Area groups host picnic and rally ahead of Transgender Day of Visibility
JOPLIN, Mo. — Joplin's LGBTQ community gets a head start on Transgender Day of Visibility this afternoon.
JOMO Pride and Joplin for Justice hosted a picnic and rally at Cunningham Park, with free hot dogs, trivia, and bingo.
Political experts with Promo Missouri were there to educate attendees about anti-transgender legislation scheduled for hearings in the Missouri legislature this week.
Some bills discussed include a ban on gender-affirming health care, barring trans athletes from playing sports, and restricting access to public restrooms.
'Southwest Missouri All for Love and Love for All' and 'Free Mom Hugs – Missouri' also came out today to celebrate and show their support for the trans community.
Celebrating Trans Visibility Day
'This is close to my heart. I have a trans daughter, and when I found out about Free Mom Hugs, I found a new home,' said Victoria Morris, Free Mom Hugs Missouri.
'How are you going to be comfortable with them if you keep them at an arm's distance and don't actually engage with them and stuff like that? So that's a big thing about being visible. LGBTQ community being visible, the trans community being visible, to let people know we are here, we're in your community, we're human,' said Ron Burch, JOMO Pride co-chair.
According to GLAAD, International Transgender Day of Visibility was established in 2010, and is celebrated every year on March 31.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Wichita Ethics Board finds mayor violated city code over transgender proclamation
WICHITA, Kan. (KSNW) – The Wichita Ethics Board met on Thursday to review its report on the 22 ethics complaints filed against Mayor Lily Wu. They found she violated one case of six alleged violations. There were two main points of alleged violation: Mayor Wu's lack of signature on the document, and her decision to not read it aloud. It was the latter that the board found to be a violation of their ethics. The complaints, submitted between March 19 and April 16, stem from controversy surrounding a city proclamation that recognized March 31 as Transgender Day of Visibility. Although the city council approved the proclamation, it lacked Wu's signature, and she did not read it out loud. City code states that the presiding officer is responsible for presenting proclamations and that the mayor shall sign all proclamations. The mayor's actions—or lack thereof—prompted reaction on social media. Twenty of the complaints focused on Wu's lack of signature on the proclamation; six also cited her for not reading it aloud. At the city council meeting on March 18, Wu 'yielded the floor' to a council member who voted in favor of the proclamation. She also noted that all proclamations are signed electronically by staff and claimed she did not request her signature to be removed. The board presented its findings during Thursday's meeting. The board said their evidence supports the mayor's original claim that her name was left off the proclamation due to a clerical error. In the report, the Ethics Board summarizes its findings, including Wu's official response to the complaints: 'The Respondent asserts that she has a right not to vote on matters before the Council, and she exercised that right by not voting for the subject Proclamation. Since she did not vote in favor of the Proclamation, she extended an offer to read it to council members who voted in its favor,' the report summarized. 'She says it is false that she refused to sign it, being as surprised as everyone else during the meeting when the document did not have her electronic signature on it.' The report lists out the six codes in which the 22 complaints state Wu violated: Section a. Be dedicated to the ideals of honor and integrity in all public and personal relationships. Section b. Conduct themselves so as to maintain public confidence in the City and its officials. Section e. Ensure that expenditures made by the City are in the interest of the City, for the betterment of the City, and only for appropriate City business, and refrain from actions unreasonably benefiting specific individuals or groups at the expense of the city as a whole. Section g. Address constituents' concerns and needs, striving to provide the highest level of service with equity, neither granting special favor nor discriminating against any citizen. Section h. Work in full cooperation with other officials and employees as they carry out the lawful discharge of their duties, unless prohibited by law or recognized confidentiality of material, to perform the operations of government, and refrain from requesting correction of any municipal code violation beyond the proper process, including but not limited to the fixing of traffic tickets. Section r. Remain impartial in the consideration of the City's business, including the approval of public policies and awarding of contracts. Do not be unduly influenced by family relationships, business interests or religious affiliation in the formulation or adoption of rules, regulations, ordinances, resolutions, or other policy matters. In the end, the board found that Wu only violated section h. 'The Ethics Board finds the evidence did not rise to the level of violating this provision, and this provision arguably does not apply to the present Complaints. No claims within the Complaints alleged influence by family, business, or religious interests,' the summarized report read. The complaint and the respondent have seven business days to request additional review and state any specific dispute of the facts or interpretation of the code of ethics. After seven business days, the findings will become final. If a request is received before then, the issues raised will return to the Ethics Board for reconsideration and a final decision. You can find the full report below: EAB-Report-2025-13-ProclamationDownload Click here to learn more about filing an ethics complaint and how the city handles the complaints. For more Kansas news, click here. Keep up with the latest breaking news by downloading our mobile app and signing up for our news email alerts. Sign up for our Storm Track 3 Weather app by clicking here. To watch our shows live on our website, click here. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Here's what Wichita ethics board decided about Mayor Lily Wu & transgender proclamation
Mayor Lily Wu violated the city's ethics policy by not reading, and not arranging someone else to read ahead of time, the Transgender Day of Visibility proclamation at a March meeting, Wichita's Ethics Board found. The ethics board cleared Wu of other alleged violations, and didn't find sufficient evidence that she asked for her signature line to be removed from the proclamation. 'Sufficient time existed for the Mayor to fulfill her duty as the official head of the city to prepare for and preside at the council meeting. Presiding routinely includes reading proclamations approved by a majority or making preparations for and arranging in advance for someone else to read them,' the ethics board report reads. 'Voting in the minority or not voting at all, as in this case, does not change the role of a mayor to execute the will of the majority.' Council member Maggie Ballard ultimately read, and signed, the proclamation during the meeting. The board found that Wu's assistant crossed off her signature line after Wu made her own edits. Twenty-two ethics complaints were filed against the mayor after she did not read a proclamation recognizing Transgender Day of Visibility at the council's March meeting. Those complaints alleged a number of violations of the ethics code, including requiring city officials to maintain public confidence, remain impartial and address constituent's needs. She was cleared of all of those allegations. Wu will not have to pay a fine or attend ethics training as a result of her one violation. The ethics ordinance outlines those possible reprimands for ethics violations. The mayor is in Paris representing the city at the International Air Show and did not immediately respond to requests for comment. The board approved the report on a 4-1 vote, with the only no vote being the mayor's appointee to the board, Al Higdon, co-founder of the marketing agency Sullivan Higdon & Sink, now Signal Theory. After the March meeting, Wu called the proclamation a political move by former mayor Brandon Whipple's political team. She also said the proclamation 'segregated' Wichita's transgender community. The proclamation was requested by Chris Pumpelly early this year through Proud of Wichita: the LGBTQ Chamber. Pumpelly is running for District 1's open seat on the city council; he didn't announce his intent to run until earlier this month. The mayor has said she has received racist emails as backlash after she did not read the proclamation, with one email using a racial slur for Asian people.
Yahoo
07-06-2025
- Yahoo
In Pride month, transgender Marylanders reflect on strengths, weaknesses, of state protections
Transgender Marylanders and advocates sitting in the Governor's Reception Room for Transgender Day of Visibility on March 31, 2025. (Photo by Danielle J. Brown/Maryland Matters). For more than a decade, state lawmakers passed laws to protect and uplift Maryland's LGBTQ+ community – from marriage equality for same-sex couples to boosting health care access for transgender individuals. The second Trump administration is likely to put those protections to the test. President Donald Trump (R) has signaled from day one of his administration that it was going to be an adversary to transgender people, signing an executive order on the first day of his second term that prohibited gender ideology in federal policy, defined sex according to biological factors at conception and rescinded 15 federal policies and guidelines on transgender equality. In the days and weeks that followed, Trump signed orders banning transgender individuals from girl's and women's sports and from military service, prohibiting federal funding or support for gender-affirming care for youth, and more. Congress is also looking to prohibit federal dollars going towards transgender health care. As they begin Pride month, a time when the LGBTQ+ community comes together to celebrate progress and reflect on setbacks for the gay and transgender community, some Maryland transgender advocates fear current state protections may not be enough to counter federal efforts. 'Maryland is in a better position than most,' said Ruth Carlock with Trans Rights Advocacy Coalition. 'Now that we're in the Trump administration, a lot of those things might not be as strong as we'd hope, and we might need more legislation in the future. 'One thing I've been saying a lot over the past six months,' Carlock said, 'I'm feeling very proud to be a Marylander, while feeling less proud of being an American in this current state of politics.' Lee Blinder, a nonbinary official who chairs the Maryland Commission on LGBTQIA+ Affairs in the Governor's Office and works with advocacy group Trans Maryland, has mixed feelings about the state's progress this year. 'We really are in an excellent place compared to so many of our sibling in other states like Florida and Texas,' they said. 'However, we have not seen the kind of movement that we would want to see from Maryland that we've been able to accomplish previously.' Blinder is particularly disappointed that the Birth Certificate Modernization Act, did not pass. The bill would have made it easier for transgender people to make changes to their birth certificates, among other measures, relieving administrative headaches that can occur when gender markers do not align on various documents. Transgender advocates have been pushing that bill for the last few years. Blinder feels transgender people were not prioritized this past session, and publicly brought those concerns to Gov. Wes Moore (D) during an event at the State House recognizing Transgender Day of Visibility. Blinder criticized what they called the administration's lack of support to protect the community amid federal measures to diminish the presence of transgender people in day-to-day life. 'We know who you, Governor Moore, can be for us, and I am here begging you to do it,' Blinder said, while standing next to Moore. 'It will not get easier to support trans people. It will not get easier to commit to this community, it will only get harder in the days that come,' Blinder said at the time. They hold those concerns to this day. 'We're facing a state of emergency for the trans community — the same message I had before on Trans Day of Visibility. That still applies,' Blinder said in a recent interview. There were some successes for gay and transgender people this legislative session. In May, Moore signed House Bill 1045 into law, which tweaks the state's shield laws on legally protected health care that prohibits physicians from turning over patient information regarding 'sensitive health services.' In Maryland, that includes gender-affirming care as well as abortions. Del. Kris Fair (D-Frederick), who chairs the Legislative LGBTQ+ Caucus, noted some other wins for the LGBTQ+ community. House Bill 39 and Senate Bill 356 were signed into law, removing a criminal penalty for intentionally transferring HIV to another person, which advocates say was antiquated and discriminatory. But Fair noted that the state budget was a major hurdle to progress across issues this session, as the state grappled with a $3 billion deficit, resulting in widespread program cuts and limited dollars available for new initiatives in general. 'We had an overarching deficit budget that we were dealing with, that was unavoidable and sucked all of the oxygen out of the room,' Fair said. 'Every conversation was buried under this question of the budget.' Despite the slowed progress this session, Fair believes that Maryland is 'light years ahead' of other states when it comes to LGBTQ+ protections. 'It is the incredible wisdom of the legislature over the last 13 years that has truly saved us, starting with the Maryland (Marriage) Equality vote in 2012 and moving forward from there,' he said. During his term, Moore has approved a handful of bills creating transgender protections that advocates say will be crucial in the coming years. One of those is the Trans Health Equity Act signed in 2023, which requires Maryland Medicaid to cover medically-necessary gender-affirming care. Congress is debating whether to prohibit federal Medicaid dollars from funding gender-affirming care. If that prohibition becomes law, the state may have to backfill any federal matching dollars currently supporting gender-affirming care under Maryland Medicaid to align with the Trans Health Equity Act, if funds are available. Advocates are also thankful that the state's shield law for legally protected health care was expanded in 2024 to include gender-affirming care. The intent is to protect the medical information of persons who seek gender-affirming care in Maryland from being shared across state lines, and potentially into the hands of law enforcement in states that are more hostile to transgender people. 'The Moore-Miller Administration will continue to protect the civil rights and livelihoods of LGBTQIA+ Marylanders by working with the state legislature, local leaders, and community advocates to deliver results for this community uniquely targeted by the Trump Administration,' a Moore spokesperson said in a written statement. Due to these and other policies, Maryland is largely recognized a 'safe haven' for gay and transgender people. The Movement Advancement Project, which assesses states based on laws that protect or harm transgender residents, ranks Maryland as seventh in protections on gender identity, and sixth for LGBTQ+ protections overall. 'One thing I've been saying a lot over the past six months ... I'm feeling very proud to be a Marylander, while feeling less proud of being an American in this current state of politics.' – Ruth Carlock, Trans Rights Advocacy Coalition Blinder and Carlock say that Pride month is important, now more than ever, for building community supports to take care of one another even if state protections don't stand up to anti-transgender federal policies. 'It's so easy for the practical needs that are so urgent to take over and to overshadow the very real need for us to be able to find joy and to celebrate,' Blinder said. 'Because it's not possible to survive these kinds of attacks without experiencing joy and experiencing the community connections and bonds that we have with one another.' Carlock said that some advocates have even been more active in the community since Trump took office. 'That's been one of the nice things about the last few months is this sense of community that has slowly been – you know, it's always there, but it's nice seeing that expand in the face of danger,' she said. 'But also recognizing that that positive turn is coming from an existential threat and big fear of legislation to come.' SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
