Slush fund past dogs prime minister nominee
Prime Minister nominee Kim Min-seok is facing growing calls from the main opposition party to withdraw from his nomination over political slush fund scandals that occurred in the 2000s.
The four-term liberal lawmaker, who was nominated for prime minister by President Lee Jae Myung on June 4, was convicted by the country's top court in 2005 of violating the Political Funds Act by receiving 200 million won ($146,500) in illegal funds from conglomerate SK Group in 2002. He received the funds during his campaign for Seoul mayor as the candidate for the Millennium Democratic Party, the main liberal party at the time.
The Supreme Court in 2005 sentenced Kim to eight months in prison, two years of probation and the forfeiture of 200 million won, finding him guilty of violating the Political Funds Act.
Additionally, the Supreme Court in 2010 found him guilty in a separate political slush fund case, in which he received illegal funds worth a combined 720 million won from three of his aides in 2007. He was fined 6 million won and forfeited 720 million won for violating the Political Funds Act again.
The main opposition People Power Party has recently ramped up its calls for Kim to withdraw his nomination.
The main opposition members of the National Assembly's special committee on personnel hearing, including People Power Party Rep. Bae Joon-young, claimed Tuesday that "candidate (Kim) and the Democratic Party of Korea are not cooperative" with the preparations for the prime minister nominee's upcoming parliamentary hearing. The committee announced Tuesday afternoon that Kim's confirmation hearing has been scheduled for June 24 to 25.
The 13-member committee, tasked with handling the nominee's confirmation hearing, is formed of seven Democratic Party lawmakers, five People Power Party lawmakers and one non-parliamentary member.
The People Power Party members of the committee urged Kim and the ruling party to submit evidence and summon witnesses tied to multiple accusations surrounding Kim, including his political slush fund case.
People Power Party spokesperson Ho Jun-seok even proposed launching a special counsel investigation into the charges in a Monday commentary.
Kim has repeatedly brushed off his court convictions as mere 'allegations.'
"The targeted investigation (against me by the prosecution) did not end the first time," Kim wrote in a Facebook post Tuesday.
The post echoes his Facebook post shared the previous day, where he wrote, "the Political Funds Act case is essentially a targeted investigation of me by a political prosecution — it is a targeted investigation that does not even make clear who demanded the political funding and why."
Kim said that his party at the time asked for corporate donations without his knowledge.
President Lee, meanwhile, downplayed the scandal surrounding Kim when speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One en route to Canada for the G7 summit early Tuesday. "I asked Kim in person and he explained that they were mere allegations, which he can sufficiently explain at the confirmation hearing," Lee told reporters.
Besides the political slush fund scandals, Kim is accused of abusing his power as a lawmaker to aid his son's extracurricular projects and help him gain admission to a US university. Critics are also questioning the master's degree Kim claims to have received from Tsinghua University in China in 2010, which was the same year he ran for mayor of Busan and failed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
![[Editorial] Brains before algorithms](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fall-logos-bucket.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fkoreaherald.com.png&w=48&q=75){kind=small}
Korea Herald
13 hours ago
- Korea Herald
[Editorial] Brains before algorithms
South Korea's push for AI leadership must confront the challenge of retaining talent South Korea has declared its ambition to become one of the world's top three powers in artificial intelligence. The goal is bold, the funding substantial: President Lee Jae Myung has pledged 100 trillion won ($72.5 billion) to the sector. Earlier this week, Lee appointed Ha Jung-woo, a respected AI researcher formerly at Naver, as the country's first senior presidential secretary for AI policy. A sweeping initiative, backed by public and private investment, is beginning to take shape. Alongside infrastructure plans such as a major AI data center in Ulsan co-funded by SK Group and Amazon Web Services, Lee's initiative signals a serious — if belated — push to catch up in the global AI race. But lofty goals and generous budgets alone do not make an AI powerhouse. Without the talent to match its vision, South Korea risks building a hollow structure: well-funded, well-planned and ultimately weakened by the steady loss of its brightest minds. The warning signs are clear. According to the Korea Chamber of Commerce and Industry, South Korea ranks 35th out of 38 OECD countries in net AI talent mobility. For every 10,000 residents, 0.36 more AI professionals leave the country than arrive. This widening 'brain deficit' threatens the very foundation of Lee's AI strategy. The trend is not confined to AI. Across science and technology fields, more Korean professionals are seeking careers abroad, while fewer foreign experts are choosing to relocate to South Korea. The KCCI analysis also shows that the country's innovation pipeline is faltering: fewer international research partnerships, declining venture investment and a generation of STEM graduates opting for medical school or emigration over startups and R&D. This is not simply about money. Young Korean scientists and engineers are drawn to countries where advancement is based on merit, not seniority. They want flexible work environments, robust research infrastructure and room to take intellectual risks. Yet at home, they face rigid institutional norms: a 52-hour workweek cap, seniority-based pay and limited opportunities for global collaboration — all of which hamper South Korea's ability to attract and retain top-tier talent. The financial cost of this exodus is high. Each college graduate who leaves to work abroad represents more than 550 million won in lost public investment and future tax revenue. The long-term damage is even greater. As the scientific workforce erodes, the innovations South Korea hopes will define its economic future could stall before they begin. The government's investment in AI infrastructure is a necessary step. Ha Jung-woo's appointment and his advocacy for a sovereign AI trained on Korean language and culture show strategic insight into the risks of overdependence on foreign platforms. But infrastructure must be matched by reforms that address the root causes of the brain drain. The task ahead is not just to slow the outflow, but to reverse it. South Korea needs a comprehensive 'brain gain' strategy that builds a national ecosystem where talent can thrive. This includes more flexible labor rules, performance-based rewards and stronger support for research and innovation. It also means creating meaningful incentives for foreign experts to come, and to stay, through streamlined visas, tax benefits and improved housing and education options. By the end of 2025, South Korea is expected to face a shortfall of nearly 15,000 AI professionals. And in an era when AI capability is closely tied to national security, economic competitiveness and global standing, there is little margin for error. South Korea has the financial resources, political resolve and technological foundation to lead in AI. But success will depend less on the amount invested and more on the country's ability to cultivate — and retain — the people who will drive that future forward. In the AI age, it is not the machines but the minds that matter most.
![[Lee Byung-jong] President Lee's pragmatic diplomacy](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwimg.heraldcorp.com%2Fnews%2Fcms%2F2025%2F06%2F19%2Fnews-p.v1.20250619.e28f3fe356a24854bdece6b379c122c6_T1.jpg&w=3840&q=100)
Korea Herald
13 hours ago
- Korea Herald
[Lee Byung-jong] President Lee's pragmatic diplomacy
Less than two weeks into office, President Lee Jae Myung is already busy shaping a new course for South Korea's foreign policy — one he describes as 'pragmatic diplomacy.' His packed diplomatic calendar signals both urgency and ambition. Earlier this week, he attended the G7 summit in Canada at the invitation of the host, marking South Korea's return to global diplomacy after six months of absence during the country's turbulent leadership transition. Later this month, he is scheduled to travel to the Netherlands to participate in the NATO summit as a representative of the alliance's Indo-Pacific partners. Despite criticism over the rushed pace and pending domestic challenges, Lee is determined to reestablish South Korea as a central player on the global stage. 'Democratic Korea is back,' declared national security adviser Wi Sung-lac. Still, many are asking: What does 'pragmatic diplomacy' actually mean in practice? Lee's approach marks a distinct departure from the 'values-based diplomacy' of his predecessor, Yoon Suk Yeol, who prioritized alliances with countries sharing democratic values. In contrast, Lee's strategy is rooted in flexibility and realpolitik — prioritizing economic interests and strategic outcomes over ideological alignment. In today's volatile geopolitical environment, with mounting tensions among global powers, Lee seems to be betting that ideological rigidity is a liability, not an asset. While the full contours of Lee's diplomatic doctrine are still emerging, his initial moves offer important clues. The order of his phone calls to world leaders in his first days in office has been particularly telling. As expected, his first call was to US President Donald Trump — a nod to the enduring importance of the South Korea-US alliance, especially on issues of trade and security. The 20-minute call reaffirmed the long-standing priority Korean presidents place on their alliance with Washington. More surprising was his second phone call — to Japanese Prime Minister Ishiba Shigeru. Coming from a liberal background, Lee had been expected by some to reach out to China's Xi Jinping next, following the pattern of previous liberal leaders like President Moon Jae-in. Lee has, in the past, been critical of Japan's stance on historical issues, leading many to doubt whether he would prioritize Tokyo early on. However, this decision was widely interpreted as a signal of Lee's practical mindset and willingness to improve ties with Japan despite lingering historical grievances. Lee's third call to Xi Jinping was hardly unexpected, given that China remains South Korea's largest trading partner. But his fourth and fifth calls did raise eyebrows: He spoke with the leaders of the Czech Republic and Vietnam, countries often overlooked in the early stages of diplomatic outreach by past presidents. His rationale, again, was pragmatic. The Czech Republic recently awarded a 26 trillion-won nuclear power plant construction deal to a South Korean bid — a hard-won contract that edged out fierce competition from France. Lee's outreach aims to solidify that economic relationship and possibly expand it. Vietnam, meanwhile, is South Korea's third-largest trading partner and the leading destination for Korean foreign investment, making it a natural choice for early engagement. The sequence of these conversations echoes one of Lee's key refrains: 'The economy is security, and security is the economy.' His decision to attend the G7 and NATO summits underscores this philosophy. At the G7, discussions focused heavily on global trade friction — particularly the fallout from President Trump's protectionist tariffs. With trade accounting for 80 percent of South Korea's GDP, these are matters Seoul cannot afford to ignore. His participation in the NATO summit is more delicate. Lee had previously expressed reservations about Korea getting too involved in European security matters, especially the war in Ukraine. However, Europe is now a growing market for South Korean defense exports. From that angle, attending the NATO meeting is less about ideology and more about ensuring access to new economic opportunities. But Lee's pragmatic diplomacy will soon face its toughest challenge: North Korea. A purely practical foreign policy could falter if Lee reverts to the liberal camp's traditional approach of engagement with Pyongyang at the expense of alignment with key allies. President Moon Jae-in, for example, pursued such a strategy, which strained Seoul's trilateral coordination with Washington and Tokyo. That fragile alliance, revitalized under President Yoon, President Biden, and former Japanese Prime Minister Kishida in the 2023 Camp David summit, could be tested once more — especially now that all three leaders have exited the political stage. Despite his calls for pragmatic diplomacy, Lee may find himself pulled back toward a more ideological, nationalistic foreign policy. Personnel choices offer early signs of this tension. National security adviser Wi Sung-lac is widely viewed as an advocate of strong alliances, particularly with the US and other democratic partners. But Lee's pick for National Intelligence Service chief, Lee Jong-seok — a former Unification Minister — is a well-known proponent of an independent foreign policy that places inter-Korean relations above external alliances. These two key advisers, representing opposing schools of thought, could end up pulling President Lee in divergent directions, risking confusion and inconsistency in policy execution. In short, President Lee's diplomatic approach shows promise in its economic focus and global engagement. His outreach to non-traditional partners and participation in key summits signal an intent to broaden South Korea's international standing. But this pragmatic posture will only succeed if it can maintain consistency and resist being derailed by ideological pulls — especially when it comes to North Korea. The balancing act between idealism and realism, between national pride and global cooperation, will define the credibility and effectiveness of Lee's foreign policy in the years to come.
Korea Herald
a day ago
- Korea Herald
N. Korea touts 'absolute solidity' of alliance with Russia on 1st anniv. of key treaty
North Korea on Thursday underscored the "absolute solidity" of its alliance with Russia and reaffirmed bilateral cooperation as it marked the first anniversary of the signing of a mutual defense treaty with Moscow. The North's mainstream Rodong Sinmun newspaper, which reflects the regime's official position, issued the message in an article marking the first anniversary of the signing of the Comprehensive Strategic Partnership treaty on June 19 last year in Pyongyang between leader Kim Jong-un and Russian President Vladimir Putin. The daily touted the treaty as opening "a new chapter in the friendship" between North Korea and Russia and as an outcome of the leaders' "extraordinary" leadership. It said the two countries have "unsparingly shown off the absolute solidity of the alliance relationship." Under the treaty, which calls on one party to come to the aid of the other without delay if it comes under armed attack, North Korea deployed around 14,000 troops to the Russian side in the war against Ukraine between October last year and February this year. In a meeting with Russia's security chief earlier this week, Kim has reportedly decided to send 5,000 military construction workers and 1,000 sappers to Russia's Kursk frontline region for mine removal and war recovery. The Rodong Sinmun described the military deployment and North Korean troops' engagement in the war as the "most exemplary" implementation of the treaty. "It is an unwavering stance of the two countries' peoples to deepen militant friendship and achieve mutual prosperity and well-being," the newspaper said. It also highlighted growing cooperation between the two countries in the economy, diplomacy, education, public health and the arts, adding that "bilateral solidarity and cooperation are becoming broader." On Tuesday, just ahead of the anniversary, Kim held talks with Russia's Security Council Secretary Sergei Shoigu in Pyongyang, where Russian media reported Kim had decided to send additional troops and workers to Kursk. North Korean media, however, did not report the decision in their reports, only mentioning plans between North Korea and Russia to commemorate North Korean soldiers killed in action while fighting for Russia. An official at South Korea's unification ministry assessed the North likely decided on the additional troop deployment to gain more rewards from Russia in exchange for its military support, adding the decision appears to have been driven by not only economic but also strategic considerations. However, the regime likely omitted media coverage of the decision out of concern for domestic public opinion, the official said. Through the decision, North Korea appears to be aiming to further solidify its alliance with Russia, and the move could likely lead to an increase in North Korean labor exports to Russia at a time when its exports to China remain sluggish, the official said. (Yonhap)
