Pepper-spraying disabled pensioner ‘consistent with police training'
A police officer's decision to pepper-spray a disabled pensioner was 'consistent with training', a court has been told.
Pc Stephen Smith, 51, faces trial alongside Pc Rachel Comotto, a 36-year-old colleague, for allegedly using excessive force on 92-year-old Donald Burgess, during an incident at Park Beck care home in St Leonards-on-Sea, East Sussex, in June 2022.
Mr Burgess was taken to hospital after the incident, during which he was sprayed with an incapacitant and tasered, and later contracted Covid. He died 22 days later, aged 93.
The care home had called 999 after Mr Burgess, a single-leg amputee and wheelchair user, reportedly grabbed a knife and threatened to stab staff.
Pc Smith previously told the jury at Southwark Crown Court that he tried to convince the pensioner to drop the knife and warned him he could be Tasered, before deciding to spray Pava synthetic pepper spray into his face.
Ian Mills, a use of force adviser for the police and an expert for the defence, told the court on Thursday: 'That would be consistent with training based on the officer's perception of the threat at the time. His [Pc Smith's] use of force, though difficult to watch, was generally in accordance with his training.
'There is the perceived threat of the knife, they [the officers] tried ... grabbing the knife, which failed, they tried threatening with Pava, which is not getting a result. He [Pc Smith] then states his intention [to use Pava] to ensure the safety of staff and the safety of other residents at the care home.'
When Mr Burgess did not drop the knife after he was sprayed, Pc Smith deployed a baton to 'try and knock the knife out of Mr Burgess's hand', the officer previously told the court.
Commenting on this incident, Mr Mills agreed the officer used his baton with 'minimal force'.
He continued: 'His use of the baton was also in general accordance with training based on the circumstances. These choices should be based on the information the officers have at that time and the officers' honestly held beliefs at the time of the incident, even if they are later found to be wrong.
'People are unpredictable, techniques are unreliable, so officers have to adapt to the situation. They make split-second decisions based on their perception of the circumstances whilst in fast-moving situations and without the benefit of hindsight.'
Mr Mills added the two officers made a 'tactical error' in failing to 'fully explore avenues of information before entering the room', notably by talking to the care home staff about Mr Burgess.
He said: 'There was an opportunity on arrival to the scene to further assess the incident – for example, the medical history and usual behaviour of the subject.'
Earlier this week, jurors heard that Pc Smith allegedly emptied a full canister of synthetic Pava spray into Mr Burgess's face and struck him with a baton, with Pc Comotto deploying her Taser – all within one minute and 23 seconds of entering his room.
On Thursday, Pc Smith denied this and said he used a 'short burst' of incapacitant on Mr Burgess.
Mr Mills seemed to agree with this assessment, stating that the can of Pava was used for a total of two seconds, when it allows for six seconds of use at full capacity.
Pc Smith denies two counts of assault, relating to his use of Pava spray and a baton, while Pc Comotto denies one count for discharging her Taser.
Prosecutors say the force used against the pensioner was excessive and unnecessary given his age and physical condition.
The trial continues.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Strong support for Milwaukee police chief's reappointment signaled from hiring body
As his contract comes up for renewal, Milwaukee's police chief received strong signals of support early in his rehiring process. Almost all of the city's Fire and Police Commission, the oversight body that handles hiring of the police chief, signaled they were in support of Police Chief Jeffrey Norman's rehiring. The commission is slated to make its final decision on Norman's reappointment June 26. "He's one of the best qualified chiefs I've ever known," said Miriam Horwitz, the commission's chair. With seven of the commission's nine members in attendance at the meeting, six said they were in support of rehiring Norman, who did not attend the commission meeting. Norman's current contract expires Nov. 15. Norman previously told the Journal Sentinel he would take an offer, if the commission extended it to him. "I believe our department has made great strides," Norman said at the time. "I desire to continue to build upon that." The commission's support follows Milwaukee Mayor Cavalier Johnson saying he was in support of rehiring the chief as well. At the June 5 meeting, activist Vaun Mayes and Levi Stein, president of the Friendship Circle of Wisconsin, said they were in support of Norman's rehiring as well. Mayes, who leads the organization Community Task Force, said a past police chief indicated he would talk with community groups, regardless of their support, and that did not happen. Norman has done that consistently, he said. With the Fire and Police Commission no longer having policymaking power for the city's police department due to a 2023 state law, Mayes said it was important to maintain Norman's place in Milwaukee's department. After that law, called Act 12, was passed, Norman elected to move a new bodycam footage release policy forward, despite opposition from the city's police union. "I am very afraid of the wrong person coming in with that kind of power and what they could and couldn't do," Mayes said. Norman, who is in his 29th year in law enforcement, has spent his entire policing career with the city's department. He was hired as acting chief of the department in 2020 and named police chief the following year, following the retirement of another acting chief and the controversial removal of former chief Alfonso Morales in 2020. The Milwaukee native was first hired in 1996 and served as a lieutenant in the homicide unit and captain of District 3, which includes parts of the central city and west side. Norman was hired as chief, in part, due to his track record of community engagement. Since being named chief, Norman has led the department through the crime spikes amid the COVID-19 pandemic, heavy local and state policy change after George Floyd's murder prompted national outrage and policing during the Republican National Convention. Rocky periods have occurred during his tenure. During the Republican National Convention, he and the department came under scrutiny after Columbus, Ohio, police officers shot and killed Sam Sharpe Jr. The officers, who did not face charges in the shooting, shot him about a mile from the convention's perimeter after the officers saw Sharpe appear to move toward another man while wielding knives. The officers were not accompanied by local police, which top department officials previously indicated any out-of-state officers would be in the lead-up to the convention. After the shooting, Norman later acknowledged local officers should have been with the Ohio police officers. The department also came under scrutiny for its handling of events in the lead-up to the homicide of Bobbie Lou Schoeffling. Schoeffling, a 31-year-old mother of two, had been reporting abuse and threats from her ex-boyfriend. Schoeffling was found shot to death on July 26, 2022. Her ex-boyfriend, Nicholas Howell, was convicted of killing Schoeffling last year and sentenced to life in prison. Norman initially declined an interview with the Journal Sentinel into the department's handling of the case but after the new organization published an investigation into her death, he ordered a review of every contact the department had with Schoeffling. The review led to the suspension of four officers. 'We have recognized our shortcomings and we, I believe, have a proven track record of … being open to feedback and working with the communities,' Norman said at the time he opened the review. In 2024, Norman was a finalist for the police chief position in Austin, Texas, but was ultimately passed on for the role. At that time, a department spokesperson said Norman remained "steadfast" in his commitment to Milwaukee. The chief previously declined to tell the Journal Sentinel in May whether he has applied for other jobs as his term approaches its end in Milwaukee. He said he was focused on reappointment locally. Norman's pay appears to have been negotiated in the months leading up to his reappointment discussions. The Fire and Police Commission's executive committee has met in closed session four times regarding senior law enforcement pay. While the city of Milwaukee's Common Council sets the pay range for the chief of police position, the Fire and Police Commission ultimately selects what the salary is in that range. Leon Todd, the commission's executive director, said he could not address what was discussed in those meetings. Norman made a gross salary of $177,112.44 in 2024, according to the city's online pay databases. The Fire and Police Commission will hold two public comment sessions for Norman's rehiring before the June 26 vote. David Clarey is a public safety reporter at the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. He can be reached at dclarey@ This article originally appeared on Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: Milwaukee commission has strong support for police chief's reappointment
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
This Annual Humblebrag Is Actually Putting Your Kid's Security At Risk
What started as a creative workaround during the lockdown days of COVID-19 has become a feel-good fixture of graduation season: lawn signs adorned with a child's name, photo, school and graduating class. You may have seen them around your own neighborhood from kindergarten 'moving up' moments to high school and college milestones. But as these signs grow in popularity, some security experts and privacy advocates are raising a red flag. Kaylen Schroeder, a mom to a 5-year-old, said she put up a sign for her son's pre-kindergarten graduation ceremony at her mom's house instead of their own. 'He doesn't actually live there and there was no photo or name,' said Schroeder. 'We just did not feel safe putting one in our yard because we are not as familiar with our neighbors as I am at my mom's house.' Instead she opted to celebrate her son at her home by throwing a party and focusing on starting new traditions around these major milestones. 'I did self-defense instructor classes at the University of Florida police department,' said Schroeder. 'One of the topics we went over was car decals. The things that say honor students or the sport they may play gets targeted a lot. We treated those yard signs the same way.' These personal displays, while festive and proud, may unintentionally expose kids to privacy and safety risks — from identity theft to location tracking. Here's what parents should consider before planting one in the yard. Graduation yard signs have become a beloved way for families to celebrate their children's milestones, but these signs can often include: a photo, age, school, and even the college the student is planning to attend. These are all pieces of information that can be useful to scammers, identity thieves, or even strangers with bad intentions. 'Everyone has to consider the risks in their own local environment,' Dr. Neha Pathak, WebMD Chief Physician Editor, health and lifestyle medicine. 'Along with names and grades on yard signs, people should be equally thoughtful about what they post on social media about their children. Particularly at the beginning and end of the school year.' She adds that there are a few other safety concerns that include: By placing a sign in your front yard, you're essentially broadcasting that your child lives at a specific address. That can open up risks ranging from doxxing to unwanted attention, especially if the sign includes a photo of the child or a school name that pinpoints their daily routine. Photos of these signs often get posted online by proud parents. Once shared on social media — especially without privacy settings — they can be scraped or misused, adding to a child's digital footprint without their consent. For families with more than one child, yard signs over the years can unintentionally reveal family patterns — like ages, school tracks, or even when a house might be empty during college drop-offs or vacation. 'It's important to have a conversation with your children about how much of their information may be out in the world so they should be particularly mindful of strangers that might know their name or what school they go to,' said Pathak. If you're concerned about privacy but still want to celebrate your child's graduation in a meaningful way, here are some safer alternatives to traditional yard signs: Create a festive display on your front door, porch, or windows—balloons, streamers, or a sign which avoids sharing personal info while still showing your pride. If you do want a yard sign, consider using just your child's first name or nickname, and skip the school name, photo, or future plans. 'For example, a sign that says, 'congratulations graduate!' can still be celebratory without sharing details about the grade, age, gender, name of your child,' said Pathak. Parades also became popular during the COVID-19 lockdowns, so opt to decorate your car and drive by friends' homes or attend a school-organized graduation parade. These celebrations are fun, mobile, and less likely to leave long-term digital traces. T-shirts, banners, or reusable yard flags with more general messages can be a safer way to show your excitement without giving away your child's identity. 'I have yard signs up in my own yard with school names, but I do not post my children's names in yard signs or on social media,' said Pathak. Invite family or close friends for a graduation brunch, backyard party, or virtual toast. Celebrating in a more personal setting can be just as meaningful — and much more secure. These alternatives let you cheer on your graduate without putting their personal information on public display. 'Community is an important thing and we often want to share these milestones in our communities,' Pathak said. 'Every parent has to make their own risk assessment. But beyond whether or not to put up a yard sign, I think it's an important launching pad to have a conversation with your children about how much information about them might be out in the world: A stranger is still a stranger, even if they seem to know your name and where you go to school.' Can You Even Stop Your Partner From Putting Your Kid In The Public Eye? Divorce Lawyers Have Thoughts The 6 Biggest Mistakes You're Making On Public Wi-Fi, According To Cybersecurity Experts The 3 Steps To Take When Dealing With Other People's Annoying Kids, According To A School Psychologist
Miami Herald
6 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Feds bust South Florida ring that collected $34 million in US loans during pandemic
At the peak of the pandemic, a ring of South Floridians jumped on the federal relief bandwagon and applied for more than $34 million in loans from the Small Business Administration to help them survive the public health crisis. Now, six ring members have been indicted on conspiracy, wire fraud and money laundering charges after the SBA guaranteed more than 90 of their bank-approved business loans between 2020 and 2021, federal prosecutors said Thursday. A grand jury indictment has charged the six defendants — Elaine A. Escoe, 40; Alfred L. Davis, 51; Gino J. Jourdan, 37; Cher L. Davis, 53; Latoya T. Clark, 39; and James G. McGhow, 69, — with scheming to obtain federal COVID-19 relief funds for their companies in Miami-Dade, Broward and Palm Beach counties. The indictment says their loan applications contained falsified employee numbers, payroll expenses and business revenues, along with fabricated tax documents and bank statements. As a result, the SBA authorized disbursements of about $29 million in Paycheck Protection Program loans and millions in other federal relief funds that the defendants allegedly spent on themselves, according to prosecutor Jonathan Bailyn. If convicted, the defendants face several years in prison. Since the pandemic, federal prosecutors have brought fraud charges against more than 3,200 defendants nationwide — including over 250 in South Florida, the worst-hit region — for stealing over $1.7 billion from the approved pandemic loan programs, according to the Justice Department. Congress approved the emergency programs, with about $800 billion in loans, to help struggling businesses meet payroll and other expenses. Among the loan-fraud suspects that popped up on South Florida's radar was Andre Lorquet, whose case led federal investigators to the probe of the six recently charged ring members. Before the pandemic, Lorquet opened a business, Miami ENT, and after COVID-19 swept the nation in March 2020, he used the company to amass a small fortune by obtaining PPP and other federal loans totaling $4.4 million. He spent more than $600,000 on two Teslas, a Lamborghini Urus and a Porsche Panamera GTS, according to Homeland Security Investigations. At his sentencing last year, Bailyn, the prosecutor, described Lorquet as a greedy criminal who fleeced his country at one of its weakest moments in history. Lorquet was sentenced to six years. 'We were in the middle of a pandemic and a national crisis,' Bailyn said. 'There were many people who saw this as an opportunity for charity; this defendant saw it as an opportunity for exploitation and opportunism.'
