'Spread the Love' calling for volunteers
Feb. 4—LIMA — Aaron Poling, of Friends of Lima, came to the Lima Municipal Building on Tuesday to offer volunteers to "Spread the Love," a new program to donate meals to children in Lima.
Laurie Camper, public relations director for the program run by Faith Christian Church, said the program would be a small step toward lowering the 20 percent of Lima children who are hungry.
"They don't know where their next meal is coming from," she said. "So we want to provide some nice sack meals for them for after school with a peanut butter and jelly sandwich, apple sauce, a drink and a cookie to help fill their tummies."
City councilman Derry Glenn said since the Cheryl Allen Community Center closed down three years ago, the number of hungry children has risen in the city.
"I wish I could take it down to zero every year, but it's a win-win for us to be involved with the church here to help out these kids," he said. "We ask that everyone in our community steps up. We always show our hometown pride and we need to get ready to go out and help one another in this community."
The program could have all the peanut butter and jelly in the world, but Camper said it is still in need of volunteers to make sandwiches and drive vans to deliver the meals to children throughout the sixth ward.
"People need to know that it's a very simple job," she said. "We have a van that's marked as the 'Spread the Love' van. You just need to be an adult driver with a good record and we will do a background check. Even if you're just a single driver, we can pair you with another to go out on delivery day to play music and hand out sandwiches to the kids."
Camper said keeping kids fed, even after school, is important for the learning process.
"No learning happens, no character building happens, nothing happens when they're hungry," she said. "And if they're in school or coming home from school and they're hungry, there are no more lessons they can learn unless they have a full belly. If they're not fed, they can't learn to be good, responsible young men and women who grow into responsible adults."
The program will deliver meals from 4 p.m. to dark starting Friday, Feb. 7 in the sixth ward.
For more information on volunteering or donating, visit bit.ly/40CMoio.
Reach Jacob Espinosa at 567-242-0399.
Featured Local Savings
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Clearlake's Feliciano Sees Slower Private Equity Growth Over Next Decade
Clearlake Capital Group co-founder José Feliciano explains why he expects slower growth in private equity over the next decade and why private credit is "well positioned" for retail investors. He speaks with Dani Burger at Bloomberg's Global Credit Forum in Los Angeles
Globe and Mail
12 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
'Operational Friction': Warner Bros Discovery Stock (NASDAQ:WBD) Jumps as Some Worry About the Split's Impact
Entertainment giant Warner Bros. Discovery (WBD) recently made a move that was, seemingly, inevitable: to take its linear cable content and spin it off from its streaming video content and put the two packages into their own operations. And investors were over the moon about this, and remain so today. Not everyone is so certain this idea will work, though. But shareholders were definitely on board, and sent Warner shares up nearly 4% in Tuesday afternoon's trading. Confident Investing Starts Here: Easily unpack a company's performance with TipRanks' new KPI Data for smart investment decisions Receive undervalued, market resilient stocks right to your inbox with TipRanks' Smart Value Newsletter Barclays analyst Kannan Venkateshwar, who has nearly a five-star rating on TipRanks, noted that the move may produce 'operational friction,' especially given how some of these operations may need to be restructured from the ground up to separate. Venkateshwar pointed out that Max is actually bundled with Warner's linear content, so separating the linear content from the streaming content would likely require those bundles to be reworked as well. Moreover, the separation also fails to address the matter of $37 billion in outstanding debt that Warner still carries. Warner is putting the linear stuff into the hands of Chief Financial Officer Gunnar Wiedenfels, who noted that 'global networks' would have most of Warner's debt. The streaming and studios business, meanwhile, would maintain a smaller, '…but not insignificant…' portion therein. And Then the Bondholders Saw the Bag They Were Holding One more problem emerged out of the Warner split: bondholders. Three years ago, Warner sold what was one of the biggest 'high-grade corporate bonds on record,' reports noted. Now, those who bought in are left with a disastrous choice. Warner is buying back up to 40% of those bonds, thanks to a $17.5 billion bridge loan. But no matter whether holding or selling, the bondholders now have a bigger problem. Part of the condition of selling, reports note, is the loss of 'key safeguards' on other Warner securities they might own. But those who keep the notes to keep those safeguards will find their position in the creditor line pushed back should that become an issue later on. Cooperation pacts, the reports note, will also be tougher to form, meaning that bondholders that actually keep their debt will have fewer protections overall. Is WBD Stock a Good Buy? Turning to Wall Street, analysts have a Moderate Buy consensus rating on WBD stock based on nine Buys and eight Holds assigned in the past three months, as indicated by the graphic below. After a 18.53% rally in its share price over the past year, the average WBD price target of $12.43 per share implies 25.3% upside potential. See more WBD analyst ratings Disclosure Disclaimer & Disclosure Report an Issue
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump aides want Texas to redraw its congressional maps to boost the GOP. What would that mean?
This coverage is made possible through Votebeat, a nonpartisan news organization covering local election administration and voting access. Sign up for Votebeat Texas' free newsletters here. Republicans representing Texas in Congress are considering this week whether to push their state Legislature to take the unusual step of redrawing district lines to shore up the GOP's advantage in the U.S. House. But the contours of the plan, including whether Gov. Greg Abbott would call a special session of the Legislature to redraw the maps, remain largely uncertain. The idea is being driven by President Donald Trump's political advisers, who want to draw up new maps that would give Republicans a better chance to flip seats currently held by Democrats, according to two GOP congressional aides familiar with the matter. That proposal, which would involve shifting GOP voters from safely red districts into neighboring blue ones, is aimed at safeguarding Republicans' thin majority in Congress, where they control the lower chamber, 220-212. The redistricting proposal, and the Trump team's role in pushing it, was first reported by The New York Times Monday. Without a Republican majority in Congress, Trump's legislative agenda would likely stall, and the president could face investigations from newly empowered Democratic committee chairs intent on scrutinizing the White House. Here's what we know about the plan so far: On Capitol Hill, members of the Texas GOP delegation huddled Monday night to discuss the prospect of reshaping their districts. Most of the 25-member group expressed reluctance about the idea, citing concerns about jeopardizing their districts in next year's midterms if the new maps overextended the GOP's advantage, according to the two GOP aides, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss the private deliberations. Rep. Jodey Arrington, R-Lubbock, was skeptical of the idea. 'We just recently worked on the new maps,' Arrington told The Texas Tribune. To reopen the process, he said, 'there'd have to be a significant benefit to our state.' The delegation has yet to be presented with mockups of new maps, two aides said. Each state's political maps must be redrawn once a decade, after each round of the U.S. census, to account for population growth and ensure every congressional and legislative district has roughly the same number of people. Texas lawmakers last overhauled their district lines in 2021. There's no federal law that prohibits states from redrawing district maps midcycle, said Justin Levitt, an election law professor at Loyola Marymount University and a former deputy assistant attorney general in the Department of Justice's civil rights division. Laws around the timing to redraw congressional and state district maps vary by state. In Texas, the state constitution doesn't specify timing, so the redrawing of maps is left to the discretion of the governor and the Legislature. Lawmakers gaveled out of their 140-day regular session last week, meaning they would need to be called back for a special session to change the state's political maps. Abbott has the sole authority to order overtime sessions and decide what lawmakers are allowed to consider. A trial is underway in El Paso in a long-running challenge to the state legislative and congressional district maps Texas drew after the 2020 U.S. Census. If Texas redraws its congressional maps, state officials would then ask the court to toss the claims challenging those districts 'that no longer exist,' Levitt said. The portion of the case over the state legislative district maps would continue. If the judge agrees, then both parties would have to file new legal claims for the updated maps. It isn't clear how much maps could change, but voters could find themselves in new districts, and Levitt said redrawing the lines in the middle of the redistricting cycle is a bad idea. 'If the people of Texas think that their representatives have done a bad job, then when the [district] lines change, they're not voting on those representatives anymore,' Levitt said. 'New people are voting on those representatives.' The National Democratic Redistricting Committee, Democrats' national arm for contesting state GOP mapmaking, said the proposal to expand Republicans' stronghold in Texas was 'yet another example of Trump trying to suppress votes in order to hold onto power.' 'Texas's congressional map is already being sued for violating the Voting Rights Act because it diminishes the voting power of the state's fast-growing Latino population,' John Bisognano, president of the NDRC said. 'To draw an even more extreme gerrymander would only assure that the barrage of legal challenges against Texas will continue.' When Republicans in charge of the Legislature redrew the district lines after the 2020 census, they focused on reinforcing their political support in districts already controlled by the GOP. This redistricting proposal would likely take a different approach. As things stand, Republicans hold 25 of the state's 38 congressional seats. Democrats hold 12 seats and are expected to regain control of Texas' one vacant seat in a special election this fall. Most of Texas' GOP-controlled districts lean heavily Republican: In last year's election, 24 of those 25 seats were carried by a Republican victor who received at least 60% of the vote or ran unopposed. The exception was U.S. Rep. Monica De La Cruz, R-Edinburg, who captured 57% of the vote and won by a comfortable 14-point margin. With little competition to speak of, The Times reported, Trump's political advisers believe at least some of those districts could bear the loss of GOP voters who would be reshuffled into neighboring, Democratic-held districts — giving Republican hopefuls a better chance to flip those seats from blue to red. The party in control of the White House frequently loses seats during midterm cycles, and Trump's team is likely looking to offset potential GOP losses in other states and improve the odds of holding on to a narrow House majority. Incumbent Republicans, though, don't love the idea of sacrificing a comfortable race in a safe district for the possibility of picking up a few seats, according to GOP aides. In 2003, after Texas Republicans initially left it up to the courts to draw new lines following the 2000 census, then-U.S. House Majority Leader Tom DeLay, a Sugar Land Republican, embarked instead on a bold course of action to consolidate GOP power in the state. He, along with his Republican allies, redrew the lines as the opening salvo to a multistate redistricting plan aimed at accumulating power for his party in states across the country. Enraged by the power play, Democrats fled the state, depriving the Texas House of the quorum it needed to function. The rebels eventually relented under threat of arrest, a rare power in the Texas Constitution used to compel absent members back to return to Austin when the Legislature is in session. The lines were then redrawn, cementing the GOP majority the delegation has enjoyed in Washington for the past two decades. However, what's at play this time is different than in the early 2000s, when Republicans had a newfound majority in the Legislature and had a number of vulnerable Democratic incumbents they could pick off. Now, Republicans have been entrenched in the majority for decades and will have to answer the question of whether there's really more to gain, said Kareem Crayton, the vice president of the Brennan Center for Justice's Washington office. 'That's the tradeoff. You can do that too much so that you actually make them so competitive that the other side wins,' Crayton said. 'That's always a danger.' Texas Republicans are planning to reconvene Thursday to continue discussing the plan, according to Rep. Beth Van Duyne, R-Irving, and Rep. Wesley Hunt, R-Houston, who said they will attend the meeting. Members of Trump's political team are also expected to attend, according to Hunt and two GOP congressional aides familiar with the matter. Natalia Contreras is a reporter for Votebeat in partnership with the Texas Tribune. She's based in Corpus Christi. Contact Natalia at ncontreras@ Disclosure: New York Times has been a financial supporter of The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization that is funded in part by donations from members, foundations and corporate sponsors. Financial supporters play no role in the Tribune's journalism. Find a complete list of them here. Big news: 20 more speakers join the TribFest lineup! New additions include Margaret Spellings, former U.S. secretary of education and CEO of the Bipartisan Policy Center; Michael Curry, former presiding bishop and primate of The Episcopal Church; Beto O'Rourke, former U.S. Representative, D-El Paso; Joe Lonsdale, entrepreneur, founder and managing partner at 8VC; and Katie Phang, journalist and trial lawyer. Get tickets. TribFest 2025 is presented by JPMorganChase.
