
DN Van Lines Founder Oded Carmi on the Hidden Hazards of Hiring the Wrong Moving Company
Every year, more than 15 million American households relocate, pursuing job opportunities, family changes, education, or simply a fresh start. But behind the logistics of packing boxes, hiring a mover, and setting up utilities, there's a lesser-known layer of complexity that can dramatically shape the outcome of a move.
Oded Carmi, founder and president of DN Van Lines , has spent over 20 years in the moving and storage industry. A respected voice in the field, Carmi is the immediate past president of the Massachusetts Movers Association , vice chair of the American Trucking Association's Moving & Storage Conference , and co-founder of IAM's U.S. Domestic Asset-Based Mover Group . He's been on the front lines of protecting consumers from one of the industry's most pressing threats: rogue movers.
These are the unlicensed, unscrupulous actors who exploit unsuspecting customers. "People think moving is just about boxes and tape. But it's much more than that. You're trusting someone with your wedding dress, photo albums, sensitive documents, high-priced painting maybe; essentially everything that makes up your life. And if you don't do your homework, that trust can be violated in ways you can't imagine," Carmi shares.
These rogue movers often pose as reputable companies, create polished websites, and offer bargain basement prices, only to subcontract the move, demand more money after pickup, or disappear entirely. "There are two big red flags: brokers and name spoofing," Carmi explains. "Brokers aren't actual moving companies. They sell your job to someone else, take a cut, and disappear. Then there's name spoofing, where a shady operator utilizes a name that can be confused with a well-known and reputable moving company. You think you're working with a brand you can trust, but you're actually giving your belongings to someone completely different, a fraudster."
He advises consumers to always check a mover's U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) number, a unique license identifier, and verify it on the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration ( FMCSA ) website. "It even shows you whether the company is an actual motor carrier [moving company] or just a broker," Carmi adds. Additionally, the FMCSA is offering resources through its Protect Your Move platform. "That DOT number is your best defense," Carmi says. "On the date of the move, make sure it matches the same on the truck that shows up. It is required to be displayed on both sides of the vehicle."
In 2024 alone, there were nearly 8,000 licensed interstate household goods carriers in the U.S., employing more than 200,000 people. But the industry's reputation is sadly undermined by a minority of bad actors , leading to lost property, broken trust, and mounting legal disputes.
Among the most alarming scams is the hostage load. Carmi shares, "This is when a mover picks up your shipment, then calls back saying it'll cost double and if you don't pay, they don't deliver. Legally, a licensed mover can only withhold delivery of your shipment if you refuse to pay up to 110% of the original quote if it's non-binding." The difference between a binding and a non-binding quote is that a binding quote is a fixed price and a non-binding quote can vary based on the weight of one's shipment.
Another common trick is switching from weight-based pricing to a volume-based one. "They'll tell you you're taking up 10 feet of truck space, then load 15 and demand more money. It's a bait-and-switch tactic," Carmi warns. The FMCSA requires that non-binding charges for all inter-state moves be based on weight, not volume.
The first question any consumer should ask is: Is this company a licensed mover with trucks, warehouses, and staff? "An asset-based moving company, such as DN Van Lines, owns its equipment, trains its crews, and maintains its warehouses. If someone doesn't have those basics, they're not handling your move, someone else is," Carmi explains.
This distinction is critical in both interstate and international moves. Interstate relocations are regulated by the FMCSA, while international moves fall under the Federal Maritime Commission (FMC). In both cases, Carmi stresses that regulations, while sometimes frustrating, are designed to protect consumers. "Sure, regulations cost money and create hurdles," he says. "But without them, any couple of guys with a rented truck can call themselves a moving company. And that puts the consumer at great risk."
Interstate moves are not regulated by the FMCSA or the FMC. Some states are regulated, requiring movers to be licensed and insured. Others are deregulated, offering little oversight. "If you're in a deregulated state, you need to be even more diligent. Licensure usually requires insurance, adherence to ethical standards, and public disclosure of rates. Without it, you're flying blind," Carmi states.
Carmi's prominent affiliation with various associations furthers his knowledge in the industry. "These associations are working tirelessly with legislators and regulators to crack down on fraudulent operators and educate the public," he says. "In fact, the ATA MSC was instrumental in getting the House of Representatives to declare May as National Moving Month, a time of the year that focuses on consumer education."
Founded in 2006, DN Van Lines was Carmi's response to the very problems that plague the industry today. "I didn't just want to start a business. I wanted to do it the right way," he says. With headquarters in Massachusetts and locations in Virginia and Florida, DN Van Lines handles everything from local household moves to long-distance relocations, government contracts, and international shipments. The company's distinguishing factors include a never-miss-a-move policy, a rigorously trained crew, wholly owned and GPS-tracked equipment, and a reputation for reliability built over two decades.
Carmi even sees the new trend post-COVID of virtual surveys instead of in-home estimates. That's not necessarily a red flag, he says, if done correctly. "Reputable companies will do video walkthroughs with you, ask the right questions, and give accurate estimates," he shares. "But don't skip the comparison process. Make sure every company you speak to has the same scope of work in mind so you can compare apples to apples."
So the next time someone is preparing for what's already one of life's most stressful events, Carmi suggests one final piece of advice: "I know it can be time-consuming, but it's important to think properly, research moving companies, and make a sensible decision. These aren't just items. They're pieces of your life. And they deserve more than an uneducated gamble; they deserve an intentional decision."

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Int'l Business Times
8 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
FBI Hounded for Epstein Files Update After Launching Tip Line to 'Protect Children' From Gender-Affirming Care: 'You Care More About Votes'
Social media users began relentlessly harassing the FBI, calling for the release of the agency's files on disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein after the bureau announced that it was looking for tips regarding gender-affirming care for children. The FBI took to X (formerly Twitter) on Monday to ask for such tips and other relevant information. "Help the FBI protect children. As the Attorney General has made clear, we will protect our children and hold accountable those who mutilate them under the guise of gender-affirming care. Report tips of any hospitals, clinics, or practitioners performing these surgical procedures on children at 1-800-CALL-FBI or the agency wrote. Users quickly pointed out the bureau's goal of protecting children, arguing that releasing the Epstein files would uphold that sentiment. "Seeing that Epstein files are still unreleased; I don't think the FBI actually cares about children's safety," wrote one user. "Here's a tip: investigate yourselves! Everyone from Epstein's client list is still walking free, with zero repercussions. You guys are NOT serious about protecting our children," another chided. "Right. Just like you helped the children on Epstein's island," one user said sarcastically. "You c***s are literally hiding the biggest pedophilia ring known to man, because it was rich people who bought the children. Kindly f*** off," one user added. "Have you thought of arresting high-profile pedophiles like Epstein's clients? Letting a certain group of pedos go solely because they are rich, famous people being used by our Deep State and the Mossad shouts that you care more about the ability to garner votes/favors than the welfare of the abused children," another wrote. "Good luck when you meet God and try to explain." The post from the FBI came on the second day of Pride Month, with the Trump administration having launched a crackdown on rights for LGBTQ+ youth, especially transgender individuals, since President Donald Trump's first day in office. "Health care for trans youth is just that — it's health care," Laurel Powell, a Human Rights Campaign spokesperson, said in a statement obtained by Axios. "Threatening to weaponize the FBI against American doctors who are following medical best practice would undermine parents who just want their children to thrive. There is no room for Donald Trump, the FBI or anyone else in the exam room," they continued. Originally published on Latin Times


Int'l Business Times
a day ago
- Int'l Business Times
Kristi Noem's 'Sanctuary' Cities List Taken Down After Police Org Condemned Her Department's 'Terrible Disservice' to Trump
The Department of Homeland Security, headed by Secretary Kristi Noem, removed a list of sanctuary cities and counties which it initially published in order to accuse local legislators of obstructing the Trump administration's mass deportation agenda. The National Sheriffs' Association, a group that consistently supports President Donald Trump, spoke out against the publication of the list on Saturday, calling it "arbitrary". "DHS has done a terrible disservice to President Trump and the Sheriffs of this country. The President's goals to reduce crime, secure the Borders, and make America safer have taken a step backward," the group's president, Sheriff Kieran Donahue of Canyon County, Idaho, said in a statement. "The sheriffs of this country feel betrayed." The association continued to state that the list was "created without any input, criteria for compliance, or mechanism for how to object to the designation." Noem shared the publication of the list last week, accusing representatives and officials of the included cities and counties of hampering federal law. "These sanctuary city politicians are endangering Americans and our law enforcement in order to protect violent criminal illegal aliens," Noem said at the time. "We are exposing these sanctuary politicians who harbor criminal illegal aliens and defy federal law. President Trump and I will always put the safety of the American people first. Sanctuary politicians are on notice: comply with federal law." Sanctuary city policies prevent local law enforcement officers from regularly checking in on people's immigration status, though undocumented immigrants are turned over to immigration authorities if they commit a felony. Trump has referred to these policies as "lawless insurrection" against the federal government, and called for a list of cities which had adopted such policies. While the list published by the DHS included cities which are known sanctuary cities, such as Boston, Chicago, New York City and Denver, it also included cities which had never adopted such policies. "The completion and publication of this list has not only violated the core principles of trust, cooperation, and partnership with fellow law enforcement, but it also has the potential to strain the relationship between Sheriffs and the White House administration," NSA's statement continued. "This decision by DHS could create a vacuum of trust that make takes years to overcome." Originally published on Latin Times


Int'l Business Times
a day ago
- Int'l Business Times
Solo Travelers Charged 'Significantly' More by Top Airlines Than Pair or Group Flyers: Report
A new report reveals that the nation's three largest airlines—Delta, United, and American—have been quietly charging solo travelers more than passengers who book in pairs or groups. While it wasn't found to be widespread across all routes, a Thrifty Traveler report discovered that on select one-way domestic flights, solo travelers are routinely paying significantly more—sometimes $80 or more—than if they had booked with another passenger. In several examples, prices for individual tickets dropped sharply when travelers searched for two or more seats, even on the same flight. United, for instance, charged $269 for a one-way ticket from Chicago to Peoria for one traveler, but just $181 per person when booking for two. Similar fare discrepancies were found on Delta and American flights. In many cases, booking with a second passenger also unlocked cheaper fare classes that were otherwise unavailable to solo travelers. Airfare experts say this is not a glitch but a deliberate pricing tactic rooted in "fare class segmentation." Airlines open specific buckets of discounted fares based on the number of seats requested. And in this case, it appears solo flyers are being steered into more expensive fare classes—likely because they're assumed to be less price-sensitive, such as business travelers expensing tickets to a company. Analysts suggest this may be a test run or limited rollout of a new pricing approach targeting perceived business travelers. It remains unclear how long it has been going on. Originally published on Latin Times