Far-right ex-professor condemned for instigating main opposition leader's assassination
A Christian group said Tuesday it has filed a criminal complaint against a former seminary professor who wrote on Facebook that he "wishes for the success of plans to assassinate Lee Jae-myung," leader of main opposition Democratic Party of Korea.
In the complaint filed by the Christian Recovery Center, an affiliate of left-leaning Christian media platform Peace Tree, So Gi-cheon, a former seminary professor of the Presbyterian University and Theological Seminary, is accused of instigating murder and inciting insurrection.
So wrote the controversial remarks wishing for Lee's assassination on his Facebook page March 12, in which he also called for a death penalty against Lee for supposed insurrection. He has since deleted the post on the plans to assassinate Lee.
The retired professor has been sharing far-right views on Facebook, including hate comments against progressives and LGBTQ+ community. In another post on March 7, he urged suspended President Yoon Suk Yeol to immediately declare martial law again. Yoon is currently on trial for impeachment while also facing criminal trial on charges of leading an insurrection and abuse of power for his Dec. 3 declaration of martial law, and cannot declare martial law as his presidential authority is suspended following his Dec. 14 parliamentary impeachment.
"(So's comments) can be regarded as an act instigating people who do not support Lee to murder him, or possibly to assist in murdering him," the center said. Concerning So's post calling for Yoon to declare martial law again, the center said So was suggesting the military should be mobilized just as during Yoon's Dec. 3 botched attempt to declare military rule on the country -- in other words, So was inciting another insurrection.
So's comments have sparked criticism even from students of his former school.
A student group from the university, the Social Missionary Group, released a statement on March 20, criticizing him for acting against the teachings of the Bible. "He used to abuse his position as professor to force students to write political statements, and now he is wishing for the murder of a politician that he opposes," the group said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Korea Herald
11 hours ago
- Korea Herald
Lee Jae-myung picks vice ministers for finance, foreign affairs, industry
President Lee Jae-myung on Tuesday filled six vice ministerial posts to pursue a speedy recovery from the economic crisis, ahead of his departure for Canada to attend the G7 summit next week. The nomination was aimed at safeguarding national interests by quickly deploying human resources amid economic recession in Asia's fourth-largest economy, the presidential office said. According to Lee's office, Lee named Lee Hyoung-il, commissioner of Statistics Korea, as the first vice finance minister. Lim Ki-keun, administrator of the Public Procurement Service, will serve as the second vice minister of the Ministry of Economy and Finance. Two vice-minister posts at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs were also filled. Park Yoon-joo, minister of the mission of South Korea to ASEAN, and Kim Jin-a, dean of the language and diplomacy division at Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, will serve as the first and second vice ministers at the Foreign Ministry, respectively. Moon Shin-hak, spokesperson of the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, was nominated as the first vice minister of trade, industry and energy. Yeo Han-koo was also reinstated as the minister of trade, a vice-ministerial position. He served in the same position from 2021 to 2022 under the former liberal Moon Jae-in administration. Vice ministers in South Korea do not require a confirmation hearing at the National Assembly before their appointment to the posts. "We promise to restore the administration that suffered a rupture after (former President Yoon Suk Yeol's) insurrection in a speedy manner," Lee's spokesperson Kang Yu-jung said. "We will create a government capable of overcoming the (aftermath of) global protectionism." Meanwhile, the presidential office announced that public access to Cheong Wa Dae will be partially restricted from July 16 to 31 and fully suspended starting August, as preparations for relocating the presidential office from Yongsan back to the historic compound in central Seoul begin. The move marks a reversal of former President Yoon Suk Yeol's 2022 decision to vacate the site. Public visits to Cheong Wa Dae will resume once President Lee's office completes the transition. The presidential office added that Seoul has secured a budget of 25.9 billion won ($18.9 million) for the relocation procedures.
Korea Herald
13 hours ago
- Korea Herald
Yoon, wife to face special counsel probes
577 prosecutors, investigators allotted to look into ex-first couple President Lee Jae-myung's Cabinet on Tuesday passed bills to open three special counsel investigations into former President Yoon Suk Yeol and his wife Kim Keon Hee. The bills are intended to "end the insurrection" that the Lee administration and the ruling Democratic Party of Korea accuse Yoon of instigating with his short-lived martial law decree on Dec. 3, 2024. At the second Cabinet meeting since Lee took office last week, the Democratic Party-led bills passed into law to bring together 577 prosecutors and investigators in total to investigate the former first couple. The combined size of the legal teams involved in the investigations is comparable to a district attorney's office. With Tuesday's passage, a special counsel investigation will look into if Yoon committed either insurrection or treason by trying to impose martial law. Yoon declared martial law late in the evening of Dec. 3, only to lift it six hours later following a National Assembly resolution that opposed it. The Democratic Party contends that Yoon attempted to provoke military action from North Korea with his hawkish policies to lay the groundwork for the declaration of martial law. Yoon's Ministry of National Defense playing anti-Kim Jong-un regime broadcasts along the inter-Korean borders from June 2024 was one example of the former administration deliberately seeking military confrontation with North Korea, according to the Democratic Party. Before their resumption last year, the border broadcasts had been used by the South Korean military as a psychological warfare tactic in the past, before they were halted in 2018 under then-President Moon Jae-in. The Democratic Party also claims that Yoon sent drones across the border into North Korea in October 2024, echoing Pyongyang's accusations that the South Korean military was behind the alleged drone infiltration. Yoon allegedly attempting to instigate an armed conflict with North Korea in the run-up to his martial law decree qualifies as "treason," the Democratic Party claimed, on top of being a "rebellion against the Constitution, which is to say, insurrection." Yoon's wife Kim is set to face a separate special counsel investigation that will scrutinize allegations she was involved in the then-ruling People Power Party's nomination of candidates for a National Assembly seat in the 2022 by-election. Another special counsel investigation would revisit the death of a Marine in July 2023. Cpl. Chae Su-geun, 20, died when he was swept away in moving water during a search and rescue operation to locate flood victims in a rain-swollen river in Yecheon, North Gyeongsang Province. The Democratic Party says Yoon's presidential office tried to impede the preliminary probe into Chae's death at the time to cover up possible wrongdoing at the top. Special counsels will be given as long as 170 days to investigate Yoon and his wife. Yoon was removed from office on April 4 in a unanimous ruling by the Constitutional Court over the martial law debacle, leading South Korea to hold an early presidential election on June 3.
Korea Herald
13 hours ago
- Korea Herald
Where do Korean celebrities stand in politics?
In politically charged Korea, celebrities walk tightrope of neutrality Following South Korea's presidential election on June 3, a seemingly innocuous act by one of the nation's most celebrated actresses ignited a storm. Actress Song Hye-kyo pressed 'like' on now President-elect Lee Jae-myung's then-election campaign video on his HR policy. The simple gesture came under fire, drawing fierce backlash from those accusing her of breaking an unspoken rule: Celebrities in South Korea must remain politically neutral — or even near-total political abstinence. The controversy underscores a long-standing tension in Korean pop culture, where public figures in the fields of entertainment and culture are expected to suppress even the slightest hint of political affiliation. During the June election, numerous celebrities, from K-pop idols to comedians, were compelled to apologize or explain their actions for reasons as mundane as wearing red or blue, the symbolic colors of the rival People Power Party and Democratic Party of Korea, respectively. In one widely discussed case, League of Legends esports team Gen.G abstained from their usual 'V for victory' gesture after setting a historic win streak, fearing it could be mistaken as a political statement for candidate No. 2, Kim Moon-soo. Similarly, popular figures like Karina of aespa, entertainer Hong Jin-kyung and rapper Beenzino faced criticism for wearing red clothing, widely associated with Kim's People Power Party during the campaign period. Others, like comedian Park Sung-kwang and actress Ahn So-hee, were accused of showing political bias simply by posting images with blue rooftops or red roses. This hyper-vigilant policing of neutrality has left many wondering: Why are Korean celebrities held to such extreme standards? Idol as 'cultural blank slate' 'Korean celebrities, particularly idols, are not merely entertainers. They are seen as projections of fan ideals — cultural blank slates,' said cultural critic Kim Heon-sik. 'This makes any personal expression — political or otherwise — subject to public interpretation and judgment.' The term "idol" in Korea has come to denote more than admiration. As The Independent put it, idols are expected to embody fan fantasies while remaining void of personal beliefs that may challenge that image. In this framework, political neutrality is not just preferred, it is mandatory. 'Fans don't see idols as individuals with agency. They are shaped, controlled and even owned — emotionally — by their followers. A 'like' on a campaign post can be perceived as betrayal if it's not in line with what the fan thinks,' Kim added. This leads to K-pop idols often avoiding using primary colors, hand gestures or even certain numbers during election periods. Some go so far as to post black-and-white photos to preempt controversy, a trend that was lauded as 'socially aware' during the most recent campaign. South Korea's hypersensitivity to political expression has deep historical roots. As a country marked by ideological division and rapid democratic transition, political affiliations have long carried career-altering consequences. Even now, expressing support for one party or another can result in social ostracism, economic repercussions or online attacks. Bae Sang-hoon, a sociology professor at Chungbuk University, explained, 'South Korea's political environment is emotionally charged, and people project these tensions onto public figures.' "The issue is compounded by the country's deepening culture of fan attachment. The emotional investment that fans place in idols, often described as 'parasocial relationships,' can blur the lines between admiration and control. That emotional ownership has only intensified as fans use celebrities as a proxy to process their own social anxieties," Bae added. Some observers suggest that intense attachment to celebrities serves, in part, as an emotional coping mechanism. 'In a highly competitive society, where people feel disconnected and under pressure, celebrities serve as emotional anchors,' Bae added. 'This can turn into a toxic dynamic when fans begin to expect moral purity and political conformity from people who are essentially strangers.' Calls are growing for a more mature fan culture — one that allows room for artists to engage as citizens without fear of professional ruin. But such a change will require a fundamental reevaluation of the role celebrities play in society and the emotional needs they are often expected to fulfill. 'If we want to continue celebrating the rise of K-pop and Korean soft power, we must also ask whether we are granting our stars the same freedoms we expect in a democratic society," said a 31-year-old surnamed Kim who is active in fandom activities.
