No winner of life changing Lotto jackpot, but over 99,000 players win prizes
No lucky Lotto player managed to scoop the massive multi-million Lotto jackpot on Saturday, but tens of thousands of people still snapped prizes.
While there was no winner of the Lotto jackpot, worth a life changing €7,420,497, in total, over 99,000 players won prizes in the Lotto and Lotto Plus draws.
In the main Lotto draw, 20 players managed to scoop up a €1,647 prize. The winning numbers were: 20, 32, 33, 44, 46, 47 and the bonus 42. There were also 90 winners of the Raffle Prize each receiving €500. The winning raffle code was: 1090.
There was also no winner of the Lotto Plus 1 top prize, worth €1 million, but many players also snagged prizes. The winning numbers were: 3, 8, 9, 26, 30, 33 and the bonus 45.
No one managed to win the Lotto Plus 2 top prize either, but once again, many players scooped prizes. The winning numbers were: 7, 11, 13, 14, 21, 45 and the bonus 2.
Meanwhile, hours after an Irish punter claimed the top prize of €500,000 in Friday night's EuroMillions Plus draw, a lucky Lotto player has scooped an even bigger reward in Saturday's Daily Million draw.
The hunt is now for the holder of the lucky ticket, who will claim a whopping €1 million after matching all six numbers in Saturday's draw.
The winning numbers were 2, 9, 12, 16, 28 and 29 and the bonus number was 5, with over 900 players also winning prizes ranging from €3 to €500.
The lucky winner now has 90 days to claim their prize from Lotto chiefs, before they turn the winnings over to promote the National Lottery, which in turn will increase the funds raised for Good Causes.
If you're holding the winning ticket, be sure to contact the National Lottery prize claims team on 1800 666 222 or email claims@lottery.ie to arrange the collection of your prize.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
9 hours ago
- Irish Times
We used to vilify unwed mothers. Now we criticise women who don't want to be mothers
According to the Central Statistics Office, the average age of Irish first-time mothers is now 31.7, while births to women aged over 40 have increased by 21.5 per cent in the last decade. Public discourse on the growing numbers of women electing not to have children is loud, insufferable and generally asking the wrong questions. The real story behind declining birth rates and elective non-parenthood in the West is unsurprisingly more complicated than we give it credit for. It is not just that women are too busy 'girlbossing' their way to Beyoncé gigs in fringed cowboy boots to think – quite literally – of the children. Some are choosing not to become parents. In a society that considers parenthood the default, this choice is usually made with care and clarity. After all, the social cost alone is a powerful disincentive. More would like to be parents but can't see how it might be possible under their present conditions. The situation is often reduced to personal selfishness or cultural decline – laziness, greed, convenience – resulting in women failing to do their duty. What's missing from the discourse is legitimate curiosity about why this decision appears to be becoming more common. We still treat readiness for parenthood as a sort of universal personal milestone, but that is no longer the world we actually live in. Desire isn't a primary factor in decision-making if you can't afford rent, if childcare costs more than the salary you require in order to live, and if there isn't a stable partner with whom to coparent or family or community support nearby. Many increasingly common material limitations are dismissed as a general unwillingness to inconvenience oneself in order to be a parent. But lacking the money, the housing or the support (let alone all three) to raise a child is more than sufficient disincentive. We are living in a time in which there is no guarantee that the future will look anything like the past. While it's in our collective interest for people to have more children, it isn't in the interest of many individuals or their prospective families. Chastising people for having the rationality to notice this and act accordingly is not an effective means of changing it. READ MORE [ Childcare in Ireland: 'Even as well-paid professionals, it was an exhausting struggle. The numbers never added up' Opens in new window ] In Ireland, we have a long history of disguising structural problems as moral ones. This is how we justified institutionalising more of our population than any other country in the world in the 20th century. It is arrogant of us to presume we've outgrown the sophistic habit we've long used to avoid looking too closely at ourselves. Until recently, we looked at mothers who had children outside the conditions we considered appropriate as moral failures – selfish abnegators of their collective duty. Now, we repurpose that same impulse and direct it at non-mothers. In both instances, we fall prey to the same error – a failure to look around at the conditions and society in which women live, and the incentive structures around them, and to consider how we are collectively contributing to the outcomes many claim to disapprove of. The reluctant mother is a shameful, piteous figure in our culture. She garners our disgust in a way we often spare fathers of the same inclination. It's the happy, fulfilled, enthusiastic mother our culture idolises. The 'natural' mother. We ignore the fact that only women who desire to be mothers are likely to feel fulfilled by the role, and even then, not all will feel that way – because women are people, and need more than a relational identity in order to value themselves. Young Irish women were taught to value autonomy by a generation of women who advocated and struggled to create a freedom they didn't enjoy themselves. The point was always choice. Now, women are choosing, and we're still blaming them. Not everyone is suited to parenthood, and it's better for all when those people choose to live childfree. There are valuable and meaningful ways to live a good, fulfilled life, make a contribution and invest in others beyond perpetuating one's own family line, obviously. It's a good thing that fewer people are raising children they don't want, and that fewer children experience this harm. Increasingly, there are people who don't feel hopeful about the future or cannot find stability – rejecting parenthood is both rational and compassionate under those circumstances. There are also those who would rather do other things with their time. It makes no sense for this fact to be personally offensive to people who have nothing to do with them – this is a coercive impulse that will not be remedied by a stranger having a baby. [ So, you want children. But can you afford them? Opens in new window ] However, declining birth rates are still a material problem. If the survival of humanity depends on women embracing motherhood (it does, but not to the exclusion of all other factors – we just like focusing on this one), then our discourse is incoherent. Why is there so little curiosity about why more women seem to find the prospect of motherhood unappealing, inaccessible or both? Why do we expect people – but specifically women – to choose parenthood despite all of the compelling reasons not to? This is a question we should be asking. [ Celtic Tiger baby boom has turned to bust as fertility rates decline Opens in new window ] Crucially, among all the patronising dismissals and the finger-wagging warnings of 'she'll-regret-it', a growing body of research suggests that women in both Ireland and the UK actively want more children than they have, or want to have a child, but don't consider themselves able to. This suggests the impediment is structural and very much not about diminishing desire or hoarding more money for Beyoncé tickets and Uber Eats. Evidence suggests most women would choose to be mothers – if there were more stable access to adequate housing, if childcare were more affordable, if we had more community cohesion and support. Less judgment and more curiosity would have benefited us when we were incarcerating unmarried pregnant women and girls for nonconformity, and it would benefit us now.
Irish Independent
13 hours ago
- Irish Independent
Eilis O'Hanlon: Horror replaces horror in the endless cycle of 24-hour news
The dreadful plane crash in Ahmedabad transfixed all of us watching in horror at home, but is it time to wean ourselves off a diet of disaster? Today at 21:30 It was 8:09 Irish time when Air India flight 171 crashed into a residential area shortly after take off at Ahmedabad airport.
Irish Independent
13 hours ago
- Irish Independent
Eoin O'Malley: Down with the puritans — we should all go back to the pub
Decline in drinking could be masking other problems It was the Irish who perfected the greatest social application in human history. The pub may not have been an Irish invention, but without deliberate design the pub in Ireland became a place for people to meet and socialise that was so successful we exported the concept all over the world.
