Elon Musk's security guards at ‘Fort Knox' Texas compound called cops on neighbor they thought was naked: report
High fences make bad neighbors.
At least that's what those living near Elon Musk's 'Fort Knox' high-walled compound near Austin, Texas, claim — including allegations that the mogul's security forces called the cops on one neighbor for allegedly standing naked in the street.
Paul Hemmer, a retired real estate agent and head of the neighborhood homeowners association in West Lake Hills, has been among the most vocal residents complaining about Musk's alleged zoning code violations.
4 Elon Musk reportedly converted his suburban Austin mansion into his own 'Fort Knox.'
REUTERS
He told the New York Times that he has been under constant surveillance from Musk's security cameras, which were installed on the grounds of a property that the billionaire mogul purchased with the intention of merging with two other adjacent lots to serve as a compound for him, his 13 kids and their mothers.
'I call that place Fort Knox,' Hemmer told the Times.
Last year, Musk's security team accused Hemmer of indecent behavior, alleging he was nude outside his home.
Hemmer denied that he was naked and said he was on his property wearing black underwear.
On another occasion, Hemmer stopped to urinate while walking his dog — which Musk's security surveillance captured.
'The cameras got me,' Hemmer told the Times. 'It's scary they have guys sitting and watching me pee.'
4 West Lake Hills, Texas is an affluent suburb of Austin not far from the banks of the Colorado River.
Getty Images/iStockphoto
Hemmer's outrage at Musk prompted him to fly a video-equipped drone over his property in a bid to document alleged violations, the Times reported.
Hemmer and other residents of an upscale cul-de-sac in West Lake Hills, an affluent suburb just west of Austin, launched a formal complaint against Musk after he moved in to their neighborhood in 2022.
The world's richest man — whose portfolio of companies includes Tesla, SpaceX, X and Neuralink, — purchased the $6 million, 6,900-square-foot mansion through a limited liability company.
Musk's arrival in the neighborhood, however, was anything but subtle as neighbors soon observed unsettling changes, the Times reported.
Workers installed a towering 16-foot chain-link fence around the property — significantly exceeding local height restrictions — accompanied by outward-facing surveillance cameras.
The fence is 10 feet higher than zoning ordinances permit, according to the Times.
Traffic congestion soon became another sore point.
Residents noted fleets of vehicles, particularly Teslas, routinely parked on their previously serene streets.
Security personnel, identifiable by their firearm holsters, changed shifts three times daily, adding to neighborhood frustrations, according to the Times.
The scale of the construction also violated at least six city ordinances, the Times reported.
Musk's representatives sought to retroactively gain permission for the various construction projects in and around the property, but were denied last month, according to the outlet.
4 Musk has reportedly turned his West Lake Hills, Texas mansion into a fortress replete with 16-foot-high fences, security guards and surveillance cameras.
Matthew Rutledge
Hemmer, whose house is located across the street from Musk's compound, voiced his irritation in a formal complaint to the city.
'Transporting service employees to other houses, leaving their cars on our quiet streets, hauling laundry to and fro to other houses has to stop,' he wrote in the complaint.
Hemmer and other neighbors formally appealed to the West Lake Hills Zoning and Planning Commission, stating that Musk was effectively operating a security business from his residence.
Last month, the commission unanimously sided with the neighbors.
4 Local officials in West Lake Hills say that Musk has violated several zoning ordinances.
Joe Mabel
Commissioner Jim Pledger emphasized the seriousness of the infractions, declaring: 'If an exception was made, we'd incentivize people to break the rules.'
The West Lake Hills city council will review the zoning commission's decision on May 14. Musk faces a potential mandate to dismantle his non-compliant installations.
In a bid to justify Musk's actions, his representatives cited ongoing security threats to the billionaire.
Longtime resident Anne Yeakel questioned Musk's decision to move to the neighborhood.
'Castles are supposed to be built on hills, right?' she remarked.
'These were sophisticated buyers, and if security was the prime directive, this was not the house for it.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Russia's new drone strikes hit Kyiv, maternity ward in Odesa, Ukraine says
By Pavel Polityuk KYIV (Reuters) -Russia launched another large drone attack on Ukraine, striking Kyiv and damaging a maternity ward in the southern port of Odesa, regional officials said early on Tuesday. The overnight attacks follow Russia's biggest drone strike on Ukraine on Monday - part of intensified operations that Moscow said were retaliatory measures for Kyiv's recent brazen attacks inside Russia. Medics were called to four districts of Kyiv a couple hours after midnight on Tuesday, including the historic Podil neighbourhood, Mayor Vitali Klitschko said on the Telegram messaging app. The military said the strikes were still ongoing and urged people to seek bomb shelters. The full scale of the attack was not immediately clear. "Enemy drones are simultaneously attacking several districts of the city," Timur Tkachenko, head of Kyiv's military administration said on the Telegram messaging app. "There is damage to residential buildings and fires. Rescuers are working at the sites." Reuters' witnesses heard a series of loud explosions throughout the city. In the southern port of Odesa, a "massive" drone attack targeted an emergency medical building and a maternity ward, as well as residential buildings, Oleh Kiper, governor of the broader Odesa region said on Telegram. Regarding the maternity hospital there were no casualties and patients and staff were evacuated, Kiper said. He posted photos of broken windows in what looked like a medical facility and of damages to facades of several buildings. Both sides deny targeting civilians in the war that Russia launched against Ukraine more than three years ago. But thousands of civilians have been killed in the conflict, the chief majority of them Ukrainian.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Judge Dismisses Justin Baldoni's Lawsuit Against Blake Lively, Ryan Reynolds, The New York Times
Justin Baldoni's lawsuit against Blake Lively, Ryan Reynolds and The New York Times was dismissed by a judge on Monday, according to court documents obtained by HuffPost. The news marks the latest in the tumultuous back-and-forth legal battle that stems from the film 'It Ends With Us,' which Baldoni directed and starred in. Lively, who is married to Reynolds, starred in the film as well. Baldoni filed a $400 million countersuit against Lively, Reynolds and Lively's publicist, Leslie Sloane, in January, claiming that they attempted to extort and defame him with sexual harassment claims and that the two actors tried to take control of his film. He also claimed in a defamation suit that the Times had falsely reported that he had created a smear campaign against Lively. Baldoni's countersuit also lists the film producer Jamey Heath, Wayfarer partner Steve Sarowitz and publicists Melissa Nathan and Jennifer Abel as plaintiffs. However, Judge Lewis J. Liman of the U.S. District Court in Manhattan argued that Lively had relied on 'legally permissible hard bargaining or renegotiation of working conditions' rather than extortion. Liman also said that Lively's statements accusing Baldoni of sexual harassment are privileged because they were made in a California Civil Rights Department complaint and therefore not considered defamation. Additionally, Liman wrote that Baldoni's claim that Reynolds, Sloane and the Times defamed him does not hold up because the suit does not prove that any of the parties 'seriously doubted these statements were true based on the information available to them.' In a 132-page opinion, the judge explicitly wrote that the Wayfarer Parties, which refer to Baldoni, Wayfarer Studios and others in the company, 'have not adequately alleged that Lively's threats were wrongful extortion rather than legally permissible hard bargaining or renegotiation of working conditions. Additionally, the Wayfarer Parties have not shown that some of Lively's allegedly extortionate acts damaged them.' (Baldoni is a co-founder of Wayfarer Studios, an independent production studio involved in the film.) 'The Wayfarer Parties have not alleged that Lively is responsible for any statements other than the statements in her CRD complaint, which are privileged,' the opinion also stated. 'The Wayfarer Parties have alleged that Reynolds and Sloane made additional statements accusing Baldoni of sexual misconduct and that the Times made additional statements accusing the Wayfarer Parties of engaging in a smear campaign. But the Wayfarer Parties have not alleged that Reynolds, Sloane or the Times would have seriously doubted these statements were true based on the information available to them, as is required for them to be liable for defamation under applicable law.' 'The Times had no obvious motive to favor Lively's version of events,' Liman added.'The Wayfarer Parties' additional claims also fail. Accordingly, the Amended Complaint must be dismissed in its entirety.' While the judge dismissed the lawsuit, Baldoni is allowed to file an amended complaint by June 23. However, he may only include claims relevant to breach of implied covenant and tortious interference with a contract, which were also included in his complaint. Lively's lawyers Esra Hudson and Mike Gottlieb told HuffPost that the ruling is 'a total victory and a complete vindication.' 'As we have said from day one, this '$400 million' lawsuit was a sham, and the Court saw right through it,' the statement continued. The attorneys said they will be seeking attorneys' fees, and treble and punitive damages from Baldoni and other Wayfarer Studios parties. Sigrid McCawley, Sloane's attorney, told HuffPost in a statement on Monday that she was 'wrongfully dragged' into this lawsuit in an attempt to damage her reputation. 'Today's decision by the Court makes clear that Sloane did nothing wrong. Sloane stands fully vindicated, and justice has been served,' McCawley said. The New York Times celebrated the lawsuit's dismissal in a statement to HuffPost. 'We are grateful to the court for seeing the lawsuit for what it was: a meritless attempt to stifle honest reporting,' a spokesperson for the Times said. 'Our journalists went out and covered carefully and fairly a story of public importance, and the court recognized that the law is designed to protect just that sort of journalism. We will continue to stand up in court for our journalism and for our journalists when their work comes under attack.' Lively's lawsuit was filed in New York in December. 'For years prior to the release of the Film, Mr. Baldoni portrayed himself asa leader of the male feminist movement, writing books, hosting podcasts, and holding TED Talks on the topic. In reality, however, Mr. Baldoni's public persona is a stark contrast to his private behavior, which is replete with hypocrisy, misogyny, and retaliation,' Lively's attorneys wrote in her complaint. Baldoni's countersuit argued that Lively and Reynolds used their prestige 'to steal an entire film right out of the hands of its director and production studio.' It added that Baldoni and Wayfarer only took legal action because Lively had 'unequivocally left them with no choice, not only to set the record straight…But also to put the spotlight on the parts of Hollywood that they have dedicated their careers to being the antithesis of.' The trial is expected to start in March 2026. Representatives for Reynolds, Baldoni and Wayfarer Studios did not immediately reply to HuffPost's request for comment. Blake Lively's Lawyer Accused Of Threatening To Leak Taylor Swift Texts Blake Lively Accuses Justin Baldoni Of Making Women On 'It Ends With Us' Set Uncomfortable Justin Baldoni Reportedly Admits He 'F***ed Up' In Voice Note Apology To Blake Lively
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Bannon Wants Special Counsel Probe Into Musk's Contracts and Drug Use
Steve Bannon has called for a special counsel investigation into Elon Musk's lucrative federal contracts and the extent of his drug use. The MAGA civil war between the two former Trump administration figures continued over the weekend on Sunday Night with Chuck Todd, with Bannon—who already suggested deporting the South African-born tech billionaire—saying Musk should face further consequences. 'I think there have to be formal investigations,' Bannon told the former Meet the Press anchor during a discussion about SpaceX and Starlink, Musk's satellite Wi-Fi service. SpaceX should be nationalized, Bannon reiterated, adding that he shared the White House's reported security concerns about Starlink being installed there. When Todd asked who would be leading such investigations, Bannon replied that 'the best way to do it is as a special counsel that can kind of oversee everything.' 'Pull the security clearance for the drugs, temporarily. Investigate the whole drug situation,' Bannon replied. In May, The New York Times reported that Musk's drug use, which Trump speculated had a role in their blow-up last week, frequently involved ketamine, as well as Adderall, ecstasy and mushrooms. Musk, The New York Times also reported, was alerted to drug tests at SpaceX ahead of time. The White House has refused to say whether Musk was drug tested during his time as de-facto head of the so-called Department of Government Efficiency. On Sunday, Bannon agreed with Todd when he said that Musk 'never would have passed a security clearance as must a mid-level staffer.' Also on Todd's show, Bannon took issue with a March report that Musk, who has extensive business interests in China, was expected to receive a briefing about potential U.S. military action in that country. 'Why would you need a briefing at a highly classified level, in the tank, at the Pentagon on the China war plan?' asked Bannon, who called Musk an 'agent of influence.' For his part, Musk has described Bannon as a 'communist r-tard' and a 'criminal.' Bannon spent four months in prison last year for defying a Jan. 6 House Committee subpoena. In February, he pleaded guilty in state court to one felony count of scheming to defraud donors to his We Build the Wall fundraising campaign. Four years prior, Trump had pardoned Bannon amid his indictment in federal court over that campaign.
