logo
A Toxic Pit Could Be a Gold Mine for Rare-Earth Elements

A Toxic Pit Could Be a Gold Mine for Rare-Earth Elements

New York Times13-05-2025

There's a tale told about a miner who found copper cans in his garbage dump in the early days of mining. Wastewater from copper mining had flowed through his land, he said, and turned steel cans into copper.
The story might be apocryphal, but the process is real, and it's called cementation. Montana Resources, the mining company that took over from the Anaconda Copper Company, still uses this alchemical trick in a process at its Continental Pit mine in Butte, Mont.
Next to the mine is the Berkeley Pit, which is filled with 50 billion gallons of a highly acidic, toxic brew. Montana Resources pipes liquid from the pit, enabling it to cascade onto piles of scrap iron. The iron becomes copper and is gathered for production.
While methods to remove metals from water have been around a long time, in recent years the global scramble for metals critical to manufacturing and technology advances has given birth to a new generation of extraction technologies and processes.
One of the mineral-rich sources researchers are focused on is wastewater, including the brine from desalination plants, oil and gas fracking water and wastewater from mining. Researchers at Oregon State University estimate the brine from desalination plants alone contains metals valued at about $2.2 trillion.
'Water is the ore body of the 21st century,' said Peter S. Fiske, director of the National Alliance for Water Innovation at the Department of Energy's Lawrence Berkeley National Lab California. 'Technology now is allowing us to pick through the garbage piles of wastewater and pick out the high-value items.'
Research on the extraction of rare earths, a set of metallic elements, from waste is widespread as the need for them increases significantly. Researchers at Indiana Geological and Water Survey at Indiana University, for example, are studying the potential for mining rare earths in coal waste, including fly ash and coal tailings. And researchers at University of Texas at Austin have created membranes that mimic natural ones to separate rare earths from waste.
Not only is mining wastewater more economical and faster than starting new mines, it is also cleaner.
Among the big waterborne prizes in the pit next to Butte are two light rare-earth elements (REEs), neodymium and praseodymium. They are vital for small, powerful magnets in electric vehicles, for medical technology and for defense purposes, such as precision-guided missiles and satellites. A single F-35 fighter jet uses 900 pounds of rare-earth metals.
'We're turning a giant liability into something that's contributing to defense,' said Mark Thompson, vice president for environmental affairs at Montana Resources. 'There's some high-level metallurgy going on here. Real egghead stuff.'
This is a critical time for research into domestic production of rare earths. Not only does the United States lag far behind China, but President Trump's trade war has spurred China to threaten to further restrict rare-earth mineral exports as a result of the Trump tariffs. Experts with the critical minerals security program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies say the large gap would enable China to expand its defense capabilities far more quickly than the United States could.
Both Greenland and Ukraine are the focus of the Trump administration's attention in large part because the countries have significant deposits of rare earths.
Mr. Trump also just ordered the government to move toward mining large portions of the ocean floor, including in international waters, for its mineral riches.
There are 17 types of metals known as rare earths, all of which have been found in the Berkeley Pit. They aren't rare in prevalence, but they are called that because they are often scattered in small concentrations.
Rare earths are sorted into two kinds: heavy and light. Heavy rare earths — such as dysprosium, terbium and yttrium — have a greater atomic weight and are typically more rare, meaning they sell in smaller quantities and are prone to shortages. Light metals, by contrast, have a lower atomic weight.
Acid mine drainage is a highly toxic pollutant created when sulfur-bearing pyrite in rock is exposed to oxygen and water during mining. The drainage then oxidizes and creates sulfuric acid and poisons waterways. It's one of the country's biggest environmental problems, and tens of thousands of abandoned mines have contaminated 12,000 miles of streams.
However, the acid also dissolves zinc, copper, rare earths and other minerals out of the rock and into the water, providing an opportunity for the right technology to extract them — which didn't exist until recently.
Paul Ziemkiewicz, director of the water research institute at West Virginia University, has researched the pit water in Butte for 25 years. He and a team of researchers from Virginia Tech and L3 Process Development, a chemical engineering firm, developed a method to extract critical metals from acid mine drainage in West Virginia's coal mines, the same process used in Butte. Large, densely woven plastic bags are filled with a mudlike sludge from the water treatment plant. The water slowly percolates out, leaving a preconcentrate of about 1 to 2 percent rare earths that need further refinement, with chemical processes. The final step in the patented process is an extraction with solvents that creates pure rare-earth elements.
'One of the nice things about acid mine drainage is the concentrates we get are particularly enriched in heavy rare earths,' Dr. Ziemkiewicz said. 'The light ones aren't as valuable.'
The Butte project is awaiting word on a Department of Defense grant of $75 million to build a concentrator, the last step needed to refine the preconcentrate to rare earths and begin full-scale production.
Zinc is also plentiful in the acid-mine-drainage mix here and, because it fetches a higher price, is important as a way to pay for the process. Nickel and cobalt are also extracted.
While rare-earth elements are much in demand, China produces a majority and manipulates prices to keep them low, which forces out competition. That's why the Defense Department is funding much of the work on rare-earth elements and other metals. The United States has just one operational rare-earths mine, in Mountain Pass, Calif., which produces around 15 percent of the global supply of rare earths.
The Berkeley Pit has been a festering sore since 1982, when, the Anaconda Copper Company closed the open-pit mine, turned off the pumps and let water fill it. The water is so acidic from acid mine drainage that when tens of thousands of snow geese flew over it on their migration in 2016, many landed on the surface and were quickly poisoned. About 3,000 birds died.
The Atlantic Richfield Company and Montana Resources are required to treat the pit water in perpetuity to keep it from reaching levels that could contaminate the area groundwater. (Montana Resources mines the Continental Pit, next to the Berkeley Pit.) The Clean Water Act requires that companies treat acid mine drainage, an expensive process. Adding another level of treatment to the Horseshoe Bend plant here is less costly than building a new one and can offset the costs of treatment or even turn a profit.
There have been dozens of research efforts to liberate the suspended metals from the water. Mr. Thompson displayed a map with lines radiating out from Butte, showing where water samples had been sent to research facilities across the country. But the metal-producing process that's going on now is the first one that's proven economical.
While the riches in the mineral soup here have been known for decades, a way to extract them was elusive, until Dr. Ziemkiewicz's team developed the new method. He has been producing rare earths at two coal mines in West Virginia where acid mine drainage is a problem. Each mine produces four tons of rare earths a year.
The Berkeley Pit, however, has a much richer concentration of rare earths in solution and a higher volume of water and is expected to produce 40 tons a year. Dr. Ziemkiewicz believes this process if used at other mines could eventually provide nearly all of the U.S. imports of rare-earth elements needed for defense purposes, which, he said, currently amount to about 1,400 tons.
But demand for rare earths could increase by as much as 600 percent in the coming decades, according to some estimates.
In the global effort to clean water and produce critical minerals, the lab at Lawrence Berkeley researches an array of water-filter-related technology, especially experiments to improve membranes. It operates a particle accelerator called Advanced Light Source, which creates very bright X-ray light that enables scientists to study various membranes at the atomic scale.
The lab has worked with outside researchers to create a new generation of filters, called nanosponges, that are designed to trap a single target molecule, such as lithium.
'It's an atomic catcher's mitt,' said Adam Uliana, the chief executive of ChemFinity, a Brooklyn company studying the use of nanosponges for cleaning many different types of waste. 'It catches one and only one type of metal.'
Lithium, cobalt and magnesium are critical minerals, in addition to rare earths, that have attracted considerable attention from researchers.
Ion exchange, a proven technique for removing metals and pollution from water, is gaining interest. Lilac Solutions, a start-up in Oakland, Calif., has developed the specialized resin beads needed to extract lithium from brine with ion exchange and plans to start its first production facility at the Great Salt Lake in Utah.
The company's technology pumps brine through ion exchange filters, extracts the mineral and returns the water to its source, a process David Snydacker, the company's president, said caused very little environmental disturbance. If it proves to work at scale, it could revolutionize lithium extraction and reduce or eliminate the need for underground mines and open pits.
Magrathea Metals is a start-up in Oakland that makes magnesium ingots from salty brines left over after seawater has been desalinated. The company allows the brines to dry, which leaves behind magnesium chloride salts. An electrical current — which can utilize off-peak renewable energy — heats the solution and separates the salts from the molten magnesium, which is cast into ingots.
Its chief executive, Alex Grant, said this process is extremely clean, though it has yet to be used to manufacture magnesium at a large scale. The Department of Defense has funded much of its work.
China produces 90 percent of the world's magnesium. The metal is smelted with something called the Pidgeon process — . heated with coal-fired kilns to around 2,000 degrees, which is highly polluting and carbon-intensive. Dr. Fiske expects a lot more innovation.
'Three vectors are converging,' he said. 'The value of some of these critical materials is going up. The cost of conventional mining and extraction is going up, and the security of international suppliers, especially Russia and China, is going down.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Soft metal solid-state battery mimics biology, could drive EVs 500 miles per charge
Soft metal solid-state battery mimics biology, could drive EVs 500 miles per charge

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Soft metal solid-state battery mimics biology, could drive EVs 500 miles per charge

Researchers at Georgia Tech have developed a new metal combination that could transform the future of solid-state batteries. By blending lithium with a soft, surprising element, sodium, the team has found a way to reduce the pressure needed for these batteries to operate significantly. This innovation could lead to lighter, longer-lasting power sources for everything from smartphones to electric vehicles. The findings were published by the lab of Matthew McDowell, a professor in Georgia Tech's School of Mechanical Engineering and the School of Materials Science and Engineering. His group has also filed for a patent on the breakthrough. Solid-state batteries promise greater energy density and better safety than lithium-ion ones. They use a solid electrolyte instead of a flammable liquid, making them more stable. However, they often require high pressure to work. The metal plates needed to apply that pressure are often heavier and bulkier than the battery itself. 'A solid-state battery usually requires metal plates to apply this high pressure, and those plates can be bigger than the battery itself,' McDowell said. 'This makes the battery too heavy and bulky to be effective.' That challenge has kept solid-state batteries from reaching widespread use, despite years of research and hype. The team, led by Georgia Tech research scientist Sun Geun Yoon, found that adding sodium to lithium changes the game. Sodium is not active in the battery's electrochemical process, but its softness plays a key role. 'Adding sodium metal is the breakthrough,' McDowell said. 'It seems counterintuitive because sodium is not active in the battery system, but it's very soft, which helps improve the performance of the lithium.' Sodium's softness is no exaggeration. In a controlled setting, someone could press a gloved finger into the metal and leave a mark. When paired with lithium, it deforms easily under lower pressure, keeping better contact with the solid electrolyte. This improves overall battery performance. To understand why sodium-lithium batteries perform better, the team turned to biology. Specifically, they used the concept of morphogenesis — the way biological structures evolve based on local conditions. Morphogenesis is rare in materials science. But in this case, the interaction between sodium and lithium followed this pattern. The researchers saw that sodium behaved like a deformable phase, adjusting to structural changes during battery use. McDowell's team developed this concept under a project funded by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), alongside other universities. The implications of this research are broad. It could lead to phone batteries that last far longer or electric vehicles capable of going 500 miles on a single charge. The ability to reduce the pressure requirement without sacrificing energy capacity opens new possibilities for scaling solid-state batteries. While challenges remain before commercialization, McDowell's group continues to test new materials. Their goal is to make solid-state batteries more competitive with the lithium-ion standard. If successful, this shift could mark a major leap in battery technology. The study is published in the journal Science.

Electrons spiral with a purpose: A new platform decodes their selective spin
Electrons spiral with a purpose: A new platform decodes their selective spin

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Electrons spiral with a purpose: A new platform decodes their selective spin

By combining the principles of physics, chemistry, and biology, scientists have crafted a special programmable platform to explore one of the most puzzling quantum mysteries of our time: why electrons seem to choose sides when passing through certain twisted molecules. This behavior, known as the chiral-induced spin selectivity (CISS) effect, has baffled researchers for over two decades. It shows up in biological processes like photosynthesis and cellular respiration, yet no one fully understands how or why it happens. Now, researchers from the University of Pittsburgh have engineered an artificial, controllable system that can mimic the conditions under which this strange effect occurs. Their approach could reshape how we study quantum transport and might also help us design new materials for electronics, energy, and even medicine. "The beauty of our approach is not that it mimics chemistry or biology exactly, but that it allows us to isolate and study individual processes that are relevant in chiral quantum transport," said François Damanet, a physicist and one of the members of the research team. Back in the late 1990s, scientists Ron Naaman and David Waldeck made a surprising discovery. When electrons pass through films of chiral (twisted) molecules, how easily they can move is decided by their spin, which is a quantum property. Instead of a small noticeable effect, they saw spin-dependent changes as high as 20 percent, a result that stunned the scientific community. Since then, the CISS effect has popped up in various biological systems, yet researchers haven't been able to pin down the exact mechanism behind it. This is because real biological molecules are complex. They're soft, flexible, constantly moving, and surrounded by water, all of which makes it nearly impossible to isolate the role of chirality alone. That's where the new platform comes in. The researchers did not try to recreate biology. Instead, they built a clean, programmable playground for electrons. Using a technique developed in 2008, they worked with a special material made from layers of lanthanum aluminate (LaAlO3) and strontium titanate (SrTiO3). By using a fine-tipped microscopic pen, they could draw paths where electrons can travel. To make those paths chiral, they introduced a clever twist: the probe not only moved in a wavy, serpentine pattern across the surface, but its voltage was also modulated up and down in sync. This combination created spiral-like channels that broke mirror symmetry, the key ingredient of chirality. These artificial chiral waveguides weren't just pretty shapes. When electrons flowed through them, surprising quantum effects emerged. The team saw unusual conductance patterns and even observed electrons pairing up in ways that shouldn't be possible under strong magnetic fields. Theoretical models suggested that the spiral geometry created a kind of engineered spin-orbit coupling, which locked the electrons' spin to their direction of motion, just like some theories had proposed for the CISS effect in molecules. What makes this platform so powerful is that it's fully programmable. Researchers can change the shape, size, and strength of the chiral patterns, erase them, and write new ones, all on the same device. "We can systematically vary parameters like the pitch, amplitude, and coupling strength of chiral modulations—something impossible with fixed structures," Damanet said. This new platform doesn't try to copy molecules atom-for-atom. Instead, it gives scientists something they've never had before: precise control. In biological systems, everything is messy—molecules wiggle, environments shift, and vibrations interfere with measurements. However, on this programmable platform, each variable can be changed independently, allowing researchers to test exactly how chirality affects quantum transport. This could help settle long-standing debates about whether spin-orbit interactions, molecular vibrations, or other mechanisms drive the CISS effect. While the system operates at ultra-cold temperatures and uses inorganic materials, it sets the stage for future hybrid setups that could combine these solid-state tools with real molecules. The team is already exploring ways to pair their platform with organic materials or carbon nanotubes, and even to run experiments at higher temperatures. The goal isn't to replace biological studies, but to work alongside them, much like how wind tunnels help engineers test aircraft designs before real-world flights. If successful, this approach could help scientists not only solve the CISS puzzle but also understand other complex quantum systems. It could inspire new materials for spintronics, where electron spin is used in computing, or guide the design of efficient catalysts and bio-inspired energy devices. The study is published in the journal Science Advances.

'What a waste:' US scientists decry Trump's 47% cuts to NASA science budget
'What a waste:' US scientists decry Trump's 47% cuts to NASA science budget

Yahoo

time7 hours ago

  • Yahoo

'What a waste:' US scientists decry Trump's 47% cuts to NASA science budget

When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Since January, when President Donald Trump took office for the second time, the White House has been asking U.S. government organizations to implement some pretty radical changes. Things have been tense, to say the least. Thousands of federal workers have been laid off with little explanation, programs that improve diversity in the workplace have been eliminated, research grants have been cancelled in large sweeps, and international college students find themselves at risk of losing their legal status. One government organization that could be hit the hardest is NASA. The agency has faced a particularly extensive amount of pressure from the Trump administration: surveillance, goal restructuring, website purging and more. Other federal science organizations haven't been spared, either — places like the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), the National Science Foundation (NSF) and the United States Geological Survey (USGS) have been targeted as well. The ground of U.S. science seems to be quaking for political reasons rather than scientific ones, leaving scientists disheartened by their government and anxious about what's next. "I don't think it is an overstatement to say that morale among U.S.-based scientists is at an all-time low," Sarah Horst, an associate professor in the Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences at The Johns Hopkins University in Maryland, told "People are afraid for their jobs, their students, the projects they've often spent decades working on, and they are afraid for the future of the United States." And things only got worse on May 30, when the Trump administration's fiscal year 2026 budget request for NASA came out. It proposes cutting the agency's science funding by 47%, and the agency's workforce by about one-third — from 17,391 to 11,853. This budget has to be officially passed by Congress to take effect, but if it indeed does, the effects could be brutal. "That would represent the smallest NASA workforce since mid-1960, before the first American had launched into space," Casey Dreier, chief of space policy at The Planetary Society, a nonprofit exploration and advocacy organization, told "If this budget is made real, I am most concerned about people," John O'Meara, chief scientist at the Keck Observatory, told "Missions deliver data and are essential, but the data is meaningless without the people there to interpret it, test theories and share discoveries with the world." Perhaps the most striking aspect of the White House's 2026 NASA budget proposal is the sheer amount of missions it would cancel altogether: 41 projects, as the Planetary Society said in a statement denouncing the report. "This is the extinction-level event we were warning people about," Dreier said. Some specifics: The sharply reduced budget would cancel the Mars Sample Return (MSR) program, which was meant to bring samples of the Red Planet's surface to Earth — samples that NASA's Perseverance rover has been dutifully collecting over the last few years, and which scientists have long stressed must be analyzed in a lab to reach their full potential. MSR has experienced its own share of complications since its genesis, to be fair, including a huge price tag and what some believe is an overcomplicated mechanism of sample retrieval. However, cancelling the project outright instead of coming up with a solution would waste much of Perseverance's work on the Red Planet. The OSIRIS-APEX mission (you may remember it by its previous moniker, OSIRIS-REx) would also be cut off. This mission successfully sent a spacecraft on a multi-billion-mile expedition to an asteroid named Bennu, then had it grab a few pieces of the asteroid before traveling all the way back to Earth and safely dropping the samples to the ground. This same probe is now on round two, headed to examine the infamous asteroid Apophis — but if the FY26 NASA budget is confirmed, it won't complete its trip. "I'm personally mostly concerned for in-flight missions that already have a significant investment in both taxpayer dollars and peoples' lives/careers (including my own)," Kevin McGill, an employee at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), the agency's lead center for robotic planetary exploration, told "Luckily, my work on [the Curiosity Mars rover] and Mars2020 [Perseverance] are mostly safe, but a lot of other stuff isn't." The budget also suggests ceasing operations for the Jupiter-orbiting Juno spacecraft, which has been circling our solar system's gas giant since 2016 while regularly delivering rich information about the world and its moons. Juno is responsible for all those swirly blue images of Jupiter the astronomy community holds high; it took five years for this spacecraft to get to where it is, and many more for it to be built in the first place. "The operating missions cancellations alone represent over $12 billion of invested taxpayer value — and once they're gone, they're gone. It would take years and many millions more to replace them," Dreier said. NASA would also need to pull out of its collaboration with the European Space Agency (ESA) on the Rosalind Franklin rover — for the second time, no less — which is a robotic life-hunting explorer set to launch toward Mars in 2028. NASA had to pull out in 2012 because of budget cuts as well but re-entered the rover program after ESA cut ties with its other partner, the Russian space agency Roscosmos, once Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022. "This makes the U.S. an untrustworthy partner and our allies hesitate the next time we ask them for help," Dreier said. Two operational Mars orbiters — Mars Odyssey and MAVEN — would be cancelled as well, as would the New Horizons spacecraft currently studying the outer reaches of the solar system and the DaVinci and VERITAS missions, which would explore Venus. The Lunar Gateway, which NASA envisioned as a sort of International Space Station around the moon, would also be cancelled. "What was surprising was the level of cuts within parts of each of the agencies. An example is astrophysics, where the cut was nearly 2/3 of the astrophysics budget," O'Meara said. According to the Planetary Society's analysis of the budget, that huge astrophysics reduction could mean eight spacecraft dedicated to studying extreme events in the universe (think, the Chandra X-ray Observatory) would be terminated. This analysis also suggests 10 missions constructed to study the region around Earth and the sun would be cancelled, as well as about a dozen Earth-specific missions that help scientists forecast natural disasters such as hurricanes and track global warming. The latter is especially concerning, given the speed with which Earth is heating up due to human activities that lead to greenhouse gas emissions — activities the Trump administration favors, such as burning coal for cheap power. Per the budget proposal, the White House also wants NASA to eliminate its "green aviation" spending, dedicated to making airplanes better for the environment, and instead work on "protecting the development of technologies with air traffic control and defense applications." It is also worth considering that other Trump-mandated moves have heavily impacted climate initiatives as well: more than 800 NOAA workers were laid off, for example, and NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies, which houses climate change records dating back to the 1800s, was closed down — leading members of NASA's largest union to speak out in solidarity with their coworkers. Hundreds of scientists working on the National Climate Assessment, a huge report that details the dangers of climate change for policymakers to lean on, were also dismissed. (That represented all of the authors of this report). "This budget request, and its implications, has been highly disruptive to the entire field," O'Meara said. "We are forced to focus on 'what-if' planning that changes in scope rapidly. That takes the time away from what we do best: doing science and sharing it with the world." Furthermore, the White House's FY26 NASA budget proposal centers around a shift toward human missions to the Red Planet; this was a rare area that saw a budget boost in the President's request. For example, one slide in the budget summary says NASA should invest "more than $1 billion in new technology investments to enable a crewed mission to Mars." Another says the agency should allocate "$200M for Commercial Mars Payload Services (CMPS) to start launching robotic precursor missions to the Martian surface, and $80M to start deploying communications relay capabilities for Mars." "It just bothers me that they are changing almost the entirety of NASA's mission to this pipe dream of a human mission to Mars in any reasonable time frame and cost," McGill said. reached out to NASA for comment on the possible impact of these budget cuts, and was directed to acting administrator Janet Petro's statement in the proposal's Technical Supplement. This statement is supportive of the budget request overall, mentioning items such as a renewed push for human spaceflight to the moon and Mars. "The President's Fiscal Year 2026 Budget Request for NASA reflects the Trump-Vance Administration's commitment to strengthening America's leadership in space exploration while exercising fiscal responsibility. With this budget, we aim to shape a Golden Age of innovation and exploration," it reads. This shift toward Mars crewed missions is perhaps predictable, given Trump's affiliation with SpaceX founder and CEO Elon Musk. (Former affiliation, maybe, given the heated feud currently unfolding on social media between the two.) Musk was a prominent backer of Trump's campaign and worked very closely with him over the past four months. For example, the SpaceX chief ran the Department of Governmental Efficiency (DOGE), which was responsible for the bulk of government funding cuts in the name of saving "wasted taxpayer money." Independently, Musk has earned a reputation as maybe the most outspoken advocate of settling Mars, even going so far as to say he wishes to "die on Mars." SpaceX, as well as its fans, are extremely focused on achieving that goal. "In isolation, a serious humans to Mars campaign should be exciting — Mars exploration is a worthy goal, and The Planetary Society has advocated for that for years," Dreier said. "But the cost here is too high." Another concern Dreier has is that the White House expects to achieve this major goal while simultaneously reducing NASA's workforce at an unprecedented rate. "This isn't just poor policy," he added. "It's fundamentally wasteful and inefficient, exactly what this administration is saying it does not want." And the layoffs could be even more far-reaching than anticipated. McGill says morale at JPL had already been very low after sweeping layoffs took place last year, but also that the energy was further damaged by the agency's recent return-to-office order. For context, nearly 5,500 JPL employees who have been working remotely since the thick of the COVID-19 pandemic were told they must return to in-person work. The deadlines for that return were Aug. 25 for general employees within California and Oct. 27 for teleworkers living outside the state. "Employees who do not return by their required date will be considered to have resigned," JPL officials said in a workforce-wide email that was obtained by "It's clear that it's a silent layoff of the over 1,000 remote employees who they don't want to pay severance to," a NASA employee at JPL not authorized to speak on behalf of the agency previously told McGill says the order "threatens to decimate the workforce and a lot of critical institutional knowledge." "I love JPL and its mission, but it's been a rough time as of late," he said. According to Dreier, there's good news and bad news concerning whether the budget proposal will go through. The good news is that, as he explains, there seems to be bipartisan dislike for the proposal. "We've heard directly from multiple congressional offices — Republican and Democrat — that this budget is 'dead on arrival,'" he said. Of note, U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), chairman of the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation released his legislative directives for Senate Republicans' budget reconciliation bill on Friday (June 6). The senator proposes dedicating $10 billion more to NASA's science programs — and, though most of it is indeed in line with the FY26 budget request's Mars endeavors, some of that funding would be used for other things, like NASA Space Launch System (SLS) rocket meant for moon exploration and Lunar Gateway. This united aversion to the budget proposal is unsurprising. The bipartisan U.S. Planetary Science Caucus, for instance, previously released a statement in response to early blueprints of the proposal that suggested the huge cuts we're seeing presented now. "We are extremely alarmed by reports of a preliminary White House budget that proposes cutting NASA Science funding by almost half and terminating dozens of programs already well underway, like the Mars Sample Return mission and the Roman Space Telescope," co-chairs Rep. Judy Chu (D-California) and Rep. Don Bacon (R-Nebraska) wrote. Such agreement across the aisle makes sense when we consider how long it takes for space missions to reach fruition. Collaboration isn't just key — it's unavoidable. "Spaceflight, and human spaceflight in particular, requires hand-off from one administration to another," Dreier said. "The timelines are just too long for any one presidential administration." The bad news, however, is the White House may have a workaround. Related Stories: — 'This is an attack on NASA.' Space agency's largest union speaks out as DOGE cuts shutter science institute located above 'Seinfeld' diner in NYC — Saving Gateway, SLS and Orion? Sen. Ted Cruz proposes $10 billion more for NASA's moon and Mars efforts — 'Their loss diminishes us all': Scientists emphasize how Trump's mass NOAA layoffs endanger the world "Even if Congress ultimately rejects this budget, the slow pace of legislation and gridlock we've seen in recent years make it unlikely that appropriations will be in place by October 1st of this year," Dreier said. "If there's another continuing resolution, the White House budget office will throttle spending to match the lowest of all possible budget scenarios: theirs. So, we face the possibility of these cuts going into effect by default. Given the breadth and depth of these cuts, that could be very hard to recover from." "This budget proposal threatens to tear down that carefully constructed coalition in favor of a narrow vision that lacks the political durability necessary for long-term success," he added. "What a waste."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store