Should arsonist get death penalty if people die in wildfire? California Supreme Court to decide
Raymond Lee Oyler, sentenced to death for starting a 2006 Southern California blaze that killed five firefighters, didn't shoot or stab his victims, or kill them personally with his bare hands. So should he be put to death?
Oral arguments in his nearly 20-year-old case were heard Wednesday by the Supreme Court of California, meeting for the first time in five years in Sacramento's historic appellate courtroom at the Stanley Mosk Library and Courthouse on the Capitol Mall downtown.
The case has particular resonance in the wake of massive wildfires that ravaged the Los Angeles area last month, killing at least 29 people and destroying more than 16,000 structures.
It also is significant following changes in California's laws governing murder, and the state's evolving policy on the death penalty, which costs $72 million per year to adjudicate and which prosecutors continue to seek despite a moratorium on executions.
Oyler's case was one of four heard Wednesday by the court on a variety of topics. One, like Oyler's, involved California's murder statutes, while two more were civil cases, including a fight over who had the right to a recipe used for barbecue sauce made for the Trader Joe's grocery store chain.
Discussing Oyler's case, the seven justices pressed attorneys for both sides for their interpretation of new laws that changed the definition of the most serious murder charges, so that, for example, a getaway car driver was not put to death for a burglary gone wrong when he or she didn't know a murder had been committed.
Oyler was the only person charged with setting the 2006 Esperanza Fire, which started near Cabazon and burned more than 40,000 acres. Five firefighters were killed as Santa Ana winds blew the blaze uncontrollably over their location as they tried to save a house.
Oyler's court-appointed lawyer, Michael Clough, argued that Oyler didn't meet the definition of the 'actual killer' as defined in state law. He disputed Oyler's 2009 conviction for setting the fire, saying his client had always denied doing it, and alleging that prosecutors presented no hard evidence that Oyler was the arsonist.
Even if he had set the fire, Clough asserted, Oyler would not have done it specifically to kill people.
The Riverside County jury that convicted Oyler of first-degree murder was not instructed to consider whether Oyler met the definition of an 'actual killer,' as defined by state law, Clough argued.
But Deputy Attorney General Meredith White said that those definitions were irrelevant, because they were only meant to apply in cases where there was more than one perpetrator present, and one was the actual killer and the other was an accomplice. Moreover, she said, there was no need to prove that he intended to kill people — only that he intended to commit arson.
That argument drew a sharp response from Associate Justice Josh Groban: 'Is the attorney general asking us to uphold a death penalty when there was no intent to kill?'
The justices also pressed Clough, seemingly frustrated that he did not provide a clearer explanation of why Oyler should not be considered the 'actual killer,' or define a specific gap in the jury instructions or the case for the court to consider.
'If the person who started the Esperanza Fire was not the actual killer, then who was?' asked Chief Justice Patricia Guerrera.
The court will consider the arguments along with briefs filed in the four cases, and is expected to issue its decisions within 90 days.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
30-05-2025
- Yahoo
Chirping device used to keep unhoused from West Hollywood Trader Joe's
A shopping center in West Hollywood has deployed a chirping device to keep the unhoused from a stairwell outside a Trader Joe's store, but it has some upset. KTLA's Gene Kang was outside the Trader Joe's store off of Santa Monica Boulevard, where the chirping could be heard loud and clear during his live report Friday morning. The device mounted above the popular grocery store chain's door makes a cricket or smoke detector-like chirping sound as blue lights continuously flash to keep people from loitering or sleeping in the stairwell. The 'Blue Chirper' is a motion-activated device invented out of frustration by Santa Monica resident Stephen McMahon after a neighbor was attacked by two men. McMahon has since sold about two dozen of the devices to local business owners and residents looking for a 'less-aggressive' way of keeping the unhoused away. Building managers at the plaza where the Trader Joe's is located have reported positive outcomes since the device was put up. However, some say that simply pushing the homeless to a different neighborhood does not help solve the city's problem. West Hollywood officials have said the device undermines the city's homeless outreach efforts and plan to investigate potential noise code violations. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
30-05-2025
- Yahoo
West Hollywood shopping center installs chirping device to discourage homeless from camping out. Will it work?
Some customers walking out of the West Hollywood Trader Joe's wear an annoyed look on their face, and it has nothing to do with rising grocery prices. The source of the irritation is a small blue box installed in a stairwell leading to the market, the latest tactic used by property owners to deter unhoused people from camping out in the area. The motion-activated device chatters like a loud, anxious cricket as people pass by the shopping center. "It's so annoying," Jeffrey Howard said as he left the market with his groceries. "It's like an alarm from a smoke detector that you're just waiting for somebody to turn off." Another shopper, Travis Adam Wright, said he thought the device was a poor response the homeless problem and a bad look for West Hollywood. "It feels indicative to a jerk's first response to people living on the street," he said. The blue box joins a growing list of deterrents deployed by Southern California business owners and property managers who have taken matters into their own hands to address the homeless crisis. In downtown Los Angeles, a property owner blasted the monotonous children's song "Baby Shark" to deter camping last month. In 2023, L.A. Metro began blaring loud classical music as part of a pilot program to drive away homeless people from subway stations. But the blue box, dubbed the BlueChirper, emits a racket that is devoid of rhythm. The chirping sound is triggered by the passing of anyone under the motion-sensing device, regardless of their intention. A spokesperson for the city of West Hollywood said a code enforcement officer is scheduled to visit the stairwell to see if the device complies with the local noise ordinance. If there is a violation, the city will recommend alternatives. West Hollywood spokesperson Joshua Schare said the chirping device is not in line with the city's response to the homeless population, which includes having nonprofit organizations provide outreach services. The property management company at the shopping center learned about the device through other news stories and installed it several weeks ago. The company said it is testing out the device, but so far the results seem positive. "We are all cognizant of and concerned about the care of our homeless population," Investors' Property Services President Robert Warren III said via email. "On the other hand, we have a responsibility to work to provide clean and safe access to and throughout this shopping center.' Read more: Editorial: To understand homelessness, listen to homeless people. Here's what I learned The chirper represents one of the not-so-subtle ways property owners and others are making public places feel unwelcome to the unhoused. Armrests protruding from the middle of a bus bench or park bench are an understated way of keeping people from lying down, said Esther Margulies, professor with the USC School of Architecture and Dornsife Spatial Sciences Institute. Margulies said she understands the frustration property owners encounter when people are trying to seek shelter around their buildings. But she said devices like the chirper represent the private sector trying to solve the problems that should be addressed by local government. "By creating these kinds of hostile elements that take people away from shelter or just move them around, we're not treating the root cause," Margulies said. "We are diminishing and demeaning the quality of our public environment, because we're responding to this social and economic problem without treating the cause." The latest data show there were 75,312 homeless people in Los Angeles County in January 2024, roughly 200 fewer than in the previous year, but about 6,100 more than in 2023. In March, Los Angeles County Supervisors approved a $908-million-funding budget for homeless services, including the first rollout of funding under the Measure A sales tax intended to address the city's homeless problem. Read more: Santa Monica residents go to war against Waymo, including obstructing driverless taxis The BlueChirper device retails for $400 and was invented out of frustration. Stephen McMahon invented and first deployed the device outside his Santa Monica condominium complex storage area after a break-in and a neighbor with her infant daughter was assaulted by two men. McMahon initially proposed a solution to his homeowners association board to deter trespassers. Now the retired director of photography is fielding orders for the BlueChirper after teaching himself how to make a circuit board that can emit the annoying sound and flash a blue light. He says the device works as intended at his condo complex. The majority of sales are from women younger than 40 who like the "non-aggressive aspect" of the device, McMahon said. He wishes he didn't have to resort to this tactic, but feels there has been little done to address the homeless crisis in Los Angeles County. "I don't want to punish anybody. I just want them to go somewhere else," he said. In West Hollywood, local merchants say the device has managed to deter people from camping in the stairwell that leads to Santa Monica Boulevard and several eateries. The chirping is hardly noticeable at a nearby pizza restaurant with the doors closed. But four businesses away at Waxology Weho, employee Roxanne Moreno said she can hear the sound and finds it embarrassing that this is the solution used to address the homeless problem in the area. "These people are patrons too and this comes across as another step to criminalize homelessness," Moreno said. "What is the end goal for all of this?" Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Yahoo
14-05-2025
- Yahoo
Where did gun in Clovis shooting come from? Parents of teen suspect may be liable
Two 16-year-olds have been arrested by Clovis police on suspicion of the shooting death of an 18-year-old outside a local McDonald's restaurant. It happened in late April in the popular shopping center anchored by a Save Mart grocery store and a Trader Joe's, at Willow and Nees avenues. The incident shocked Clovis residents, both for the young ages of those involved as well as where the slaying happened. A key question before investigators is this: Where did the gun come from? If it was taken from one of the suspects' homes, the parents (or guardian) will likely fall under legal jeopardy for unsafe storage of a firearm in a home with children present. Opinion California has strict rules regarding safeguarding guns from youths. If the gun used in the shooting of Caleb Quick came from the home of the 16-year-old boy, believed to be the shooter, or the 16-year-old girl, considered the driver of the getaway car, District Attorney Lisa Smittcamp will have to choose whether to bring charges against the parents. In this case, she would be right to do so. On the evening of April 23, Quick and two friends entered McDonald's and then talked among themselves for about 13 minutes. Watching them was a suspect dressed in a black hoodie sweatshirt, who police believe was the shooter. When Quick and his friends left the restaurant, so did the suspect, police have said. 'Moments later, the suspect shot Quick in the side of the head at least one time shortly before 9 p.m., then fled westbound on Nees in a getaway vehicle, described as a newer white Tesla,' reported Bee staff writer Anthony Galaviz. On May 6 Clovis police served a search warrant at a home in north Fresno and found a white Tesla believed to be the getaway vehicle. Police Chief Curt Fleming said the car was impounded, and a 'gun was also recovered from the alleged shooter's home,' Galaviz reported. To be clear, no details about the weapon have been given yet by police. It may not belong to parents of either suspect. But if it does, prosecutors would seem to have good grounds to bring first-degree criminal charges for unsafe storage of a weapon. California Penal Code Section 25100(a) defines criminal storage of a firearm in the first degree as occurring when a person keeps any firearm on a premises they control and a child (or prohibited person, like an ex-felon) gains access, resulting in injury or death. If someone is found guilty of first-degree criminal storage, that person can be sent to state prison for up to three years. A Fresno man was arrested on suspicion of such a crime last December after a toddler got hold of his loaded firearm and fired it, killing the child's mother by accident. Jessinya Mina, 22, was killed in an apartment at Fresno Street and San Jose Avenue. She lived there with 18-year-old Andrew Isaac Sanchez. He kept the 9mm loaded handgun in the bedroom the couple shared, where children could find it. 'While handling the firearm, the toddler was able to pull the trigger, resulting in Mina being struck,' police said. The leading examples of parental negligence in a teen shooting were James and Jennifer Crumbley of Michigan. Their son Ethan, then 15, used a gun to kill four students and injure others at Oxford High School in November 2021. Their son took the weapon from an unlocked container at home. The parents were later convicted of involuntary manslaughter and sent to prison. The Crumbleys' convictions marked the first time such charges had been brought against parents of a school shooter, CNN noted. Quick was a student in Clovis Online School, and the suspects were also students in the Clovis Unified School District. Clovis Unified superintendent Corrine Folmer sent an email to district parents on Saturday saying 'that those arrested are also students in our district is a tragedy now doubled.' Galaviz reported Fleming said Quick, who previously attended Buchanan High, and the two suspects knew one another. Fleming is confident the two suspects were at the location when the crime occurred. The Clovis-Fresno community waits to learn more from police about the weapon used in Quick's killing. If it ends up coming from one of the suspects' homes, the parents or guardians of that person must be charged, if for no other reason than to send the message that such negligence is wrong and will not be tolerated.
