logo
Mecklenburg County leaders adopt $2.5B FY26 operating budget with property tax hike

Mecklenburg County leaders adopt $2.5B FY26 operating budget with property tax hike

Yahoo2 days ago

MECKLENBURG COUNTY, N.C. (QUEEN CITY NEWS) — Mecklenburg County leaders adopted the FY26 budget ordinance Tuesday night, establishing an operating budget of $2.5 billion.
The budget includes $65 million in new funding for programs that align with the Board's priorities, like economic development and education.
Among the many services and programs receiving funding, here's some key takeaways:
The budget sets a property tax rate of 49.27 cents per $100 of assessed value. That represents a .96-cent increase in the tax rate over FY2025. The average homeowner will pay $36.19 a year more or $3.02 a month.
The budget fully funds Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools with $666.1 million in operating funds for CMS, which is a 4.4% increase over the previous year. The increase will primarily supplement teachers' salaries.
$9.9 million for salary increases for locally funded staff
$8.3 million to address below-market salaries and increase compensation based on years of service
$8.1 million to increase in local supplements
$2 million to fund the second year of a four-year plan to provide students with technology or devices needed
$33 million in capital spending for repairs and maintenance
Other education investments include $3.4 million for 10 new MECK Pre-K classrooms and $1.7 million in additional operating funds for Central Piedmont Community College, plus $3.6 million in capital maintenance.
The Charlotte-Mecklenburg Library also will receive $2 million to add 15 library branch positions and support planning for the opening of the new Main Library.
Mecklenburg County has more than 6,000 employees and the budget invests $38.7 million in new funding for employees.
$15.7 million for a 3% across-the-board pay increase.
$11.4 million for a performance-based pay increase, up to 5%.
$5.3 million for an expected 8.75% increase in medical premiums.
$3.3 million for the County's contribution to the Local Government Employee Retirement System.
$389,000 for law enforcement for special separation pay.
$7.9 million was allocated to fund Medic's request for additional ambulances and equipment, which will enable Medic to increase its staffing by 78 positions.
The budget distributes more than $53 million in funding to a wide variety of nonprofit partners that offer services to address the Board of County Commissioners' priorities.
$14.3 million for more than 20 organizations that work to address homelessness and housing, such as Legal Aid of N.C., the Salvation Army, Roof Above, the Relatives, United Way of Greater Charlotte, and others.
$12.5 million for 16 organizations that address the Board's mental and behavioral health priorities, such as Anuvia Prevention and Recovery Center, Promise Resource Network, Teen Health Connection, Alliance Health, and others.
$9 million for the Arts and Science Council, plus nearly $1 million in additional arts funding.
$3.1 million to more than 30 organizations that work to reduce or eliminate health disparities, such as the Cabarrus Rowan Community Health Center, Care Ring, InReach, RAIN Charlotte, and others.
$2.6 million for Crisis Assistance Ministry.
$1.6 million for Unified Workforce Development.
Child, Family, and Adult Services
$1.4 million to annualize the operating costs for the Youth and Family Services emergency shelter.
$2.3 million to expand in-home aide subsidies to serve an additional 60 clients, and to expand adult day care to serve an additional 50 clients.
$416,000 in one-time funding for additional vehicles.
$357,000 to increase meal, guardianship and interpreting services.
$250,000 to support phase one of the implementation of the Behavioral Health Strategic Plan.
$226,000 for three new social workers within Adult Protective Services.
Community Support Services
$1.1 million to annualize the operating costs for Forest Point Place permanent supportive housing for seniors.
$464,000 for housing placement and navigation, and a subsidy increase for Keeping Families Together.
$75,000 to fund new locations for homeless meal services.
$60,000 in one-time funding for Hearts for the Invisible Charlotte to complete an ARPA-funded program.
$996,000 to fund the operations of newly opened greenway and park amenities
$355,000 for an increase in contracted mowing services for County properties
$261,000 for three new, full-time employees to support existing demand for park services
The budget goes into effect July 1.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Heavy traffic expected in Uptown Charlotte for weekend events
Heavy traffic expected in Uptown Charlotte for weekend events

Yahoo

time10 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Heavy traffic expected in Uptown Charlotte for weekend events

CHARLOTTE, N.C. (QUEEN CITY NEWS) — Heavy traffic is anticipated in the Uptown area from Friday, June 6, to Sunday, June 8, due to the Savannah Bananas game and the Taste of Charlotte Festival. The following streets will be closed starting on Thursday, June 5: 9 a.m. – South Tyron Street between Brooklyn Village Avenue and Trade Street 6 p.m. – Levine Avenue of the Arts between Church Street and Tryon Street 10 p.m. – Mint Street between Morehead Street and First Street 10 p.m. – Brooklyn Village Avenue between Church Street and Mint Street 10 p.m. – Graham Street between Mint Street and Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard The following streets will be closed starting on Friday, June 6: 9 a.m. – Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard between Church Street and College Street 9 a.m. – Third Street between Church Street and College Street 9 a.m. – Fourth Street between Church Street and College Street All streets will reopen on June 8 by 11 p.m. Please seek alternative routes. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

North Carolina leaders urge preparedness for hurricane season
North Carolina leaders urge preparedness for hurricane season

Yahoo

time10 hours ago

  • Yahoo

North Carolina leaders urge preparedness for hurricane season

CHARLOTTE, N.C. (QUEEN CITY NEWS) — North Carolina Leaders say now is the time to prepare for hurricane season. Emergency management officials say more than a dozen named storms will hit the US this season. Several are expected to become powerful, dangerous hurricanes. During a press conference on Thursday, Governor Josh Stein said North Carolinians should have an emergency kit ready, including important documents and three to five days' worth of food and water. State Emergency Manager Director William Ray said forecasters expect at least a dozen powerful storms to make landfall the next few months, six to ten of those storms could become hurricanes. 'The state emergency response team is hosting workshops, planning sessions, conducting plan reviews, conducting operation and logistics and readiness checks,' Ray added. Over at Duke Energy, Hurricane Helene is still fresh on the mind of staff at their power distribution control center in Charlotte. 'We've never experienced something like that,' said operator Laura Weigel. Company executives told Queen City News they took what they saw during Helene and applied it to trainings they run every year. 'We also practice ahead of storm season, doing storm drills, preparing operators for a variety of scenarios they might encounter. You know, every kind of scenario, including even a facility not working,' said Duke Energy spokesperson Jeff Brooks. Brooks echoed Stein's message, saying everyone should have a plan in place. 'Where would you go if you had an extended power outage? Do you have a generator in your home and do you know how to use it safely, always use those outside.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Arkansas Corrections Board lawsuit against governor stays alive with Supreme Court ruling
Arkansas Corrections Board lawsuit against governor stays alive with Supreme Court ruling

Yahoo

time14 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Arkansas Corrections Board lawsuit against governor stays alive with Supreme Court ruling

Arkansas Supreme Court (Courtesy Photo) A lawsuit over who has the ultimate authority over the state prison system gained renewed life Thursday with the dismissal of a state appeal of a lower court preliminary injunction. The Arkansas Board of Corrections filed a lawsuit in Pulaski County Circuit Court on Dec. 14, 2023 against Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders, the secretary of state and Arkansas Department of Corrections, challenging the constitutionality of Act 185 and 659 of 2023. Act 185 requires the secretary of corrections to serve at the pleasure of the governor rather than the board, while Act 659 alters the reporting structure for the directors of the Division of Correction and Division of Community Correction, requiring them to serve at the pleasure of the secretary rather than the board. The board argued the laws violate Amendment 33 of the Arkansas Constitution, which protects the power of constitutional boards like the board of corrections from 'usurpation by the Governor or the General Assembly, or both,' according to Thursday's ruling. Arkansas judge sides with prison board in dispute with governor, corrections secretary A circuit court judge granted a preliminary injunction in January 2024, which Attorney General Tim Griffin appealed. The Supreme Court's ruling Thursday dismissed the state's motion to send the case back to the circuit court, order the preliminary injunction vacated and the case dismissed as moot. The high court also dismissed a motion to disqualify the corrections board's attorney from further participation in proceedings before the court. In its motion to remand, the state argues the controversy ended when the board fired former Corrections Secretary Joe Profiri. The firing was part of a dispute between the board and the executive branch that started in late 2023 over who controls the state's prison system. The board's refusal in November 2023 to approve a request to increase prison capacity by 500 beds prompted harsh public criticism from Griffin and Sanders. The board responded by hiring an outside attorney the following month to represent it in employment matters. Because Profiri was fired prior to the entry of the preliminary injunction, the lower court's finding of irreparable harm was erroneous, the state argued. The board said it wasn't seeking court confirmation of its right to fire Profiri, but relief from the legislation regarding the board's authority under Amendment 33. Writing for the majority, Chief Justice Karen Baker said she agreed with the board's assertion that Profiri's termination doesn't resolve the ultimate question of whether the board controls the secretary or division directors, and therefore the dispute is not specific to the individual holding the secretary's office. 'The Board's complaint concerns the Challenged Legislation and the resulting changes to the Board's supervisory authority. This dispute exists notwithstanding the individual who holds the Secretary position and is not personal to Secretary Profiri,' Baker wrote. 'Further, because this case presents an existing legal controversy, it is not moot. Therefore, we deny appellants' motion to remand.' The state also filed a motion to disqualify the legal counsel obtained by the corrections board, arguing the firm was obtained illegally. The board didn't follow state law for securing outside counsel, and the board did not have the 'authority to hire special counsel because the Board is not a constitutional officer,' the attorney general's motion argued. The circuit court denied this motion, explaining that 'the Board is a constitutionally created board, making its members constitutional officers' who therefore had the legal authority to hire special counsel. The attorney general typically represents state agencies, but state law gives constitutional officers the ability to hire outside counsel when they disagree with the attorney general over a constitutional provision. In dismissing this motion, Baker notes the board correctly points out that 'an order denying a motion to disqualify adversary's counsel in a civil proceeding is not an appealable final order.' 'As a general rule, an appeal from an interlocutory decision brings up for review only the decision from which the appeal was taken, here, the granting of an injunction,' Baker wrote. The motion to disqualify the attorney is outside the scope of the Supreme Court's review of the preliminary injunction, she said. The high court majority affirmed the lower court's issuance of an injunction because its 'findings that there would be irreparable harm were not clearly erroneous.' The crux of the lawsuit, Baker wrote, is whether the board retains ultimate authority over the corrections secretary and directors or whether the challenged legislation constitutionally transfers that power to the governor and corrections secretary. 'The evidence presented to the circuit court demonstrates that, in the absence of the injunction, the dispute will be ongoing until the constitutionality of the Challenged Legislation is resolved,' Baker said. 'This, coupled with appellants' failure to even argue their likelihood of success on the merits, leaves us with little choice under our deferential standard of review. 'We hold that the circuit court did not abuse its discretion in determining that the Board demonstrated that irreparable harm would result in the absence of the requested preliminary injunction, and we affirm,' she added. Arkansas Supreme Court sends AG's FOIA lawsuit against prison board back to circuit court Special Justices Troy Braswell and Bud Cummins joined in the decision. Associate Justice Barbara Webb concurred in part and dissented in part. Associate Justice Shawn Womack dissented. Associate Justices Cody Hiland and Nicholas Bronni, both of whom were appointed by the governor, did not participate. Webb wrote that she agreed with the majority that the matter is not moot because Profiri's termination doesn't resolve the question of whether Acts 185 and 659 of 2023 are unconstitutional. She also agreed that it's not appropriate to disqualify the board's counsel at this time. However, she argues the board 'failed to demonstrate irreparable harm' and the circuit court therefore erred in enjoining the challenged acts. 'The crux of the Board's claim for irreparable harm was Secretary Profiri's alleged acts of insubordination, which were directly attributable to Act 185 requiring the Secretary to serve at the pleasure of the Governor rather than the Board,' Webb wrote. 'This harm is not irreparable…By definition, if a secretary may be terminated and his actions undone, then it cannot be said that any harm resulting therefrom is 'irreparable.'' In his dissenting opinion, Womack argues the court must vacate the preliminary injunction and dismiss the lawsuit because sovereign immunity bars the board's lawsuit against the governor, corrections secretary and Department of Corrections. Sovereign immunity, which Womack cites often in court opinions, is the legal doctrine that the state cannot be sued in its own courts. 'Even if that was not so, the Board would still lose because it failed to show irreparable harm — a necessary element to establish entitlement to a preliminary injunction,' Womack wrote 'Therefore, I also join the other dissenting opinion in this case.' Regarding the issue of the disqualification of the board's 'potentially illegally retained counsel, I again remind citizens of this state of their ability to protect themselves 'against the enforcement of any illegal exactions whatever,'' he said. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store