FA charges referee Coote in relation to comments on Klopp
June 17 (Reuters) - Premier League referee David Coote was charged by the Football Association on Tuesday in relation to comments he made about former Liverpool manager Juergen Klopp in a video that went viral last year.
Coote had been sacked by English soccer referees' body PGMOL after a video, recorded in July 2020, circulated on social media showing the official allegedly abusing Klopp and after a full investigation, his position was deemed untenable.
"It's alleged that the referee acted in an improper manner and/or used abusive and/or insulting words contrary to FA Rule E3.1," the FA said in a statement.
"It's further alleged that this constitutes an 'Aggravated Breach', which is defined in FA Rule E3.2, as it included a reference – whether express or implied – to nationality."
Rule E3 deals with improper conduct that brings the game into disrepute, including insulting words or behaviour, while it also covers actions that question the integrity of match officials.
In November, the FA said they were also investigating allegations that Coote had discussed booking a player the day before a game with a friend, which the referee denied.
"No charges have been issued in relation to allegations of gambling misconduct against David Coote, which were also fully investigated," the FA added.
Europe's soccer governing body also said Coote was banned from any UEFA refereeing activity until June 2026. The 42-year-old had apologised for his actions.
The Sun also published a video which the newspaper said showed Coote appearing to snort white powder during his time working as a match official at Euro 2024.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News
8 minutes ago
- Sky News
Scream heard on night woman raped and murdered almost 60 years ago, jury told
A woman was heard screaming on the night a 75-year-old woman was raped and murdered in her home almost 60 years ago, a jury has heard. Mother-of-two Louisa Dunne was found dead in her home in Easton, Bristol, by neighbours on the morning of 28 June 1967. Police launched an investigation and took palm prints from thousands of local boys and men, but could not identify Ms Dunne's killer. Avon and Somerset Police reopened the cold case in 2023 and arrested Ryland Headley, from Ipswich, after new tests on semen found on Ms Dunne's skirt gave a match that was "a billion times more likely" to be Mr Headley's DNA than anyone else. Headley denies the charges of rape and murder. On Thursday, the jury at Bristol Crown Court heard statements from eight men and four women that were taken by police at the time of Ms Dunne's death. Violet Fortune, who lived close to Ms Dunne's two-bedroom terraced house, said her family had gone to bed on the evening of 27 June when she was "awoken suddenly by what sounded like a scream". "It wasn't a long, piercing scream, but a crying out. It sounded muffled. I got out of bed and went to the window. I could see up and down the road by the light of the moon but there was no one in sight," she said. She returned to bed, but around two minutes later "heard someone cry out" and "could distinguish it was the voice of a woman. It lasted for about two to three seconds." 'It was a frightening scream' Harold Hodson, 64, told officers he had gone to bed but was woken up by his dog and "heard a loud scream". "It was a frightening scream. It was obviously an adult woman. It sounded as if someone was being attacked," he said. "There was a sound I can only describe as moans or being muffled. There were three or four of these moans." Neighbour found Ms Dunne lying dead On the morning of 28 June Ms Dunne's sash window was open, which was unusual as she was known to shut her windows overnight, and she was not seen by neighbours. A neighbour climbed through the window and found Ms Dunne dead in the front room, which she used as a bedroom. Ambulance attendant Alfred Maslin was called to the property and "saw the body of an old woman, lying on a pile of clothes" in the front room. "I did notice her knickers were around her ankles. I could see she was dead," he said. He spotted that a sash window at the back of the house appeared to have been recently damaged, with the pivot catch broken away. Hand 'forcibly held' over her mouth Ms Dunne was found "on her back between a piano and the foot of the single bed", Sergeant Frederick Durbin of Bristol Constabulary said. "It didn't appear as if anything in the room had been disturbed, nor were there any signs of a violent struggle," he recorded. Pathologist Albert Hunt noted "extensive abrasions" to Ms Dunne's lips, indicating something hard was pressed against her mouth. "The most likely explanation is that a hand has been forcibly held over her mouth," Dr Hunt said. "The straight mark across the back of her neck has probably been caused by the scarf being tightened violently at the front." He recorded Ms Dunne's cause of death as asphyxia due to strangulation and pressure on the mouth. Headley's palm prints allegedly matched print found at scene Headley was arrested at his home in November last year and his palm prints were taken, which allegedly matched the print found at the scene. The jury has been told Headley previously admitted to raping two widows aged 84 and 79 within weeks in Suffolk in October 1977.
The Sun
10 minutes ago
- The Sun
Troll made £500k a year from sick abuse of my mates GK Barry & Stacey Solomon – I know how to stop it happening again
FOLLOWING years of fevered speculation over who's the mystery owner making vast profits from toxic website Tattle, the truth has finally been revealed. It's an Englishman called Sebastian Bond, aka Bastian Durward (anagram 'u inward bastard' — how apt.) 6 6 And guess what? He's a ' vegan blogger' who has written plant-based recipe books and probably subscribes publicly to the #BeKind mindset while simultaneously making around £500k a year in ad revenue from the largely anonymous vitriol posted by his site's users. Tattle, for anyone in blissful ignorance, is infamous for unfiltered discussions about celebrities and online influencers, including my friends Stacey Solomon and GK Barry, who are both genuinely lovely people and deserve better than to be harshly judged by someone who's probably never even met them.. It claims to be a forum for 'free speech' and, for sure, many of the posts making firm but fair criticisms of anyone who monetises their life by putting it online fall under this description. But there's also anonymously posted content that's at best, pure vitriol, at worst, downright lies that can ruin the subject's livelihood. And thanks to Bond's efforts to obscure his finances by operating across international jurisdictions such as Hong Kong, he has been happily profiting from other people's misery while shielding his own identity and income . . . until now. Enter Neil and Donna Sands from Northern Ireland. He's a 43-year-old tech entrepreneur, she's the 34-year-old founder of fashion label Sylkie, and together — after finding a 45-page thread of defamatory and false claims about them on Tattle Life — they used their own money to launch a legal action. In December 2023, it resulted in them being awarded £150,000 each and, this month, finally saw reporting restrictions on Bond's name being lifted. The High Court has also ordered Bond to pay costs of £1.8million, and frozen assets of over £1million, believed to be from the site's ad revenue. It will review this decision next week. The Sands have now made the following statement… 'For nearly a decade, the hate site Tattle Life has profited as a space where users could defame, harass, stalk and attack others online — all behind a veil of seeming anonymity . . . 'For some, this court ruling comes sadly too late, as the site has cost innocent people their businesses, reputations, and mental health. 'For others, we hope it marks a turning point — a reminder that the internet is not an anonymous place.' Except that, sadly, it still is unless you have the financial means for a protracted legal battle. I have been writing this column for nearly 30 years now, and every week it's checked by sub-editors, executives and lawyers before going to print. If I published a sentiment as blatantly vile and unfounded as some of the comments currently on Tattle, I would immediately be 'cancelled', lose the majority of my freelance work and rightly be sued. That's because my name is at the top of the column so I take full ownership of my views and I'm easy to track down. But the anonymity of some of the internet's worst trolls means that it's still the Wild West when it comes to libel laws, and I have long argued on this page that everyone should be required to have an online handle that, at the very least, includes their real name, a verified photo and country location, even if it's @JaneMooreUK4567. That way, it might make some of the internet's worst offenders think twice before posting downright lies designed to destroy someone's peace of mind or livelihood. Will this successful legal action prove to be the final nail in Tattle Life's coffin? Perhaps, but chop off the monster's head and, like the Hydra, it will simply grow another. The only way to truly thwart the worst of unfounded bile is to make online trolls identifiable so they think twice before posting it. BEWARE SIZZLE, GWYN 6 GWYNETH PALTROW says that when TV producer Brad Falchuk was her boyfriend, she started the tradition of making him breakfast every Saturday morning. 'It became this very special moment for us. They are called #boyfriendbreakfasts to this day.' And of course, he's now her husband. But Gwynnie isn't slacking now she's got the ring on her finger – oh no. Here she is, er, topless while cooking him a skillet brekkie of eggs, tomatoes and sizzling sausages. To which, I can only comment: 'Ouch.' Chefs wear aprons for a reason. REGULAR readers of this column will know that I have long campaigned for The Who frontman Roger Daltrey to receive a knighthood for his tireless fund- raising in aid of the Teenage Cancer Trust. 6 And finally, it has now happened. Arise Sir Roger. Long overdue but truly deserved. SCHOOLS LOOS OUT A NEW survey by Parenthood says pupils don't want to attend school because the toilets are so disgusting. It found that one in six parents rated the loos at their child's school as unclean. Obviously, schools should make every effort to ensure that such facilities are checked and cleaned regularly. But equally, most of the kids currently saying they want to skip school because of these conditions will no doubt happily toddle off to Glastonbury / Reading /Leeds festivals and defecate in a stinking hole in the ground with just a flimsy piece of hessian shielding their modesty from the 45-mile queue. RETURNALL TO FRANCE 6 DESPITE the Prime Minister 's ludicrous claim that the UK is leading the world in tackling people-smuggling gangs, the evidence that we're not is there for all to see. More than 16,000 have reportedly reached these shores from France this year alone, despite us paying Emmanuel Macron 's government nearly £500million to supposedly help stop the small boats. Last week I suggested that, rather than focusing on the desperate people risking their lives to board the dinghies, the French police could simply arrest the balaclava-clad people-smugglers holding the keys. This week, I have another suggestion. To cross the Channel in one of these flimsy contraptions, it takes anything from three to six hours, depending on the weather. And the majority are picked up halfway across by lifeboats or Border Force vessels who then bring them to the UK. But as we supposedly have a 'deal' with France, why don't we just pick them up and immediately return them to the same beach they boarded from? News would soon get round and act as a deterrent, no? THE head of private school Winchester College says parents should take summer holidays in places with bad WiFi to encourage their children to read good books and stay off their screens. Hmmm. Nice idea, but pretty much every time I've seen someone pacing agitatedly around a hotel trying to pick up a decent signal it's nearly always been one of the parents. GO FOR IT, BRAD . . . UNTIL INES PUTS HER FOOT DOWN 6 BRAD PITT 'S recent fashion choices have led to suggestions he may be suffering from a midlife crisis. Baggy jeans, shiny nylon cargo pants, a banana-yellow suit – these have all been cited by fashionistas as evidence that the 61-year-old movie star is perhaps trying to cling on to his youth because new girlfriend Ines de Ramon is just 32. But personally speaking, I feel that any man who eschews the mid-life male's uniform of baggy grey T-shirt and elasticated-waist cargo shorts should be celebrated. And as Ines undoubtedly knows, we always have a secret weapon when a partner starts favouring a clothing item that does them no favours. We quietly dispose of it and, when they ask where it's gone, reply wide-eyed and innocent with: 'Sorry honey, absolutely no idea.' CHEER UP, CHAPS THE difference between men and women: Part 784. Here's Scarlett Johansson, Mahershala Ali and Jonathan Bailey promoting their new movie Jurassic World Rebirth at an official photocall in London. Exuding Hollywood glamour with red lipstick, designer suit and killer heels, Scarlett beams broadly at the assembled photographers. Meanwhile, the two blokes look like a couple of dressed-for-comfort tourists who've been ambushed by a charity canvasser. Cheer up chaps. Think of the pay cheque.
Daily Mail
11 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE: Police chiefs back calls for more thugs to be banned following season of mayhem in Scottish football, while Justice Secretary announces public consultation over issue
Police chiefs are backing calls for greater use of banning orders on hooligans following a season of mayhem in Scottish football. Assistant Chief Constable Alan Waddell said the court-imposed orders were 'instrumental' in helping to keep the majority of well-behaved fans, players and communities safe, while David Kennedy, general secretary of the Scottish Police Federation, described them as 'a powerful tool'. Justice Secretary Angela Constance announced yesterday that a public consultation on the issue will take place following talks between the Scottish Government, police, football authorities and player and fan representatives. Both the SFA and SPFL have called for more action to be taken after a season marred by illegal pyrotechnic displays and the throwing of items on to the field of play, the most serious of which saw Aberdeen defender Jack MacKenzie struck on the head by a chair. Assistant Chief Constable Waddell said: 'We should all be able to go to a football match and enjoy the game without fear of violence or disorder. Football banning orders can be instrumental in helping to keep fans, players and communities safe. 'There must be deterrents and that includes police enforcement, as well as sanctions from the clubs, authorities and courts issuing football banning orders. 'We are working with the Scottish Government to explore strengthening current legislation and we continue to work with the clubs and the justice system to tackle criminality together.' Kennedy, who represents Scotland's rank and file officers, said: 'Banning orders are a powerful tool and we would encourage their use to combat a minority of people who are giving football a bad name. 'They have the effect of banning individuals from the grounds which obviously doesn't mean they won't create problems in the vicinity of the venue - and we have fewer police on the ground to deal with them if they should do so. But keeping them out of the grounds is an important step and one we would support and encourage. 'The order can be imposed by a sheriff as part of sentencing - or it can be applied for by police.' Last month it was reported that just five Football Banning Orders (FBOs) were issued in Scotland between last August and February this year. That was down from 37 in the 2023-24 season and 59 in 2022-23. The orders can last up to 10 years and 'the length of the ban reflects the seriousness of the offence'. A breach can lead to a fine and up to six months in jail. Getting an order means a ban from every football ground in the UK. It also means a ban from the national team's matches, including ones played abroad. Anyone hit with a ban may also have to hand their passport into a police station when their team plays abroad - and they will have to report at a police station on the day the game is played. Specific conditions can be imposed on a case-by-case basis - but 'must be relevant to the original offence'. Bans can apply on public transport on match days, and can forbid travel to other public places such as town and city centres, railway stations, pubs, and bars which are popular with fans. Justice Secretary Constance announced plans for a public consultation on the issue after chairing a roundtable discussion which featured the SFA and SPFL, PFA Scotland, police officials, safety officers from Rangers, Celtic, Hibs and Aberdeen, Supporters Direct and the Scottish Football Supporters Association, Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service, and local council representatives.. She said: 'The vast majority of football fans behave responsibly. However, we need to look at what more can be done to address the very small minority who continue to create disorder. 'At the roundtable, I was pleased to see a strong shared will and commitment of partners, including football clubs and authorities, fans' groups, football safety officers and councils, to work together to make football safer for fans, players and communities. 'We must all do everything possible, individually and collectively, to rid football of dangerous and harmful behaviours. 'We will publish a public consultation on Football Banning Orders legislation and how they can be effectively used to address disorder, in particular the reckless and illegal use of pyrotechnics at matches, and work closely with our partners to develop the consultation and consider next steps.' Clubs last week accepted new rules at the SFA AGM, which will allow for sanctions to be taken against them over issues at Scottish Cup matches. The tightened regulations follow similar changes in competitions run by the SPFL. Speaking last week, SFA chief executive Ian Maxwell said: 'We see, particularly at Hampden, if there's significant pyro use, there are a large number of supporters that have to leave the stadium because of breathing difficulties, because of safety concerns, because kids are frightened and it's those supporters that we need to look after. 'It needs us to do as much as we can, along with the SPFL. It needs the clubs to do as much as they can. It needs the police and the stewarding teams on a match day to do as much as they can. 'It needs the Crown and the judiciary system to do as much as they can. It's a real collaborative approach that's required.' Celtic, Rangers and Motherwell were all sanctioned by the SPFL for fans' pyrotechnic displays in the Premier Sports Cup last season, and the champions, Aberdeen and Partick Thistle were all hit with disciplinary notices over similar instances in league games towards the end of the campaign. Other high-profile incidents late in the season included Aberdeen player Mackenzie being injured after part of a seat was thrown on to the Tannadice pitch, allegedly by a Dons supporter, and Livingston issuing a lifetime ban to a fan who allegedly spat at then Ross County assistant boss Carl Tremarco. An SPFL statement last week added: 'As well as club bans, unwelcome incidents such as these have unfortunately made it abundantly clear that there is a need for far more widespread use of football banning orders and we are encouraged by the progress being made in partnership with our clubs, Police Scotland and the Scottish Government.'
