her period and had a tampon in. She said she told them she needed to go back to her friends, but they repeatedly said no and that she was 'fine'. When medically examined later that evening, she was found to have extensive bleeding and bruising. She had not had sexual intercourse before prior to the attack. The girl (now aged 18) was not in court for the sentence hearing in Dublin. In a victim statement read out on her behalf by counsel, she described her fear and anxiety in the aftermath of the attack, during which she was 'begging them to get off me'. 'At the age of 16, I had my innocence stripped away from me,' she said. 'These two (boys) took what they wanted with no regrets.' She said her parents had to hear every 'vulgar' and 'gruesome' detail of what happened to her and that she will 'forever have guilt on my shoulders – not just for how it affected me, but everyone around me'. 'They not only took away the rest of my childhood, they took away the rest of my life,' she said. 'At the age of 16, I was raped. This is always something I will have to carry around. 'But what I can do is live with the fact that I told the truth.' The court heard the boys have no previous convictions. They are all in detention or custody since the guilty verdicts were handed down last April. The case was previously adjourned for a number of weeks for preparation of probation reports. Cathal McGreal, BL, defending the youngest of the three boys, said his client was then aged 13 and had no previous convictions. He said that a report before the court described him as mild-mannered, introverted and vulnerable from a mental health point of view. Counsel said his client made admissions and described him as 'not a particularly mature 13-year-old, and this was his first sexual experience'. The court heard that the boy's father and his family do not accept the verdict. McGreal said his client wants to pursue his Junior Certificate and is interested in becoming a mechanic or a builder. He is against drugs and alcohol and wants to marry his girlfriend. Vincent Heneghan SC, defending the then-15-year-old boy, said his client comes from a 'good supportive family' and they are concerned for him. He stated that his client does not accept the jury's verdict and that this will limit any potential mitigation. Counsel said his client presents as intermittently distressed since going into custody and is not sleeping well. He said he is engaging in education and sport while in Oberstown. Henaghan said the defendant has no issues with drugs or alcohol and outlined that there was no pre-planning to this offending. He asked the court to consider the reports that were before the court on behalf of his client and requested that the court be as lenient as possible. Donal Cronin BL, defending the third boy, said his sexual knowledge at the time was limited. He outlined that his client has no issues with drink or drugs and that sport has formed a major part of his life. Cronin asked the court to fashion a sentence that would mark the wrongdoing but also include rehabilitation. He asked the court to consider the mitigating factors, including his client's culpability, his involvement and the fact he was a child at the time.
Sunday World
3 days ago
- Sunday World
'Danger to society' who subject ex-partner to ‘reign of terror' is resentenced
Scott Donegan pleaded guilty at Ennis Circuit Court to the false imprisonment of an ex-partner during a four-hour ordeal at his home on November 9, 2022. The Court of Appeal has ruled that a sentence of eight years and seven months was not unduly lenient for a 'danger to society' who inflicted 'a reign of terror' on his former partner and threatened to stab a man to death. However, the court ruled that the cumulative sentences imposed on Scott Donegan (39) could not stand due to how they were structured by the sentencing judge, and he was resentenced today. Donegan, of Knockmore, Kilmilhil, Co Clare, pleaded guilty at Ennis Circuit Court to the false imprisonment of an ex-partner during a four-hour ordeal at his home on November 9, 2022. He also pleaded guilty to producing a knife at the same address on the same date contrary to Section 11 of the Offensive Weapons and Firearms Act. Detective Garda Donal Corkery told the Ennis court that Donegan took the mobile phone off the woman and forced her to sit in a chair 'where she was frozen out of fear due to the aggressive behaviour of Mr Donegan'. Scott Donegan News in 90 Seconds - 5th June 2025 Det Corkery stated that Donegan ran at the woman with a knife and put her in fear. The detective said Donegan then grabbed the woman by the throat and squeezed her windpipe. He said that Donegan told her that he had a Glock handgun and a shotgun. Det Corkery said that four of Donegan's previous convictions were for assault against three ex-partners when Donegan went under the name of Paul McMenamy. This incident was committed while Donegan was on bail for a separate matter, relating to a charge of making threats to kill on April 19, 2021, when he verbally abused a man and threatened to stab him to death. The total sentence imposed for all offences at the Circuit Criminal Court in Ennis in September 2023 was eight years and seven months, with the final nine months suspended. Judge Francis Comerford imposed 20 months for the offence of making threats to kill, with this sentence made consecutive to a sentence of 83 months for the false imprisonment and the production of a knife. The Director of Public Prosecutions appealed this sentence, saying it was unduly lenient. In delivering judgement today, Mr Justice John Edwards said the court did not fault the sentencing judge for regarding the false imprisonment offence as being the most serious offence, as the judge had carefully assessed the respondent's culpability in a careful and rigorous manner. He said the sentencing judge was right in regarding the production of a knife as being an aggravating factor, as was the respondent's previous record. However, Mr Justice Edwards went on to say: 'The sentencing judge was significantly in error in how he structured his sentence.' He said it was clear that, where an offender is being sentenced for an offence committed while on bail, the sentence imposed should be made consecutive to the sentence imposed for the previous offence. Mr Justice Edwards said that the sentencing judge was required to make the sentences for false imprisonment and the production of a knife consecutive to any sentence imposed for the offence involving threats to kill. However, the sentencing judge had instead made the sentence for threats to kill consecutive to the other sentences. He said that while the court found that the sentencing judge's failure to apply the statute correctly made no practical difference to the overall sentence, the sentences could not stand as presently structured. He added that it did not follow, however, that the court regarded the overall sentence as unduly lenient. Quashing the original sentence and moving on to resentencing, Mr Justice Edwards said that for the offence of making threats to kill, the court would nominate a headline sentence of 25 months and discount five months to reflect mitigation, leaving 20 months. For the false imprisonment and the production of a knife, which were committed while the respondent was on bail, the court nominated a headline sentence of 10 years and five months and three years and four months, respectively. Having considered mitigating factors, he reduced the sentences to six years and eleven months and 25 months respectively, to run concurrently. Mr Justice Edwards said this was to be consecutive to the 20 months for the offence of making threats to kill. Mr Justice Edwards said the court would suspend the final nine months, making a cumulative sentence of seven years and ten months to be served. Conditions of the suspended portion of the sentence are that Donegan is to keep the peace for three years post release, have no contact with the injured parties, and submit to supervision by the probation services. In her victim impact statement, the Co Clare woman told the court that Scott Donegan 'is a danger to society, and he has scarred and damaged me for life'. The woman said that Donegan imposed 'a reign of terror' on her during the four-hour ordeal despite her begging him to stop. She said: 'I believed that I would be killed by him and never see my children or family again.'
