State declares CO strike over
DANNEMORA — The grounds outside Clinton Correctional Facility looked much different Monday than they have the past three weeks.
Instead of hundreds of correction officers huddling around fires, holding makeshift signs denouncing the state's treatment of them and receiving food deliveries from supportive members of the community, the parking lot across the street from Clinton Correctional was empty for the first time since before Feb. 17 — when the strike began.
State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision Daniel F. Martuscello III declared Monday afternoon that the strike was over, and that about 10,000 of the 13,500 officers in the state had returned to work.
Monday's developments occurred after an agreement on paper was reached between the state and the correction officer's union, the New York State Correction Officers Police Benevolent Association, over the weekend.
It had remained to be seen whether or not staff would return to work.
THRESHOLD
An 'agreement' was previously reached on Feb. 27, but the strike continued on. However, this time, it played out differently after the state set an early Monday morning deadline to return to work.
'The agreement will take effect upon at least 85 percent of staff returning to work,' a statement issued Saturday night said.
James Miller, Director of Public Relations for NYSCOPBA, said Monday morning he did not have an official tally of those who went back to work.
'Received multiple inquiries this morning on the number of officers who returned to work at the deadline today,' he said by email.
'No numbers yet on how many returned to work. I will hopefully have a better sense by early afternoon. More than likely, we won't put out a statement until we know if the threshold was met.'
ITEMS
The deal appears to include most of the same items that were agreed upon in previous rounds of negotiations.
A suspension of the Humane Alternatives to Long Term Incarceration Act for 90 days with review to follow, changes in scheduling to alleviate overtime and double and triple shifts, improved screening procedures and limited or no discipline for striking officers.
The deal was signed by DOCCS Commissioner Daniel F. Martuscello III, Office of Employee Relations Director Michael Volforte and New York State Correction Officers Police Benevolent Association President Chris Summers.
Officers across the state have been on a wildcat strike not sanctioned by the union for three weeks. They have been demanding safer conditions inside prisons.
They are seeking more staffing, less double and triple shifts, better screening for packages and visitors to keep contraband out, a repeal to HALT.
The state has threatened to fire striking officers and suspended health insurance coverage for them and their families.
The National Guard has been called in to help those officers who have been reporting for work, cover prisons.
THANKED THE STAFF
Martuscello said the National Guard and the officers who have been working deserve credit.
'I want to thank the staff that have worked hard every day of this strike,' he said.
'Your being there was critical for this challenging 22 days.'
While it appears that officers at Clinton Correctional Facility and Altona Correctional Facility have largely returned to work, there reportedly were still large numbers of officers picketing at prisons in Malone in Franklin County.
Martuscello said that the state would be terminating about 2,000 officers who did not return to work, immediately.
LEGAL AID SOCIETY
While Martuscello touted the end of the strike, the Legal Aid Society said it was not happy about the deal reached, and threatened legal action.
'Although Department of Corrections and Community Supervision (DOCCS) Commissioner Daniel F. Martuscello III and NYSCOPBA leadership have signed an agreement aimed at ending the illegal strike, the threat to incarcerated New Yorkers persists. Without a clear plan to swiftly restore essential services, resume legal and family visits, provide medical care neglected during the strike, and implement strong oversight to prevent retaliation by returning correctional staff, the people we serve in DOCCS facilities across the state will continue to face life-threatening harm,' a statement from the Legal Aid Society said Monday.
'Compounding these concerns, DOCCS has doubled down on a purported 'suspension' of HALT, the vague terms of which threaten a boundless and illegal circumvention of critical legal protections for incarcerated New Yorkers. All incarcerated New Yorkers, their families, friends, and communities, deserve to know what DOCCS is doing to comply with HALT, and we are going to court to ensure they have that clarity.'
The Legal Aid Society said it will continue to closely monitor this situation to ensure the well-being of those they represent and safeguard their legal rights.
JONES WANTS SAFETY
State Assemblyman D. Billy Jones (D-Chateaugay Lake) a former correction officer himself, said he will remain committed to fighting for workplace safety at correctional facilities across the state.
'What is happening at correctional facilities is horrible and it should have never come to this,' Jones said.
'No one wants to see anyone lose their job for protecting workplace safety. All we want is for everyone to return to work under safe conditions.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
You won't beat ICE with violence
President Donald Trump is spoiling for a violent fight on American soil. In response to protests in Los Angeles against his mass deportation regime — a small number of which have turned violent — Trump deployed thousands of National Guard members and roughly 700 Marines. He's been pining to invoke the Insurrection Act for years, and now that his administration is filled with sycophants, he just might do it. As Trump flails for a justification to turn the force of the most powerful military in the world on its own citizenry, a tiny but disproportionately destructive element of the L.A. protests is essentially acting in service of Trump's ambitions to crush dissent. I'm not pearl-clutching about the optics of flying Mexican flags or trying to tone-police protesters' mean words to cops. I'm not talking about nonviolent lawbreaking or other civil disobedience — which Trump has already, outrageously, likened to violence. And despite the right-wing media panic that Los Angeles is in a state of anarchy, most of the city is completely unaffected by the unrest. I'm talking about the masked vigilantes beating driverless Waymo cars with their skateboards before setting them ablaze. I'm talking about looting of shoe stores, cannabis dispensaries and an Apple store — among other places of business. Some advocates will deny that arson and theft constitute violence — as long as the impetus for the protest is the correct kind. I disagree, but regardless of what I think, history has shown that most Americans are unlikely to respond positively to such tactics. What should be considered easily and universally condemnable, however, are acts of cowardly and nihilistic violence. Dropping rocks, bricks and e-scooters off overpasses, throwing Molotov cocktails or shooting commercial-grade fireworks at human beings (whether or not they work in law enforcement) don't constitute free speech. They're attempted murder, and they're unjustifiable. A spokesperson for Unión del Barrio — an independent Latino political group that organizes workers and immigrants — said in an Instagram video: 'What has happened these days weren't acts of vandalism or crime; they were acts of resistance against a government that is kidnapping our fathers, our mothers, our wives, our husbands, our children.' Though the organization isn't speaking for other groups involved in the protests, the aforementioned incidents are indeed crimes, and they make the much larger, peaceful protest movement look dangerous. They undermine the protests' righteousness against the Trump administration's overt racism, wanton brutality and relentless lawbreaking. They won't win any hearts and minds, they won't liberate people rounded up by ICE agents, and they won't do anything to thwart Trump's authoritarianism. Nor will rioters win a street war against the LAPD, much less the Marines. So what's the point, other than the vibes? There have already been reports of law enforcement using excessive force on protesters and journalists. The Los Angeles Times reported that an LAPD helicopter flew over a crowd and announced: 'I have all of you on camera. I'm going to come to your house.' And while the American public still generally approves of Trump's mass deportation policies, the extreme tactics and the choices of targets of ICE's raids (like green card holders and children) are increasingly less popular. Images of police and the military attacking peaceful protesters won't increase Trump's approval ratings. That's why activists and community leaders who support the protests need to unequivocally condemn violence and looting. Period. Full stop. To be sure, condemning violence probably won't stop Trump from doing whatever he's planning on doing, but if the protests are clearly nonviolent, it's a lot harder to convince the American people that violent government crackdowns on demonstrations are justifiable. I covered police and prosecutorial abuses for years as a reporter, including violent law enforcement crackdowns on protests. I witnessed and wrote about unjustified and often brutal assaults by police on demonstrators during the summer 2020 protests following George Floyd's murder. But I also witnessed incidents of rioting and looting surrounding some of those same protests. These typically occurred after huge groups of peaceful demonstrators had marched through a certain area, trailed by police. Once the main demonstrations and their police escorts left the area, I saw much smaller groups of young men seize the opportunity left by the vacuum of authority. They broke windows, stole merchandise and attacked parked cars. The destruction seemed to be the point. Many activist leaders and advocates at the time denied what was happening was violence, as if the livelihoods of people working at a small business that was burned to the ground can simply be replaced by insurance reimbursements (which also rarely cover the total value of property lost). Some even attempted to justify rioting by citing the Martin Luther King Jr. quote 'a riot is the language of the unheard.' But they ignored what Dr. King said moments earlier: 'Let me say as I've always said, and I will always continue to say, that riots are socially destructive and self-defeating. I'm still convinced that nonviolence is the most potent weapon available to oppressed people in their struggle for freedom and justice. I feel that violence will only create more social problems than they will solve. That in a real sense it is impracticable for the Negro to even think of mounting a violent revolution in the United States. So I will continue to condemn riots and continue to say to my brothers and sisters that this is not the way. And continue to affirm that there is another way.' The American public, which at first had been overwhelmingly sympathetic to those protests in 2020, began to sour on the demonstrations months later, as they were increasingly perceived as dangerous and out of control. The movement was popular. The violence wasn't. Violence isn't just morally objectionable; it's strategically foolish in protests against the government. The hypocrisy of Trump's sending the Marines into Los Angeles to protect police is off the charts — given his mass pardons of Jan. 6 rioters who brutally attacked Capitol Police. And deploying the military to confront civilians — the same week he's throwing an ostentatious military parade that just happens to coincide with his birthday — only telegraphs his intentions. Trump's escalations demonstrate that he wants to provoke demonstrators into violence. It only makes it easier for him to go full authoritarian and to frame violent crackdowns as a necessary remedy to violence. It's incredible that this needs to be said, but dropping bricks off of overpasses onto police cars will not make Americans sympathetic to protests against ICE crackdowns, nor will they lead the government to de-escalate. Excusing or justifying any incidents of violence — however rare they might be — in otherwise peaceful protest movements is a losing tactic for winning popular support. And it's a hopeless tactic to use against the state, which has a legal monopoly on violence. This article was originally published on
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Union leader David Huerta faces felony charge after arrest at ICE raid
A prominent California union leader is facing a federal charge after he was arrested on Friday, June 6 during a confrontation with authorities at an immigration raid in downtown Los Angeles. David Huerta, president of the Service Employees International Union California (SEIU), is facing one charge of felony conspiracy to impede an officer after he was arrested by federal officers on Friday, according to court records obtained by USA TODAY. Huerta remained in federal custody until Monday, June 9, when he was released on $50,000 bond, according to multiple reports. Crowds had gathered in downtown Los Angeles to demand for Huerta's release. Federal prosecutors allege that Huerta 'deliberately obstructed' agents from accessing a worksite suspected of employing undocumented immigrants by sitting in front of the business's only entrance gate for vehicles. SEIU California said Huerta was injured as he was detained by police. Following his arrest, Huerta issued a statement calling for people to stand together against injustice. "What happened to me is not about me. This is about something much bigger," Huerta said in a statement obtained by local news stations. "We all collectively have to object to this madness because this is not justice. This is injustice. And we all have to stand on the right side of justice." U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli reaffirmed federal prosecutors' allegations against Huerta in a post on X on Friday. 'Let me be clear: I don't care who you are − if you impede federal agents, you will be arrested and prosecuted. No one has the right to assault, obstruct, or interfere with federal authorities carrying out their duties,' he said. Live updates: Newsom sues over Trump's National Guard deployment in LA; 700 Marines also being sent In a statement to USA TODAY on June 9, April Verrett, International President of the SEIU, demanded Huerta's release. 'SEIU refuses to be silent in the face of these horrific attacks on working communities. Standing in solidarity as a movement of working people is not new to us,' Verrett said. 'We demand David Huerta's immediate release and an end to these abusive workplace raids.' According to ABC 7, State Senator Sasha Renée Pérez condemned Huerta's arrest. "It is such a scary time right now, to watch this happen. I have people like my mom asking me 'If they can come for the president of our entire union so brazenly and attack him in this way then what does that mean for the rest of us?'" Perez said. Huerta's arrest comes as the Trump administration continues to increase measures against anti-ICE protests in Los Angeles. Trump ordered the deployment of 2,000 National Guard troops in Los Angeles for what is expected to last 60 days, according to California's adjutant general. In a social media post, Newsom blamed Trump for the increase in unrest after three days of protests, saying, "we're suing him." 'Donald Trump is creating fear and terror by failing to adhere to the U.S. Constitution and overstepping his authority. This is a manufactured crisis to allow him to take over a state militia, damaging the very foundation of our republic,' Newsom said in a statement. Contributing: John Bacon, Trevor Hughes and N'dea Yancey-Bragg, USA TODAY Fernando Cervantes Jr. is a trending news reporter for USA TODAY. Reach him at and follow him on X @fern_cerv_. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: California union leader David Huerta faces felony charge, out on bond
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Has Trump overblown the threat of protests? Residents, local officials say yes.
LOS ANGELES ‒ President Donald Trump's deployment of thousands of troops to the nation's second-largest city has unleashed indignation and anger among residents and local officials who say the threat of immigration protests has been dramatically overblown by the White House. "The implication is that Donald Trump is waging a war on us personally," said protester Charlie Knowlton, 30. Immigration agents carrying out Trump's goal of deporting 1 million undocumented immigrants annually sparked a series of sometimes-violent protests in the greater Los Angeles area. A small mob set multiple vehicles and a palm tree on fire, threw rocks and fireworks at police in downtown Los Angeles on June 7 and June 8 as thousands of non-violent protesters watched and occasionally cheered. Trump has dispatched 4,000 members of the National Guard and 700 Marines to Los Angeles, arguing that local law enforcement is overwhelmed. Few of those troops are actually on the streets, however. "If I didn't 'send in the troops' to Los Angeles the last three nights, that once beautiful and great city would be burning to the ground right now …" Trump said in a June 10 post on his social media site Truth Social. The Los Angeles Police Department alone has about 9,000 officers to serve the city of nearly 4 million people sprawling across a land area that's one-third the size of Rhode Island. The larger Los Angeles metro area has more than 18 million residents and covers an area nearly the size of Maine. Local authorities say they have detained about 150 people in connection to the unrest that left small areas of the 5.8-square mile downtown marred with pervasive graffiti and a few broken windows. No serious injuries have been reported. The nightly protests are still being handled primarily by the Los Angeles Police Department and other local law enforcement officers. The graffiti criticizes Trump and Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents, and more broadly raises concerns that the country is careening toward a fascist state. Some of California's leaders have accused Trump of using the protests as a pretext to strengthen federal control, especially in a state whose leadership he has long battled. On June 10, Knowlton joined thousands of protesters as they marched around downtown, chanting slogans and criticizing Trump and his immigration-enforcement plans. Some waved the national flags of Mexico or El Salvador, while others carried upside-down American flags, a traditional distress symbol previously used by right-wing groups during the Biden administration. "We all know this is a power grab," Knowlton said before taking a selfie in front of a line of LAPD officers in riot gear. "What I want right now is for the city police to grow a spine and stand up to the feds." Knowlton, a professional musician wearing a sarape adorned with an eagle, carried a sign aimed squarely at Trump: "Marines!! Where were U Jan 6?" Like many protesters, Knowlton said he found it infuriating that Trump refused to call out the National Guard during the Jan. 6, 2021, insurrection at the Capitol, and then pardoned the people who violently breached the building and attacked Capitol police officers. "It's funny that you can send the Marines in for some fireworks but you can kill a police officer in D.C. and get a pardon," Knowlton said. While some people set off large fireworks that echoed around buildings and a few threw water bottles, most of the protesters remained peaceful, although they were occasionally redirected by local police with pepper-ball guns when they got too close to protected buildings like the police headquarters. Many federal buildings in the area, including courthouses and office buildings, were unprotected and targeted with graffiti. On June 11, Mayor Karen Bass said she believes her city is "an experiment" for White House officials in learning how to displace local control. Trump called up the National Guard over the objections of Gov. Gavin Newsom, who promptly sued to stop him, calling it "an unmistakable step toward authoritarianism." In turn, Trump suggested that Newsom could be arrested. "I feel like we've all been in Los Angles a part of a grand experiment to see what happens when the federal government decides they want to roll up on a state or roll up on a city and take over," Bass said. "It's a sense of intimidation and fear that is just so unnecessary and so corrosive to our city." Across the city, community members worry that the Marines and National Guard will dangerously escalate any violence that does occur. Trump has promised that anyone who assaults a federal officer or member of the military will face swift punishment. One-third of Los Angeles County residents were born in another country and nearly one in 10 lack documentation to remain legally. But many of those undocumented parents have children who were born American citizens, making Trump's aggressive immigration enforcement unwelcome in this city of immigrants. Retired teacher Jose "Bear" Gallegos, 61, who attended protests in the city of Paramount on June 7, said he was angry that California National Guard troops had been called up by Trump over Newsom's objections. Carrying rifles, the guard members spent Monday and Tuesday controlling access to the Paramount Business Center, which Gallegos said is home to a small federal detention said he was among the protesters hit with pepper-ball rounds, and drew a contrast between the armed troops and unarmed protesters worried about family and community members."We don't have guns. All we have is prayers and feathers," he said. Former Los Angeles deputy district attorney Alfonso Estrada said introducing more federal troops to what is effectively a law-enforcement situation may further exacerbate tensions with protesters, but also with local police who didn't ask for that help.'It also creates an awkward jurisdictional issue for local law enforcement agencies and their members who now have the national guard and U.S. Marine Corps operating in their jurisdiction,' said Estrada, now in private practice as a partner at the California-based law firm Hanson Bridgett LLP. Estrada added: 'The unnecessary and provocative acts of the executive branch endanger both the general public and local law enforcement officers who will bear the brunt of the political backlash and anger that Los Angelenos are feeling for the executive branch targeting its immigrant community and population without due process." This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Trump deployed troops to LA. Was it an overreaction?
