
Panel who recommended Sabsabi for Venice Biennale ‘deeply concerned' by Creative Australia pulling artist
An independent panel who advised Creative Australia on the selection of Khaled Sabsabi for the 61st Venice Biennale say they are 'deeply concerned' by the abrupt decision to rescind his appointment.
The panel has broken their silence amid mounting calls for an inquiry into the board's decision to drop the Lebanese-Australian artist and curator Michael Dagostino from the 2026 event following media and political criticism of two of Sabsabi's historical artworks.
It follows Creative Australia's announcement earlier today that it will commission an 'immediate independent external' review into the 'artistic selection process' that led to the artistic team being chosen to represent Australia.
In a letter written to Creative Australia's chair Robert Morgan, the board and it's CEO, Adrian Collette, the five-member panel expressed support for the dumped artistic team, and called on the board to explain why it ditched the duo.
Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email
'The Panel is deeply concerned by the decision to rescind the appointment, as well as the impact that is having on the Artistic Team, and the people otherwise connected with the selection process,' the group said.
'We urge Creative Australia and the Australia Council Board (together with the wider Australian and international artistic communities) to provide support to and stand with Khaled Sabsabi and Michael Dagostino at this difficult time.
'Any failure to do so would not reflect the expectation of integrity which is at the core of thriving artistic and democratic communities or demonstrate care for the people they engage.
All five panel members called for transparency from the board 'on the process and reasoning for its decision to rescind the selection' which they said 'will go some way to mitigate the confusion, disappointment, and hurt' that is being felt by the artistic team and the broader arts community.
The panel members were: Anthony Gardner, Prof of Contemporary Art History at the University of Oxford, Dunja Rmandić, the director of the Mornington Peninsula Regional Gallery, Dr Mariko Smith, the First Nations curator at the Australian Museum, Wassan Al-Khudhairi, a curator of contemporary art from the Arab world and Elaine Chia, the executive director of the Naomi Milgrom Foundation.
The panel's letter also sheds some light on the selection process, which involved panellists providing individual advice on the six shortlisted teams to the Creative Australia CEO in one-on-one meetings.
'Our task as an independent, peer review Panel was to advise Creative Australia and the Board in their selection of the Artistic Team. This role was a privilege and an honour,' the group said.
While the panel provided advice, Guardian Australia understands the final decision was made by the CEO of Creative Australia and the Head of Visual Arts based on the panel's expert advice.
Mikala Tai, who has led Creative Australia's visual arts department for more than four years tendered her resignation on Friday after the board revoked the appointment.
The panel said they were informed of the final selection of the artistic team on the same date as the media, and they only became aware of the decision to rescind that appointment when the news broke.
'While the Panel has sought clarification from Creative Australia following its decision to rescind the original appointment, no explanation beyond its public statements has been received at the time of issuing this statement,' the panel said.
'The Panel was not consulted or communicated with in respect to the decision to rescind the appointment, and is not involved in any process following that decision.'
It comes as almost 3,000 artists, curators, writers and academics signed a petition calling on Creative Australia to reinstate Sabsabi and Dagostino.
The petition, organised by weekly Melbourne-based art criticism journal Memo, said it would be an essential step in upholding the integrity of Creative Australia's statutory functions and its commitment to artistic independence.
Some of Australia's most highly awarded artists have signed, including Tony Albert, Hoda Afshar, Bronwyn Bancroft, brothers Abdul-Rahman Abdullah and Abdul Abdullah, and a number of artists who have represented Australia in Venice in past biennales, including Judy Watson, Fiona Hall, Susan Norrie and Callum Morton.
The petition said Creative Australia's decision set a concerning precedent for artistic freedom and sectoral independence.
'If public pressure and political sensitivities of the day can determine — apparently within a matter of hours — Creative Australia's support for artists after selection, what does this mean for future appointments, funding decisions, and the autonomy and credibility of Australian artists on the world stage?' the petition statement said.
It spelled out that, under the Creative Australia Act 2023, the Australian Government's principal arts investment and advisory body was required to support artistic excellence, uphold freedom of expression, and foster diversity in Australian arts practice.
'We do not see how Creative Australia's justification for withdrawing Australia's representation — concerns over 'prolonged and divisive debate' — fulfils its statutory functions under the Act,' the statement said.
Guardian Australia understands that the same selection process was used in 2022 for the previous biennale in which First Nations artist Archie Moore was picked to represent Australia.
Moore went on to win the Golden Lion at the event - becoming the first ever Australian to win the prestigious award.
Sabsabi has previously won numerous accolades for his work, and has exhibited dozens of major works at events in Australia and abroad.
Creative Australia declined to comment.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New Statesman
3 hours ago
- New Statesman
Australia is no model for assisted dying
Photo by Kelly Barnes / AAP Image via Alamy Australian laws on voluntary assisted dying (VAD) are deemed so similar to the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill that three quarters of overseas witnesses invited to give evidence to MPs were from Australia. 'This is not a revolutionary law reform,' Alex Greenwich, a politician from New South Wales, told the bill's scrutiny committee earlier this year. 'It has been tried and tested, we have appropriate safeguards in place throughout Australia, and they work.' Although Australian states extend the six-month life expectancy requirement to a year for those with neurodegenerative conditions, in terms of eligibility, process and safeguards, their laws are similar to the UK's bill. The two differ only in that self-administration of life-ending drugs would be permitted here, and a multidisciplinary panel would review cases. So when Kim Leadbeater, Labour MP and the bill's sponsor, responded with a heart emoji and '#ChoiceAtTheEndOfLife' to a Guardian article published on 7 June that showed the Australian system being abused, eyebrows were raised. An elderly couple had been granted VAD when neither were terminally ill; medics in New South Wales effectively greenlit their suicide pact. 'Looks like the safeguards didn't work,' Mark Taubert, an NHS consultant and the vice-president of the European Association for Palliative Care, responded on X. According to the palliative care doctor Rachel Clarke, the story 'could not highlight more starkly the dangers of the law we are currently debating'. MPs hearing evidence on the bill had little time with six Australian witnesses, all of whom were supportive of VAD. Their arguments didn't always stand up to scrutiny. 'The medications are completely effective. I have not experienced any failures,' said Chloe Furst, a palliative care doctor from South Australia and board member of Voluntary Assisted Dying Australia and New Zealand. But, MPs pointed out, there is no requirement that a doctor be present when someone self-administers, nor is there provision for reporting complications. In Western Australia, where this information is collected, complications were recorded in 4.3 per cent of deaths in 2023-24. Asked if it was a concern that a 'large proportion of people who opted for assisted dying cited being a burden as their reason', another witness, Meredith Blake from the University of Western Australia, replied this was 'not the evidence that we have got'. Except it is. Official state figures showed 35 per cent of those seeking VAD cited being a burden on family, friends or carers as their reason for doing so. Blake replied: 'If there are people who are saying they are a burden, that does not mean that their decision is not voluntary.' While MPs were told Australian palliative care doctors had 'embraced' VAD, I have spoken with medics in Australia who are troubled by how the legislation operates. Academics and politicians are, too. Robert Clark, a former attorney-general and MP in Victoria wrote to the committee twice with his observations: the second time after his fellow Australians had addressed MPs. Numerous aspects of their evidence were 'factually incorrect or incomplete', Clark claimed. There was not adequate palliative care available to all terminally ill patients in Australia. Evidence didn't show any reduction in non-medically assisted suicide. The right of doctors to object to VAD was not respected. Many doctors 'feel unable to raise concerns about VAD… lest they suffer adverse professional or career consequences, or else they are leaving the hospital system altogether', he said. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe British palliative care doctor Alex Hughes recently relayed his experience of assisted dying while working in Australia. Hughes, who is neutral on VAD in principle, described a borderline case in which it seemed the patient had chosen to die because of poor alternative care options. In another, he suspected the man may have been influenced by depression, but this had gone unexplored in assessment. Were assisted dying to come to the UK, doctors would be 'at a heightened risk of unconscious bias… [and] may lean towards giving patients the 'benefit of the doubt', granting assisted dying to individuals who, in reality, have more than six months to live.' The events described in the Guardian confirm that risk is not merely hypothetical. Ahead of its return to the Commons on 13 June, 1,000 doctors urged MPs to vote against the assisted dying bill. They argued it is 'deeply flawed' and unsafe. Similar statements have been made by the Royal College of Physicians and the Royal College of Psychiatrists, which say they cannot support the legislation as it stands. Such concerns are not 'noise', as Leadbeater has suggested. Many critics have no issue with the principle of safe VAD. But the passage of the bill has revealed law-making at its worst: rushed debate, the views of the vulnerable ignored or downplayed, and crucial information on how the bill would work absent. Supporters say there will be time to iron out details later. That is too risky. Under current plans, some vulnerable people will be helped – in Hughes's words – to have 'an inappropriate assisted death'. He now poses two critical questions for MPs: how many vulnerable people slipping through the net is acceptable? And can adequate safeguards be put in place 'without creating a system so cumbersome that it becomes unworkable'? It's time for MPs to be honest with themselves and the public: enabling some an autonomous death through assisted dying will inevitably put others at risk of harm. [See also: Has any Chancellor faced a challenge this daunting?] Related


Graziadaily
4 hours ago
- Graziadaily
All The Amazing Filming Locations In 'The Survivors', Netflix's New Thriller
There's nothing like a tense murder mystery to keep us glued to our screens, and Netflix's new crime series, The Survivors, has filled the gap in our TV schedules. If you haven't heard of The Survivors, the Australian drama flicks between the past and the present to tell the story of a coastal town, Evelyn Bay, that has been rocked with tragic deaths. The show is based on a bestselling novel by Jane Harper, and follows the story of Kieran Elliot, played by Charlie Vickers, as he returns to his hometown 15 years after losing his brother at sea in a storm. But on arriving back, he is met with another tragedy - a girl's body discovered on the beach. But alongside its twisty-turny storyline, something else has struck viewers: the gorgeous filming location. Think golden beaches, mysterious caves and rocky cliffs. Yerin Ha, who stars in the show, recently shared an Instagram post featuring some of the beautiful filming locations. As Ha's Instagram post suggests, the show was mostly filmed in Tasmania, but the production used several different locations to bring the action to life. Evelyn Bay is an entirely fictional town, which meant the crew has to get creative about where they filmed the series. Speaking with Tudum, Tony Ayres, the creator of The Survivors, said 'Evelyn Bay doesn't actually exist. Jane [Harper] made it up out of a number of different place.' The town of Evelyn Bay is bought to life through locations around Hobart, which is the capital city of Tasmania. Hobart has an urban landscape with a small population that strikes the right balance between nature and city, which the crew thought was perfect for the story. The Survivors. Cr. Courtesy of Netflix © 2025 ©Netflix Ayres told Tudum: 'Big emotions play out in this big landscape. That's why Tasmania works so well.' The eerie, remote locations, menacing cliffs and underpopulated areas work to represent the dangers the characters face, and adds to the sense of mystery that shrouds the town. According to Netflix's' Tudum, filming also took place at Eaglehawk Neck. Eaglehawk Neck is a small village which is about a 77km drive from Hobart, and hosts an impressive rocky shoreline. The Survivors. Cr. Courtesy of Netflix © 2025 ©Netflix Tony Ayres said that Eaglehawk Neck has 'such a gothic landscape. It's cliffs and sea caves and this pounding ocean. It really is so spectacular.' In another interview with Variety, Ayres explained why Eagle Hawk was the perfect place to film the show. 'It became very clear once we found Eagle Hawk Neck and the spectacular landscapes that the locations were going to be crucial to not just the tone of the show, but the themes of the show,' he told the outlet, adding that the landscape became integral to the story. 'We peppered the series all the way through with images from this sort of sense of foreboding that you have when you're standing on those cliff tops and seeing the caves and the ocean, the ferocity of the ocean, all of those things felt absolutely that they became emblematic of the storm, but also they felt metaphoric for the themes of the series,' he said. Alongside Eagle Hawk, some of the beach scenes were done at Freycinet Peninsula, which is part of Freycinet National Park and a place of great natural beauty. The area consists of dramatic mountain ranges and rocky cliffs which are integral to the show's atmosphere. One of these locations is Great Oyster Bay, which has breathtaking views of Schouten Island and the Hazards mountain range. Along with Tasmania, filming for The Survivors also took place in Docklands Studios in Melbourne. This location was mostly used for the interior shots, which allowed the crew to have more control over their environments. The studio is kitted out with six stages including two with waterproof pits, making it an ideal location for recreating the shows at-sea scenes. Alice Hall is the Staff Writer at Grazia UK. She was previously a Junior Features Writer for The Daily Telegraph. At Grazia, she writes news and features about pop culture, dating, health, politics and interiors.


Scottish Sun
6 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Reality show crossover as UK fan-favourite is secretly dating Australian multi-millionaire TV icon after co-star split
The multi-millionaire recently sold his home for an impressive sum stars align Reality show crossover as UK fan-favourite is secretly dating Australian multi-millionaire TV icon after co-star split THERE'S been a reality crossover as a UK fan-favourite star is secretly dating an Australian multi-million TV icon, after splitting from her co-star. Ruby Adler joined the cast of Made In Chelsea back in 2020 as Reza Amiri-Garroussi's girlfriend. Advertisement 7 There's been a reality crossover as a UK fan-favourite star is secretly dating an Australian multi-million TV icon, after splitting from her co-star Credit: E4 7 Ruby hasn't had the best luck in love, after splitting from long-term boyfriend Reza Credit: E4 7 Ruby has moved on with another reality star - Australian real estate agent Gavin Rubinstein from Luxe Listings Sydney Credit: Getty 7 Gavin is a very successful real estate agent and is best known for the show he's on, which made its debut on Amazon Prime in 2021 Credit: Getty Fans will know that the pair had a very rocky relationship, and the couple, who dated on-and-off for 10 years, called it quits for good in 2022. Now, Ruby has moved on with another reality star - Australian real estate agent Gavin Rubinstein from Luxe Listings Sydney. A source told The Sun: 'They met a few months back and have been on a string of dates since - including a trip to LA where they watched the Lakers play.' Ruby's rep had no comment when approached by The Sun. Advertisement Gavin is a very successful real estate agent and is best known for the show he's on, which made its debut on Amazon Prime in 2021. The show sees Gavin, alongside other agents Simon Cohen and D'Leanne Lewis, trading some of the most exclusive properties in Sydney. Recently, the real estate reality star made a big profit after selling his Sydney home for $8million. Meanwhile, Ruby hasn't had the best luck in love, after splitting from long-term boyfriend Reza, and then dating convicted drug dealer Nicholas Sinclair, after his release from prison last year. Advertisement Ruby and Nicholas ended their relationship, and on MIC, she broke down, saying she wishes "the best for him". Made In Chelsea star Ruby Adler opens up about family heartbreak as she plans to raise awareness on E4 show Nicholas is now dating OnlyFans model Jemma Lucy, and they often share racy photos together. It was also revealed that Ruby had a "secret fling" with All Stars winner Tom Clare, and the two were messaging just hours before he entered the Love Island villa back in January. A source said at the time: "Tom and Ruby were seeing each other for several weeks before he went on Love Island All Stars. Advertisement "After Tom slid into her DMs, they met up in person and started dating, with Ruby often staying over at Tom's place." Tom is now dating Molly Smith, with the pair winning Love Island All Stars last year. 7 Ruby and her new man have enjoyed a trip to LA together Credit: Instagram/@rubyadler 7 They've also been to watch the Lakers play Credit: Instagram/@g_rubinstein Advertisement