logo
Superman beware! Scientists claim a real-life KRYPTONITE could be the secret to a greener future

Superman beware! Scientists claim a real-life KRYPTONITE could be the secret to a greener future

Daily Mail​a day ago

In the classic films and comics, kryptonite is Superman's ultimate weakness, robbing him of his powers.
Originating from Superman's home world of Krypton, the green alien material emits a unique, poisonous radiation that can weaken and even kill him.
Of course, kryptonite is entirely fictional, consigned to the realms of sci-fi.
But scientists at the Natural History Museum in London believe a real-life version could have surprising benefits on Earth.
Unlike the fictional kryptonite, jadarite is white and powdery, emits no radiation, and comes from Serbia rather than outer space.
The rare but promising lithium-bearing mineral, first found more than 20 years ago, is formed like 'cake ingredients combined in precise order', the scientists reveal.
And it could soon power Europe's transition to a global electric car revolution as internal combustion engines are replaced by batteries.
'If mined, jadarite can offer huge potential,' said Dr Robin Armstrong, geologist at the Natural History Museum.
Jadarite was discovered in Serbia in 2004 by mining corporation Rio Tinto, but even geologists initially were not sure what it was.
Three years later it was officially described by a team including Natural History Museum scientists Chris Stanley and Mike Rumsey.
At the time, the scientists' comparison with a database of all existing known minerals proved jadarite was totally unique.
Experts were amazed that its chemical formula was similar (but not identical) to the formula invented for kryptonite in the 2006 film 'Superman Returns'.
In the film, the fictional formula – 'sodium lithium boron silicate hydroxide with fluorine' – is written on a case of kryptonite stolen by Superman's arch enemy Lex Luthor.
This coincidence attracted mass-media attention in 2007, but nearly two decades on the potential of jadarite is still yet to be realised.
Curiously, jadarite has so far only been been found in one place on Earth – Serbia's Jadar Basin, from which the mineral takes its name.
But it's been found there in a quantity so large that, if mined, it could power a green revolution.
What is jadarite?
Jadarite, which Rio named after the Jadar valley in western Serbia, is a unique high-grade mineral compound.
It has been compared with kryptonite, because its chemical formula is similar to the formula invented for kryptonite in the 2006 film 'Superman Returns'.
The lithium-bearing mineral has the 'potential to facilitate the green energy transition', scientists say.
Jadarite contains high amounts of boron and lithium, which are both relatively rare and 'industrially important' elements.
Boron is used in fertilisers and heat resistant glass for smartphones, as well as materials for wind farms and solar panels.
Lithium, meanwhile, is a key component in lithium-ion electric car batteries.
If the jadarite at Jadar Basin is mined, it could produce lithium to power up to 90 per cent of Europe's quota of electric vehicles, the scientists reveal.
To form, jadarite must follow a rare set of geological steps in specific conditions, involving alkaline-rich lakes, lithium-rich volcanic glass and the transformation of clay minerals into crystalline structures.
'Similar to baking a cake, everything needs to be measured and exact for this rare mineral to form,' said Natural History Museum mineralogist Francesco Putzolu.
'For instance, if the mineral ingredients are not just right, if the conditions are too acidic or too cold, jadarite will not form.
'The criteria seem to be so precise that we've not yet seen it replicated anywhere else on Earth.'
Dr Putzolu and two other colleagues at Natural History Museum have shared their findings in a new paper, 'Jadarite's unique recipe', published in the journal Nature Geoscience.
Since its discovery and despite the global rush to find new lithium resources, no further occurrences of jadarite have been found.
So the next challenge is finding new locations around the world where conditions are also just right for jadarite to form.
'Perhaps the coincidence of geological conditions at Jadar is a recipe requiring such precision in its execution that it is more often over- or under-cooked or not with the correct proportion of ingredients to be successful,' the team say.
'The challenge for geoscientists is to find where on Earth nature may have used another similar recipe.'
In the weird world of comic books, kryptonite was a glowing green crystal capable of stripping Superman of his powers.
But a real-life crystal made from the gas element krypton could be created for the first time after scientists discovered how to synthesise it.
They discovered a compound of krypton and oxygen - technically known as krypton monoxide - can form under extremely high pressures.
While the crystal is unlikely to have properties seen in the Superman comics, there is a remote possible it could be found on alien planets, just like the fictional substance.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

First pictures of the Sun's south pole taken
First pictures of the Sun's south pole taken

BBC News

time3 hours ago

  • BBC News

First pictures of the Sun's south pole taken

A special space robot called the Solar Orbiter has taken the first ever photos and videos of the Sun's south pole. The new pictures show a super hot, glowing part of the Sun. The Solar Orbiter was sent by the European Space Agency to take these pictures to help scientists learn more about how Earth's nearest star actually images will help scientists learn about the cycles of the Sun, which can sometimes turn from calm to stormy, which is important as it can affect things on Earth. Scientists are really excited about these pictures as they are the closest and most detailed images that have ever been taken of the Sun. "Today we reveal humankind's first-ever views of the Sun's pole" said Prof Carole Mundell, ESA's Director of Science. These pictures will help scientists learn about the changes in the Sun which go in cycles - sometimes the sun is calm and other times it gets stormy and sends out strong bursts of energy. Why do the Sun's poles and cycles matter? From Earth, the Sun looks like a bright, round ball but with special cameras, scientists can see it's actually very active, with swirling magnetic fields that twist and turn. These magnetic fields help decide when the Sun has a storm and when it's the new data and images scientists weren't able to track how these magnetic fields moved towards the Sun's poles, but now with the Solar Orbiter's help they can. This new learning should help scientists to build better computer models which could help predict the Sun's weather and that could help them know when to prepare for a solar storm. As solar storms can affect things like satellites, phone signals, and even power grids, this is a really helpful thing to know.

Why there are so many aphids this year, and what to do about them
Why there are so many aphids this year, and what to do about them

The Independent

time13 hours ago

  • The Independent

Why there are so many aphids this year, and what to do about them

A surge in aphids is being observed in gardens across the UK. Warm spring weather has facilitated rapid aphid colony growth, with some species previously confined to glasshouses now appearing outdoors. Dr. Stephanie Bird from RHS notes that while aphid populations are expected this time of year, their numbers have increased, with 2025 being dubbed 'the year of the aphid'. Aphids can cause distorted plant growth and leave sticky excretions, but they are unlikely to kill established plants, and the RHS advises tolerating them where possible. Gardeners are advised to avoid pesticides, which harm biodiversity, and instead use methods like squashing colonies by hand or planting pollinator-friendly plants to encourage natural aphid predators.

Miliband is wasting billions on the wrong nuclear technology
Miliband is wasting billions on the wrong nuclear technology

Telegraph

time17 hours ago

  • Telegraph

Miliband is wasting billions on the wrong nuclear technology

Ed Miliband first succumbed to his idée fixe on Sizewell C in 2009 and that is the problem. The concept is sixteen years out of date. The technological and commercial case for European pressurised reactors (EPR) has been diminishing ever since. It is not a question of whether you are for or against nuclear, or for or against renewables. That culture war absolutism does no favours to the nation. Nuclear technology is in a state of creative revolutionary ferment in America and China. Sizewell C is a throwback to another age. It is a very expensive refinement of 20th-century fission – Gen III in the jargon – with layer after layer of protective barriers, able to withstand an earthquake, a tsunami, a head-on crash by an A380, or a meltdown of the core. You pay to make this old technology super-safe. The International Energy Agency says the capital cost of Hinkley Point, the sister EPR plant to Sizewell C, works out at $16,000 (£12,000) per kilowatt (kW) of gross capacity, compared to $2,700 kW for the simpler Saeul 1 and 2 reactors in Korea. There are hidden subsidies in the Korean figures, but the gap is astonishing. By the time Sizewell C delivers its first watt to the grid in the late 2030s – or 2040 more likely – the world will already be humming with small modular reactors (SMRs) that can made in factories like Nissan Micras, shipped in parts by road and rail, and rolled out in a third of the time. Bill Gates started building his advanced SMR in Wyoming a year ago. If that does not make you stop and pause, it ought to. His TerraPower Gen IV Natrium plant is radically different from old light-water reactors. It is a pocket-sized 350 megawatt (MW) sodium-cooled reactor coupled with molten salt storage. It can ramp up to 500 MW when needed. It dovetails with a modern flexible decentralised grid. The project is built on the site of a coal-powered plant, which means that cables, roads and an eager workforce are all in place. That slashes the cost by 30pc and takes years off the development time. TerraPower originally hoped to supply dispatchable zero-carbon power at $50-$60 per megawatt hour (MWh). Inflation will have pushed up the cost but it is still likely to be a lot lower than Hinkley Point at a strike price of $178 (in today's money). The company is eyeing the UK market. I am willing to bet that TerraPower or something like it will be generating electricity for British data centres or industrial hubs years before Sizewell C fires up – if it ever gets that far, which I question. Or there is X-energy, co-owned by Amazon and able to tap the capital markets for near unlimited sums. It has applied to build its 80 MW, helium-cooled mini-reactors in Texas to supply Dow's petrochemical campus. Unlike the Hinkley-Sizewell reactors, its SMR generates both electricity and 'high-quality heat' (750 degrees) that can be used for heavy industries. It can flex up and down, does not need a vast containment dome and requires no refuelling halts. If not these two, it could be one of the 80 or so different SMR technologies in the global nuclear race, several funded by tech billionaires. Labour has selected the Rolls-Royce design for Britain's first batch of SMRs. They will supply the grid. I heartily applaud. It is home-grown technology and will have 80pc domestic content. It supports a defence company that is critical for UK rearmament and nuclear submarines. What worries me is that a) it is a small version of a standard light-water reactor, and b) the target date has slipped to the mid-2030s. If we are going to press ahead with an older Gen III technology, we had better get a move on. Great British Nuclear has ordered three of the 470 MW reactors; a good signal, yes, but too few to turbo-charge development and pull forward delivery. 'It is not enough to stand up commercial operations,' said the company's Dan Gould. Rolls-Royce is in SMR talks with the Czech Republic, Sweden, Poland and a host of other countries, as well as with a private energy group in the Netherlands. Nothing is yet firm. Mr Miliband would have done better with our money to order 10 or 12 Rolls-Royce reactors. That would have reached critical mass and crowded in hesitant buyers. Instead, Labour is committing a further £14.2bn to Sizewell C and blowing smoke in our eyes with its 'regulated asset base model'. 'They are not telling us how much this is going to cost. They are hiding behind the RAB model,' said Michael Liebreich, founder of BNEF. I would be more forgiving if the Government had not botched the 3.8 gigawatt (GW) Xlinks project, which has money lined up, requires no taxpayer subsidy and is offering to start supplying the UK with baseload power from southern Morocco by 2030. The plan combines Sahara solar power with desert winds that kick up every evening (a convection effect), generating electricity all year round. It would be transmitted to Cornwall via the world's longest cables. All that Xlinks needs is a standard contract for difference of circa £75 MWh and it can start building. Labour has sat on it. Nuclear fusion is further away than SMRs but it is no longer science fiction. High-temperature superconductors have suddenly made it possible to build a fusion plant 40 times smaller than once was the case. This radically changes the economics of fusing hydrogen isotopes to make power, either by squeezing super hot plasma inside a tokamak with magnets, or by inertial fusion with lasers. It has unlocked a torrent of investment funding. Britain is a world-class player in the field, the legacy of the Joint European Torus project at Culham. Mr Miliband did well to secure another £2.5bn to keep this country in the fusion race, funding both the Spherical Tokamak for Energy Production (Step) in Nottingham and the wider fusion ecosystem around Oxford. Britain should have valuable niches breeding tritium fuel and making superconducting magnets for the world market. Fusion ticks every box. It provides clean, constant baseload power. It creates almost no long-term waste. It is so safe that it can be regulated like a hospital. It uses almost no land and little water. I have no idea what it will cost but Bob Mumgaard, the head of America's Commonwealth Fusion Systems, told me that he was aiming for $80 MWh at his first plant in Virginia in the early 2030s. I have heard similar figures from other fusion companies. Where does Sizewell C fit in this new nuclear order? We know the track record of EPR reactors. The Flamanville project in France was 12 years late and six times over budget. The French Cour des Comptes says the final tally was €19.1bn (£16.3bn), calling it an 'operational failure', undertaken with hubris. Perhaps Flamanville was unlucky. The concrete pillars were 'pockmarked with holes'. Nobody noticed for nine months that the steel reactor vessel had unsafe levels of carbon content. We were told that lessons had been learnt, both there and at Olkiluoto in Finland. The next in the EPR series, at Hinkley Point, would be faster and cheaper. Dream on. I am not against bold industrial ventures. They lift the national spirit. Defenders say the costs of Hinkley and Sizewell are much lower than the nosebleed headline figures once you stretch the lifetime to 60 or 80 years. Realists say we need a large enough nuclear power industry to sustain our military nuclear deterrent. I get all that. But locking the country into yesterday's technology as far out as the 22nd century is a fateful step. It will not cut energy bills – ceteris paribus – and is not needed to tackle green intermittency. We can rely on cheaper gas peaker plants to buttress renewables for a few more years until SMRs, fusion and new fission come of age. Let me make a wager. Sizewell C will not survive real scrutiny or the next austerity crisis. It has HS2 written all over it.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store