North Korea Denounces ‘Absurd' Denuclearization Pledge by US and Allies
North Korea's foreign ministry said on Tuesday that it will keep bolstering its nuclear force, denouncing a recent joint pledge by the United States, South Korea and Japan for its denuclearization, according to state media KCNA.
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, South Korean Foreign Minister Cho Tae-yul and Japanese Foreign Minister Iwaya Takeshi held talks on Saturday on the sidelines of a security conference in Munich and issued a statement, reaffirming their commitment to North Korea's complete denuclearization.
Pyongyang's foreign ministry criticized the countries for pursuing an "outdated, absurd" plan, warning against seeking what it called "foolish acts inciting collective hostility and conflicts."
"As long as the US and its vassal forces' hostile threat exists, the DPRK's nukes are means for defending peace and sovereignty and a means for legitimate self-defense entrusted by the constitution of the state," an unnamed ministry spokesperson said in a statement carried by KCNA, vowing to continue strengthening its nuclear force.
The spokesperson was referring to North Korea's formal name, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea.
South Korea's foreign ministry urged the North to cease its illicit weapons programs and return to the path to denuclearization.
"North Korea will never be recognized as a nuclear weapons state," ministry spokesperson Lee Jae-woong told a briefing. "We hope that they will realize that the development of nuclear weapons and missiles will only hinder their own security and economic development."
The three-way meeting was their first since the inauguration of US President Donald Trump, who held unprecedented summits with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un during his first term and has touted their personal rapport.
South Korean lawmakers, after being briefed by the National Intelligence Service, have said that Pyongyang's recent missile tests were in part intended to "show off its US deterrent assets and drawing Trump's attention."
Also in Seoul, South Korea's military said on Tuesday it has deployed a domestically developed new bunker buster missile named the Korean Tactical Surface to Surface Missile (KTSSM).
The missile - nicknamed Ure, which means thunder in Korean - is capable of conducting simultaneous, precision strikes in a short span of time against North Korea's long-range artillery systems that could threaten the greater Seoul area in the event of a contingency, the military said in a press release.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Asharq Al-Awsat
4 hours ago
- Asharq Al-Awsat
Trump Administration Weighs Adding 36 Countries to Travel Ban, Memo Says
US President Donald Trump's administration is considering significantly expanding its travel restrictions by potentially banning citizens of 36 additional countries from entering the United States, according to an internal State Department cable seen by Reuters. Earlier this month, the Republican president signed a proclamation that banned the entry of citizens from 12 countries, saying the move was needed to protect the United States against "foreign terrorists" and other national security threats. The directive was part of an immigration crackdown Trump launched this year at the start of his second term, which has included the deportation to El Salvador of hundreds of Venezuelans suspected of being gang members, as well as efforts to deny enrollments of some foreign students from US universities and deport others. In an internal diplomatic cable signed by U. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, the State Department outlined a dozen concerns about the countries in question and sought corrective action. "The Department has identified 36 countries of concern that might be recommended for full or partial suspension of entry if they do not meet established benchmarks and requirements within 60 days," the cable sent out over the weekend said. The cable was first reported by the Washington Post. Among the concerns the State Department raised was the lack of a competent or cooperative government by some of the countries mentioned to produce reliable identity documents, the cable said. Another was "questionable security" of that country's passport. Some countries, the cable said, were not cooperative in facilitating the removal of its nationals from the United States who were ordered to be removed. Some countries were overstaying the US visas their citizens were being granted. Other reasons for concern were the nationals of the country were involved in acts of terrorism in the United States, or antisemitic and anti-American activity. The cable noted that not all of these concerns pertained to every country listed. The State Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The countries that could face a full or a partial ban if they do not address these concerns within the next 60 days are: Angola, Antigua and Barbuda, Benin, Bhutan, Burkina Faso, Cabo Verde, Cambodia, Cameroon, Cote D'Ivoire, Democratic Republic of Congo, Djibouti, Dominica, Ethiopia, Egypt, Gabon, The Gambia, Ghana, Kyrgyzstan, Liberia, Malawi, Mauritania, Niger, Nigeria, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Sao Tome and Principe, Senegal, South Sudan, Syria, Tanzania, Tonga, Tuvalu, Uganda, Vanuatu, Zambia, and Zimbabwe. That would be a significant expansion of the ban that came into effect earlier this month. The countries affected were Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, Congo Republic, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. The entry of people from seven other countries - Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela - has also been partially restricted. During his first in office, Trump announced a ban on travelers from seven Muslim-majority nations, a policy that went through several iterations before it was upheld by the Supreme Court in 2018.
Asharq Al-Awsat
13 hours ago
- Asharq Al-Awsat
Republicans Are Divided Over Iran. Will Trump Pick a Side?
Tyler Pager and Luke Broadwater* As Israel pummels Iran with waves of airstrikes, US President Donald Trump is navigating the divides within the Republican Party over whether the United States should get involved in another foreign conflict. On one side are the isolationists who fear that Israel could pull the United States into another Middle East war. And on the other are the Iran hawks and Israel supporters who have been calling for just this sort of military action for years. Trump appears caught between the two sides, veering back and forth as he tries to distance the United States from Israel's assault while celebrating the success of the attacks and warning Iran that more is coming. 'This, right now, is going to cause, I think, a major schism in the MAGA online community,' Charlie Kirk, the right-wing activist and podcaster, said Thursday on his podcast. Trump had several times this year dissuaded Israel from launching an attack, saying he wanted to pursue a negotiated settlement with Iran. Shortly after the assault began, the White House sent out a statement from Secretary of State Marco Rubio, emphasizing that the United States was not involved in the initial military operation. 'Israel took unilateral action against Iran,' Rubio said. 'We are not involved in strikes against Iran, and our top priority is protecting American forces in the region.' But in subsequent interviews, the president said he spoke with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel on Thursday, knew the attacks were planned and called the strikes 'excellent.' In a post on Truth Social, he wrote Israel has 'already planned attacks' that would be 'even more brutal.' And the US military helped Israel intercept some of the ballistic missiles Iran fired in retaliation, an American official said. While running for president, Trump promised to end wars around the world, and in his inaugural address, he said he wanted to be remembered as a peacemaking president. So far, Trump's diplomatic efforts have failed to end the war between Russia and Ukraine, which he had promised to do within 24 hours, or the war between Israel and Hamas. Over the past several months, the Trump administration had been trying to strike a new nuclear deal with Iran, and the president had urged Netanyahu to hold off any military actions as the talks continued. 'I don't want them going in because that would blow it,' Trump told reporters at the White House just hours before the attacks. After Israel launched the missiles, Trump put the blame on Iran, faulting its leaders for refusing to accept a proposal that would have stopped it from enriching uranium. 'I gave Iran chance after chance to make a deal,' he wrote on Truth Social on Friday morning. 'I told them, in the strongest of words, to 'just do it,' but no matter how hard they tried, no matter how close they got, they just couldn't get it done.' Elliott Abrams, a senior fellow for Middle Eastern studies at the Council on Foreign Relations, noted that Trump had flipped his position on whether Israel should strike Iran. But he said Israel made a calculated gamble that Trump would go along with the idea. 'They made a bet on President Trump,' he said, adding: 'Trump, for a long time -- most of the time he's been in office -- has been saying 'no, we're negotiating, no, don't do it.' The Israelis strike, and today Trump called it excellent.' For many Republicans, Israel's military strikes were long overdue amid growing fears that Iran was moving closer to full nuclear capabilities. 'The number of Republicans who do not see a nuclear-armed Iran as a threat to Israel and the world is exceedingly small,' said Senator Lindsey Graham, a Republican from South Carolina and a close ally of the president. 'The overwhelming majority of Republicans back Israel's use of military force to neuter the Iranian nuclear threat.' Another faction of Trump's most ardent supporters see it differently. Israel's strikes and the prospect of US involvement in the conflict, they argue, run counter to Trump's 'America First' foreign policy agenda. 'The emails are so largely overwhelmingly against Israel doing this, I'd say it's probably a 99 to one,' Kirk said on Thursday night of feedback he was receiving from his listeners. Some MAGA supporters argued that Israel's targeted strikes of both nuclear sites and top military commanders were part of an effort to ignite a bigger conflict and draw the United States into it. US officials said on Friday that the Pentagon was positioning warships and other military assets in the Middle East to help protect Israel and US troops in the region from any further Iranian retaliation. 'The bottom line is we cannot be dragged into, inexorably dragged into, a war on the Eurasian land mass in the Middle East or in Eastern Europe,' Stephen K. Bannon, a former top adviser to Mr. Trump who remains close to the president, said on Friday on his 'War Room' podcast. On Israel, he said: 'Hey, you guys did it. You're putting your country first. Your country's defense first. That's fine, but we've got to put our defense first.' But Michael Rubin, a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, said the Trump administration was just 'shouting from the sidelines.' 'Trump will likely keep the US out of conflict and offer mediation, but at this point, he's just basically treading water,' he wrote in an email. 'The big issue will play out in Congress during debates about Israel aid and replenishing Israeli stockpiles.' *The New York Times
Leaders
a day ago
- Leaders
Baghdad Asks Iran Not to Strike US Targets in Iraq
An Iraqi senior security official said that Baghdad asked Iran to avoid targeting US interests in Iraq amid mounting tensions between Israel and Tehran, according to Al-Arabiya. 'The request was made. They promised us positive things,' the official said. Despite the fact that Baghdad is a close ally of Tehran, Iraq is also a strategic partner of the US and even has approximately 2,500 US troops on its soil as part of an anti-extremist coalition. Israeli Iranian Tensions On June 13, Israel launched a wave of airstrikes on Iran under the name of Operation Rising Lion. The military campaign targeted Iran's nuclear facilities and killed top military commanders and nuclear scientists. As a response, Iran launched a retaliatory wave of missiles against Israel and targeted Tel Aviv. US Denies Involvement On Friday, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said that the United States was not involved in Israel's unilateral strikes on Iran, according to The New York Times. Rubio said Israel started the attacks and acted unilaterally based on its belief that the operation was necessary for self-defense. 'We are not involved in strikes against Iran and our top priority is protecting American forces in the region. Israel advised us that they believe this action was necessary for its self-defense,' Rubio said. He also warned Iran late Thursday not to respond to Israeli strikes by targeting American bases in the region. Importantly, the US military maintains a large fleet of warplanes, naval vessels as well as thousands of troops stationed at its bases in the region, including in Qatar and Bahrain. 'Let me be clear: Iran should not target US interests or personnel,' Rubio added. Related Topics: Iran Halts 'Meaningless' Nuclear Talks with US After Israeli Strikes Iran-Israel Escalation: Tehran Retaliates with Missile Waves Jordan Shuts Airspace after Israeli Strikes on Iran Short link : Post Views: 16
