Scientists sound the alarm over concerning chemicals lurking in common products: 'They shouldn't be exposed in the first place'
One University of Michigan scientist says that per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, also known as "forever chemicals" or PFAS, can cause changes in cells that can lead to cancer, even at relatively low levels of exposure.
Jackie Goodrich, a research associate professor of environmental health sciences at UM's School of Public Health, has been assessing the effects of PFAS on firefighters, who are exposed to these chemicals in their uniforms and firefighting foams, and children.
Her work, which was summarized in the Toledo Blade, specifically focuses on how PFAS can cause changes within a human body cell. For instance, PFAS may deactivate tumor suppressor genes while also turning on genes that promote cancerous processes and cell growth, Goodrich said. They can also disrupt hormone signaling, harm cells, and modify the immune system.
In her studies on firefighters and newborns, Goodrich has observed such changes at exposure levels near the median for the U.S. population. Meanwhile, people who are more heavily exposed at their work or residence can experience PFAS levels that are around 50 to 500 times greater than what she has observed in firefighters, putting them at greater risk for "bigger, more dramatic changes," she said.
Goodrich's ongoing research adds to a growing knowledge base on the health impacts of PFAS. For example, one study found that exposure to PFAS can alter the expressions of certain genes within the brain. Another paper tied these chemicals to an increased risk of cardiovascular diseases in postmenopausal women.
Most Americans have been exposed to PFAS and have it in their blood, according to the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. For instance, one study found that more than 20% of Americans may be exposed to PFAS-laced tap water, and it can also be found in everyday household items like water-resistant clothing and non-stick cookware.
According to Goodrich, "It shouldn't be up to consumers and workers to have to avoid PFAS; they shouldn't be exposed in the first place."
Though the Blade article notes that PFAS can linger in the environment for thousands of years, scientists have identified a few ways to break them down in water. In fact, one University of Illinois team discovered a way to remove the full spectrum of PFAS from water in a single process.
In the meantime, governments have started to form legislation to reduce PFAS exposure. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, for example, estimates its plans will "reduce PFAS exposure for approximately 100 million people and prevent thousands of premature deaths, tens of thousands of serious illnesses, including cancers and liver and heart impacts in adults, and immune and developmental impacts to infants and children."
Do you worry about having toxic forever chemicals in your home?
Majorly
Sometimes
Not really
I don't know enough about them
Click your choice to see results and speak your mind.
You can help reduce your exposure by looking for PFAS-free brands, opting for nonstick cookware, and limiting your purchases of stain- or water-resistant clothing.
Join our free newsletter for weekly updates on the latest innovations improving our lives and shaping our future, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Talkiatry Chief Medical Officer and co-founder Dr. Georgia Gaveras, DO named to Modern Healthcare's 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives Class of 2025
NEW YORK, June 9, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- Talkiatry, a leading provider of high-quality, in-network psychiatry and therapy services, is proud to announce that co-founder and Chief Medical Officer Dr. Georgia Gaveras, DO has been recognized by Modern Healthcare as one of the 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives for 2025. Detailed profiles of all the honorees are featured in the June 9, 2025 issue of Modern Healthcare's magazine and online at This program honors licensed clinicians in executive roles who are recognized by the senior editors of Modern Healthcare and selected for their exceptional achievements in driving innovation, improving outcomes, serving their communities, and demonstrating exemplary leadership both within and beyond their organizations. "Becoming a clinician doesn't automatically prepare one for a leadership role, helping to guide an organization or an industry. The 50 clinicians chosen this year as the most influential, some newcomers and some we have recognized previously, are having an oversized impact," said Mary Ellen Podmolik, editor-in-chief of Modern Healthcare. "Their work is benefiting their own teams in terms of clinical advancements and financial results and is leading to better patient outcomes." With more than 600 licensed psychiatrists and 150+ therapists treating children, adults, and seniors for conditions including ADHD, anxiety, bipolar disorder, depression, OCD, and PTSD, Talkiatry has expanded to 47 states and reaches over 70% of commercially insured Americans through partnerships with more than 60 insurance providers, including Blue Cross Blue Shield, Aetna, United Healthcare, Cigna, and Humana. As access has increased, Talkiatry's dedication to high-quality care continues to lead to positive patient outcomes. In peer-reviewed clinical findings, two out of three patients saw their anxiety symptoms drop below clinically significant levels, and a similar portion experienced the same improvement with depression. Notably, one out of three patients achieved full remission in under 15-weeks. Among those who did not reach these thresholds, the vast majority still reported measurable improvement. Talkiatry is a physician-led practice where quality care comes first. Clinicians have the autonomy to make the best decisions for their patients, supported by structured clinical leadership, peer collaboration, and continuous education. To deliver these outcomes, Talkiatry has built an environment that prioritizes clinician support and sustainability. All clinicians receive structured onboarding, access to ongoing clinical education, and support from dedicated teams that handle scheduling, billing, and credentialing. Talkiatry is a community of like-minded, mission-driven peers. Through clinical chats, mentorship, grand rounds, and peer case consultations, the organization fosters connection, knowledge sharing, and a sense of belonging. "This recognition is a testament to the vital work the Talkiatry team is doing to expand access to high quality mental health care, regardless of a patient's geography or circumstance. Being named one of Modern Healthcare's 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives reinforces the importance of our mission, and I am incredibly grateful to be part of a movement that is transforming the way mental health care is delivered in this country." - Dr. Georgia Gaveras, Co-Founder & Chief Medical Officer, Talkiatry. For information or questions about the 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives program, please contact: MH Awards mhawards@ About Modern HealthcareModern Healthcare is the most trusted business news and information brand in the healthcare industry. Modern Healthcare empowers healthcare leaders and influencers to make timely and informed business decisions. To learn more or subscribe, go to About TalkiatryTalkiatry is a national mental health practice that provides in-network psychiatry and therapy. Co-founded by Robert Krayn and Georgia Gaveras, DO, Talkiatry is solving the core challenges patients and clinicians face in accessing and providing high-quality mental healthcare. With over 2 million patient visits delivered by a growing team of 600+ full-time psychiatrists and 150+ full-time therapists, Talkiatry is the largest dedicated psychiatry practice in the U.S. Our technology platform removes administrative burdens so clinicians can focus solely on patient care, resulting in strong clinical outcomes and significantly lower burnout. At Talkiatry, we're reimagining psychiatric care to be accessible, human, and responsible. Learn more at and follow us on LinkedIn, Facebook, and Instagram. Media Contactpress@ View original content to download multimedia: SOURCE Talkiatry Sign in to access your portfolio
2 hours ago
NIH scientists publish declaration criticizing Trump's deep cuts in public health research
WASHINGTON -- In his confirmation hearings to lead the National Institutes of Health, Jay Bhattacharya pledged his openness to views that might conflict with his own. 'Dissent," he said, 'is the very essence of science.' That commitment is being put to the test. On Monday, scores of scientists at the agency sent their Trump-appointed leader a letter titled the Bethesda Declaration, a frontal challenge to 'policies that undermine the NIH mission, waste public resources, and harm the health of Americans and people across the globe.' It says: "We dissent." In a capital where insiders often insist on anonymity to say such things publicly, more than 90 NIH researchers, program directors, branch chiefs and scientific review officers put their signatures on the letter — and their careers on the line. They went public in the face of a 'culture of fear and suppression' they say President Donald Trump's administration has spread through the federal civil service. 'We are compelled to speak up when our leadership prioritizes political momentum over human safety and faithful stewardship of public resources,' the declaration says. Named for the agency's headquarters location in Maryland, the Bethesda Declaration details upheaval in the world's premier public health research institution over the course of mere months. It addresses the abrupt termination of 2,100 research grants valued at more than $12 billion and some of the human costs that have resulted, such as cutting off medication regimens to participants in clinical trials or leaving them with unmonitored device implants. In one case, an NIH-supported study of multi-drug-resistant tuberculosis in Haiti had to be stopped, ceasing antibiotic treatment mid-course for patients. In a number of cases, trials that were mostly completed were rendered useless without the money to finish and analyze the work, the letter says. 'Ending a $5 million research study when it is 80% complete does not save $1 million,' it says, 'it wastes $4 million.' The four-page letter, addressed to Bhattacharya but also sent to Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and members of Congress who oversee the NIH, was endorsed by 250 anonymous employees of the agency besides the 92 who signed. Jenna Norton, who oversees health disparity research at the agency's National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, recently appeared at a forum by Sen. Angela Alsobrooks, D-Md., to talk about what's happening at the NIH. At the event, she masked to conceal her identity. Now the mask is off. She was a lead organizer of the declaration. 'I want people to know how bad things are at NIH," Norton told The Associated Press. The signers said they modeled their indictment after Bhattacharya's own Great Barrington Declaration of October 2020, when he was a professor at Stanford University Medical School. His declaration drew together likeminded infectious disease epidemiologists and public health scientists who dissented from what they saw as excessive COVID-19 lockdown policies and felt ostracized by the larger public health community that pushed those policies, including the NIH. 'He is proud of his statement, and we are proud of ours," said Sarah Kobrin, a branch chief at the NIH's National Cancer Institute who signed the Bethesda Declaration. As chief of the Health Systems and Interventions Research Branch, Kobrin provides scientific oversight of researchers across the country who've been funded by the cancer institute or want to be. But sudden cuts in personnel and money have shifted her work from improving cancer care research to what she sees as minimizing its destruction. "So much of it is gone — my work,' she said. The 21-year NIH veteran said she signed because 'I don't want to be a collaborator' in the political manipulation of biomedical science. Ian Morgan, a postdoctoral fellow with the National Institute of General Medical Sciences, also signed the declaration. 'We have a saying in basic science,' he said. 'You go and become a physician if you want to treat thousands of patients. You go and become a researcher if you want to save billions of patients. 'We are doing the research that is going to go and create the cures of the future,' he added. But that won't happen, he said, if Trump's Republican administration prevails with its searing cuts to grants. The NIH employees interviewed by the AP emphasized they were speaking for themselves and not for their institutes or the NIH. Employees from all 27 NIH institutes and centers gave their support to the declaration. Most who signed are intimately involved with evaluating and overseeing extramural research grants. The letter asserts that 'NIH trials are being halted without regard to participant safety' and that the agency is shirking commitments to trial participants who 'braved personal risk to give the incredible gift of biological samples, understanding that their generosity would fuel scientific discovery and improve health.' The Trump administration has gone at public health research on several fronts, both directly, as part of its broad effort to root out diversity, equity and inclusion values throughout the bureaucracy, and as part of its drive to starve some universities of federal money. This has forced 'indiscriminate grant terminations, payment freezes for ongoing research, and blanket holds on awards regardless of the quality, progress, or impact of the science,' the declaration says. Some NIH employees have previously come forward in televised protests to air grievances, and many walked out of Bhattacharya's town hall with staff. The declaration is the first cohesive effort to register agency-wide dismay with the NIH's direction. A Signal group became the place for participants to sort through NIH chatter on Reddit, discern rumor from reality and offer mutual support. The declaration took shape in that group and as word spread neighbor to neighbor in NIH offices. The dissenters remind Bhattacharya in their letter of his oft-stated ethic that academic freedom must be a lynchpin in science. With that in place, he said in a statement in April, 'NIH scientists can be certain they are afforded the ability to engage in open, academic discourse as part of their official duties and in their personal capacities without risk of official interference, professional disadvantage or workplace retaliation." Now it will be seen whether that's enough to protect those NIH employees challenging the Trump administration and him. 'There's a book I read to my kids, and it talks about how you can't be brave if you're not scared,' said Norton, who has three young children. "I am so scared about doing this, but I am trying to be brave for my kids because it's only going to get harder to speak up. 'Maybe I'm putting my kids at risk by doing this," she added. "And I'm doing it anyway because I couldn't live with myself otherwise.'
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
NIH scientists speak out over estimated $12 billion in Trump funding cuts
By Chad Terhune (Reuters) -Dozens of scientists, researchers and other employees at the U.S. National Institutes of Health issued a rare public rebuke Monday criticizing the Trump administration for major spending cuts that 'harm the health of Americans and people across the globe,' politicize research and 'waste public resources.' More than 60 current employees sent their letter to NIH director Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and members of Congress who oversee NIH. Bhattacharya is scheduled to testify Tuesday at the U.S. Senate appropriations committee about his agency's budget. Overall, more than 340 current and recently terminated NIH employees signed the letter, about 250 of them anonymously. In their letter, NIH staff members said the agency had terminated 2,100 research grants totaling about $9.5 billion and an additional $2.6 billion in contracts since President Donald Trump took office Jan. 20. The contracts often support research, from covering equipment to nursing staff working on clinical trials. These terminations "throw away years of hard work and millions of dollars" and put patient health at risk, the letter said. NIH clinical trials "are being halted without regard to participant safety, abruptly stopping medications or leaving participants with unmonitored device implants." Officials at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, which oversees NIH, didn't immediately respond to a request for comment. In prior remarks, Bhattacharya has pledged support for Kennedy's Make America Healthy Again agenda, and he has said that means focusing the federal government's "limited resources" directly on combating chronic diseases. At his Senate confirmation hearings in March, Bhattacharya said he would ensure scientists working at NIH and funded by the agency have the necessary resources to meet its mission. NIH is the world's largest public funder of biomedical research and has long enjoyed bipartisan support from U.S. lawmakers. The Trump administration has proposed cutting $18 billion, or 40%, from NIH's budget next year, which would leave the agency with $27 billion. Nearly 5,000 NIH employees and contractors have been laid off under Kennedy's restructuring of U.S. health agencies, according to NIH staff. Dr. Jenna Norton, a program director within NIH's division of kidney, urologic and hematologic diseases, was one of 69 current employees who signed the letter as of early Monday. She said speaking out publicly was worth the risk to her career and family. "I am much more worried about the risks of not speaking up," Norton said. "There are very real concerns that we're being asked to do likely illegal activities, and certainly unethical activities that breach our rules." About 20 NIH employees who were recently terminated as probationary workers or "subject to reductions in force" added their names to the letter. In the letter, Norton and other NIH employees asked Bhattacharya to restore grants that were delayed or terminated for political reasons, where officials ignored peer review to "cater to political whims." They wrote that Bhattacharya had failed to uphold his legal duty to spend congressionally appropriated funds. One program director at the NIH's National Cancer Institute, who asked not to be identified for fear of retaliation, said she has repeatedly been asked to cancel research grants for no valid reason and in violation of agency rules. She said she fears she could become the target of lawsuits from grantees challenging those decisions. Dr. Benjamin Feldman, a staff scientist and core director at NIH's Institute of Child Health and Human Development, said he and other researchers want to work with Bhattacharya on reversing the cuts and restoring the NIH as a "beacon for science around the world." "This is really a hit to the whole enterprise of biomedical research in the United States," Feldman said. Dr. Ian Morgan, a postdoctoral fellow at the NIH, signed the letter and said he has heard from university researchers about patients losing access to novel cancer treatments in clinical trials due to the uncertainty over NIH funding. He also worries about the long-term effect from gutting NIH's investment in basic science research that can lead to lifesaving treatments years later. The NIH employees, based in Bethesda, Maryland, named their dissent the "Bethesda Declaration," modeled after Bhattacharya's Great Barrington Declaration in 2020 that called on public health officials to roll back lockdowns during the COVID-19 pandemic. "Our hope is that by modeling ourselves after the Great Barrington Declaration that maybe he'll see himself in our dissent," Norton said.
