NATO not part of Ukraine peace talks
NATO is not involved in the US-mediated ceasefire negotiations between Russia and Ukraine, Secretary General Mark Rutte has said. He added that Ukraine's NATO membership has never been a part of a potential peace deal.
During an interview with Ukraine's New Voice published on Saturday, the NATO chief was asked if the bloc had any
'red lines'
in the negotiations to end the Ukraine conflict.
'We do not have our own red lines, because we are not part of that,'
Rutte said.
'We are not part, as NATO, of those negotiations. They are really driven by the US, together with Ukraine and the Russians. I'm glad that the US has broken the deadlock, that these talks are now ongoing,'
he added.
Rutte ruled out that NATO, as a bloc, could send peacekeepers to Ukraine.
'Probably it will not be NATO as such. That's not very likely,'
he said, adding that individual member states could dispatch troops on their own.
'That always means that it has an impact on NATO territory. It might have an impact on the defense of NATO territory also going forward.'
Several NATO members, including France, the UK, and Germany have floated proposals to deploy peacekeepers after a ceasefire is reached.
Read more
Trump rules out Ukraine joining NATO in exchange for rare earths
Rutte stressed that Ukraine's aspiration to join NATO has not been tied to the ongoing talks.
'It has never been promised to Ukraine that NATO membership will be part of a peace deal or a ceasefire,'
he said.
'These are two separate things, a peace deal and the long-term prospect.'
US President Donald Trump reiterated this week that Ukraine will
'never be a member of NATO.'
Russia has cited NATO's expansion eastward as one of the core reasons behind the conflict, and demanded that Ukraine drop its plans to join the alliance.
Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov has rejected the deployment of troops from NATO members in Ukraine in any capacity as unacceptable.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
5 hours ago
- Russia Today
Ukraine membership out of NATO summit statement
The prospect of Ukraine joining NATO will not be mentioned in the declaration at the bloc's summit later this month, Bloomberg has reported. Kiev has long sought to become a member of the US-led organization, an aim that Russia views as a threat to its national security. The one-page draft statement, which was seen by the outlet, focuses solely on NATO's spending goals, Bloomberg reported on Monday. The document could still be subject to change. The summit in The Hague will reportedly include only a dinner with the king of the Netherlands and a single working session. The 'brevity' of both the declaration and the gathering is reportedly designed to minimize potential public disagreements between US President Donald Trump and other NATO leaders. 'Notably absent from the statement is the prospect of Ukraine joining the military alliance,' Bloomberg wrote. Last year's military assistance pledge worth $45 billion will not be renewed either, the report added. In July 2024, then-Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg urged the bloc's members to make a multi-year commitment to keep providing military aid for Kiev. Annual spending across the bloc should have amounted to €40 billion ($45 billion) each year under that scheme. This year, NATO members are only expected to commit to allocating at least 3.5% of their GDP to defense by 2032 and to spend an additional 1.5% on protecting infrastructure and ensuring civil preparedness. The bloc is considering allowing its members to count military assistance to Kiev toward the spending goals, according to Bloomberg. NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte wants the summit to become a 'win' for Trump, who has repeatedly called on the bloc's members to spend at least 5% of their GDP on defense, Bloomberg reported, citing its sources. Earlier this month, AFP reported that NATO leaders would avoid discussing Ukraine's membership at the upcoming summit in a bid to alleviate tensions between the US and EU. The US president, who is seeking to facilitate a peace agreement between Russia and Ukraine, has ruled out the possibility of Kiev joining NATO. Russia views the military bloc's eastward expansion as a threat, and has cited it as one of the root causes of the Ukraine conflict. Russian officials have on numerous occasions stated that admitting Ukraine into the bloc would be crossing a red line and has insisted that the country remain neutral.
Russia Today
a day ago
- Russia Today
German intelligence chief claims Russia could attack NATO
Russia could attack NATO countries after the Ukraine conflict is over, Bruno Kahl, the head of the German foreign intelligence agency (BND), has claimed while defending the drive to boost defense spending. 'We are confident, and have the intelligence data that Ukraine is merely one step on [Russia's] path toward the West,' Kahl stated when asked why the Germans should agree to take on 'additional debt' to fund the rearmament program and potentially reintroduce conscription abolished in 2011. 'There are people in Moscow who no longer believe that NATO's Article 5 would be upheld — and they would like to put it to the test,' the spy chief said. He argued that Russia is skeptical about the US resolve to defend its allies and send American troops 'across the Atlantic to die for Tallinn, Riga, or Vilnius.' Russia could 'send little green men to Estonia' under the guise of protecting the Baltic state's Russian-speaking minority, Kahl claimed. Western media used the term 'little green men' to describe commandos sent to protect the residents of Crimea ahead of the 2014 referendum, in which the largely ethnic Russian region rejected the US-backed coup in Kiev and voted to secede from Ukraine and become a part of Russia. Kahl suggested that Russia's ultimate goal is to 'catapult NATO back to where it was in the late 1990s,' and push the US out of Europe. Moscow views the US-led alliance's expansion eastward as a threat, and has cited it as one of the root causes of the Ukraine conflict. President Vladimir Putin, however, said that Russia has no intention of attacking NATO states unless it is attacked first. Moscow also warned that Western military aid to Kiev de facto makes NATO 'a direct participant' in the conflict. Germany has ramped up its hostile rhetoric against Russia under new chancellor Friedrich Merz who said last month Ukraine could receive long-range Taurus cruise missiles. He also pledged to assist Ukraine in the production of its own long-range weapons. Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova has responded by accusing Germany of undermining the peace process.
Russia Today
a day ago
- Russia Today
Musk's father comments on son's spat with Trump (VIDEO)
Errol Musk has weighed in on the public feud between his son, Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk, and US President Donald Trump, telling reporters in Moscow that the two may yet find common ground. The dispute between Musk and Trump – once close allies – escalated last week over the president's so-called 'Big Beautiful' tax and spending bill. Musk, who recently stepped down as head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), had repeatedly criticized the bill, arguing it undermines his efforts to trim the fat off the federal budget. On Thursday, he accused Trump of 'ingratitude,' backed calls for his impeachment, and threatened to halt the US space program by grounding the Dragon spacecraft. Trump fired back, saying Musk had 'gone crazy' and blaming the spat on the end of what he called the 'EV mandate' – a reference to federal incentives that had benefited Tesla. Musk responded with a now-deleted post linking Trump to deceased financier and convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. Speaking to journalists in Moscow on Monday, where he was attending a tech forum, Errol Musk suggested that his son's strong response was rooted in principle, but added there may be room for compromise. 'I think Elon might agree to step down a little … because he's basically standing up for his principles,' the elder Musk said. Errol Musk said his son had backed the Trump administration, believing it would cut government spending, not increase it, and that the shift in direction left him frustrated, as it went against the values he had agreed to support. The 79-year-old pointed out that government policy often requires compromise and long-term thinking. 'In politics, sometimes you have to spend money on products you have yet to make, because that money later helps increase production. It's the laws of economics,' Errol Musk explained. He added that both men may now be taking a more mature view of the situation – and hinted that a thaw in relations could be possible.
