I'm 87 and work full time. I was rejected from hundreds of companies in my 80s and have a low-paying job, but I love the work.
This as-told-to essay is based on a conversation with Charles Smith, 87, who lives in Pennsylvania. After hundreds of unsuccessful applications in his mid-80s, he found work at the Lancaster County Office of Aging and makes about $30,000 a year. He and his wife live a frugal and somewhat comfortable life, though Smith said if he didn't work, they would be much more stressed financially. This interview has been edited for length and clarity.
The job I have now is not the best-paying job I've ever had, as I only make a little more than $30,000 a year, but it's the best job I've ever had. I go to work every day and know I'm helping people who are very much in need of the services we provide.
Still, if I weren't working, we wouldn't be quite so comfortable.
It's been a long journey. My first job out of high school was when I was 18. It was with a large chemical company headquartered in Philadelphia, and I worked as a lab technician on a rotating shift.
Are you an older American comfortable sharing your retirement outlook with a reporter? Please fill out this quick form. We are especially looking to hear from people 80 and older.
By the time I was 19, I was making more money than my father, but I was doing shift work. I got married shortly after that and started to realize that if I was going to do anything more, I needed to get back to school.
Back then, if you were 19, you were eligible for the draft. No one would hire me until I met that draft obligation. So I went into the military.
That went a little off the rails. I went downtown to sign up for the Air Force as a mechanic. I wanted to learn all about jet engines. But the Air Force office was closed. The Army office was open, and I wound up spending the next three years in the Army. Two years of that time period were spent listening to Morse code. We were intelligence intercept operators. We listened to the Berlin Wall being built.
I got out in 1962. I got a great job with another chemical company in Philadelphia, and I worked for them for almost six years. At the end, that company was going public, and the new management that came in found that I was trading shifts for the other operators so that I could go to school at night. Because they didn't want us to trade, I decided to continue going to school instead.
I learned how to start a business, and I opened a successful water treatment business. I eventually sold it and ventured into the chemical side of water treatment.
I found a job with a company in New Jersey. They hired me as a district manager, and for the next three years, I built their business considerably. They wanted me to move to Rochester and duplicate what I did here. I told them I've got a family with kids in school here, and I'm not going.
Jumping around companies and facing layoffs
I went back on an entrepreneurial journey. In 1985, I started my own chemical water treatment business. I operated it until 2005. My business philosophy was that you need to develop the business to make it self-sustaining, not driven by chasing the dollar.
I started having heart problems and had a heart attack. It was time to wrap up that business, and I sold it to the young man with whom I had a joint venture for a while.
I lost money after that deal. My plans for retirement were disrupted by the poor choices I made in my personal and business relationships.
I decided that going back to work as a private individual wasn't going to work. I didn't fully anticipate I would start running into age discrimination, but there wasn't anything I could do about it.
I went to work for a friend who was in a similar line of business for another three years before he sold his company to a national company. This new national company decided that they needed younger people in their sales force, and by this time, I was in my late 60s, so I was out of work.
I bounced around with another couple of companies that would hire me. It was a pattern of them trying to learn as much as they could from me, then terminating my employment and eliminating my position. This went on in my 70s.
By my early 80s, it got to the point where no one was going to hire me. I had four different businesses that were all successful, but my age got in the way of landing jobs. I spent a lot of time on unemployment, filling out hundreds of applications with no response. No matter what I did, it just didn't seem to work.
Three years ago, I had a serious accident. I fell on my face when I was gardening and wound up paralyzed. I injured my spinal cord. I spent a couple of months in a rehab hospital and eventually got myself back to being functional.
The fortunate thing is that my wife and I had bought a very nice house in a really good community. After the accident, we were able to sell that house, and the profit we realized from that was enough to buy another house with no mortgage. Each of us is collecting Social Security, and this small income from my current job with the county keeps us comfortable.
The best job I've had
I decided it was time to change careers. I saw an ad in the local paper in December 2022. It was not a well-paid job, but it was with the Lancaster County Office of Aging. I figured with them, I wouldn't have to worry about age discrimination.
In February 2023, I went to work with them on initiatives that include Meals on Wheels, home assistance, physical therapy, and adult daycare.
Many of those we help are old and don't have material finances or assets. Some are disabled. Whenever I think I've got problems, I just take a look at some of the people whom we provide services to, and then I realize my problems fade into the background. It's really rewarding to know that what you do makes a difference in someone's life, who would be pretty miserable without the programs we administer.
I work five days a week for seven and a half hours a day, which doesn't leave a lot of time between my work schedule and recovering from the injury. I do try to reserve some personal time.
We do get out of the house with other people. We have friends who live nearby, and I try to achieve a pretty good work-personal time balance. I recently went down to Delaware and took a walking tour using a type of walker with a seat on it. One of my friends and I share an interest in photography, and we each have some high-end photographic equipment. I spend a lot of my free time processing photos, and I'm pretty proficient in Photoshop.
We get almost $40,000 in Social Security income between the two of us, so with this income, we've got about $70,000 coming in a year. We're trying to save that for our actual old age.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Creating tax reform that is both pro-work and pro-family
There is growing recognition among both Republicans and Democrats that American families deserve more support. Yet, for too many low-income Americans striving to build a better life for their families, key provisions of the federal tax code penalize hard work and marriage, creating barriers where there should be reward. The ongoing discussions about tax reform present an opportunity to introduce reforms that are both pro-work and pro-family. The Earned Income Tax Credit is one of the largest sources of support for low-income families, but it could be streamlined and paired with changes to the Child Tax Credit so that the two credits are better structured to accomplish the dual goals of rewarding work and providing income support to families with children. The Earned Income Tax Credit currently provides a maximum of $7,830 a year for qualifying families with three children. Families receive no money from the program if they have no earnings. The credit then increases at low levels of earnings to encourage work. It also increases as the number of children in the family goes from one to two to three. An unintended, undesirable feature of this design is that the 'pro-work' incentives of the Earned Income Tax Credit are stronger for families with more kids — exactly opposite to common sense ideas of family wellbeing. Families with more kids likely benefit from more parental time at home. In addition, because the earnings eligibility limits do not double for married couples, the Earned Income Tax Credit discourages marriage among working low-income parents and makes it harder for married couples to get ahead by adding a second earner. Such 'marriage penalties' are found throughout the tax code. Since the progressive U.S. tax code is applied to combined household income, couples who marry can be subject to a higher overall tax rate and potentially reduced government benefits. The Department of the Treasury estimates that in 2023, 37 percent of married couples filing jointly faced a marriage penalty. Although couples can legally file separately, they rarely do, as it also almost always leads to a higher tax burden and it precludes the claiming of many tax credits, including the Earned Income Tax Credit. According to research from the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta and Boston University, over 7 percent more low-income women with children would marry by age 35 without this marriage penalty. But it doesn't have to be this way. As Congress is poised to implement major changes to the U.S. tax system, we urge lawmakers to adopt a more coherent, pro-family approach to tax policy. The current tax debate presents a golden opportunity to address and modernize some of the system's most outdated features. We propose modifications to the two main federal tax credits affecting low-income families. Specifically, we propose a unified Earned Income Tax Credit that applies to any family with children. We scale the credit size and income eligibility for married couples so that fewer families see their benefits reduced when they marry or a spouse starts to work. To ensure that low-income families with children are not left worse off under these changes, we pair these Earned Income Tax Credit reforms with an expansion of the Child Tax Credit. The enhanced Child Tax Credit would provide greater support to families raising young children and help offset the rising costs of caregiving and childrearing. To ensure even the lowest-income children have access to support, families with no earnings are eligible for half of the proposed Child Tax Credit. Our proposal increases Child Tax Credit benefits quickly as parental earnings increase, providing an incentive for parents to enter the workforce. Our proposed changes prioritize low- and middle-income American families, with 58 percent of the increases in transfer payments going to families in the bottom two-thirds of the income distribution. These changes would update the U.S. tax code to be both pro-family and pro-work, supporting working parents, reducing marriage penalties, and providing impactful support to children in low-income households. At a time when there is growing bipartisan interest in better supporting children and working parents, these changes offer a clear path forward. With modest adjustments, we can create a tax system that promotes family stability, encourages workforce participation and helps more families build secure, thriving futures. Melissa S. Kearney director of The Aspen Economic Strategy Group and Luke Pardue is policy director of The Aspen Economic Strategy Group.
Miami Herald
2 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Trump approves Nippon Steel purchase of U.S. Steel
June 14 (UPI) -- President Donald Trump issued an executive order on Friday officially giving the green light to Nippon Steel Corporation's multi-billion-dollar purchase of U.S. Steel Corporation. Trump's executive order rescinds a directive issued by former President Joe Biden that blocked the Tokyo-based steel producer's $14.9 billion purchase on national security grounds. The president had been signaling he would approve such a move, stating in May that the two steel giants would form a "planned partnership." Trump previously ordered a review of the transaction by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States. "Based on the recommendation of and my review of the materials provided by CFIUS, including re-review of the prior assessment of risk, I additionally find that the threatened impairment to the national security of the United States arising as a result of the Proposed Transaction can be adequately mitigated if the conditions set forth in section 3 of this order are met," Trump wrote in the executive order. "President Trump has approved the Companies' historic partnership that will unleash unprecedented investments in steelmaking in the United States, protecting and creating more than 100,000 jobs," Pennsylvania-based U.S. Steel said in a release jointly issued with Nippon Steel. "We thank President Trump and his Administration for their bold leadership and strong support for our historic partnership. This partnership will bring a massive investment that will support our communities and families for generations to come. We look forward to putting our commitments into action to make American steelmaking and manufacturing great again." Trump's executive order requires both companies to enter into a National Security Agreement, which stipulates $11 billion in new investments must be made in the United States by 2028. That includes an already-underway project not scheduled for completion until after 2028. The United States government will also be issued a golden share as part of the NSA, giving it unique voting rights. "President Trump promised to protect American Steel and American Jobs -- and he has delivered on that promise," White House spokesperson Kush Desai told CNN in a statement. "Today's executive order ensures US Steel will remain in the great Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and be safeguarded as a critical element of America's national and economic security." Confirmation of the deal comes just over a week after 50% tariffs took effect on metals imported into the United States from nearly all countries. The tariffs were enacted a day after Trump signed an executive order doubling the duties on almost all imported aluminum and steel. Copyright 2025 UPI News Corporation. All Rights Reserved.
UPI
3 hours ago
- UPI
Trump approves Nippon Steel purchase of U.S. Steel
1 of 3 | President Donald Trump issued an executive order, officially giving the green light Nippon Steel Corporation's multi-billion-dollar purchase of U.S. Steel Corporation. File Photo by Archie Carpenter/UPI | License Photo June 14 (UPI) -- President Donald Trump issued an executive order on Friday officially giving the green light to Nippon Steel Corporation's multi-billion-dollar purchase of U.S. Steel Corporation. Trump's executive order rescinds a directive issued by former President Joe Biden that blocked the Tokyo-based steel producer's $14.9 billion purchase on national security grounds. The president had been signaling he would approve such a move, stating in May that the two steel giants would form a "planned partnership." Trump previously ordered a review of the transaction by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States. "Based on the recommendation of and my review of the materials provided by CFIUS, including re-review of the prior assessment of risk, I additionally find that the threatened impairment to the national security of the United States arising as a result of the Proposed Transaction can be adequately mitigated if the conditions set forth in section 3 of this order are met," Trump wrote in the executive order. "President Trump has approved the Companies' historic partnership that will unleash unprecedented investments in steelmaking in the United States, protecting and creating more than 100,000 jobs," Pennsylvania-based U.S. Steel said in a release jointly issued with Nippon Steel. "We thank President Trump and his Administration for their bold leadership and strong support for our historic partnership. This partnership will bring a massive investment that will support our communities and families for generations to come. We look forward to putting our commitments into action to make American steelmaking and manufacturing great again." Trump's executive order requires both companies to enter into a National Security Agreement, which stipulates $11 billion in new investments must be made in the United States by 2028. That includes an already-underway project not scheduled for completion until after 2028. The United States government will also be issued a golden share as part of the NSA, giving it unique voting rights. "President Trump promised to protect American Steel and American Jobs -- and he has delivered on that promise," White House spokesperson Kush Desai told CNN in a statement. "Today's executive order ensures US Steel will remain in the great Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and be safeguarded as a critical element of America's national and economic security." Confirmation of the deal comes just over a week after 50% tariffs took effect on metals imported into the United States from nearly all countries. The tariffs were enacted a day after Trump signed an executive order doubling the duties on almost all imported aluminum and steel.
