Around 1,000 doctors urge MPs to vote against ‘unsafe' assisted dying Bill
The Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill will return to the House of Commons for debate on Friday, with MPs expected to consider further amendments.
But in a letter, published this week, doctors from across the NHS have urged lawmakers to listen to those 'who would have to deliver the consequences of this deeply flawed Bill'.
They warn the Bill 'poses a real threat to both patients and the medical workforce'.
In its current form the proposed legislation, which applies only to England and Wales, would mean terminally ill adults with only six months left to live could apply for assistance to end their lives, subject to the approval of two doctors and an expert panel.
Last month, MPs approved a change in the Bill to ensure no medics would be obliged to take part in assisted dying.
Doctors already had an opt-out but the new clause extends that to anyone, including pharmacists and social care workers.
Encouraging or assisting suicide is currently against the law in England and Wales, with a maximum jail sentence of 14 years.
The letter to MPs said: 'As experienced medical professionals who regularly work with dying patients and who have reviewed the worldwide evidence on assisted dying, it is our opinion that this Bill poses a real threat to both patients and the medical workforce, and we urge you to vote against it.
'We are concerned that the private member's Bill process has not facilitated a balanced approach to the collection of evidence and input from key stakeholders including doctors, people with disabilities and other marginalised groups.
'This Bill will widen inequalities, it provides inadequate safeguards and, in our collective view, is simply not safe.
'This is the most important piece of healthcare legislation for 60 years and we urge you to listen to the doctors who would have to deliver the consequences of this deeply flawed Bill.'
Sir Ed Davey welcomed the letter on Monday, telling Sky News he had 'real concerns'.
'I have voted against this assisted dying legislation, as I did on previous occasions,' the Liberal Democrat leader said.
'I have real concerns about the pressure on individuals, that they will put on themselves, if they think they are a burden on their family, so I welcome this letter.'
He added: 'I hope, as time has gone on, as the arguments have been better exposed, that MPs will switch sides and join the side that I and many MPs are on.'
But Sir Chris Bryant said he would be voting in favour.
The technology minister told Sky News: 'The Government doesn't have a formal position at all and individual members are free to choose how they vote.
'I'm not going to hide my own personal preference. I abstained on the first time round, I decided I wasn't going to vote because I wanted to hear the debate.
'I have listened to a lot of the debate. Of course, I don't want anybody to feel that they are a burden on society and that should lead them towards taking their own life, but I also have heard the cries of people who are absolutely miserable, and that's why I will be voting for the Bill.'
Some of the Bill's opponents have urged MPs to focus on improving end-of-life care rather than legislating for assisted dying.
Ahead of last month's Commons debate on the Bill, two royal medical colleges raised concerns over the proposed legislation.
The Royal College of Physicians (RCP) said it believes there are 'concerning deficiencies', while the Royal College of Psychiatrists (RCPsych) said it has 'serious concerns' and cannot support the Bill.
People with terminal illnesses, surrounded by loved ones, display their dying wishes on tags outside the Palace of Westminster in London to urge MPs to support the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Jas Lehal/PA)
Opinions among members of the medical profession remain varied, with TV doctor Hilary Jones describing assisted dying for the terminally ill as 'kind and compassionate', adding that he would help a patient to end their life if the law was changed.
The GP, often seen on ITV's Good Morning Britain and the Lorraine show, told the PA news agency he believes medicine will go 'back to the Dark Ages' if proposed legislation being considered at Westminster is voted down.
While Friday is expected to see debate on further amendments to the Bill, it is thought a vote on the overall legislation might not take place until the following Friday, June 20.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
26 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Assisted dying Bill a ‘threat to patients', doctors tell MPs
The assisted dying Bill is a 'real threat to both patients and the medical workforce', around 1,000 doctors have warned MPs. Labour MP Kim Leadbeater's Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill will return to the Commons for debate on Friday, with MPs expected to consider further amendments. But in a letter published this week, doctors from across the NHS urged MPs to listen to those 'who would have to deliver the consequences of this deeply flawed Bill'. They warned that it 'poses a real threat to both patients and the medical workforce'. In its current form, the proposed legislation, which applies only to England and Wales, would mean terminally ill adults with only six months left to live could apply for assistance to end their lives, subject to the approval of two doctors and an expert panel. Last month, MPs approved a change in the Bill to ensure no medical staff would be obliged to take part in assisted dying. Doctors already had an opt-out, but the new clause extends that to anyone, including pharmacists and social care workers. Encouraging or assisting suicide is currently against the law in England and Wales, with a maximum jail sentence of 14 years. 'Urge you to vote against it' The letter to MPs said: 'As experienced medical professionals who regularly work with dying patients and who have reviewed the worldwide evidence on assisted dying, it is our opinion that this Bill poses a real threat to both patients and the medical workforce, and we urge you to vote against it. 'We are concerned that the private member's Bill process has not facilitated a balanced approach to the collection of evidence and input from key stakeholders including doctors, people with disabilities and other marginalised groups. 'This Bill will widen inequalities, it provides inadequate safeguards and, in our collective view, is simply not safe. 'This is the most important piece of healthcare legislation for 60 years and we urge you to listen to the doctors who would have to deliver the consequences of this deeply flawed Bill.'
Metro
30 minutes ago
- Metro
Seven key things that will be decided in Rachel Reeves' spending review
This Wednesday is going to be one of the most important days for Keir Starmer's government since they took over power almost a year ago. The words 'comprehensive spending review' might not suggest edge-of-your-seat excitement, but the decisions announced by Chancellor Rachel Reeves will have a massive impact. She will be setting out the budgets for different government departments until 2030 – making it clear to the public where her priorities lie. After last year's budget, we've become used to the language of 'difficult choices'. Think of the changes to the winter fuel payment and inheritance tax, both cited as ways to get the economy back on track. This time around, expect a new approach from the Chancellor. She'll be announcing billions of pounds to help ministers achieve what they want to. But while there will be high-profile winners, it's inevitable there will also be painful cuts to other areas of government. Craig Munro breaks down Westminster chaos into easy to follow insight, walking you through what the latest policies mean to you. Sign up here. That's because the spending review is not a budget: Reeves won't be announcing any changes to how the Treasury raises cash. She can only allocate the cash it has, or knows it is going to get. Health and social care is already comfortably the most expensive single item that the government spends money on. According to the Office for Budget Responsibility, the expected spend on health and social care for 2024/25 is £193.3 billion. But of course, it's not like the NHS is in an ideal state at the moment. It's expected that Health Secretary Wes Streeting will get a significant financial boost to his department to pay for his ambitious plans. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper is believed to still be in negotiations with the Treasury, barely 48 hours before the spending review is unveiled. That's because an increase in funding to areas like health, defence and education is expected to come at the expense of cuts to her already-stretched department. Yesterday, it was reported in the Sunday Times that police budgets were expected to receive a real-terms rise, but that's likely to mean other parts of the Home Office will face serious cuts. It's no secret that this government is keen to pour a significant amount of money into defence, with the main disagreement over how significant it should be. After last week's strategic defence review grabbed headlines, there's a question mark over whether Keir Starmer will accept Nato recommendations to raise his defence spending target from 3% of GDP to a massive 5% of GDP. Such a huge rise – in 2024, the UK spent 2.3% of GDP on defence – would, of course, force cuts to other parts of government. But even the existing commitments are causing a serious squeeze. The Chancellor's biggest announcement over the weekend was the science and tech budget, which will be £86 billion. Drug and battery technology will be among the areas set to benefit, while local leaders across the country will be sent cash to develop what are described as 'innovation clusters'. Expect to hear a lot about AI on Wednesday too – not just how it'll be funded for sectors around the country, but also how government department will be encouraged to use the shiny new tech. Alongside health and defence, education is expected to be one of the big winners from Wednesday's announcement. Last week, Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson revealed the expansion of free school meals for all pupils in families that receive universal credit, with the aim of tackling child poverty. In an interview with the Observer, Reeves said schools will get an additional £4.5 billion a year, which will go towards teachers' pay rises and reforms to Special Educational Needs and Disabilities (SEND) provision. Another major pre-spending review announcement last week was investment in buses, trams and local train infrastructure for England's city regions. There is also speculation one of the big projects included in the review may be a high-speed rail link between Liverpool and Manchester. More Trending However, the squeeze could mean plans such as the DLR and Bakerloo extensions in London may be scrapped and schemes like the bus fare cap could come under pressure. Like Yvette Cooper, Local Government Secretary Angela Rayner has also been locked into negotiations with the Treasury – though she reportedly reached an agreement yesterday. The government has very ambitious targets for housing over the next few years, and those plans could fall short if serious cuts are made. Greater Manchester Mayor Andy Burnham and London Mayor Sadiq Khan are among the local leaders who are asking for powers to introduce a tourist levy, though a source close to Khan said this looks unlikely. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Government finally reveals who will get winter fuel payout after U-turn MORE: New solar panels 'could cut people's bills by £530 per year' MORE: Universal digital 'BritCards' on an app could soon be used to prove who you are
Daily Mail
44 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
More than 1,000 doctors write to MPs to demand they vote AGAINST 'unsafe' assisted dying laws that are 'a real threat to both patients and NHS staff'
More than 1,000 doctors have written to MPs to demand they vote against 'unsafe' assisted dying laws. In an open letter, doctors from across the NHS warned the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill poses a 'real threat to both patients and the medical workforce'. The Bill aims to allow terminally ill adults in England and Wales - with less than six months to live - to legally end their lives. But, while the doctors said it was 'entirely appropriate to have a national debate on how to address the issue of end-of-live care', they added the Bill 'is not the answer'. They said the 'deeply flawed' legislation, which is being spearheaded by Labour MP Kim Leadbeater, is 'simply not safe'. Their concerns about the Bill include that it will 'widen inequalities' and 'provide inadequate safeguards'. The proposed legislation 'does not protect against the risk of coercion, particularly for women and the elderly', the letter added. The Bill is set to return to the House of Commons for debate this Friday, with MPs expected to consider further amendments. In an open letter to MPs, doctors from across the NHS warned the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill poses a 'real threat to both patients and the medical workforce' Campaigners opposed to the Bill recently claimed the 'momentum is against' Ms Leadbeater's legislation. They highlighted how a number of MPs who previously backed the Bill last year have since withdrawn their support, as it moves through its parliamentary stages. Last month, MPs approved a change in the Bill to ensure no medics would be obliged to take part in assisted dying. Doctors already had an opt-out but the new clause extends that to anyone, including pharmacists and social care workers. Encouraging or assisting suicide is currently against the law in England and Wales, with a maximum jail sentence of 14 years. In their open letter, the doctors pleaded with MPs to block the Bill at its Third Reading, which is expected later this month. They wrote: 'As experienced medical professionals who regularly work with dying patients and who have reviewed the worldwide evidence on assisted dying, it is our opinion that this Bill poses a real threat to both patients and the medical workforce, and we urge you to vote against it. 'We are concerned that the private member's Bill process has not facilitated a balanced approach to the collection of evidence and input from key stakeholders including doctors, people with disabilities and other marginalised groups. 'This Bill will widen inequalities, it provides inadequate safeguards and, in our collective view, is simply not safe. 'This is the most important piece of healthcare legislation for 60 years and we urge you to listen to the doctors who would have to deliver the consequences of this deeply flawed Bill.' Liberal Democrat leader Sir Ed Davey welcomed the doctors' letter, saying he had 'real concerns' about the pressure on those who feel a 'burden' on their families. 'I hope, as time has gone on, as the arguments have been better exposed, that MPs will switch sides and join the side that I and many MPs are on,' he told Sky News. But Labour minister Sir Chris Bryant said he would now be voting in favour of the Bill having previously abstained. 'The Government doesn't have a formal position at all and individual members are free to choose how they vote,' he said. 'I'm not going to hide my own personal preference. I abstained on the first time round, I decided I wasn't going to vote because I wanted to hear the debate. 'I have listened to a lot of the debate. Of course, I don't want anybody to feel that they are a burden on society and that should lead them towards taking their own life. 'But I also have heard the cries of people who are absolutely miserable, and that's why I will be voting for the Bill.' Last month, Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood - an opponent of the Bill - warned assisted dying legislation was being rushed through Parliament with too little time for proper scrutiny. In an historic vote in November, the Commons voted in favour of the Bill at its Second Reading and sent it for line-by-line scrutiny by the committee of MPs. But Ms Leadbeater subsequently sparked anger when she made a major change to the Bill from when it was first introduced to Parliament. It had initially been said assisted dying applications would only be allowed with the approval of two doctors and a High Court judge. But Ms Leadbeater later proposed scrapping the High Court oversight in favour of an assisted dying commissioner and expert panels. Under her new plans, the panels will feature a senior legal figure, a psychiatrist and a social worker who will decide on assisted dying applications. While Friday is expected to see debate on further amendments to the Bill, it is thought a vote on the overall legislation might not take place until the following Friday, June 20. Ahead of last month's Commons debate on the Bill, two royal medical colleges raised concerns over the proposed legislation. The Royal College of Physicians (RCP) said it believes there are 'concerning deficiencies', while the Royal College of Psychiatrists (RCPsych) said it has 'serious concerns' and cannot support the Bill.
