
Ukraine to ask EU to lead on Russia sanctions as US wavers
*
West has heavily sanctioned Russia since 2014
*
Trump's US has torn up Biden's pro-Kyiv policies
*
Ukraine sets out sanctions ideas for EU in white paper
*
Kyiv wants bloc to assume new level of leadership
KYIV, - Ukraine will ask the EU next week to consider big new steps to isolate Moscow, including seizing Russian assets and bringing in sanctions for some buyers of Russian oil, as U.S. President Donald Trump has backed off from tightening sanctions.
A previously unreported Ukrainian white paper to be presented to the EU calls for the 27-member bloc to take a more aggressive and independent position on sanctions as uncertainty hangs over Washington's future role.
Among 40 pages of recommendations were calls to adopt legislation that would speed up the EU's seizure of assets from sanctioned individuals, and send them to Ukraine. Those under sanctions could then seek compensation from Russia.
The EU should consider a range of steps to make its sanctions apply more forcefully beyond its own territory, including targeting foreign companies that use its technology to help Russia, and "the introduction of secondary sanctions on purchasers of Russian oil".
Such secondary sanctions, which could hit big buyers such as India and China, would be a major step that Europe has so far been reluctant to take. Trump had publicly discussed this before taking the decision not to act for now.
The white paper also calls for the EU to consider using more majority-rules decision making over sanctions, to prevent individual member states from blocking measures that otherwise require unanimity.
After speaking to Putin on Monday, Trump opted not to impose fresh sanctions on Russia, dashing hopes of European leaders and Kyiv who had been lobbying him for weeks to ratchet up pressure on Moscow.
Trump spoke to Ukrainian and European leaders after his call with Putin and told them he didn't want to impose sanctions now and to give time for talks to take place, a person familiar with conversation told Reuters.
The EU and Britain imposed additional sanctions against Russia on Tuesday anyway, saying they still hope Washington will join them. But Europeans are openly discussing ways they can maintain pressure on Moscow if Washington is no longer prepared to participate.
'CATALYSE THE EU'
Publicly, Ukraine has tried to avoid any hint of criticism of Washington since President Volodymyr Zelenskiy received a dressing down from Trump in the White House in February.
The sanctions white paper emphasises the "unprecedented" sanctions imposed by the EU so far and talks up their potential to do more. It also includes a stark assessment of the Trump administration's commitment to coordination efforts so far.
"Today, in practice, Washington has ceased participation in nearly all intergovernmental platforms focused on sanctions and export control," it said.
Washington had slowed work in the monitoring group for enforcing price caps on Russian oil, dissolved a federal taskforce focused on prosecuting sanctions violations and reassigned a significant number of sanctions experts to other sectors, it added.
It noted that two potentially major U.S. sanctions packages had been drawn up - one by the government and another by pro-Trump senator Lindsey Graham - but that it was "uncertain" whether Trump would sign off on either of them.
Uncertainty over the U.S. stance had slowed the pace of economic countermeasures and multilateral coordination, but "should not prompt the European Union to ease sanctions pressure", it said.
"On the contrary, it should catalyse the EU to assume a leading role in this domain."
'HUGE STRIKE'
Ukraine is worried that Washington peeling away from the Western consensus on sanctions could also cause vacillation in the EU, which traditionally requires consensus for major decisions.
"American withdrawal from the sanctions regime be a huge strike on the unity of the EU. Huge," a senior Ukrainian government official told Reuters.
The EU cannot fully replace the heft of the United States in applying economic pressure on Russia. Much of the impact of U.S. sanctions comes from the dominance of the dollar in global trade, which the euro cannot match.
Still, U.S. sanctions relief for Russia would not spur a significant return of foreign investors and investment if Europe held firm, said Craig Kennedy, a Russian energy expert at the Davis Center, Harvard.
"Europe holds a lot more cards than you'd think," he said.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Time of India
31 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump's Big Message To Khamenei After Israel Bombards Iran Nuke Sites
/ Jun 13, 2025, 02:31PM IST U.S. President Donald Trump has surprised many by confirming he knew about Israel's plan to strike Iran in advance. While the U.S. claims it had no role in the actual operation, Trump reaffirmed his firm stance against Iran obtaining nuclear weapons and expressed hope for renewed negotiations. He hinted that some Iranian leaders may not survive the fallout from this escalation. An Israeli official confirmed the U.S. had been informed a week earlier and remains in constant contact with Israeli authorities. Meanwhile, Israeli opposition leaders criticized Prime Minister Netanyahu for not consulting them. As tensions rise, both Iran's response and regional stability hang in the balance.#trump #mossad #IsraelIranConflict #KhameneiWarning #MiddleEastTensions #IDFStrikes #IranRetaliation #NuclearCrisis #BreakingNews #OperationRisingLion #TehranStrikes #MilitaryEscalation


Mint
40 minutes ago
- Mint
Why regretful tweets can't fix Musk's Tesla mess
Sometime in the wee hours of Wednesday, Elon Musk shared a pang of contrition: 'I regret some of my posts about President @realDonaldTrump last week. They went too far." Telling the president that he owes his election to you, amplifying calls for his impeachment and throwing in alleged associations with a dead sex offender do indeed err toward the pugnacious. Even so, Musk, like Trump, is not one to back down easily. Besides reported interventions from the likes of Vice President J.D. Vance, the slump in Tesla's shares during last Thursday's online onslaught presents an obvious rationale. Investors appear relieved that the boss is showing his seldom seen humbler side, with the stock having made back virtually all of that loss. Also Read: Musk versus Trump: A case of mutually assured destruction Meanwhile, a frisson had arrived on Tuesday in the form of a brief clip on X, Musk's social media platform, apparently showing a self-driving Model Y turning a corner in Austin. This most Panglossian read of the past week ignores a couple of things. Regarding the spat with US President Donald Trump, the salient point is not that Musk now appears open to reconciling. It is that the chief executive of a $1 trillion-ish market cap company thought it was smart to pick that fight in the first place. Tesla, like other companies in the Muskplex, is very exposed to a vengeful administration, should it choose to let loose. Just as when Musk has gambled with Tesla's brand and legal exposure in prior episodes of endorsing hard-right politics and touting 'funding secured," the lesson is that he is prone to erratic behaviour that can wipe out tens of billions of dollars of value in as much time as it takes to tap out a tweet. In that, he is enabled by a board that has been conspicuous in its silence these past few days. Also Read: X factor: The rise and fall of Elon Musk as a political figure In short, even if you now think Musk and Trump will just let this all slide, you still own stock in a company run by a man who could quite easily, and needlessly, throw the dice again without warning. And it's as yet unclear if this act of contrition will be enough to curry special favour with the administration on issues such as regulatory oversight and autonomous vehicle legislation that are central to Tesla's investment thesis. The episode threatened to overshadow Tesla's big robotaxi launch in Austin. Tuesday's video clip came in the nick of time. Where this vehicle lay on the spectrum of 'self-driving' is unclear. While there is no one visible in the driving seat, it looks as if there may be someone sitting in the passenger seat, and the vehicle is also being closely followed by another Tesla. As I wrote recently, Tesla's robotaxi launch looks likely to involve a limited operating domain twinned with a lot of remote support. Perhaps more importantly, Musk provided a specific rollout date for the first time, 22 June. This is later than the reported target date of 12 June that surfaced in a Bloomberg News story in late May, but still within the targeted month. That said, Musk posted that he was setting this date, just eight days before month-end, only 'tentatively." Note, too, that it is a Sunday, when traffic is quieter. Also Read: Electric debacle: Tesla's troubles started before Musk wore the MAGA cap This is all happening against a backdrop of weak sales in Tesla's actual main business of making and delivering electric vehicles. The latest figures out of China this week show a drop in May of 30%, year over year. This offers strong evidence that Tesla has a demand problem as opposed to the rationale it offered for weak sales in the first quarter, namely factory downtime to refresh the Model Y. Meanwhile, with less than three weeks left in the quarter, we are yet to see the 'more affordable models" Tesla said it would begin production of by then. Come early July, Tesla will likely release another set of weak official sales numbers, followed soon after by what will almost certainly be underwhelming earnings. Of course, a handful of robotaxis may be driving around bits of Austin by then, and Musk may be saying nice things about the president he just trashed. What more could one hope for? ©Bloomberg The author is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering energy.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
How US and Trump fooled Tehran with nuclear talks, helped Israel attack Iran's military and nuclear program leadership
Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel US President Donald Trump was engaging with Iran on the latter's nuclear program and had held five rounds of talks before Israel decided to show its might. According to a report by Israel's Channel 12, the United States conducted a campaign to convince Iran that an Israeli military strike was not imminent. This misinformation effort put the Iranian leadership into complacency and reportedly helped enable Israel's June 13, 2025, airstrike on its nuclear and military sites, including the Natanz enrichment facility Trump, in a public statement on Thursday, June 12, acknowledged the possibility of Israeli military action but indicated that diplomacy remained viable. 'An Israeli strike on Iran's nuclear sites could very well happen,' he said. However, he also added that a diplomatic deal was 'fairly close' if Iran showed flexibility regarding its nuclear activities in ongoing talks with the read: Stocks sell off, oil surges as Israel strikes Iran Meanwhile, US Ambassador to Israel , Mike Huckabee, stated in an interview that Israel was unlikely to carry out such an attack without approval from Washington. His remarks appeared to support the narrative that military escalation was not a foregone suggest that these coordinated public statements along with the nuclear talks may have contributed to Iran lowering its alert levels, giving Israel a tactical advantage. While Iranian officials have not directly commented on the report, sources in Tehran acknowledged they were caught off guard by the timing and scope of the Israeli government has not officially commented on the alleged US role, but Israeli media widely reported that high-level coordination occurred in the days leading up to the development raises questions about the broader strategy employed by the US and Israel in managing Iran's nuclear program, especially in light of stalled nuclear negotiations and Tehran's continued enrichment activities.